Explore the vast range of titles available.

PurposeWhether blood volume (BV) primarily determines the synchronous nature of the myocardium remains unknown. This study determined the impact of standard blood withdrawal on left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony (LVMD) in women.MethodsTransthoracic speckle-tracking echocardiography and central hemodynamic measurements were performed at rest and during moderate- to high-intensity exercise in healthy women (n = 24, age = 53.6 ± 16.3 year). LVMD was determined via the time to peak standard deviation (TPSD) of longitudinal and transverse strain and strain rates (LSR, TSR). Measurements were repeated within a week period immediately after a 10% reduction of BV.ResultsWith intact BV, all individuals presented cardiac structure and function variables within normative values of the study population. Blood withdrawal decreased BV (5.3 ± 0.7 L) by 0.5 ± 0.1 L. Resting left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume (− 8%, P = 0.040) and passive filling (− 16%, P = 0.001) were reduced after blood withdrawal. No effect of blood withdrawal was observed for any measure of LVMD at rest (P ≥ 0.225). During exercise at a fixed submaximal workload (100 W), LVMD of myocardial longitudinal strain (LS TPSD) was increased after blood withdrawal (36%, P = 0.047). At peak effort, blood withdrawal led to increased LVMD of myocardial transverse strain rate (TSR TPSD) (31%, P = 0.002). The effect of blood withdrawal on TSR TPSD at peak effort was associated with LV concentric remodeling (r = 0.59, P = 0.003).ConclusionMarked impairments in the mechanical synchrony of the myocardium are elicited by moderate blood withdrawal in healthy women during moderate and high intensity exercise.

Background Advances in the field of genetics of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) have led to the recent consensus statements made by expert groups. International standards for genetic testing in ILD have not yet been established. We aimed to examine current real-world strategies employed by pulmonologists working with familial ILD. Methods A panel of pulmonologists with expertise in ILD developed an international survey aimed at clinicians working with ILD. The survey consisted of 74 questions divided into eight topics: characteristics of respondents, diagnosis, screening of first-degree relatives, screening tools, genetic testing methods, lung transplantation, ethical concerns, and future needs. Results Overall, 237 pulmonologists from 50 countries participated. A family history of ILD was asked for by 91% of respondents while fewer asked for symptoms related to telomere disorders. Respondents stated that 59% had access to genetic testing, and 30% to a genetic multidisciplinary team (MDT). Many respondents were unaware of specific genetic testing methods. Pathogenic genetic variants were seen as a potential contraindication for lung transplantation in 6–8% of respondents. Genetic screening of relatives was supported by 80% of respondents who indicated insufficient evidence and a lack of formal guidelines for genetics and ILD. Only 16% had a standardized program. Conclusion Most pulmonologists ask for a family history of ILD and recommend genetic testing for ILD and screening in relatives but have limited knowledge of specific tests and access to genetic MDT. Evidence-based guidelines to inform patients, relatives, and physicians are still warranted.