Explore the vast range of titles available.

In two phase 3 placebo-controlled, randomized trials in 1012 and 1040 patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease, solanezumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that preferentially binds soluble forms of amyloid, did not improve cognition or functional status. Alzheimer's disease is associated with the accumulation of aggregated amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptide in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus. One approach to reducing brain amyloid involves increasing the clearance of Aβ by means of prolonged treatment with monoclonal antibodies directed against this peptide. In preclinical studies, a murine antibody that targeted the central domain of Aβ and was selective for soluble forms slowed Aβ deposition in a transgenic mouse model 1 ; in another transgenic murine model, Aβ–antibody complexes were present in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma, and behavioral deficits were reversed without a decrease in amyloid plaques, as assessed by . . .

In this placebo-controlled trial, the γ-secretase inhibitor semagacestat did not improve cognitive status in patients with Alzheimer's disease and was associated with more adverse events than placebo, including skin cancers and infections. Alzheimer's disease begins decades before the appearance of clinical symptoms, with the deposition of aggregated amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptide plaques in the cortex and hippocampus. This protein is cleaved from the amyloid precursor protein (APP) by the sequential action of β- and γ-secretases, producing fragments that include Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42. Since the accumulation of aggregated Aβ is associated with disease progression, both β-secretase and γ-secretase represent potential therapeutic targets. Multiple small molecules can inhibit γ-secretase in vitro, 1 – 4 but Notch and other transmembrane proteins are also substrates for γ-secretase, 1 – 4 and studies have raised concern that the inhibition of γ-secretase could . . .

Remote health assessments that gather real-world data (RWD) outside clinic settings require a clear understanding of appropriate methods for data collection, quality assessment, analysis and interpretation. Here we examine the performance and limitations of smartphones in collecting RWD in the remote mPower observational study of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Within the first 6 months of study commencement, 960 participants had enrolled and performed at least five self-administered active PD symptom assessments (speeded tapping, gait/balance, phonation or memory). Task performance, especially speeded tapping, was predictive of self-reported PD status (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.8) and correlated with in-clinic evaluation of disease severity ( r  = 0.71; P  < 1.8 × 10 −6 ) when compared with motor Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). Although remote assessment requires careful consideration for accurate interpretation of RWD, our results support the use of smartphones and wearables in objective and personalized disease assessments. Smartphone sensors that monitor disease symptoms enable remote assessment of Parkinson’s patients.

Many patients with Parkinson's disease have motor fluctuations despite treatment with available drugs. Tozadenant (SYN115) is an oral, selective adenosine A2A receptor antagonist that improves motor function in animal models of Parkinson's disease. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of tozadenant as an adjunct to levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease who have motor fluctuations on levodopa. We did an international, multicentre, phase 2b, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-finding clinical trial of tozadenant in levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson's disease who had motor fluctuations (at least 2·5 h off-time per day). Eligible patients were randomly assigned via a computer-generated randomisation schedule to receive tozadenant 60, 120, 180, or 240 mg or matching placebo twice daily for 12 weeks. All study management, site personnel, and patients were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was change from baseline to week 12 in hours per day spent in the off-state (assessed from Parkinson's disease diaries completed by patients). This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01283594. Of 420 randomised patients (mean age 63·3 [SD 8·3] years; mean duration of Parkinson's disease 8·7 [4·7] years), 403 provided post-baseline diary data and 337 completed study treatment. Compared with placebo, mean daily off-time was significantly reduced in the combined tozadenant 120 mg twice-daily and 180 mg twice-daily group (−1·1 h, 95% CI −1·8 to −0·5; p=0·0006), the tozadenant 120 mg twice-daily group (−1·1 h, −1·8 to −0·4; p=0.0039), and the tozadenant 180 mg twice-daily group (−1·2 h, −1·9 to −0·4; p=0·0039). The most common adverse events in these groups were dyskinesia (seven [8%] of 84 patients in the placebo group, 13 [16%] of 82 in the 120 mg twice-daily group, and 17 [20%] of 85 in the 180 mg twice-daily group), nausea (three [4%], 9 [11%], and ten [12%]), and dizziness (one [1%], four [5%], and 11 [13%]). Tozadenant 60 mg twice daily was not associated with a significant reduction in off-time, and tozadenant 240 mg twice daily was associated with an increased rate of discontinuation because of adverse events (17 [20%] of 84 patients). Tozadenant at 120 or 180 mg twice daily was generally well tolerated and was effective at reducing off-time. Further investigation of tozadenant treatment in phase 3 trials is warranted. Biotie Therapies.

Levodopa is the most effective therapy for Parkinson's disease, but chronic treatment is associated with the development of potentially disabling motor complications. Experimental studies suggest that motor complications are due to non-physiological, intermittent administration of the drug, and can be reduced with continuous delivery. We aimed to assess efficacy and safety of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel delivered continuously through an intrajejunal percutaneous tube. In our 12-week, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, double-titration trial, we enrolled adults (aged ≥30 years) with advanced Parkinson's disease and motor complications at 26 centres in Germany, New Zealand, and the USA. Eligible participants had jejunal placement of a percutaneous gastrojejunostomy tube, and were then randomly allocated (1:1) to treatment with immediate-release oral levodopa-carbidopa plus placebo intestinal gel infusion or levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel infusion plus oral placebo. Randomisation was stratified by site, with a mixed block size of 2 or 4. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to final visit in motor off-time. We assessed change in motor on-time without troublesome dyskinesia as a prespecified key secondary outcome. We assessed efficacy in a full-analysis set of participants with data for baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment, and imputed missing data with the last observation carried forward approach. We assessed safety in randomly allocated patients who underwent the percutaneous gastrojejunostomy procedure. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00660387 and NCT0357994. From baseline to 12 weeks in the full-analysis set, mean off-time decreased by 4·04 h (SE 0·65) for 35 patients allocated to the levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel group compared with a decrease of 2·14 h (0·66) for 31 patients allocated to immediate-release oral levodopa-carbidopa (difference −1·91 h [95% CI −3·05 to −0·76]; p=0·0015). Mean on-time without troublesome dyskinesia increased by 4·11 h (SE 0·75) in the intestinal gel group and 2·24 h (0·76) in the immediate-release oral group (difference 1·86 [95% CI 0·56 to 3·17]; p=0·0059). In the safety analyses 35 (95%) of 37 patients allocated to the levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel group had adverse events (five [14%] serious), as did 34 (100%) of 34 patients allocated to the immediate-release oral levodopa-carbidopa group (seven [21%] serious), mainly associated with the percutaneous gastrojejunostomy tube. Continuous delivery of levodopa-carbidopa with an intestinal gel offers a promising option for control of advanced Parkinson's disease with motor complications. Benefits noted with intestinal gel delivery were of a greater magnitude than were those obtained with medical therapies to date, and our study is, to our knowledge, the first demonstration of the benefit of continuous levodopa delivery in a double-blind controlled study. AbbVie.

ObjectiveTo examine the baseline prevalence and longitudinal evolution in non-motor symptoms (NMS) in a prospective cohort of, at baseline, patients with de novo Parkinson’s disease (PD) compared with healthy controls (HC).MethodsParkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) is a longitudinal, ongoing, controlled study of de novo PD participants and HC. NMS were rated using the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part I score and other validated NMS scales at baseline and after 2 years. Biological variables included cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) markers and dopamine transporter imaging.Results423 PD subjects and 196 HC were enrolled and followed for 2 years. MDS-UPDRS Part I total mean (SD) scores increased from baseline 5.6 (4.1) to 7.7 (5.0) at year 2 in PD subjects (p<0.001) versus from 2.9 (3.0) to 3.2 (3.0) in HC (p=0.38), with a significant difference between the groups (p<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, higher baseline NMS score was associated with female sex (p=0.008), higher baseline MDS-UPDRS Part II scores (p<0.001) and more severe motor phenotype (p=0.007). Longitudinal increase in NMS severity was associated with the older age (0.008) and lower CSF Aβ1–42 (0.005) at baseline. There was no association with the dose or class of dopaminergic therapy.ConclusionsThis study of NMS in early PD identified clinical and biological variables associated with both baseline burden and predictors of progression. The association of a greater longitudinal increase in NMS with lower baseline Aβ1–42 level is an important finding that will have to be replicated in other cohorts.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01141023.

SIGNAL is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study (no. NCT02481674) established to evaluate pepinemab, a semaphorin 4D (SEMA4D)-blocking antibody, for treatment of Huntington’s disease (HD). The trial enrolled a total of 265 HD gene expansion carriers with either early manifest (EM, n  = 179) or late prodromal (LP, n  = 86) HD, randomized (1:1) to receive 18 monthly infusions of pepinemab ( n  = 91 EM, 41 LP) or placebo ( n  = 88 EM, 45 LP). Pepinemab was generally well tolerated, with a relatively low frequency of serious treatment-emergent adverse events of 5% with pepinemab compared to 9% with placebo, including both EM and LP participants. Coprimary efficacy outcome measures consisted of assessments within the EM cohort of (1) a two-item HD cognitive assessment family comprising one-touch stockings of Cambridge (OTS) and paced tapping (PTAP) and (2) clinical global impression of change (CGIC). The differences between pepinemab and placebo in mean change (95% confidence interval) from baseline at month 17 for OTS were −1.98 (−4.00, 0.05) (one-sided P  = 0.028), and for PTAP 1.43 (−0.37, 3.23) (one-sided P  = 0.06). Similarly, because a significant treatment effect was not observed for CGIC, the coprimary endpoint, the study did not meet its prespecified primary outcomes. Nevertheless, a number of other positive outcomes and post hoc subgroup analyses—including additional cognitive measures and volumetric magnetic resonance imaging and fluorodeoxyglucose–positron-emission tomography imaging assessments—provide rationale and direction for the design of a phase 3 study and encourage the continued development of pepinemab in patients diagnosed with EM HD. The SIGNAL Phase 2 study of pepinemab immunotherapy in early Huntington’s disease (HD) did not meet its coprimary clinical efficacy endpoints, but had a favorable safety profile and showed a significant treatment-related reduction in caudate brain atrophy and reversal of the characteristic decline in brain metabolic activity that is typical of HD progression.

In an open-label phase 1 trial, gene delivery of the trophic factor neurturin via an adeno-associated type-2 vector (AAV2) was well tolerated and seemed to improve motor function in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of AAV2-neurturin in a double-blind, phase 2 randomised trial. We did a multicentre, double-blind, sham-surgery controlled trial in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) by a central, computer generated, randomisation code to receive either AAV2-neurturin (5·4×1011 vector genomes) injected bilaterally into the putamen or sham surgery. All patients and study personnel with the exception of the neurosurgical team were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to 12 months in the motor subscore of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale in the practically-defined off state. All randomly assigned patients who had at least one assessment after baseline were included in the primary analyses. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00400634. Between December, 2006, and November, 2008, 58 patients from nine sites in the USA participated in the trial. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint in patients treated with AAV2-neurturin compared with control individuals (difference −0·31 [SE 2·63], 95% CI −5·58 to 4·97; p=0·91). Serious adverse events occurred in 13 of 38 patients treated with AAV2-neurturin and four of 20 control individuals. Three patients in the AAV2-neurturin group and two in the sham surgery group developed tumours. Intraputaminal AAV2-neurturin is not superior to sham surgery when assessed using the UPDRS motor score at 12 months. However, the possibility of a benefit with additional targeting of the substantia nigra and longer term follow-up should be investigated in further studies. Ceregene and Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research.

Disease outcomes are heterogeneous in Parkinson's disease and may be predicted by gene variants. This study investigated if the BDNF rs6265 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) is associated with differential outcomes with specific pharmacotherapy treatment strategies in the “NIH Exploratory Trials in PD Long-term Study 1” (NET-PD LS-1, n = 540). DNA samples were genotyped for the rs6265 SNP and others (rs11030094, rs10501087, rs1491850, rs908867, and rs1157659). The primary measures were the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and its motor component (UPDRS-III). Groups were divided by genotype and treatment regimen (levodopa monotherapy vs levodopa with other medications vs no levodopa). T allele carriers were associated with worse UPDRS outcomes compared to C/C subjects when treated with levodopa monotherapy (+ 6 points, p = 0.02) and to T allele carriers treated with no levodopa treatment strategies (UPDRS: + 8 points, p = 0.01; UPDRS-III: + 6 points, p = 0.01). Similar effects of worse outcomes associated with levodopa monotherapy were observed in the BDNF rs11030094, rs10501087, and rs1491850 SNPs. This study suggests the levodopa monotherapy strategy is associated with worse disease outcomes in BDNF rs6265 T carriers. Pending prospective validation, BDNF variants may be precision medicine factors to consider for symptomatic treatment decisions for early-stage PD patients.