Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Reading Level
      Reading Level
      Clear All
      Reading Level
  • Content Type
      Content Type
      Clear All
      Content Type
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Item Type
    • Is Full-Text Available
    • Subject
    • Publisher
    • Source
    • Donor
    • Language
    • Place of Publication
    • Contributors
    • Location
23 result(s) for "Kilpatrick, Bill"
Sort by:
One company – two outcomes
To learn to avoid pitfalls there is need to accept and understand failures. This anonymous case study aims to report a major organisational failure due to the absence of effective knowledge management, where both the reasons for, and organisational consequences of, the failure are fairly clear. Within a theoretical framework of organisational autopoiesis, the case study compares knowledge management styles from two eras in the history of one engineering project management company: as it grew from an acquired site with a single project to a multi-divisional leader in its regional market, and then as it failed in its original line of business to the point where it divested most of its assets. In the first era, the executive and line managers were permissive, allowing project teams to work out local solutions for business problems as they arose producing successful and profitable solutions. The decline began and accelerated when management strengthened hierarchical command and control that stifled knowledge sharing and solution development at the work face and exceeded line managers' limits of rationality. This study has the limitations of any historical study of a single case, exacerbated by a need to maintain the anonymity of the surviving company. Few studies so clearly highlight the critical importance of personal knowledge and its sharing in knowledge intensive organisations for maintaining successful operations. Success may have many parents, but in this case the internal comparisons identify specific factors that caused a successful organisation to disintegrate.
One company - two outcomes
Purpose - To learn to avoid pitfalls there is need to accept and understand failures. This anonymous case study aims to report a major organisational failure due to the absence of effective knowledge management, where both the reasons for, and organisational consequences of, the failure are fairly clear.Design methodology approach - Within a theoretical framework of organisational autopoiesis, the case study compares knowledge management styles from two eras in the history of one engineering project management company: as it grew from an acquired site with a single project to a multi-divisional leader in its regional market, and then as it failed in its original line of business to the point where it divested most of its assets.Findings - In the first era, the executive and line managers were permissive, allowing project teams to work out local solutions for business problems as they arose producing successful and profitable solutions. The decline began and accelerated when management strengthened hierarchical command and control that stifled knowledge sharing and solution development at the work face and exceeded line managers' limits of rationality.Research limitations implications - This study has the limitations of any historical study of a single case, exacerbated by a need to maintain the anonymity of the surviving company.Originality value - Few studies so clearly highlight the critical importance of personal knowledge and its sharing in knowledge intensive organisations for maintaining successful operations. Success may have many parents, but in this case the internal comparisons identify specific factors that caused a successful organisation to disintegrate.
Guest Opinion: A plea for political pragmatism, smoke-filled rooms
The sorry truth is that intelligent sifting of candidate qualifications and positions is not a prerequisite of the voting franchise. [...] H.L. Mencken's boobus americanus goes to the polls blinded by prejudice and rhetorical smog.
One company two outcomes
Purpose To learn to avoid pitfalls there is need to accept and understand failures. This anonymous case study aims to report a major organisational failure due to the absence of effective knowledge management, where both the reasons for, and organisational consequences of, the failure are fairly clear. Designmethodologyapproach Within a theoretical framework of organisational autopoiesis, the case study compares knowledge management styles from two eras in the history of one engineering project management company as it grew from an acquired site with a single project to a multidivisional leader in its regional market, and then as it failed in its original line of business to the point where it divested most of its assets. Findings In the first era, the executive and line managers were permissive, allowing project teams to work out local solutions for business problems as they arose producing successful and profitable solutions. The decline began and accelerated when management strengthened hierarchical command and control that stifled knowledge sharing and solution development at the work face and exceeded line managers' limits of rationality. Research limitationsimplications This study has the limitations of any historical study of a single case, exacerbated by a need to maintain the anonymity of the surviving company. Originalityvalue Few studies so clearly highlight the critical importance of personal knowledge and its sharing in knowledge intensive organisations for maintaining successful operations. Success may have many parents, but in this case the internal comparisons identify specific factors that caused a successful organisation to disintegrate.
Jonathan Chevreau's tax revolt
I am in complete agreement with [Jonathan Chevreau]'s article; in fact, it mirrors my position 100%. Of course, my situation is even worse, as I live in Quebec.
Jonathan Chevreau's tax revolt
I am in complete agreement with [Jonathan Chevreau]'s article; in fact, it mirrors my position 100%. Of course, my situation is even worse, as I live in Quebec.
The First Brush With Death
At the northeast corner of Buell Lane and Church Street in East Hampton, right across from what I, think was a Catholic church, there used to be a vacant lot.
A Place Where Kids Used to Be Kids
Whatever became of the porch? Any suburban anthill emphasizes faults in contemporary homebuilding, but to me the most glaring is the absence of porches. I can only assume that today's architects and builders had no childhood.