Explore the vast range of titles available.

Objective: To determine the pattern of eye diseases at the general outpatient department (GOPD) of a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Materials and Methods: Patients selected by systematic random sampling at the GOPD of a Nigerian tertiary hospital were studied. Information on sociodemographics and ocular complaints were obtained using interviewer-administered questionnaire. Ocular examination included visual acuity measurement and anterior and posterior segments examinations. Data analysis was with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Results: Three hundred and eighty-two patients, comprising 124 (32.5%) males and 258 (67.5%) females, aged between 18 and 86 years, mean 44.8 ± 15.4 years, were studied; 112 (29.3%) had eye diseases but only 88 (78.6%) patients complained of ocular disorder(s). Common complaints were poor vision 53 (60.4%), red eye and grittiness 15 (17.0%) each. Common eye diseases were lens 52 (13.6%) and conjunctiva 46 (12.0%) disorders. Attaining higher education was protective against eye diseases (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Nearly a third of patients at the GOPD have eye diseases. Therefore, primary eye care should be integrated into the GOPD service with provision of relevant manpower and facilities for care of the ophthalmic patients.

BackgroundBlindness from glaucoma is prevalent in parts of Africa. Lack of awareness, late diagnosis, poor acceptance and compliance to treatment as well as unorthodox care practices are among many contributing factors. Strategies that improve glaucoma awareness and treatment acceptance are required to resolve this trend.PurposeTo evaluate the influence of counselling on glaucoma awareness, willingness to accept glaucoma surgery and eye care practices among primary open-angle glaucoma patients on medical treatment.MethodsA prospective cross-sectional interviewer-administered questionnaire-based study evaluating the demographics, glaucoma awareness, acceptance of operative care and use of traditional eye medications among patients with primary open-angle glaucoma on medical treatment followed up over a 12-month period.ResultsA total of 120 eligible participants were recruited. Glaucoma awareness and basic knowledge were 93.3 and 12%, respectively. Educational attainment and positive family history were associated with glaucoma awareness (p = 0.027 and p = 0.042, respectively). Seventy-five (62.5%) participants accepted glaucoma surgery as a treatment option. However, the duration of medical treatment was inversely related to the acceptance of glaucoma surgery (odds ratio = − 0.390, p = 0.009). Twelve (10.5%) participants use traditional eye medication for their current eye problem.ConclusionGlaucoma counselling should be performed with a content template that delivers all relevant information to patients and caregivers. This will bridge gaps in knowledge and improve the early presentation, acceptance of glaucoma surgery and eye care practices.

AimThe aim of this study was to determine the level of awareness and knowledge of glaucoma and the proportion of people with glaucoma among participants of a 1-day urban eye outreach programme.MethodsThe study was a cross-sectional survey. Data, collected by means of a structured questionnaire, included participants' demographic details, and awareness, knowledge and ocular status as regards glaucoma. Publicity for the outreach was created through the mass media (radio stations and television), churches, handbills, posters and different hospital staff. Data analysis was by Statistical Package for Social SciencesV.20.0. Associations between participants' demographic and other details were tested using Pearson's χ2 test, and a p value of <0.05 was considered significant.ResultsFour hundred and seventy-eight (93.2%) of the 513 people in attendance were eligible and consented to participate. Awareness, knowledge and proportion of people with glaucoma in the study population were 65.5%, 36.8% and 14.5%, respectively. Awareness was significantly associated with attainment of some formal education, awareness of a positive family history, and having had an eye check prior to the outreach. The mass media was the most common information source. Good knowledge level was significantly associated with higher educational attainment and occupation, whereas proportion of people with glaucoma was significantly associated with increasing age.ConclusionImproving awareness with suitable content for the target population through effective means such as the mass media may be a veritable first step in combating blindness from glaucoma.

There is a global rise in the prevalence of diabetes and this has led to a rise in the consequences of diabetes such as diabetic retinopathy (DR). The current study aims to determine the prevalence, awareness and determinants of DR among diabetics who attended a screening centre in Enugu, south-eastern Nigeria. A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out among consenting diabetic patients who visited the centre. An interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to gather information on demographic details, the knowledge of the participants on effects of diabetes on the eye and previous care they had received for their eyes. Each participant underwent eye examination which included posterior segment examination with slit lamp biomicroscopy with? 90DS lens after pupil dilation. A total of 80 eligible participants were examined. The prevalence of any DR among the participants was 32.1 % (95 % CI 20.6–43.5) whereas prevalence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy, PDR was 6.4 % and diabetic macular oedema, DME was 31.3 %. Age at onset of diabetes and duration of diabetes were the most determinant factors associated with DR (p = 0.039 and p = 0.000 respectively). Only ten (12.5 %) participants had undergone at least one specific eye examination to check for DR since they were diagnosed with diabetes. The major reason for not having had a prior screening is ‘no one referred me for it’ (31 participants, 44.3 %). DR is emerging as an important cause of blindness and severe visual impairment. Adequate screening programme and treatment protocol need to be set up for this population even in developing countries to prevent blindness.

Background The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on healthcare and ophthalmology services globally. Numerous studies amongst various medical and surgical specialties showed a reduction in patient attendance and surgical procedures performed. Prior published ophthalmic literature focused on specific types of procedures and were usually single centre. The current study attempts to quantify the impact on a larger scale, namely that of sub-Saharan Africa, and to include all ophthalmic subspecialties. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of the surgical records from 17 ophthalmology centres in seven countries located in East, Central, West and Southern Africa. The date of declaration of the first lockdown was used as the beginning of the pandemic and the pivot point to compare theatre records one year prior to the pandemic and the first year of the pandemic. We examined the total number of surgical procedures over the two year period and categorized them according to ophthalmic subspecialty and type of procedure performed. We then compared the pre-pandemic and pandemic surgical numbers over the two year period. Results There were 26,357 ophthalmic surgical procedures performed with a significant decrease in the first year of the pandemic ( n  = 8942) compared to the year prior to the pandemic ( n  = 17,415). The number of surgical procedures performed was lower in the first year of the pandemic compared to the year prior to the pandemic by 49% [Incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.51, 95% CI 0.41–0.64), 27% (0.73, 0.55–0.99), 46% (0.54, 0.30–0.99), 40% (0.60, 0.39–0.92) and 59% (0.41, 0.29–0.57) in sub-Saharan Africa (4 regions combined), West, Central, East and Southern Africa, respectively]. The number of surgical procedures in the different sub-specialty categories in sub-Saharan Africa (4 regions combined) was significantly lower in the first year of the pandemic compared to the year prior to the pandemic, except for glaucoma (IRR 0.72, 95% CI 0.52–1.01), oncology (0.71, 0.48–1.05), trauma (0.90, 0.63–1.28) and vitreoretinal (0.67, 0.42–1.08) categories. Conclusion This study provides insight into the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in multiple regions and countries on the African continent. The identification of which surgical subspecialty was most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in each region allows for better planning and resource allocation to address these backlogs.