Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
Content TypeContent Type
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectPublisherSourceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
486
result(s) for
"Klein, Bradley S"
Sort by:
Strategic studies and world order
by
Klein, Bradley S
in
National security
,
National security -- United States
,
North Atlantic Treaty Organization
1994
In this 1994 book, Bradley Klein draws upon debates in international relations theory to raise important questions about the nature of strategic studies. He argues that post-modern critiques of realism and neorealism open up opportunities for new ways of thinking about nuclear deterrence. In clear and uncluttered language, he explores the links between modernity, state-building and strategic violence, and argues that American foreign policy and NATO undertook a set of dynamic political practices intended to make and remake world order in the image of Western identity. Klein warns against too facile a celebration of the end of the Cold War, concluding that it is even more imperative today to appreciate the scope and power of the Western strategic project. The book will be of interest to students of international relations theory, strategic studies, peace studies, and US foreign policy.
Strategic Studies and World Order
1994
In this 1994 book Bradley Klein draws upon debates in international relations theory to raise important questions about the nature of strategic studies. He argues that post-modern critiques of realism and neorealism open up opportunities for new ways of thinking about nuclear deterrence. In clear and uncluttered language, he explores the links between modernity, state-building and strategic violence, and argues that American foreign policy, and NATO, undertook a set of dynamic political practices intended to make and remake world order in the image of Western identity. Klein warns against too facile a celebration of the end of the Cold War, concluding that it is even more imperative today to appreciate the scope and power of the Western strategic project. The book will be of interest to students of international relations theory, strategic studies, peace studies, and US foreign policy.
Hegemony and strategic culture: American power projection and alliance defence politics
1988
The whole field of Strategic Studies bears the crippling legacy of having abstracted question of war and peace from their embeddedness in historically produced relations of social movements, political economy and culture. The very objects of strategic analysis—states and their mutual security alliances—are presumed to have been there from the start. And the principles underpinning their interactions are likewise construed as consistent with the rules governing a state system first made evident in Thucydides’ The Peloponnesian War.
Journal Article
Strategic Studies and World Order
2010
In this 1994 book Bradley Klein draws upon debates in international relations theory to raise important questions about the nature of strategic studies. He argues that post-modern critiques of realism and neorealism open up opportunities for new ways of thinking about nuclear deterrence. In clear and uncluttered language, he explores the links between modernity, state-building and strategic violence, and argues that American foreign policy, and NATO, undertook a set of dynamic political practices intended to make and remake world order in the image of Western identity. Klein warns against too facile a celebration of the end of the Cold War, concluding that it is even more imperative today to appreciate the scope and power of the Western strategic project. The book will be of interest to students of international relations theory, strategic studies, peace studies, and US foreign policy.
How the West was One: Representational Politics of NATO
1990
Contemporary discussions about the West having \"won' the Cold War are framed within a conventional strategic discourse in which one politicalmilitary alliance, NATO, demonstrated its staying power and integrity in the face of its rival alliance, the Warsaw Pact. NATO's strategic practices, long the object of criticism on the part of revisionist historians and critical peace researchers, have apparently been vindicated. This paper draws upon a variety of post-realist approaches to global politics to examine NATO as a set of practices by which the West has constituted itself as a political and cultural identity. By turning our attention from the external, foreign, and defense policies of NATO and its member states to the domestic social and cultural dimensions of Western security politics, we can illuminate a side of security policy overlooked in conventional debates. NATO's success resides in having provided a network of intertextual representations for the articulation of global political space. Traditional security concerns, including the nature of the Soviet/Warsaw Pact \"threat,\" can thereby be seen not as existing externally out there on their own, but as circulating within a broader set of social practices. In the wake of recent developments within the Warsaw Pact and between the two alliance systems, the critical perspective outlined here enables us to analyze contemporary security issues in ways that transcend prevailing strategic discourse. Theoretically, we can see the outlines of a post-realist approach to security. For Europe, such an approach accords dignity to alternative, post-statist, post-modern security arrangements.
Journal Article
After Strategy: The Search for a Post-Modern Politics of Peace
1988
THE MODERN CONCEPT OF STRATEGY HAS NEVER STRAYED FAR FROM THE CLASSICAL GREEK TERM FOR MILITARY GENERAL, \"STRATEGOS,\" NOR FROM THE IDEA OF MILITARY COMMAND. IT IS AN IRONIC POLITICAL PHENOMEMON THAT THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC STUDIES SO DOMINATES CONTEMPORARY DISCOURSE ABOUT THE MEANING OF PEACE AND SECURITY. THE MAJOR POINT OF THIS PAPER IS THAT THE PRACTICE OF STRATEGY NEED NOT BE CONFINED TO THE STATE ACTING AS AN ERSATZ GENERAL COMMANDING NATIONAL FORCES IN THE SEARCH FOR A SECURITY DEFINED AS THE ABSENCE OF GLOBAL WAR. THE PREVAILING TERMS OF DEBATE ACCEPT AS GIVEN A STATE STRUCTURE AND A WORLD ORDER OF LIKE-STRUCTURED STATES. WITHIN THESE \"GIVENS,\" THEY SEEK TO STREAMLINE STRATEGIC OPERATIONS BY ENDOWING THE STATE WITH THE POWER TO ORGANIZE VIOLENCE. SOME CRITICAL MODES OF ANALYSIS, HOWEVER, SUBJECT THESE COMMITMENTS TO SCRUTINY. TO WHAT EXTENT, AND WITH WHAT SUCCESS, ARE DISCUSSED IN THIS PAPER.
Journal Article