Explore the vast range of titles available.

Chemically modified mRNA is an efficient, biocompatible modality for therapeutic protein expression. We report a first-time-in-human study of this modality, aiming to evaluate safety and potential therapeutic effects. Men with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) received intradermal injections of modified mRNA encoding vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) or buffered saline placebo (ethical obligations precluded use of a non-translatable mRNA control) at randomized sites on the forearm. The only causally treatment-related adverse events were mild injection-site reactions. Skin microdialysis revealed elevated VEGF-A protein levels at mRNA-treated sites versus placebo-treated sites from about 4–24 hours post-administration. Enhancements in basal skin blood flow at 4 hours and 7 days post-administration were detected using laser Doppler fluximetry and imaging. Intradermal VEGF-A mRNA was well tolerated and led to local functional VEGF-A protein expression and transient skin blood flow enhancement in men with T2DM. VEGF-A mRNA may have therapeutic potential for regenerative angiogenesis. Chemically modified mRNA is a new approach for therapeutic protein expression that could be applied to angiogenesis. Here the authors show in a phase 1 clinical trial that a modified mRNA encoding VEGF-A is well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes.

This prospective, controlled, and multicentric study evaluated nutritional status, body composition, muscle strength, and quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in clinical remission. In addition, possible effects of gender, malnutrition, inflammation, and previous prednisolone therapy were investigated. Nutritional status (subjective global assessment [SGA], body mass index, albumin, trace elements), body composition (bioelectrical impedance analysis, anthropometry), handgrip strength, and quality of life were assessed in 94 patients with Crohn's disease (CD; 61 female and 33 male, Crohn's Disease Activity Index 71 ± 47), 50 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC; 33 female and 17 male, Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index 3.1 ± 1.5), and 61 healthy control subjects (41 female and 20 male) from centers in Berlin, Vienna, and Bari. For further analysis of body composition, 47 well-nourished patients with inflammatory bowel disease were pair-matched by body mass index, sex, and age to healthy controls. Data are presented as median (25th–75th percentile). Most patients with inflammatory bowel disease (74%) were well nourished according to the SGA, body mass index, and serum albumin. However, body composition analysis demonstrated a decrease in body cell mass (BCM) in patients with CD (23.1 kg, 20.8–28.7, P = 0.021) and UC (22.6 kg, 21.0–28.0, P = 0.041) compared with controls (25.0 kg, 22.0–32.5). Handgrip strength correlated with BCM ( r = 0.703, P = 0.001) and was decreased in patients with CD (32.8 kg, 26.0–41.1, P = 0.005) and UC (31.0 kg, 27.3–37.8, P = 0.001) compared with controls (36.0 kg, 31.0–52.0). The alterations were seen even in patients classified as well nourished. BCM was lower in patients with moderately increased serum C-reactive protein levels compared with patients with normal levels. In CD and UC, selected micronutrient deficits and loss of BCM and muscle strength are frequent in remission and cannot be detected by standard malnutrition screening.

Adipokines are fat-derived hormones and cytokines with immune-modulating and metabolic properties. Most of them are associated with insulin resistance. The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate circulating levels of adipokines and glucose homeostasis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and to evaluate possible associations with the course and characteristics of the disease. Serum leptin, resistin, visfatin, retinol-binding protein-4, adiponectin, glucose, insulin, and inflammatory parameters were analyzed in 93 patients with inactive IBD (49 with Crohn's disease [CD], 44 with ulcerative colitis [UC]), 35 patients with active IBD (18 with CD, 17 with UC), and 37 age- and body mass index–matched healthy controls. Ninety-two patients were followed for 6 mo. Leptin was similar in patients with IBD and controls, whereas resistin and visfatin were increased in patients with active disease but not in those in remission. In active and inactive disease, adiponectin was decreased ( P < 0.001) and retinol-binding protein-4 was increased ( P < 0.001) compared with controls. About 60% of patients with IBD showed increased levels of insulin, whereas serum glucose remained normal, resulting in increased homeostasis model assessment values in most patients. Hyperinsulinemia was associated with the decrease in adiponectin ( r = −0.572, P < 0.001) and proved to be an independent protective factor for 6-mo maintenance of remission ( P = 0.016). IBD led to largely similar alterations in circulating adipokines and hyperinsulinemia in patients with CD and those with UC. The unexpected protective effect of hyperinsulinemia on relapse rate denotes the role of the metabolic–inflammatory response as a modulator in IBD.

Objective SB2, a biosimilar to infliximab reference product (INF), has an identical amino acid sequence and similar physicochemical functional properties to its reference product. The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate pharmacokinetic (PK) bioequivalence between SB2 and EU-sourced INF (EU-INF), between SB2 and US-sourced INF (US-INF), and between EU-INF and US-INF. Methods This study was a randomized, single-blind, three-arm, parallel group study in 159 healthy subjects. All subjects received a single 5 mg/kg intravenous infusion of study drug and then were observed for 10 weeks to study PK, safety and immunogenicity. The primary PK parameters were area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity (AUC inf ), AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC last ) and maximum concentration ( C max ). Bioequivalence for the primary PK parameters was to be concluded using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) if the 90 % confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of geometric least squares means (LSMeans) of the treatments compared were completely contained within the pre-defined equivalence margin, 0.8–1.25. Results All of the 90 % CIs for the geometric LSMean ratios of primary PK parameters for each comparison were within the pre-defined equivalence margin. The proportion of subjects who experienced treatment-emergent adverse events was comparable between treatments. The incidences of anti-drug antibodies between the three treatments were comparable. Conclusion This study demonstrated biosimilarity of SB2 to its marketed reference products of infliximab in terms of PK equivalence in healthy subjects. SB2 was generally well tolerated and showed comparable safety and immunogenicity profiles to the reference products (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01922336).

Purpose We evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of EMD 525797 (DI17E6), a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting αv-integrins, in healthy subjects. Methods In this first-in-human, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized Phase 1 study, healthy male volunteers were consecutively assigned to 6 ascending single-dose cohorts of 35, 100, 250, 500, 1000, or 1500 mg. Per dose cohort, EMD 525797 or placebo was administered over 1 h as an intravenous 250-mL infusion to 6 and 3 volunteers, respectively. Escalation to the next dose level was based on evaluation of safety, tolerability, and PK data. Results Fifty-five subjects (aged 18–45 years) were randomized. Twenty-seven of 37 (73 %) subjects receiving EMD 525797 reported a total of 61 adverse events (AEs), including 38 events (in 17 subjects) considered by the investigator to be treatment related. A total of 35 AEs were reported by 14 of 18 (78 %) placebo-treated subjects. The most commonly occurring AEs were gastrointestinal disorders, abnormal laboratory values, and increased or decreased biochemistry and/or hematology values, as well as headaches, which occurred at a slightly higher frequency in the EMD 525797 group compared with placebo. There were no serious AEs or deaths. EMD 525797 PK appeared to be dose dependent, especially at lower doses. Conclusion Ascending single doses of EMD 525797 were shown to be safe and well tolerated. No safety concerns were identified. This study supports the ongoing investigation of EMD 525797.

We evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of EMD 525797 (DI17E6), a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting [alpha]v-integrins, in healthy subjects. In this first-in-human, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized Phase 1 study, healthy male volunteers were consecutively assigned to 6 ascending single-dose cohorts of 35, 100, 250, 500, 1000, or 1500 mg. Per dose cohort, EMD 525797 or placebo was administered over 1 h as an intravenous 250-mL infusion to 6 and 3 volunteers, respectively. Escalation to the next dose level was based on evaluation of safety, tolerability, and PK data. Fifty-five subjects (aged 18-45 years) were randomized. Twenty-seven of 37 (73 %) subjects receiving EMD 525797 reported a total of 61 adverse events (AEs), including 38 events (in 17 subjects) considered by the investigator to be treatment related. A total of 35 AEs were reported by 14 of 18 (78 %) placebo-treated subjects. The most commonly occurring AEs were gastrointestinal disorders, abnormal laboratory values, and increased or decreased biochemistry and/or hematology values, as well as headaches, which occurred at a slightly higher frequency in the EMD 525797 group compared with placebo. There were no serious AEs or deaths. EMD 525797 PK appeared to be dose dependent, especially at lower doses. Conclusion Ascending single doses of EMD 525797 were shown to be safe and well tolerated. No safety concerns were identified. This study supports the ongoing investigation of EMD 525797. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]

Background Dabigatran etexilate, a novel oral direct thrombin inhibitor, has been approved for prophylaxis of thromboembolism in patients undergoing total knee or total hip replacement, and is under clinical investigation for treatment of venous thromboembolism, prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, and the treatment of thromboembolic complications following acute coronary syndromes. Objective To evaluate the potential impact of atorvastatin coadministration on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of dabigatran etexilate. Methods Healthy male and female volunteers (n = 22) were recruited to this open, randomized, multiple-dose, three-way crossover study. They received dabigatran etexilate 150 mg twice daily on days 1–3 and once daily on day 4, atorvastatin 80 mg once daily on days 1–4, or both treatments together on days 1–4. Results Exposure to dabigatran at steady state (area under the drug plasma concentration-time curve at steady state) was reduced by 18% with concomitant atorvastatin administration. An 18% increase in plasma atorvastatin concentration occurred with coadministration of dabigatran etexilate. Exposure to its metabolite 2′-hydroxy-atorvastatin remained essentially unchanged and exposure to 4′-hydroxy-atorvastatin was increased by 15%. The small changes observed are deemed of little clinical relevance given the overall interindividual variability in the metabolism of atorvastatin. Furthermore, there were no changes in the concentrations of active HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in plasma following dabigatran etexilate coadministration. Six subjects in the atorvastatin treatment group, six subjects during combination treatment, and eight subjects in the dabigatran treatment group reported adverse events. Most of the adverse events reported were nervous system disorders such as dizziness and headache, and general disorders such as fatigue. All adverse events were resolved at the end of the study. Conclusion Results of this randomized, open-label, three-way crossover design study in healthy male and female volunteers showed that atorvastatin had no influence on the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of dabigatran, and vice versa , dabigatran etexilate had no impact on the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of atorvastatin. Both drugs were well tolerated when given alone or in combination.