Explore the vast range of titles available.

This study explores the feasibility of a wearable system to monitor vital signs during sleep. The system incorporates five inertial measurement units (IMUs) located on the waist, the arms, and the legs. To evaluate the performance of a novel framework, twenty-three participants underwent a sleep study, and vital signs, including respiratory rate (RR) and heart rate (HR), were monitored via polysomnography (PSG). The dataset comprises individuals with varying severity of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). Using a single IMU sensor positioned at the waist, strong correlations of more than 0.95 with the PSG-derived vital signs were obtained. Low inter-participant mean absolute errors of about 0.66 breaths/min and 1.32 beats/min were achieved, for RR and HR, respectively. The percentage of data available for analysis, representing the time coverage, was 98.3% for RR estimation and 78.3% for HR estimation. Nevertheless, the fusion of data from IMUs positioned at the arms and legs enhanced the inter-participant time coverage of HR estimation by over 15%. These findings imply that the proposed methodology can be used for vital sign monitoring during sleep, paving the way for a comprehensive understanding of sleep quality in individuals with SDB.

Sensor placement identification in body sensor networks is an important feature, which could render such a system more robust, transparent to the user, and easy to wear for long term data collection. It can be considered an active measure to avoid the misuse of a sensing system, specifically as these platforms become more ubiquitous and, apart from their research orientation, start to enter industries, such as fitness and health. In this work we discuss the offline, fixed class, sensor placement identification method implemented in PDMonitor®, a medical device for long-term Parkinson’s disease monitoring at home. We analyze the stepwise procedure used to accurately identify the wearables depending on how many are used, from two to five, given five predefined body positions. Finally, we present the results of evaluating the method in 88 subjects, 61 Parkinson’s disease patients and 27 healthy subjects, when the overall average accuracy reached 99.1%.

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is one of the most prevalent neurological diseases, described by complex clinical phenotypes. The manifestations of PD include both motor and non-motor symptoms. We constituted an experimental protocol for the assessment of PD motor signs of lower extremities. Using a pair of sensor insoles, data were recorded from PD patients, Elderly and Adult groups. Assessment of PD patients has been performed by neurologists specialized in movement disorders using the Movement Disorder Society—Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS)-Part III: Motor Examination, on both ON and OFF medication states. Using as a reference point the quantified metrics of MDS-UPDRS-Part III, severity levels were explored by classifying normal, mild, moderate, and severe levels of PD. Elaborating the recorded gait data, 18 temporal and spatial characteristics have been extracted. Subsequently, feature selection techniques were applied to reveal the dominant features to be used for four classification tasks. Specifically, for identifying relations between the spatial and temporal gait features on: PD and non-PD groups; PD, Elderly and Adults groups; PD and ON/OFF medication states; MDS-UPDRS: Part III and PD severity levels. AdaBoost, Extra Trees, and Random Forest classifiers, were trained and tested. Results showed a recognition accuracy of 88%, 73% and 81% for, the PD and non-PD groups, PD-related medication states, and PD severity levels relevant to MDS-UPDRS: Part III ratings, respectively.