Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background The CytoSorb hemoadsorption device has been demonstrated to be capable of clearing inflammatory cytokines, but has not yet been shown to attenuate plasma cytokine concentrations. We investigated the effects of CytoSorb hemoperfusion on plasma levels of various cytokines using the repeated human experimental endotoxemia model, a highly standardized and reproducible human in vivo model of systemic inflammation and immunological tolerance induced by administration of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Methods Twenty-four healthy male volunteers (age 18–35) were intravenously challenged with LPS (a bolus of 1 ng/kg followed by continuous infusion of 0.5 ng/kg/hr for three hours) twice: on day 0 to quantify the initial cytokine response and on day 7 to quantify the degree of endotoxin tolerance. Subjects either received CytoSorb hemoperfusion during the first LPS challenge (CytoSorb group), or no intervention (control group). Plasma cytokine concentrations and clearance rates were determined serially. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04643639, date of registration November 24th 2020). Results LPS administration led to a profound increase in plasma cytokine concentrations during both LPS challenge days. Compared to the control group, significantly lower plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF, − 58%, p  < 0.0001), interleukin (IL)-6 ( − 71%, p  = 0.003), IL-8 ( − 48%, p  = 0.02) and IL-10 ( − 26%, p  = 0.03) were observed in the CytoSorb group during the first LPS challenge. No differences in cytokine responses were observed during the second LPS challenge. Conclusions CytoSorb hemoperfusion effectively attenuates circulating cytokine concentrations during systemic inflammation in humans in vivo, whereas it does not affect long-term immune function. Therefore, CytoSorb therapy may be of benefit in conditions characterized by excessive cytokine release.

Background Decreased monocytic (m)HLA-DR expression is the most studied biomarker of sepsis-induced immunosuppression. To date, little is known about the relationship between sepsis characteristics, such as the site of infection, causative pathogen, or severity of disease, and mHLA-DR expression kinetics. Methods We evaluated mHLA-DR expression kinetics in 241 septic shock patients with different primary sites of infection and pathogens. Furthermore, we used unsupervised clustering analysis to identify mHLA-DR trajectories and evaluated their association with outcome parameters. Results No differences in mHLA-DR expression kinetics were found between groups of patients with different sites of infection (abdominal vs. respiratory, p  = 0.13; abdominal vs. urinary tract, p  = 0.53) and between pathogen categories (Gram-positive vs. Gram-negative, p  = 0.54; Gram-positive vs. negative cultures, p  = 0.84). The mHLA-DR expression kinetics differed between survivors and non-survivors ( p  < 0.001), with an increase over time in survivors only. Furthermore, we identified three mHLA-DR trajectories (‘early improvers’, ‘delayed or non-improvers’ and ‘decliners’). The probability for adverse outcome (secondary infection or death) was higher in the delayed or non-improvers and decliners vs. the early improvers (delayed or non-improvers log-rank p  = 0.03, adjusted hazard ratio 2.0 [95% CI 1.0–4.0], p  = 0.057 and decliners log-rank p  = 0.01, adjusted hazard ratio 2.8 [95% CI 1.1–7.1], p  = 0.03). Conclusion Sites of primary infection or causative pathogens are not associated with mHLA-DR expression kinetics in septic shock patients. However, patients showing delayed or no improvement in or a declining mHLA-DR expression have a higher risk for adverse outcome compared with patients exhibiting a swift increase in mHLA-DR expression. Our study signifies that changes in mHLA-DR expression over time, and not absolute values or static measurements, are of clinical importance in septic shock patients.

Decades of sepsis research into a specific immune system-targeting adjunctive therapy have not resulted in the discovery of an effective compound. Apart from antibiotics, source control, resuscitation and organ support, not a single adjunctive treatment is used in current clinical practice. The inability to determine the prevailing immunological phenotype of patients and the related large heterogeneity of study populations are regarded by many as the most important factors behind the disappointing results of past clinical trials. While the therapeutic focus has long been on immunosuppressive strategies, increased appreciation of the importance of sepsis-induced immunoparalysis in causing morbidity and mortality in sepsis patients has resulted in a paradigm shift in the sepsis research field towards strategies aimed at enhancing the immune response. However, similar to immunosuppressive therapies, precision medicine is imperative for future trials with immunostimulatory compounds to succeed. As such, identifying those patients with a severely suppressed or hyperactive immune system who will most likely benefit from either immunostimulatory or immunosuppressive therapy, and accurate monitoring of both the immune and treatment response is crucial. This review provides an overview of the challenges lying ahead on the path towards precision immunotherapy for patients suffering from sepsis.

Sepsis is poorly understood, largely untreatable and frequently fatal. Netea and colleagues assess both mouse sepsis and human sepsis to demonstrate that its late phase is characterized by immunoparalysis and broad metabolic alterations in cells of the immune system. The acute phase of sepsis is characterized by a strong inflammatory reaction. At later stages in some patients, immunoparalysis may be encountered, which is associated with a poor outcome. By transcriptional and metabolic profiling of human patients with sepsis, we found that a shift from oxidative phosphorylation to aerobic glycolysis was an important component of initial activation of host defense. Blocking metabolic pathways with metformin diminished cytokine production and increased mortality in systemic fungal infection in mice. In contrast, in leukocytes rendered tolerant by exposure to lipopolysaccharide or after isolation from patients with sepsis and immunoparalysis, a generalized metabolic defect at the level of both glycolysis and oxidative metabolism was apparent, which was restored after recovery of the patients. Finally, the immunometabolic defects in humans were partially restored by therapy with recombinant interferon-γ, which suggested that metabolic processes might represent a therapeutic target in sepsis.

Excessive or persistent proinflammatory cytokine production plays a central role in autoimmune diseases. Acute activation of the sympathetic nervous system attenuates the innate immune response. However, both the autonomic nervous system and innate immune system are regarded as systems that cannot be voluntarily influenced. Herein, we evaluated the effects of a training program on the autonomic nervous system and innate immune response. Healthy volunteers were randomized to either the intervention (n = 12) or control group (n = 12). Subjects in the intervention group were trained for 10 d in meditation (third eye meditation), breathing techniques (i.a., cyclic hyperventilation followed by breath retention), and exposure to cold (i.a., immersions in ice cold water). The control group was not trained. Subsequently, all subjects underwent experimental endotoxemia (i.v. administration of 2 ng/kg Escherichia coli endotoxin). In the intervention group, practicing the learned techniques resulted in intermittent respiratory alkalosis and hypoxia resulting in profoundly increased plasma epinephrine levels. In the intervention group, plasma levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 increased more rapidly after endotoxin administration, correlated strongly with preceding epinephrine levels, and were higher. Levels of proinflammatory mediators TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8 were lower in the intervention group and correlated negatively with IL-10 levels. Finally, flu-like symptoms were lower in the intervention group. In conclusion, we demonstrate that voluntary activation of the sympathetic nervous system results in epinephrine release and subsequent suppression of the innate immune response in humans in vivo. These results could have important implications for the treatment of conditions associated with excessive or persistent inflammation, such as autoimmune diseases.

Abstract Sepsis is the leading cause of death in the intensive care unit and ranks in the top 10 causes of death in general worldwide. Proinflammatory mediators are related to symptoms observed early in patients with sepsis, such as fever and hemodynamic instability. However, in recent years it has become clear that most septic patients do not die from an overwhelming proinflammatory immune response but in an immunosuppressive state, which can last for days or even weeks, and that results in increased susceptibility to secondary (opportunistic) infections. Although infection control and supportive therapies will remain the cornerstone of treatment, especially in the early phase of sepsis, the identification of this so-called “immunoparalysis” is currently causing a paradigm shift in the adjunctive treatment of sepsis from therapies that suppress the immune system toward immunostimulation. In this Critical Care Perspective we give an overview of the pathophysiology of sepsis, with a focus on immunosuppressive mechanisms that play an important role in outcome. In addition, we present an appraisal of the recent advances in immunotherapy as an adjunctive treatment for sepsis.

Septic shock is a major cause of death worldwide and a considerable healthcare burden in the twenty-first century. Attention has shifted from damaging effects of the proinflammatory response to the detrimental role of antiinflammation, a phenomenon known as sepsis-induced immunoparalysis. Sepsis-induced immunoparalysis may render patients vulnerable to secondary infections and is associated with impaired outcome. The immunoparalysis hypothesis compels us to reevaluate the current management of septic shock and to assess whether we are inadvertently compromising or altering the host immune response. In this perspective, we discuss the potential detrimental role of norepinephrine, the cornerstone treatment for septic shock, in sepsis-induced immunoparalysis. We provide a short overview of the current understanding of the immunologic pathophysiology of sepsis, followed by a detailed description of the immunomodulatory effects of norepinephrine and alternative vasopressors. We conclude that although the development of novel therapies aimed at reversing immunoparalysis is underway, the use of norepinephrine may aggravate the development, extent, and duration of sepsis-induced immunoparalysis. Current in vitro and animal data indicate that norepinephrine treatment exerts immunosuppressive and bacterial growth–promoting effects and may increase susceptibility toward infections. However, evidence in humans is circumstantial, as immunologic effects of norepinephrine have not been investigated properly in experimental or clinical studies. Alternatives such as vasopressin/selepressin, angiotensin II, and phenylephrine could have a fundamental advantage over norepinephrine with respect to their immunologic properties. However, also for these agents, in vivo immunologic data in humans are largely lacking. As such, human studies on the immunomodulatory properties of norepinephrine and viable alternatives are highly warranted.

Background Procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were previously shown to have value for the detection of secondary infections in critically ill COVID-19 patients. However, since the introduction of immunomodulatory therapy, the value of these biomarkers is unclear. We investigated PCT and CRP kinetics in critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with dexamethasone with or without tocilizumab, and assessed the value of these biomarkers to detect secondary bacterial infections. Methods In this prospective study, 190 critically ill COVID-19 patients were divided into three treatment groups: no dexamethasone, no tocilizumab (D−T−) , dexamethasone, no tocilizumab (D + T−) , and dexamethasone and tocilizumab (D + T + ) . Serial data of PCT and CRP were aligned on the last day of dexamethasone treatment, and kinetics of these biomarkers were analyzed between 6 days prior to cessation of dexamethasone and 10 days afterwards. Furthermore, the D+T− and D+T+ groups were subdivided into secondary infection and no-secondary infection groups to analyze differences in PCT and CRP kinetics and calculate detection accuracy of these biomarkers for the occurrence of a secondary infection. Results Following cessation of dexamethasone, there was a rebound in PCT and CRP levels, most pronounced in the D+T− group. Upon occurrence of a secondary infection, no significant increase in PCT and CRP levels was observed in the D+T− group ( p  = 0.052 and p  = 0.08, respectively). Although PCT levels increased significantly in patients of the D+T+ group who developed a secondary infection ( p  = 0.0003), this rise was only apparent from day 2 post-infection onwards. CRP levels remained suppressed in the D+T+ group. Receiver operating curve analysis of PCT and CRP levels yielded area under the curves of 0.52 and 0.55, respectively, which are both markedly lower than those found in the group of COVID-19 patients not treated with immunomodulatory drugs (0.80 and 0.76, respectively, with p values for differences between groups of 0.001 and 0.02, respectively). Conclusions Cessation of dexamethasone in critically ill COVID-19 patients results in a rebound increase in PCT and CRP levels unrelated to the occurrence of secondary bacterial infections. Furthermore, immunomodulatory treatment with dexamethasone and tocilizumab considerably reduces the value of PCT and CRP for detection of secondary infections in COVID-19 patients.

Background Sepsis is characterized by a dysregulated immune response to infection. The complement system plays an important role in the host defence to pathogens. However, exaggerated complement activation might contribute to a hyperinflammatory state. The interplay between complement activation and inflammation in relationship with adverse outcomes in sepsis patients is unclear. Methods Secondary analysis of complement factors in a prospective study in 209 hospitalized sepsis patients, of whom the majority presented with shock. Concentrations of complement factors C3, C3a, C3c, C5, C5a, and soluble terminal complement complex were assessed in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid plasma samples collected within 24 h after sepsis diagnosis using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Results The concentration of complement factors in plasma of severely ill sepsis patients indicated profound activation of the complement system (all P  < 0.01 compared to healthy controls). Spearman rank correlation tests indicated consistent relationships between the different complement factors measured, but no significant correlations were observed between the complement factors and other inflammatory biomarkers such as leukocyte numbers, C-reactive protein and ferritin concentrations, or HLA-DR expression on monocytes. The concentration of complement factors was not associated with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, the incidence of septic shock, and mortality rates (all P  > 0.05) in this cohort of patients with high disease severity. Conclusions Once an infection progresses to severe sepsis or septic shock, the complement pathway is already profoundly activated and is no longer related to a dysregulated inflammatory response, nor to clinical outcome. This implies that in this patient category with severe disease, the complement system is activated to such an extent that it no longer has predictive value for clinical outcome.