Explore the vast range of titles available.

We performed pulsed field ablation using FARAPULSE after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). We should confirm flower configurations did not overlap with the LAAC device using intracardiac echocardiography and 3‐D mapping system and without LAAC device artifacts by real‐time electrograms. If overlapping, push the flower configuration deeper and tilt posteriorly to resolve.

The distal radial approach (DRA) has been proposed as an alternative approach for coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); however, the predictors of DRA failure and puncture site complications are unclear. Among 7153 consecutive patients undergoing CAG or PCI between November 2018 and January 2021, 3610 patients undergoing CAG or PCI with DRA were analyzed. The primary endpoint of this study was the procedural success, and the secondary endpoint of this study was puncture site complications during procedure. Puncture site complications during procedure were defined as a composite of major bleeding, minor bleeding, arteriovenous fistula, pseudoaneurysm, and neuropathy. The DRA success rate and the puncture site complication rate were 90.4% and 7.7%, respectively. The predictors of DRA failure were low body weight and dual antiplatelet therapy; those of DRA success were PCI and ultrasonography-guided DRA; those of puncture site complications during procedure were low body weight, peripheral arterial disease, dual antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulant therapy, and PCI; and that of no puncture site complications were previous PCI and ultrasonography-guided DRA. The negative predictors of DRA success with no puncture site complication during procedure were low body weight and dual antiplatelet therapy. The positive predictor of DRA success with no puncture site complication during procedure was ultrasonography-guided DRA. We identified the predictors of DRA failure and puncture site complications during procedure in patients undergoing CAG and PCI with DRA. Ultrasonography-guided DRA was associated with a high DRA success rate and a low puncture site complication rate in patients undergoing CAG or PCI with DRA.

For pre-procedural planning of left atrial appendage (LAA) closure, sizing is crucial. Although transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a standard modality, cardiac computed tomography (CT) is also widely used. The virtual TEE (V-TEE) that our group developed enables us to reconstruct images similar to TEE images from CT images. The software should be helpful to understand and plan the procedure strategy. Accordingly, we investigated the utility of V-TEE. Sixty-six patients at 4 participating sites who completed both CT and TEE prior to LAA closure were included. The LAA diameter at the landing zone (LZ) for WATCHMAN™ device implantation was statistically compared at 0°, 45°, 90°, and 135° between V-TEE and TEE. Among 66 cases, only 3 cases were excluded due to poor imaging quality, and 63 cases were analyzed. The device LZ diameters based on V-TEE were strongly correlated with those based on TEE, despite the significantly greater diameter based on V-TEE with mean differences of 2.4 to 3.0 mm (all of them: P  < 0.001). The discordances (V-TEE/TEE ratio) at most angles were significantly larger in the elliptical LAAs. V-TEE provides a valuable method for the evaluation of the LAA diameters. V-TEE-based measurements were larger than conventional TEE-based measurements, especially in cases of elliptical LAAs. The assessment by V-TEE has the potential benefit of ensuring proper device sizing regardless of the LAA morphology.

We aimed to compare the intravascular imaging findings, and clinical outcomes between three-dimensional optical coherence tomography (OCT)- and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the left main coronary artery (LMCA). We enrolled 331 patients underwent OCT- or IVUS-guide single crossover stenting across the side branch (SB) and subsequent kissing balloon inflation (KBT) for LMCA bifurcation. Primary endpoint was defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. Of 331 patients, 58 patients (17.5%) underwent OCT-guide PCI. OCT-guide PCI associated with higher frequency of proximal optimization technique (POT) (98.3% vs 85.3%, P  = 0.013) and smaller balloon size of POT (4.29 ± 0.44 mm vs 4.43 ± 0.42, P  = 0.02) than IVUS-guide PCI. Although maximal stent area at LMCA and minimal stent area at main vessel were significantly smaller in OCT-guide PCI in intravascular imaging ( P  = 0.01, and P  = 0.002, respectively), the restenosis rate at follow-up angiography was comparable in both groups (15.2% vs. 9.4%, P  = 0.387). Cumulative rate of primary endpoint was not significantly different between 2 groups both before and after propensity score adjustment (7.0% vs. 7.4%, P  = 0.98 and 2.6% vs. 7.3%, P  = 0.18). In conclusion, the clinical outcomes at 1 year were comparable, suggesting OCT- and IVUS-guided PCI for LMCA were similarly feasible. The balloon size of POT in OCT-guide PCI might be influenced by the limited visibility in the proximal LMCA.

Background In left atrial appendage closure using WATCHMAN FLX, accurate device measurement by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is important. We aimed to experimentally validate appropriate methods of device measurement with two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) TEE compared with actual size. Methods We prepared a full range of device sizes (20, 24, 27, 31, 35 mm), each with five different compression rates. Each device was measured by 2D and 3D TEE at depths of 2, 4, and 6 cm in vitro using inner, outer, and middle line methods. We compared the difference between the actual size by caliper and measurements at each compression rate and depth by the three methods in 2D and 3D TEE. Results A total of 450 patterns of measurements were analyzed. The differences using the middle line method were much less than those using the inner and outer line methods in 2D and 3D TEE (2D TEE: 0.45 ± 0.36 vs. 2.55 ± 0.99 vs. 2.59 ± 0.72 mm, p < 0.01; 3D TEE: 0.34 ± 0.27 vs. 2.38 ± 0.69 vs. 1.86 ± 0.77 mm, p < 0.01). Moreover, the differences in measurements by 3D TEE were more accurate than those of 2D TEE in the inner (2.47 ± 1.86 vs. 1.86 ± 0.77 mm, p < 0.01) and middle (0.58 ± 0.37 vs. 0.34 ± 0.27 mm, p < 0.01) line methods. Conclusions Middle line method by 3D TEE is the most reliable approach for device measurement at left atrial appendage closure using WATCHMAN FLX device.

Left atrial appendage (LAA) evaluation is important to select the optimal LAA closure device for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The LAA characteristics of Japanese patients remain uninvestigated. We compared the LAA size and morphology between 212 Japanese AF patients before catheter ablation and 119 AF patients undergoing LAA closure in the United States (US). We measured the LAA ostial dimension and depth by transesophageal echocardiography in all patients and determined the LAA morphology types of Japanese patients by multidetector cardiac computed tomography and those of US patients by LAA angiography. The maximum LAA ostial dimension was significantly larger in Japanese patients than in US patients (22.6 ± 4.1 mm vs. 21.5 ± 3.5 mm, P  = 0.02). Also, Japanese patients had larger maximum dimension and depth corrected by body surface area than US patients in both paroxysmal and nonparoxysmal AF groups. The angle showing the maximum dimension was 0° or 135° in approximately 75% of patients in both groups. The common LAA morphology types were “cauliflower” and “chicken wing” in Japanese patients and “cactus” and “windsock” in US patients. In this study, Japanese patients had a larger LAA size than US patients. Because the maximum LAA dimension was obtained at the same angles, the LAA measurement method for US patients can be applicable to Japanese patients.

We have seen ischemic stroke associated with a high‐grade device‐related pedunculated thrombosis after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) after discontinuation of oral anticoagulations (OACs). Continuation of OACs, including half‐dose direct oral anticoagulations after LAAC, may be a better option for patients at high risk of thromboembolism to prevent further thromboembolic events.

Background Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who are not suitable for long‐term anticoagulant therapy undergo percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). The safety and feasibility of left atrial catheter ablation (CA) procedures after LAAC remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify the feasibility and safety of CA after LAAC, including in the early phase within 180 days. Methods Characteristics and clinical outcomes of 46 patients with AF who had undergone both CA and LAAC within 2 years (mean age, 72 years; 29 men) were compared between those who had undergone CA‐first (31 patients) and LAAC‐first (15 patients). Results The mean CHA₂DS₂‐VASc and HAS‐BLED scores were 4.8 and 3.3 points, respectively. The LAAC‐first strategy was often used in patients with prior major bleeding and LAA thrombosis or sludge. In the LAAC‐first group, the mean duration between both procedures was 212 days, and all LAAC‐first patients, including seven patients in the early phase, could undergo CA without LAAC device‐related complications; moreover, no cardiovascular adverse events were reported after both procedures (mean periods: 420 days). After CA post‐LAAC, no device‐related adverse events (device‐related thrombosis, new peri‐device leak appearance, peri‐device leak increase, or device dislodgement) were observed, whereas, after LAAC post‐CA, 3 new peri‐device leak appearance events and 1 peri‐device leak increase event were observed, especially patients who underwent LAAC in the early phase post‐CA. Conclusion Based on single‐center experience, left atrial CA in the presence of an LAAC device implanted including the early phase was safe and feasible. Atrial fibrillation ablation in the presence of an LAAC device implanted including the early phase was safe and feasible without LAAC device adverse events. Contrastingly, when performing LAAC after PVI, it may be better to perform in the late phase, considering the possibility of PDL due to LAA ridge edema.

The long-term outcomes of patients who underwent paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty for drug-eluting stent restenosis (DES-ISR) remain unclear. We investigated the 5-year safety and efficacy outcomes of PCB angioplasty for DES-ISR. The study included 185 patients with 216 DES-ISR lesions who underwent PCB angioplasty from September 2008 to December 2010. Two serial angiographic follow-ups were routinely scheduled at 6 and 18 months after the index procedure. Five-year clinical outcomes were investigated. The mean duration of follow-up was 2,052 ± 352.5 days, and 94.1% of the patients completed the 5-year follow-up. Recurrent restenosis was observed in 48 lesions (22.2%) at the 6-month follow-up and late restenosis was observed in 22 lesions (14.3%) at the 18-month follow-up. Very late restenosis was observed in 6 lesions (6.8%), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) was performed for 8 lesions (13.6%) beyond 24 months after the procedure. The cumulative rates of TLR at 1, 2, and 5 years were 16.4%, 28.9%, and 34.1%, respectively. In patients who underwent TLR, 87% (52 of 60 patients) underwent TLR within the first 2 years after the index procedure. Multivariable analysis revealed that in-stent occlusion lesion (odds ratio [OR] 2.21; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 to 4.47; p = 0.03), postprocedural percent diameter stenosis >35% (OR 3.19; 95% CI 1.54 to 6.68; p = 0.001), and right coronary artery ostial lesions (OR 5.56; 95% CI 1.40 to 24.9; p = 0.01) were independent predictors of recurrent restenosis. In conclusion, our results suggest that long-term outcomes after PCB angioplasty are acceptable; however, close follow-up during the first 2 years following this procedure may be necessary.

Background: Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) reduces the incidence of stroke/bleeding events in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, high risk of stroke, and contraindication in continuing anticoagulation therapy. Of them, patients with heart failure may remain at high risk of these events after LAAC. Method: Patients who underwent LAAC and were listed for the multi-center, prospectively collected OCEAN-LAAC registry, were eligible. Of them, individuals without baseline plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels and those dependent on hemodialysis were excluded. The prognostic impact of baseline plasma BNP levels on the incidence of death or stroke/bleeding events after LAAC was evaluated. Results: A total of 937 patients (median 78 years, 596 men) were included. The LAAC device was successfully implanted in 934 (98%) patients. Over the 366 (251, 436) days after the LAAC, 148 patients encountered a primary outcome. The common logarithm of baseline plasma BNP was independently associated with the primary outcome with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.46 (95% confidence interval 1.06–2.18, p = 0.043). A calculated cutoff of 2.12 (equivalent to 133 pg/mL of plasma BNP level) significantly stratified the cumulative incidence of the primary outcome (29% vs. 21% for 2 years, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Using prospectively collected large-scale multi-center Japanese registry data, we demonstrated that a baseline higher plasma BNP level was independently associated with a higher incidence of stroke/bleeding events and mortality after LAAC. Further studies are warranted to understand the optimal therapeutic strategy for LAAC candidates with elevated baseline plasma BNP levels.