Explore the vast range of titles available.

Molnupiravir is an oral prodrug of the broadly active, antiviral ribonucleoside analog N‐hydroxycytidine (NHC). The primary circulating metabolite NHC is taken up into cells and phosphorylated to NHC‐triphosphate (NHC‐TP). NHC‐TP serves as a competitive substrate for viral RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), which results in an accumulation of errors in the viral genome, rendering virus replication incompetent. Molnupiravir has demonstrated activity against SARS‐CoV‐2 both clinically and preclinically and has a high barrier to development of viral resistance. Little to no molnupiravir is observed in plasma due to rapid hydrolysis to NHC. Maximum concentrations of NHC are reached at 1.5 h following administration in a fasted state. The effective half‐life of NHC is 3.3 h, reflecting minimal accumulation in the plasma following twice‐daily (Q12H) dosing. The terminal half‐life of NHC is 20.6 h. NHC‐TP exhibits a flatter profile with a lower peak‐to‐trough ratio compared with NHC, which supports Q12H dosing. Renal and hepatic pathways are not major routes of elimination, as NHC is primarily cleared by metabolism to uridine and cytidine, which then mix with the endogenous nucleotide pools. In a phase III study of nonhospitalized patients with COVID‐19 (MOVe‐OUT), 5 days of treatment with 800 mg molnupiravir Q12H significantly reduced the incidence of hospitalization or death compared with placebo. Patients treated with molnupiravir also had a greater reduction in SARS‐CoV‐2 viral load and improved clinical outcomes, compared with those receiving placebo. The clinical effectiveness of molnupiravir has been further demonstrated in several real‐world evidence studies. Molnupiravir is currently authorized or approved in more than 25 countries.

Tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.) is a globally important horticultural crop; however, inconsistent germination and weak early seedling vigour remain major bottlenecks to productivity. Seed nanopriming using zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) represents an emerging, eco-compatible strategy for enhancing seed performance by modulating early biochemical and physiological processes. This study investigated the influence of ZnO NPs seed priming on seed quality traits and physio-biochemical responses in three genetically distinct tomato varieties: Pusa Rohini, H-81, and Pusa Prasanskrit. The optimal concentration (50ppm) of ZnO NPs significantly enhanced germination percentage, speed of germination, seedling vigour indices, shoot and root elongation, and biomass accumulation while reducing mean germination time. Biochemically, ZnO nano-primed seedlings exhibited elevated levels of total chlorophyll, proline, and total phenol along with enhanced antioxidant enzyme activities (superoxide dismutase, catalase and peroxidase). A concurrent reduction in malondialdehyde content indicated lower lipid peroxidation and oxidative damage. These effects collectively suggest improved homeostasis and metabolic efficiency. The findings confirm that 50ppm ZnO nanopriming modulates germination-linked signaling and antioxidant defense pathways, accelerating early seedling establishment and enhancing seed quality through improved enzyme activity and seedling development in tomato, while offering a cost effective and environmentally sustainable approach.

In Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 treatment-naive adults, a fixed combination of doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate demonstrated non-inferior antiretroviral efficacy to efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate at week 48, with similar immunologic effects, low viral drug resistance rates, and significantly fewer neuropsychiatric adverse events. Abstract Background Doravirine (DOR), a novel non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), is active against wild-type Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 and the most common NNRTI-resistant variants, and has a favorable and unique in vitro resistance profile. Methods DRIVE-AHEAD is a phase 3, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Antiretroviral treatment-naive adults with ≥1000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL were randomized (1:1) to once-daily, fixed-dose DOR at 100 mg, lamivudine at 300 mg, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) at 300 mg (DOR/3TC/TDF) or to efavirenz at 600 mg, emtricitabine at 200 mg, and TDF at 300 mg (EFV/FTC/TDF) for 96 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants with <50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL at week 48 (Food and Drug Administration snapshot approach; non-inferiority margin 10%). Results Of the 734 participants randomized, 728 were treated (364 per group) and included in the analyses. At week 48, 84.3% (307/364) of DOR/3TC/TDF recipients and 80.8% (294/364) of EFV/FTC/TDF recipients achieved <50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL (difference 3.5%, 95% CI, -2.0, 9.0). DOR/3TC/TDF recipients had significantly lower rates of dizziness (8.8% vs 37.1%), sleep disorders/disturbances (12.1% vs 25.2%), and altered sensorium (4.4% vs 8.2%) than EFV/FTC/TDF recipients. Mean changes in fasting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) were significantly different between DOR/3TC/TDF and EFV/FTC/TDF (−1.6 vs +8.7 mg/dL and −3.8 vs +13.3 mg/dL, respectively). Conclusions In HIV-1 treatment-naive adults, DOR/3TC/TDF demonstrated non-inferior efficacy to EFV/FTC/TDF at week 48 and was well tolerated, with significantly fewer neuropsychiatric events and minimal changes in LDL-C and non-HDL-C compared with EFV/FTC/TDF. Clinical Trials Registration NCT02403674

Background: Nurse led noncommunicable diseases (NCD) clinic may address the significant shortage of human resource for health for managing common NCDs. The objective of this study is to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of nurse-led NCD clinic for identification, prevention, and management of common NCDs. Materials and Methods: A quasi experimental study was conducted at a Public Health Dispensary in periurban community of Northern India. Situational analysis and stakeholders' interview were done based on which the clinic was setup and run over a period of 2 months by registered nurses and nursing students to offer screening, health education and appropriate referral. The primary outcome of study was proportion of population screened, prevalence of common NCDs, risk factors modification, medication adherence, and patient satisfaction. Results: It was feasible to run a nurse led clinic in terms of availability of space, equipment to run the clinic and human resource. A total of 455 individuals aged ≥30 years were enrolled using the total enumeration sampling technique. There was a significant increase in screening rates from 0.29% to 3.7% in nurse-led NCD clinic. There was significant mean change in systolic blood pressure (18.75 ± 6.92 mm Hg), diastolic blood pressure (4.4 ± 3.71 mm Hg), random blood sugar (33.36 ± 38.49 mg/dl) Body Mass Index, and waist circumference (P < 0.01) among the population screened. Medication adherence significantly increased from 7.8% to 76.4% (P < 0.01) after 2 months of nurse-led NCD clinic. Conclusion: Task sharing for managing common NCDs in nurse-led NCD clinic was feasible and effective in increasing screening rates, medication adherence, and risk factors modification among studied population.

Mental health stigma continues to remain a challenge for those individuals with mental illness and often is a barrier towards help-seeking and social acceptance. It is therefore essential to understand the factors that cause and maintain mental health stigma in order to develop effective strategies to address it. Little is known about the mental health challenges faced by South Asians, particularly first-generation Asian Indians living in the United States. The present study examined the effect of causal attributions and acculturation on stigmatizing behavioral responses. In addition, the study explored the relationship between cultural causal attributions and stigma to broaden our knowledge on one of the largest growing immigrant group in the United States. One-hundred and thirty-seven (n = 137) first generation Indian immigrants completed measures that assessed their causal beliefs, levels of acculturation and stigma towards severe mental illness. Multiple linear regressions showed that genetic causal attributions were positively associated with avoidance. Participants who endorsed stronger neurobiological causal beliefs endorsed lesser avoidance. In this sample, cultural causal attributions did not predict stigma. However, it was also found that participants who rated high on mainstream acculturation and low on heritage maintenance and believed more in culturally relevant causes were more likely to provide help. This study has implications for developing culturally relevant anti-stigma interventions which may be effective in reducing stigma in the Indian immigrant population in the United States.

Purpose: Men who have sex with men (MSM) is a vulnerable group, who have been neglected and discriminated. Such discrimination decreases their access to health care and increases the spread of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Aims and Objective: The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of \"self-care interventional package\" on the promotion of sexual health, among MSM. Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted on MSM from two nongovernmental organization centers of Chandigarh, which were randomized by simple random sampling into a control and experimental group. Over a period of 1 month, a total of 115 MSM were found eligible; 55 in control group and 60 in experimental group. Data were collected by a personal interview, after taking consent, in a comfortable and private environment. The Self-Care Interventional Package on the promotion of sexual health was developed in the form of flash book and booklet, and delivered by one-to-one interaction. Three follow-ups were done weekly for motivation in both the groups. Postintervention assessment was conducted after 1 month. Results: There was a statistically significant (P < 0.01) improvement in knowledge about prevention and management of STIs and HIV, getting vaccinated for Hepatitis B and regular self check-up. Statistically significant reduction in unsafe sexual practices was noted among the MSM of experimental group. Conclusion: The self-care interventional package for the promotion of sexual health was effective in improving the sexual heath of the MSM population.

Background Doravirine (DOR) is a novel non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). In the phase 3 DRIVE-AHEAD trial in HIV-1-infected treatment-naïve adults, DOR demonstrated noninferior efficacy to efavirenz (EFV) and favorable profiles for neuropsychiatric tolerability and lipids at 48 weeks. We present data through week 96. Methods DRIVE- AHEAD (Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02403674) is a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, noninferiority trial that compared DOR with EFV. Eligible participants were HIV-1-infected treatment-naïve adults with pre-treatment HIV-1 RNA ≥1,000 copies/mL. Participants were randomized (1:1) to a fixed-dose regimen of DOR 100 mg, lamivudine 300 mg and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg (DOR/3TC/TDF) QD or EFV 600 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg and TDF 300 mg (EFV/FTC/TDF) QD for up to 96 weeks. Randomization was stratified by screening HIV-1 RNA (≤/>100,000 copies/mL) and hepatitis B/C co-infection (yes/no). The efficacy endpoint of interest at week 96 was HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL with predefined noninferiority margin of 10%. Safety endpoints of interest included occurrence of pre-specified neuropsychiatric adverse events and mean change from baseline in fasting lipid levels at week 96. Results Of 734 participants randomized, 728 received study drug and were included in analyses (mean age 33 years, 85% male, 48% white, 19% black, 34% Hispanic). At week 96, HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL was achieved by 77.5% of DOR/3TC/TDF recipients vs. 73.6% of EFV/FTC/TDF recipients (difference 3.8%, 95%CI [−2.4, 10.0]). No additional phenotypic resistance to DOR was observed between weeks 48 and 96, while two additional participants in the EFV/FTC/TDF group developed resistance to EFV. Dizziness, sleep disorders/disturbances, altered sensorium, and rash were less frequent in DOR/3TC/TDF recipients than in EFV/FTC/TDF recipients. Fasting LDL-C and non-HDL-C increased in the EFV/FTC/TDF group but not in the DOR/3TC/TDF group, while change in total cholesterol/HDL-C ratio was similar. Conclusion Week 96 results support non-inferiority of DOR/3TC/TFD to EFV/FTC/TDF established at Week 48 with no additional DOR resistance between week 48 and 96. DOR/3TC/TDF was safe and well-tolerated with fewer neuropsychiatric and rash events and favorable lipid profile compared with EFV/FTC/TDF. Disclosures C. Orkin, AbbVie, Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, ViiV: Grant Investigator and Research Contractor, Research grant and Research support. K. Squires, Merck & Co., Inc.: Ad Board, Ad Board. Gilead Sciences: Grant, Ad Board. VIIV: Ad Board, Ad Board. Bristol Myers Squibb: Ad Board, Ad Board. Janssen: Ad Board, Ad Board. J. M. Molina, Gilead: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. Merck: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. ViiV: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. Teva: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. P. Sax, Gilead: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting fee, Grant recipient and Research grant. ViiV Healthcare: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting fee, Grant recipient and Research grant. Merck: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting fee, Grant recipient and Research grant. Janssen: Consultant, Consulting fee. BMS: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient and Research grant. W. Wong, Merck & Co., Inc.: Research Contractor, Research grant. G. Lin, Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, May hold stock/stock options in the company and Salary. S. Kumar, Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. G. Hanna, Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. C. Hwang, Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. E. Martin, Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. H. Teppler, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA: Employee, May hold stock/stock options in the company and Salary.

Background Doravirine is a novel, non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) that has demonstrated efficacy in two Phase 3 trials in treatment-naïve adults with HIV-1. Methods This open-label, active-controlled, noninferiority (NI) trial evaluated a once-daily single-tablet regimen of doravirine 100 mg, lamivudine 300 mg, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg (DOR/3TC/TDF) vs. continuation of current therapy in adults with HIV-1 virologically suppressed for ≥6 months on a stable regimen of two NRTIs plus a boosted protease inhibitor (PI), boosted elvitegravir, or NNRTI. Participants with screening HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL, no history of virologic failure on any regimen, and no resistance to DOR/3TC/TDF were randomized (2:1) to start DOR/3TC/TDF on Day 1 (immediate switch group, ISG) or after 24 weeks (delayed switch group, DSG). The primary endpoint was the proportion (%) of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (FDA snapshot approach), with the primary comparison between ISG at Week 48 and DSG at Week 24 and a secondary comparison between the groups at Week 24; the NI margin was -8%. The % of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL was also analyzed (FDA snapshot approach; NI margin 4%). Results A total of 670 participants (447 ISG, 223 DSG) were treated and included in the analyses; 84.5% were male, 76.4% were white, and mean age was 43.3 years. At Week 24, 93.7% (419/447) of ISG vs. 94.6% (211/223) of DSG had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (difference −0.9% [−4.7, 3.0]), and 1.8% of each group had HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL. At Week 48, 90.8% (406/447) of ISG maintained HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (vs. 94.6% of DSG at Week 24; difference −3.8%, 95% CI [−7.9%, 0.3%]), and 1.6% of ISG had HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL. In the ritonavir-boosted PI stratum, mean changes in fasting LDL-C and non-HDL-C at Week 24 were significantly lower (P < 0.0001) in ISG vs. DSG (table). Rates of any AE and of drug-related AEs at Week 24 were higher in ISG vs. DSG. AEs were mild in most ISG participants (64% of those with any AE; 80% of those with drug-related AEs). Conclusion A once-daily single-tablet regimen of DOR/3TC/TDF demonstrated non-inferior efficacy and acceptable safety compared with continuing therapy, and is an option for maintaining viral suppression in patients considering a change in therapy. Disclosures P. Kumar, Merck, Pfizer, Janssen,: Grant Investigator and Shareholder, Research grant. GSK, Gilead, Teratechnologies, TaiMed,: Grant Investigator, Scientific Advisor and Shareholder, Consulting fee and Research grant. J. M. Molina, Merck GIlead ViiV Janssen Teva: Ad Board and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee. Gilead Sciences: Grant Investigator, Research support. G. Rizzardini, ViiV, Gilead Science, MSD, Angelini, and Abbvie: Board Member and Speaker’s Bureau, Speaker honorarium. Gliead, ViiV, and MSD: Research Contractor, Research grant. P. Cahn, Abbvie: Grant, Research grant. Merck: Grant, Advisory Board. ViiV Healthcare: Grant, Advisory Board. M. Bickel, Merck & Co., Inc.: Research Contractor, Research grant. Y. Zhou, Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee, Salary. C. Morais, Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, May hold stock/stock options in the company and Salary. S. Kumar, Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. P. Sklar, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. G. J. Hanna, Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., inc.: Employee and Shareholder, May hold stock/stock options in the company. and Salary. C. Hwang, Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. W. Greaves, Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee, May hold stock/stock options within the company.

Background DOR is a novel NNRTI that has shown noninferior efficacy to DRV+r- and EFV-based regimens in phase 3 trials (DRIVE-FORWARD [NCT02275780] and DRIVE-AHEAD [NCT02403674]). A prespecified integrated analysis of those trials plus a completed phase 2 trial (P007; NCT01632345) was performed to evaluate the overall safety and tolerability of DOR. Methods In this integrated analysis, DOR (100 mg QD) arms from P007, DRIVE-FORWARD, and DRIVE-AHEAD were compared with DRV+r in DRIVE-FORWARD and EFV in P007 and DRIVE-AHEAD for treatment of HIV-1 in ART-naïve adults. The NRTI background included FTC/TDF in P007, ABC/3TC or FTC/TDF in DRIVE-FORWARD, and 3TC/TDF for DOR and FTC/TDF for EFV in DRIVE-AHEAD. The primary safety endpoint was the proportion of participants discontinuing due to adverse events (AEs) through Week 48. Results A total of 1,710 treated participants were included in the analysis (table). Similar proportions of DOR− and DRV+r-treated participants, and fewer of those treated with DOR than with EFV discontinued due to AEs (2.5% vs. 3.1%, DOR vs. DRV+r; 2.5% vs. 6.6%, DOR vs. EFV). Drug-related AEs (DRAEs) were similar for DOR (30.9%) and DRV+r (32.1%), and higher for EFV (61.4%). The most common DRAEs (≥10% any group, any grade) were dizziness (4.9%, 1.8%, and 30.7%) diarrhea (4.0%, 12.8%, and 5.7%), and abnormal dreams (3.2%, 0.3%, and 10.6%) for DOR, DRV+r, and EFV, respectively. Higher rates of central nervous system (CNS) AEs were reported for DOR when EFV was the comparator, while similar low rates of CNS AEs were reported for DOR when DRV+r was the comparator. In two prespecified analyses combining the DOR 100-mg arms and EFV arms from P007 and DRIVE-AHEAD, 2.8% vs. 6.1% discontinued due to AEs on the DOR- and EFV-treated arms, respectively, for a treatment difference of −3.4% (95% CI: −6.2, −0.8; P = 0.012); 25.0% vs. 55.9% of participants experienced ≥1 neuropsychiatric AE in DOR and EFV arms, respectively. Conclusion At Week 48, DOR was generally safe and well tolerated in ART-naïve adults with HIV-1. Statistically significantly lower proportions of DOR- than EFV-treated participants discontinued due to AEs supported by a lower proportion that discontinued due to DRAEs. Those on DOR had fewer CNS AEs compared with those on EFV, and less diarrhea than those on DRV+r. Disclosures M. Thompson, Merck & Co., Inc.: Research funding to AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta; no funds to me personally, Research funding to AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta; no funds to me personally. Bristol Myers Squibb: Research funding to AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta; no funds to me personally, Research funding to AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta; no funds to me personally. CytoDyn, Inc.: Research funding to AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta; no funds to me personally, Research funding to AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta; no funds to me personally. Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Research funding to AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta; no funds to me personally, Research funding to AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta; no funds to me personally. GlaxoSmithKline: Research funding to AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta; no funds to me personally, Research funding to AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta; no funds to me personally. Roche Laboratories: Research Funding, Research funding to AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta; no funds to me personally and Research grant. TaiMed, Inc.: Research Funding, Research funding to AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta; no funds to me personally and Research grant. ViiV Healthcare: Research Funding, Research funding to AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta; no funds to me personally. C. Orkin, AbbVie, Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, ViiV: Ad Board, Grant Investigator and Research Contractor, Research grant and Research support. J. M. Molina, Merck GIlead ViiV Janssen Teva: Ad Board and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee. Gilead Sciences: Grant Investigator, Research support. J. Gatell, Gilead Sciences: Grant and Independent Contractor, Consulting fee and Educational grant. Janssen: Grant and Independent Contractor, Consulting fee. ViiV Healthcare: Grant and Independent Contractor, Consulting fee. MSD: Grant and Independent Contractor, Consulting fee. P. Sax, Gilead: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting fee, Grant recipient and Research grant. ViiV Healthcare: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting fee, Grant recipient and Research grant. Merck: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting fee, Grant recipient and Research grant. Janssen: Consultant, Consulting fee. BMS, Gilead, Merck, GSK/ViiV: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient and Research grant. P. Cahn, Abbvie: Grant, Research grant. Merck: Grant, Advisory Board. ViiV Healthcare: Grant, Advisory Board. K. Squires, Merck & Co., Inc.: Ad Board, Ad Board. Gilead Sciences: Grant, Ad Board. VIIV: Ad Board, Ad Board. Bristol Myers Squibb: Ad Board, Ad Board. Janssen: Ad Board, Ad Board. Y. Zhou, Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee, Salary. X. Xu, Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee, Salary. A. Rodgers, Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. S. Kumar, Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. H. Teppler, Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. E. Martin, Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. G. Hanna, Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. C. Hwang, Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary.