Explore the vast range of titles available.

Weekend effect has been considered to be associated with poorer quality of care and patient’s survival. For acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients, the question of whether patients admitted during off-hours have worse outcomes as compared with patients admitted during on-hours is still inconclusive. We conducted this study to explore the weekend effect in AMI patients, using a nationwide insurance database in Taiwan. Using Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) claims database, we designed a retrospective cohort study, and extracted 184,769 incident cases of AMI through the NHI claims database between January 2006 and December 2014. We divided the patients into weekend admission group and weekday admission group. Patients were stratified as ST elevation/non-ST elevation AMI and receiving/not receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We used a logistic regression model to examine the relative risk of in-hospital mortality and 1-year mortality which were obtained from the Taiwan National Death Registry between study groups. We found no difference between weekend group and weekday group for risk of in-hospital mortality (15.8% vs 16.2%, standardized difference 0.0118) and risk of 1-year mortality (30.2% vs 30.9%, standardized difference 0.0164). There was no statistically significant difference among all the comparisons through the multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusting for all the covariates and stratifying by the subtypes of AMI and whether or not executing PCI during hospitalization. As for AMI patients in Taiwan, admission on weekends or weekdays did not have a significant impact on either in-hospital mortality or 1-year cumulative mortality.

Background Several studies have found a so-called weekend effect that patients admitted at the weekends had worse clinical outcomes than patients admitted at the weekdays. We performed this retrospective cohort study to explore the weekend effect in four major cardiovascular emergencies in Taiwan. Methods The Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) claims database between 2005 and 2015 was used. We extracted 3811 incident cases of ruptured aortic aneurysm, 184,769 incident cases of acute myocardial infarction, 492,127 incident cases of ischemic stroke, and 15,033 incident cases of pulmonary embolism from 9,529,049 patients having at least one record of hospitalization in the NHI claims database within 2006 ~ 2014. Patients were classified as weekends or weekdays admission groups. Dates of in-hospital mortality and one-year mortality were obtained from the Taiwan National Death Registry. Results We found no difference in in-hospital mortality between weekend group and weekday group in patients with ruptured aortic aneurysm (45.4% vs 45.3%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87–1.17, p  = 0.93), patients with acute myocardial infarction (15.8% vs 16.2%, adjusted OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95–1.00, p  = 0.10), patients with ischemic stroke (4.1% vs 4.2%, adjusted OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96–1.03, p  = 0.71), and patients with pulmonary embolism (14.6% vs 14.6%, adjusted OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.92–1.15, p  = 0.66). The results remained for 1 year in all the four major cardiovascular emergencies. Conclusions We found no difference in either short-term or long-term mortality between patients admitted on weekends and patients admitted on weekdays in four major cardiovascular emergencies in Taiwan.

Randomized trials suggest that radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may be more effective than percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the survival advantage of RFA needs confirmation in daily practice. We conducted a population-based cohort study using the Taiwan Cancer Registry, National Health Insurance claim database and National Death Registry data from 2004 through 2009. Patients receiving PEI or RFA as first-line treatment for newly-diagnosed stage I-II HCC were enrolled. A total of 658 patients receiving RFA and 378 patients receiving PEI treatment were included for final analysis. The overall survival (OS) rates of patients in the RFA and PEI groups at 5-year were 55% and 42%, respectively (p < 0.01). Compared to patients that received PEI, those that received RFA had lower risks of overall mortality and first-line treatment failure (FTF), with adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) [95% confidence interval (CI)] of 0.60 (0.50-0.73) for OS and 0.54 (0.46-0.64) for FTF. The favorable outcomes for the RFA group were consistently significant for patients with tumors > 2 cm as well as for those with tumors < 2 cm. Consistent results were also observed in other subgroup analyses defined by gender, age, tumor stage, and co-morbidity status. RFA provides better survival benefits than PEI for patients with unresectable stage I-II HCC, irrespective of tumors > 2 cm or ≤ 2 cm, in contemporary clinical practice.

Objective To assess the relationship between smoking status and health-related quality of life 1 year after participation in a smoking cessation programme in Taiwan. Design A cohort study of smokers who voluntarily participated in a smoking cessation programme with two follow-up assessments of smoking status via telephone interview, conducted 6 months and 1 year after finishing the smoking cessation programme. Setting Hospitals and clinics providing smoking cessation services. Participants A total of 3514 participants completed both telephone interviews, which represents a response rate of 64%. After the interviews, participants were divided into four groups according to their smoking status: (1) long-term quitters: participants who had quit tobacco use for 1 year; (2) short-term quitters: participants who had been smoking for at least 6 months and then quit tobacco for 6 months after participating in the programme; (3) relapsed smokers: participants who relapsed into tobacco use after ceasing tobacco use for 6 months; and (4) continuing smokers: participants who failed to quit smoking for at least 1 year, despite participating in the programme. Interventions The Outpatient Smoking Cessation Service of Taiwan provides counselling and pharmacotherapy to individuals seeking to quit smoking. Primary outcomes The health-related quality of life of the participants was measured using an approved Chinese version of the EuroQol-5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L) descriptive system. Results After controlling for sex, age, education, marital status, job status, monthly income and disease status at baseline, our results revealed that long-term (OR=0.61 (0.48 to 0.77)) and short-term (OR=0.65 (0.54 to 0.79)) quitters experienced less anxiety and depression than did continuing smokers. Conclusions Our study provides evidence to support claims that all quitters, regardless of whether they stop smoking for 6 months or 1 year, have better quality of life with regard to anxiety or depression.

ObjectivesOne feature unique to the Taiwanese healthcare system is the ability of physicians other than oncologists to prescribe systemic chemotherapy. This study investigated whether the care paths implemented by oncologists and non-oncologists differ with regard to patient outcomes.SettingData from the Taiwan Cancer Registry and National Health Insurance Database were linked to identify patients with colon cancer who underwent colectomy as first treatment within 3 months of diagnosis and adjuvant chemotherapy between 2005 and 2009.Participants and methodsPostoperative patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy were included in this study. The exclusion criteria included patients with stage IV disease, a positive surgical margin and early disease recurrence. Among the patients presenting with multiple primary cancers, we also excluded patients who were diagnosed with colon cancer but for whom this was not the first primary cancer. The variables included sex, age, comorbidities, disease stage, chemotherapy cycle and changes in treatment regimen as well as the specialty of treatment providers and their case volume. Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to examine differences in outcomes in the matched cohorts.ResultsWe examined 3534 patients who were prescribed adjuvant chemotherapy by physicians from different disciplines. In terms of 5-year disease-free survival, no significant difference was observed between the groups of oncologists or surgeons among patients with stage II (90.02%vs88.99%) or stage III (77.64%vs79.99%) diseases. Patients who were subjected to changes in their chemotherapy regimens presented recurrence rates higher than those who were not.ConclusionsThe discipline of practitioners is seldom taken into account in most series. This is the first study to provide empirical evidence demonstrating that the outcomes of patients with colon cancer do not depend on the treatment path, as long as the selection criteria for adjuvant chemotherapy is appropriate. Further study will be required before making any further conclusions.

The clinical outcomes of different limus-based drug-eluting stents (DES) in a real-world setting have not been well defined. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of three different limus-based DES, namely sirolimus-eluting stent (SES), Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES) and everolimus-eluting stent (EES), using a national insurance claims database. We identified all patients who received implantation of single SES, E-ZES or EES between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2009 from the National Health Insurance claims database, Taiwan. Follow-up was through December 31, 2011 for all selected clinical outcomes. The primary end-point was all-cause mortality. Secondary end-points included acute coronary events, heart failure needing hospitalization, and cerebrovascular disease. Cox regression model adjusting for baseline characteristics was used to compare the relative risks of different outcomes among the three different limus-based DES. Totally, 6584 patients were evaluated (n=2142 for SES, n=3445 for E-ZES, and n=997 for EES). After adjusting for baseline characteristics, we found no statistically significant difference in the risk of all-cause mortality in three DES groups (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94-1.38, p=0.20 in E-ZES group compared with SES group; adjusted HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.54-1.10, p=0.15 in EES group compared with SES group). Similarly, we found no difference in the three stent groups in risks of acute coronary events, heart failure needing hospitalization, and cerebrovascular disease. In conclusion, we observed no difference in all-cause mortality, acute coronary events, heart failure needing hospitalization, and cerebrovascular disease in patients treated with SES, E-ZES, and EES in a real-world population-based setting in Taiwan.

Little is known about the discrepancies in the burden of child mental disorders based on differences in prevalence between populations with and without care. Identifying such discrepancies may help to elucidate the unmet needs related to child mental disorders. We compared the years lived with disability (YLD) between children with and without care for mental disorders using a representative national survey, Taiwan’s National Epidemiological Study of Child Mental Disorders (TNESCMD), and a national health facility database, the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (TNHIRD). The comorbidity-adjusted YLD rate ratio (RR) was reported to quantify the YLD discrepancy. The overall YLD rate for all mental disorders in the TNESCMD was 9.05 times higher than that in the TNHIRD with the lowest and highest YLD RRs for autism spectrum disorder (RR 3.51) and anxiety disorders (RR 360.00). Unlike the YLD proportion explained by attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder, the proportions explained by anxiety disorders and conduct disorder/oppositional defiant disorder relative to the total YLD were relatively lower in the TNHIRD than in TNESCMD and the Global Burden of Disease 2016. The discrepancies in YLD between populations with and without care in child mental disorders ranged from ± 55% to 99% and had an overall value of ± 80.1%. High YLD discrepancies in child mental disorders between estimates based on the general population and those in health facilities suggest significant unmet needs for care in child mental disorders and that estimates of disease burden that rely heavily on a single source may result in unreliable results.

Alpha-blockers are notorious for their first-dose effect of acute hypotension during the early initiation period. Because acute cerebral hypoperfusion may precipitate an episode of ischemic stroke, we aimed to provide a quantitative estimate of the risk of ischemic stroke during the early initiation period of α-blocker therapy, using a self-controlled case series design. We identified all men aged 50 years or more as of 2007 who were incident users of α-blockers and had a diagnosis of ischemic stroke during the 2007–2009 study period using claims data from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance claims database. The first day on which the α-blocker was prescribed was the index date. We partitioned different risk periods according to their relationship to the index date (pre-exposure risk periods 1 and 2 = ≤ 21 d and 22–60 d before index date, respectively; post-exposure risk periods 1 and 2 = ≤ 21 d and 22–60 d after index date, respectively); the remainder of the study period was defined as the unexposed period. We estimated the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of ischemic stroke in each risk period relative to the unexposed period using a conditional Poisson regression model. A total of 7502 men were included. Compared with the risk in the unexposed period, the risk of ischemic stroke was increased in post-exposure risk period 1 among all patients in the study population (adjusted IRR 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22–1.61) and among patients without concomitant prescriptions for other antihypertensive agents (adjusted IRR 2.11, 95% CI 1.73–2.57). Alpha-blocker therapy was associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke during the early initiation period, especially among patients who were not taking other antihypertensive agents.

Background Although performance measurement for assessing care quality is an emerging area, a system for measuring the quality of cancer care at the hospital level has not been well developed. The purpose of this study was to develop organization-based core measures for colorectal cancer patient care and apply these measures to compare hospital performance. Methods The development of core measures for colorectal cancer has undergone three stages including a modified Delphi method. The study sample originated from 2004 data in the Taiwan Cancer Database, a national cancer data registry. Eighteen hospitals and 5585 newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients were enrolled in this study. We used indicator-based and case-based approaches to examine adherences simultaneously. Results The final core measure set included seventeen indicators (1 pre-treatment, 11 treatment-related and 5 monitoring-related). There were data available for ten indicators. Indicator-based adherence possesses more meaningful application than case-based adherence for hospital comparisons. Mean adherence was 85.8% (79.8% to 91%) for indicator-based and 82.8% (77.6% to 88.9%) for case-based approaches. Hospitals performed well (>90%) for five out of eleven indicators. Still, the performance across hospitals varied for many indicators. The best and poorest system performance was reflected in indicators T5-negative surgical margin (99.3%, 97.2% - 100.0%) and T7-lymph nodes harvest more than twelve(62.7%, 27.6% - 92.2%), both of which related to surgical specimens. Conclusions In this nationwide study, quality of colorectal cancer care still shows room for improvement. These preliminary results indicate that core measures for cancer can be developed systematically and applied for internal quality improvement.

Among patients with concomitant prescriptions for antihypertensive agents, the incidence of ischemic stroke in post-exposure risk period 1 was similar to that in the unexposed period (adjusted IRR 1.07, 95% CI 0.88-1.29), whereas the incidence in post-exposure risk period 2 was significantly lower than in the unexposed period (adjusted IRR 0.67, 95% CI 0.56-0.81). In contrast, among patients without concomitant prescriptions for antihypertensive agents, the incidence of ischemic stroke was significantly higher in post-exposure risk period 1 than in the unexposed period (adjusted IRR 2.11, 95% CI 1.73- 2.57), whereas the incidence in post-exposure risk period 2 was similar to that in the unexposed period (adjusted IRR 1.06, 95% CI 0.86-1.31). Irrespective of whether patients had concomitant prescriptions for antihypertensive agents, the incidence of ischemic stroke was significantly higher in both pre-exposure risk periods than in the unexposed period (Table 2). In our study of claims data for more than 7500 older men in Taiwan prescribed an α-blocker, we observed an increased risk of ischemic stroke in the early initiation period (within 21 d after the start of treatment) and a reduced risk in the late initiation period (22-60 d after the start of treatment). In our stratified analysis, only patients without concomitant exposure to other antihypertensive agents had an increased risk of ischemic stroke during the early initiation period of α-blocker therapy. In contrast, patients already using antihypertensive agents had no increased risk of ischemic stroke in the early postexposure period and even had a decreased risk of stroke after treatment for more than 3 weeks. The increased risk of ischemic stroke during the early initiation period of α-blocker therapy was observed for nearly all of the α-blockers studied. Alpha-blockers are notorious for their firstdose effect of acute hypotension during the early initiation period.5,7,8 Although several studies have shown that α-blocker therapy could improve cerebral blood flow after treatment for 4-8 weeks,20,21 acute hypotension associated with antihypertensive therapy could precipitate cerebral hypoperfusion and ischemic stroke.2-4,11 One possible explanation of our findings was that patients without underlying hypertension were vulnerable to the first-dose effect of α-blockers and contributed to the observed increase in risk of ischemic stroke in the early initiation period of α-blockers in the whole study population. In contrast, patients with underlying hypertension appeared to be tolerant of the firstdose effect of α-blockers, benefited from the positive influence of α-blockers on cerebral blood flow and contributed to the observed decrease in risk of ischemic stroke in the late initiation period in the whole study population.