Explore the vast range of titles available.

BackgroundHyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is performed with a wide variation in methodology, drugs, and other elements vital to the procedure. Adoption of a limited number of regimens could increase the collective experience of peritoneal oncologists, make comparison between studies more meaningful, and lead to a greater acceptance of results from randomized trials. This study aimed to determine the possibility of standardizing HIPEC methodology and regimens and to identify the best method of performing such a standardization.MethodsA critical review of preclinical and clinical studies evaluating the pharmacokinetic aspects of different HIPEC drugs and drug regimens, the impact of hyperthermia, and the efficacy of various HIPEC regimens as well as studies comparing different regimens was performed.ResultsThe preclinical and clinical data were limited, and studies comparing different regimens were scarce. Many of the regimens were neither supported by preclinical rationale or data nor validated by a dose-escalating formal phase 1 trial. All the regimens were based on pharmacokinetic data and did not take chemosensitivity of peritoneal metastases into account. Personalized medicine approaches such as patient-derived tumor organoids could offer a solution to this problem, although clinical validation is likely to be challenging.ConclusionsApart from randomized trials, more translational research and phases 1 and 2 studies are needed. While waiting for better preclinical and clinical evidence, the best way to minimize heterogeneity is by an expert consensus that aims to identify and define a limited number of regimens for each indication and primary site. The choice of regimen then can be tailored to the patient profile and its expected toxicity and the methodology according regional factors.

BackgroundControversies still persist regarding the terminology and pathologic classification of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms and associated pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). We assessed reproducibility and prognostic significance of the classification recently proposed by the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI).MethodsA prospective database of 265 PMP patients uniformly treated by cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) from 1995 to 2017 was reviewed. According to the PSOGI, peritoneal disease was retrospectively classified into three categories: low-grade (LG-PMP), high-grade (HG-PMP), and signet-ring cells (SRC-PMP). Acellular mucin (AC) was classified separately. The extent of peritoneal involvement was quantified by the peritoneal cancer index (PCI).ResultsTwenty-six patients were diagnosed with AC (9.8%), 197 with LG-PMP (74.4%), 38 with HG-PMP (14.3%), and 4 with SRC-PMP (1.5%). In the overall series, median follow-up was 65.5 months (95% confidence interval 53.7–78.8) and 10-year overall survival was 62.9% (median 148.7 months). Operative death occurred in 10 patients (3.8%) and major complications occurred in 89 patients (33.6%). Ten-year survival was 89.6% for AC, 63.2% for LG-PMP, 40.1% for HG-PMP, and 0 for SRC-PMP. In a multivariate model, the World Health Organization (WHO) pathological classification independently correlated with survival (p = 0.028). In a separate model, the PSOGI classification did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.149). Completeness of cytoreduction and PCI > 22 correlated with prognosis in both models.ConclusionsAC and SRC-PMP pathological categories of the PSOGI classification identified two subsets of patients with favorable and exceedingly dismal prognosis, respectively. It remains unclear whether the PSOGI classification might provide better prognostic stratification than the current WHO classification. Further studies in larger prospective series are needed.

BackgroundSelecting patients with colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRC-PMs) for surgery is still a concern. Biological features have the potential to improve prognostic stratification, but their significance in this clinical setting is still unclear. We assessed the prognostic impact of primary side and KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA mutations in patients treated with either cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) or CRS alone.MethodsWe reviewed a prospective database of 152 CRC-PM patients selected to undergo perioperative systemic chemotherapy and CRS with or without HIPEC. Extensive mutational analysis of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In 68 patients, Ion Torrent next-generation sequencing technology was used to characterize the hotspot regions of 50 genes.ResultsThe primary tumor was right-sided in 61 patients (40.1%) and left-sided in 91 patients (59.9%). Right-sided primaries were associated with mutated KRAS (p = 0.01) and normal carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA; p = 0.03). KRAS was mutated in 71/152 patients (46.7%), NRAS in 7/152 patients (4.6%), BRAF in 10/152 patients (6.6%), PIK3CA in 17/78 patients (25.0%), TP53 in 37/68 patients (54.4%), APC in 25/68 patients (36.7%), SMAD4 in 13/68 patients (19.1%), and FBXW7 in 5/68 patients (7.4%). Median follow-up was 54.9 months and median survival from PM diagnosis was 45.1 months. The right-sided primary (hazard ratio [HR] 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43–0.89; p = 0.011), BRAF mutations (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.05–4.63; p = 0.038), and Peritoneal Cancer Index (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.03–2.10; p = 0.036) independently correlated with poorer survival, while APC mutations univariately correlated with better survival (p = 0.03).ConclusionsBRAF mutations and right-sided primary are adverse prognostic factors that may be used to optimize therapeutic strategies. APC may be involved in CRC-PM development and progression.

Background We conducted a prognostic analysis of preoperative parameters and Ki-67 determination to develop selection criteria for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC in patients with diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM). Methods DMPM patients treated with CRS and HIPEC at NCI of Milan participated in this study. Multivariate analysis was conducted using Cox proportional hazard model and conditional inference tree method to select independent predictors of overall survival (OS) from the followings pre-cytoreduction parameters: age, sex, ECOG performance status, Charlson comorbidity index, previous systemic chemotherapy, CA-125, histological subtype (epithelioid vs. biphasic/sarcomatoid), Ki-67 (determined with immunohistochemistry), and peritoneal cancer index (PCI). Results A total of 117 patients (male/female: 67/50) with median age of 60.5 (range 22–75) years were included. Eighty-three patients had ECOG performance status = 0, median Charlson comorbidity index was 4 (range 2–9), and 102 cases had epithelioid subtype. Median Ki-67 was 5 % (range 1–60). Ninety-four (80.3 %) cases were optimally cytoreduced. The Cox analysis identified Ki-67, PCI, and histological subtype as independent prognosticators of OS. Conditional inference tree method identified three prognostic subsets: (I) Ki-67 ≤ 9 %; (II) Ki-67 > 9 % and PCI ≤ 17; and (III) Ki-67 > 9 % and PCI > 17. The median OS for subsets I, II, and III were, 86.6, 63.2, and 10.3 months, respectively. Conclusions Ki-67 is a powerful prognosticator that allows, along with PCI, and histological subtype, a good prediction of OS in patients with DMPM. Patients with Ki-67 > 9 % and PCI > 17 are unlikely to benefit from the procedure and should be considered for other treatment protocols.

Background Peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer (CRCPM) are related to poor prognosis. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been reported to improve survival, but peritoneal recurrence rates are still high and there is no consensus on the drug of choice for HIPEC. The aim of this study was to use patient derived organoids (PDO) to build a relevant CRCPM model to improve HIPEC efficacy in a comprehensive bench-to-bedside strategy. Methods Oxaliplatin (L-OHP), cisplatin (CDDP), mitomycin-c (MMC) and doxorubicin (DOX) were used to mimic HIPEC on twelve PDO lines derived from twelve CRCPM patients, using clinically relevant concentrations. After chemotherapeutic interventions, cell viability was assessed with a luminescent assay, and the obtained dose–response curves were used to determine the half-maximal inhibitory concentrations. Also, induction of apoptosis by different HIPEC interventions on PDOs was studied by evaluating CASPASE3 cleavage. Results Response to drug treatments varied considerably among PDOs. The two schemes with better response at clinically relevant concentrations included MMC alone or combined with CDDP. L-OHP showed relative efficacy only when administered at low concentrations over a long perfusion period. PDOs showed that the short course/high dose L-OHP scheme did not appear to be an effective choice for HIPEC in CRCPM. HIPEC administered under hyperthermia conditions enhanced the effect of chemotherapy drugs against cancer cells, affecting PDO viability and apoptosis. Finally, PDO co-cultured with cancer-associated fibroblast impacted HIPEC treatments by increasing PDO viability and reducing CASPASES activity. Conclusions Our study suggests that PDOs could be a reliable in vitro model to evaluate HIPEC schemes at individual-patient level and to develop more effective treatment strategies for CRCPM.

A reduction of mean arterial pressure (MAP) below 65 mmHg for at least one minute is associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes, including acute kidney injury, myocardial injury, prolonged hospital length of stay, increased in-hospital and postoperative mortality [2]. Hemodynamic management (fluids and vasopressors) followed institutional protocol (evaluation of HPI, SVV, Eadyn and dP/dtmax), which considers the main mechanisms of hypotension (hypovolemia, vasoplegia, and decreased contractility). According to the literature, a hypotensive burden greater than 0.3 mmHg is considered high [2, 5]. [...]hemodynamic fluctuations and hypotensive burden during CRS + HIPEC are a major concern, especially when in mesothelioma surgery.

BackgroundNon-gynecologic rare peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs) often are misdiagnosed as disseminated ovarian cancer and initially treated by gynecologic surgeons. This study aimed to assess whether these previous maneuvers (i.e., full surgical staging and/or cytoreductive attempts) affect outcomes after the definitive surgery performed in a tertiary center.MethodsThe study reviewed 298 women affected by non-gynecologic PSM who underwent cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after previous gynecologic surgery. Prior surgery was categorized as limited surgery (pLS: abdominal exploration with biopsy plus adnexectomy and/or appendectomy) or extended surgery (pES: full surgical staging or cytoreductive attempts including hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy).ResultsOf the 298 patients, 143 had pLS and 153 had pES. Morbidity was similar between the groups (P = 0.143), but the pES group had more severe urinary tract injuries (19 vs. 3; P < 0.001), longer operating time (585.9 vs. 506.7; P = 0.027), and more patients needing more than two anastomoses (41 vs. 26; P = 0.033). Age older than 55 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.42; P = 0.009) and number of anastomoses (OR 3.17; P = 0.002) correlated with severe morbidity; pES correlated with urinary tract grades 3 and 4 injuries (OR 7.9; P = 0.001). The 5-year cumulative incidence of locoregional relapse was significantly higher in the pES group (0.41 vs. 0.27; P = 0.012; median follow-up period, 69 months). The multivariate analysis identified a Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI) higher than 20 and pES as independent risk factors.ConclusionFor women undergoing CRS±HIPEC for non-gynecologic PSM, the risk for locoregional relapse and severe postsurgical urinary tract complications is increased by pES. Therefore, prior full surgical staging or cytoreductive attempts without definitive gynecologic histology should be avoided. Prophylactic ureteral stenting and stricter oncologic follow-up assessment must be considered in this scenario.