Explore the vast range of titles available.

The notion of a “serious” genetic condition is commonly used in clinical contexts, laws, and policies to define and delineate both the permissibility of and, access to, reproductive genomic technologies. Yet, the notion lacks conceptual and operational clarity, which can lead to its inconsistent appraisal and application. A common understanding of the relevant considerations of “serious” is lacking. This article addresses this conceptual gap. We begin by outlining existing distinctions around the notion of “serious” that will factor into its appraisal and need to be navigated, in the context of prenatal testing and the use of reproductive genomic technologies. These include tensions between clinical care and population health; the impact of categorizing a condition as “serious”; and the role of perception of quality of life. We then propose a set of four core dimensions and four procedural elements that can serve as a conceptual tool to prompt a mapping of the features of seriousness in any given context. Ultimately, consideration of these core dimensions and procedural elements may lead to improvements in the quality and consistency of decision-making where the seriousness of a genetic condition is a pivotal component at both a policy and practice level.

We aimed to assess the definition of actionability of secondary findings in childhood, using a screening framework. For 31 disorders on the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics SF v.2.0 list, World Health Organization screening criteria were applied to assess actionability in childhood. The age of onset was variable. We categorized disorders based on the proportion of cases that presented in childhood: rare (n = 6), fewer than half the cases (n = 9), the majority of cases (n = 12), or unclear (n = 4). The age at initiation of intervention was based on the youngest age of onset reported, not evidence of the benefit of early intervention. For 15 disorders, guidelines were supported by a moderate quality of evidence for at least one recommendation. Only tuberous sclerosis complex had recommendations based on high-quality evidence. All others were based on evidence of low or very low quality. We propose that actionability in childhood should be based on the proportion of cases that manifest in childhood and the quality of the evidence supporting intervention recommendations. Ideally, disclosure in childhood would be limited to disorders for which a majority of cases present in childhood and for which interventions are supported by evidence of at least moderate quality (i.e., multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2, retinoblastoma, tuberous sclerosis complex, Marfan syndrome, and Wilson's disease).

Purpose and scopeThe aim of this Position Statement is to provide recommendations for Canadian medical geneticists, clinical laboratory geneticists, genetic counsellors and other physicians regarding the use of genome-wide sequencing of germline DNA in the context of clinical genetic diagnosis. This statement has been developed to facilitate the clinical translation and development of best practices for clinical genome-wide sequencing for genetic diagnosis of monogenic diseases in Canada; it does not address the clinical application of this technology in other fields such as molecular investigation of cancer or for population screening of healthy individuals.Methods of statement developmentTwo multidisciplinary groups consisting of medical geneticists, clinical laboratory geneticists, genetic counsellors, ethicists, lawyers and genetic researchers were assembled to review existing literature and guidelines on genome-wide sequencing for clinical genetic diagnosis in the context of monogenic diseases, and to make recommendations relevant to the Canadian context. The statement was circulated for comment to the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists (CCMG) membership-at-large and, following incorporation of feedback, approved by the CCMG Board of Directors. The CCMG is a Canadian organisation responsible for certifying medical geneticists and clinical laboratory geneticists, and for establishing professional and ethical standards for clinical genetics services in Canada.Results and conclusionsRecommendations include (1) clinical genome-wide sequencing is an appropriate approach in the diagnostic assessment of a patient for whom there is suspicion of a significant monogenic disease that is associated with a high degree of genetic heterogeneity, or where specific genetic tests have failed to provide a diagnosis; (2) until the benefits of reporting incidental findings are established, we do not endorse the intentional clinical analysis of disease-associated genes other than those linked to the primary indication; and (3) clinicians should provide genetic counselling and obtain informed consent prior to undertaking clinical genome-wide sequencing. Counselling should include discussion of the limitations of testing, likelihood and implications of diagnosis and incidental findings, and the potential need for further analysis to facilitate clinical interpretation, including studies performed in a research setting. These recommendations will be routinely re-evaluated as knowledge of diagnostic and clinical utility of clinical genome-wide sequencing improves. While the document was developed to direct practice in Canada, the applicability of the statement is broader and will be of interest to clinicians and health jurisdictions internationally.

Background Conventional genetic tests (CGT) are currently employed in Canada to investigate rare genetic disorders (RGD) but costs related to their use have been scarcely examined. We aimed to estimate the total hospital costs for children suspected of having rare genetic diseases. Methods This was a retrospective study based on the patients’ medical records. The analysis adopted the hospital’s perspective and the total hospitalization cost was assessed using an inhospital cost database, which included direct costs (e.g., lab tests, drugs), and indirect costs (e.g., hospital overheads). We provide mean costs with 95% confidence intervals obtained with bootstrap analyses. Results Data from a total of 223 children were analyzed. Mean age was 3.0 years and 119 (53.4%) were male. The average length of hospital stay was 42 days. The mean hospitalization cost per patient in the CGT cohort was $170,337 (95% CI. 128,231 − 219,277). The cost for newborns (0–30 days), $219,498 (95% CI. 144,061–312,395), was higher than for other age categories ( p  = 0.0914). Conclusion Hospitalization costs for the CGT cohort were substantially greater than hospitalization costs for the general pediatric population. Subgroup analyses revealed that newborns investigated with CGT were the most expensive among all pediatric cases.

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) is the most common orthopedic condition requiring surgery, affecting 4% of adolescents. There is currently no proven method or prognostic test to identify symptomatic patients at risk of developing severe scoliosis who could benefit from growth-guided devices or minimally invasive non-fusion instrumentation surgeries. These innovative treatments must be performed at an early disease stage in younger patients to benefit from their growth potential. In this prospective cross-sectional study, we investigated the clinical utility of circulating microRNAs (miRNAs), an important class of small non-coding RNA, as biomarkers to predict the risk of developing severe scoliosis in AIS. Blood samples and clinical data were collected from 116 AIS patients who were followed until skeletal maturity and stratified according to their clinical outcome. Genome-wide expression profiling of miRNAs was performed with plasma obtained at the time of diagnosis of AIS (mean age of 13.3 ± 1.7 years with a mean Cobb angle of 24.4° ± 12.4°). This approach led to the identification of 15 circulating miRNAs that are upregulated in AIS patients who developed a severe scoliosis (Cobb angle ≥ 45°) at skeletal maturity compared to moderate and mild scoliosis groups (Cobb angle between 25°-44° and < 25° respectively). After optimization and the application of Random Forest Models a panel of six miRNAs (miR-1-3p, miR-19a-3p, miR-19b-3p, miR-133b, miR-143-3p, and miR-148b-3p) out of 15 led us to develop an algorithm predicting the risk of developing a severe scoliosis with great accuracy (100%), sensitivity (100%) and specificity (100%). Having a scoliosis predictive bioassay and decision-making tools to predict curve progression in order to find the best treatment plan will undoubtedly transform the orthopedic care system in the field of pediatric scoliosis by integrating innovative precision medicine approaches. In addition, investigation of genes targeted by these miRNAs could fill our gaps in our understanding of AIS pathogenesis and reveal new actionable targets.

Background Canadian policies regarding the implementation and public coverage of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) are heterogeneous and shifting, with NIPT being publicly covered for high-risk pregnancies in some provinces, but not others. Such a diverse and evolving policy landscape provides fertile ground for examining the preferences of pregnant women, their partners, and health professionals regarding the implementation and coverage of NIPT by the public healthcare system, as well as the factors influencing their preferences, which is what the present study does. Methods In this paper, we report the results of three-large scale Canadian surveys, in which 882 pregnant women, 395 partners of pregnant women, and 184 healthcare professionals participated. Results The paper focuses on preferences regarding how and when NIPT should be used, as well as the factors influencing these preferences, and how coverage for NIPT should be provided. These are correlated with respondents’ levels of knowledge about Down syndrome and testing technologies and with their stated intended use of NIPT results. Conclusion Salient is the marked difference between the preferences of prospective parents and those of healthcare professionals, which has potential implications for Canadian policy regarding NIPT implementation and insurance coverage.

Background In the near future, developments in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) may offer couples the opportunity to expand the range of genetic conditions tested with this technology. This possibility raises a host of ethical and social concerns, such as the type of information (medical vs. non-medical information) that couples might be exposed to and how this might complicate their informed decision-making. Currently, only limited research, mainly carried out in western countries, was conducted on women’s and partners’ views regarding the potential expansion of NIPT. Methods This study used semi-structured interviews with pregnant women and their partners to explore their views on future potential NIPT applications such as non-medical sex selection and non-medical traits, paternity testing, and NIPT use for fetal whole genome sequencing (FWGS). It was conducted in Lebanon and Quebec, as case studies to explore the impact of cultural differences on these views. Results We found no differences and many similarities when comparing the perceptions of participants in both contexts. While couples in both settings disapproved of the use of NIPT for non-medical sex selection and non-medical traits such as physical characteristics, they were near-unanimous about their support for its use for paternity testing in specific cases, such as legal doubts or conflicts related to the identity of the father. Participants were more ambivalent about NIPT for Fetal Whole Genome Sequencing. They supported this use to detect conditions that would express at birth or early childhood, while objecting to testing for adult-onset conditions. Conclusions These results can further inform the debate on the future uses of NIPT and future policy related its implementation.

Background The clinical introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidies is currently transforming the landscape of prenatal screening in many countries. Since it is noninvasive, safe and allows the early detection of abnormalities, NIPT expanded rapidly and the test is currently commercially available in most of the world. As NIPT is being introduced globally, its clinical implementation should consider various challenges, including the role of the surrounding social and cultural contexts. We conducted a qualitative study with healthcare professionals in Lebanon and Quebec as case studies, to highlight the relevance of cultural contexts and to explore the concerns that should be taken into account for an ethical implementation of NIPT. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 healthcare professionals (HCPs), 10 from each country, practicing in the field of prenatal screening and follow up diagnostic testing, including obstetricians and gynecologists, nurses, medical geneticists and, genetic counselors. We aimed to 1) explore HCPs’ perceptions and views regarding issues raised by NIPT and 2) to shed light on ways in which the introduction of the same technology (NIPT) in two different contexts (Lebanon and Quebec) raises common and different challenges that are influenced by the cultural norms and legal policies in place. Results We identified challenges to the ethical implementation of NIPT. Some are common to both contexts, including financial/economic, social, and organizational/ educational challenges. Others are specific to each context. For example, challenges for Lebanon include abortion policy and financial profit, and in Quebec challenges include lobbying by Disability rights associations and geographical access to NIPT. Conclusions Our findings highlight the need to consider specific issues related to various cultural contexts when developing frameworks that can guide an ethically sound implementation of NIPT. Further, they show that healthcare professional education and training remain paramount in order to provide NIPT counseling in a way that supports pregnant women and couples’ choice.

In this paper, we explore key aspects of the complex ethical and legal landscape surrounding consent in the context of incorporating genomic sequencing into existing newborn bloodspot screening programs. In particular, we consider the potential impact of genomic sequencing on the health rights of the child in relation to existing consent practices in newborn screening. We begin with an introduction to newborn screening programs and their population health goals. We then discuss public health ethics as a rationale underpinning newborn screening before turning to consent. We go on to describe seven current research projects on genomic sequencing in newborn screening and then introduce the ‘right of the asymptomatic at-risk child to be found’ as a useful concept to draw on when considering consent to newborn screening. We draw on this novel right to argue for the adoption of “appropriate consent” when it comes to certain uses of genomics in newborn screening. We contend that, for ‘virtual panels’ at least, appropriate consent proportionately balances the ongoing universality of newborn screening for important health conditions with an acknowledgement of the complex outcomes that bringing a complicated diagnostic technology into the screening domain will generate.

We hypothesized that ethical criteria that guide the use of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) could be used to inform policies about expanded use of non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS). We used a systematic review of reasons approach to assess ethical criteria used to justify using (or not using) PGT for genetic conditions. Out of 1135 identified documents, we retained and analyzed 216 relevant documents. Results show a clear distinction in acceptability of PGT for medical vs. non-medical conditions. Criteria to decide on use of PGT for medical conditions are largely based on their severity, but there is no clear definition of “severity”. Instead, characteristics of the condition that relate to severity are used as sub-criteria to assess severity. We found that characteristics that are used as sub-criteria for assessing severity include monogenic etiology, high penetrance, absence of treatment, early age of onset, shortened lifespan, and reduced quality of life. Consensus about the use of PGT is highest for conditions that meet most of these criteria. There is no consensus around the acceptability of using PGT to detect non-medical conditions. We propose that the same severity criteria could be used by policymakers to assess the acceptability of using other genetic tests in screening and practice, including for the use of NIPS for additional conditions as indications broaden.