Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
3
result(s) for
"Laifman Eric"
Sort by:
Life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias in congenital central hypoventilation syndrome
2020
Congenital central hypoventilation syndrome (CCHS) patients are at risk for life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias, and presentation is dependent on their PHOX2B gene mutation. We describe the presentation of life-threatening arrhythmias in our cohort of CCHS patients. We reviewed the records of 72 CCHS patients seen at CHLA from 2004 to 2018. Data collected included demographics, PHOX2B genotype, ventilatory support, clinical symptoms, ambulatory cardiac monitoring results, and presence of cardiac pacemaker. Sixteen of 72 patients had evidence of potential life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias. PHOX2B genotypes were 20/25 polyalanine repeat expansion mutation (PARM), 20/26 PARM, 20/27 PARM, 20/32 PARM, and c.245C > T non-polyalanine repeat mutation. 11/16 patients were ventilated during sleep only. Symptoms included syncope, dizziness, chest pain, tingling in the left arm, and palpitations. 15/16 patients had recorded ambulatory cardiac monitoring. 5/16 patients were symptomatic without significant sinus pauses. 12/16 patients had implantation of cardiac pacemakers. 9/12 had significant sinus pauses on ambulatory monitoring, and 7/12 patients were symptomatic.Conclusion: CCHS patients have potential life-threatening arrhythmias requiring cardiac pacemaker implantation. Many of these patients are symptomatic with significant sinus pauses on ambulatory monitoring. However, some symptomatic patients with no significant pauses on ambulatory monitoring may still require cardiac pacemaker implantation.What is Known:• CCHS patients are at risk for life-threatening sinus pauses and require cardiac pacemaker implantation.What is New:• CCHS patients regardless of PHOX2B genotype are at risk for significant sinus pauses. Many CCHS patients with significant sinus pause on ambulatory cardiac monitoring are symptomatic and most present with syncope. Some symptomatic patients do not have significant sinus pauses but may still require cardiac pacemaker implantation.
Journal Article
Correction to: Life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias in congenital central hypoventilation syndrome
2020
The publisher regrets that in the original published version of this article, one of the author’s name was incorrectly presented as “Yaniv Bar Cohen”. The correct presentation should have been “Yaniv Bar-Cohen” and is now presented correctly in this article.
Journal Article
Children with Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome Do Not Wake up to Ventilator Alarms
2022
PurposeCongenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome (CCHS) requires lifelong ventilatory support during sleep. Subjects with CCHS are vulnerable to sleep disturbances associated with treatments, monitoring alarms, and care they receive. We hypothesized that sleep would be disrupted in patients with CCHS due to ventilatory support and other treatments at night.MethodsAn anonymous survey of patients with CCHS, age up to 17 years was conducted through REDCAP. Subjects were recruited in person, by flyer, email, and social media. Data collected included demographics, PHOX2B genotype, ventilatory support, treatments, nursing, and sleep parameters.ResultsWe received 23 responses (35% female, 8.1 years ± 5.6). PHOX2B genotypes were 20/24 PARM (2), 20/25 PARM (4), 20/26 PARM (2), 20/27 PARM (9), ≥ 20/28 PARM (2), and NPARM (2). Two subjects did not indicate the PHOX2B genotype. 13/23 were ventilated by PPV via tracheostomy, 7 by NIPPV, 2 by diaphragm pacing, and 1 did not indicate. Additional treatments received at night included suctioning (9), aerosol (1), G-tube feeding (2), and none (11). Only 9 received nursing at night. 13 used pulse oximetry for monitoring, and 9 used both pulse oximetry and end tidal CO2 monitor. 17/23 rarely woke up due to ventilator or monitor alarms. 11/23 usually or sometimes woke up at least once a night; only 2/11 woke up due to alarms. 5/17 who rarely woke up to the alarms had night nursing.ConclusionMost subjects with CCHS did not awaken to ventilator or monitoring alarms and a majority of these patients did not have nighttime nursing. (Mathur et al. in Sleep 43(Supplement_1):A333, 2020)
Journal Article