Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Reading Level
      Reading Level
      Clear All
      Reading Level
  • Content Type
      Content Type
      Clear All
      Content Type
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Item Type
    • Is Full-Text Available
    • Subject
    • Publisher
    • Source
    • Donor
    • Language
    • Place of Publication
    • Contributors
    • Location
122 result(s) for "Lamarque, Peter"
Sort by:
Literary Form and Ethical Content
The paper offers a qualified endorsement of Terry Eagleton’s striking claim that “a work’s moral outlook … may be secreted as much in its form as its content”. A number of points are raised in defence of the claim: an argument for the inseparability, under certain conditions, of form and content in a literary work; an idea of moral content, not as derived moral principle, but as inward-facing interpretation grounded in an ethical vocabulary; the possibility of internal and external perspectives on fictional characters; and an emphasis on emotions expressed in, rather than caused by, narrative. Three literary examples are explored, to show how vocabulary, syntax, implicature, and tone, contribute to the emergence of moral salience. A consequence drawn is that the ethical stance readers take to a scene or incident is partially shaped by the narrative modes of its presentation. The overall perspective of the paper is that of aesthetic autonomism: the view that the aesthetic value of a work of literature is distinct from, and not reducible to, any instrumental moral values (positive or negative) attributed to the work.
In Memoriam: Ananta Charan Sukla .(In memoriam)
Sukla was a polymathic author, scholar and editor who showed extraordinary energy and vision, not only in creating and sustaining an international journal, the Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics (JCLA), but in numerous scholarly projects of his own, covering literature, philosophy and aesthetics, always with a rich, well-informed, cross-cultural and interdisciplinary flair. The contents of the journal attest to this enlightened conception, free from theoretical orthodoxy, dogma, or ideology, and encouraging a broad sweep of interests, international in scope, hospitable to a diversity of approaches. In lesser hands an edited volume on the theme 'Fiction and Art' might restrict itself to some limited aspects of fictional representation in, say, literature, possibly painting.
On Not Being Too Formalistic About Aesthetic Value
I hope to show how we might resist a certain kind of formalism in talking about aesthetic value: in particular, given my own interests, when talking about the aesthetic value of literary works, poetry, say, or the novel. It is a sensitive topic for me because I have sometimes been charged with being a formalist in my writing about literature: a charge that seems to arise out of my rejection of truth as one of the core values of literature.1 But I don’t see myself as a formalist—in any recognizable sense of the term—but I do think that literary works exhibit aesthetic values.
The Uselessness of Art
Lamarque attempts to build a case on behalf of the uselessness of art that rests partially on a reworked notion of art for art's sake. The first thing to note is that art for art's sakes makes no mention of the aesthetic.
Aesthetics and Literature: A Problematic Relation?
The paper argues that there is a proper place for literature within aesthetics but that care must be taken in identifying just what the relation is. In characterising aesthetic pleasure associated with literature it is all too easy to fall into reductive accounts, for example, of literature as merely \" fine writing\". Belleslettrist or formalistic accounts of literature are rejected, as are two other kinds of reduction, to pure meaning properties and to a kind of narrative realism. The idea is developed that literature— both poetry and prose fiction— invites its own distinctive kind of aesthetic appreciation which far from being at odds with critical practice, in fact chimes well with it.