Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Direct comparisons between lamivudine plus bPIs and lamivudine plus dolutegravir as maintenance strategies in virologically-suppressed HIV positive patients are lacking. Methods Time to treatment discontinuation (TD) and virological failure (VF) were compared in a cohort of HIV+ patients on a virologically-effective ART starting lamivudine with either darunavir/r, atazanavir/r or dolutegravir. Changes in laboratory parameters were also evaluated. Results Four-hundred-ninety-four patients were analyzed (170 switching to darunavir/r, 141 to atazanavir/r, 183 to dolutegravir): median age was 49 years, with 8 years since ART start. Groups differed for age, HIV-risk factor, time since HIV-diagnosis and on ART, previous therapy and reasons for switching. Estimated proportions free from TD at week 48 and 96 were 79.8 and 48.3% of patients with darunavir/r, 87.0 and 70.9% with atazanavir/r, and 88.2 and 82.6% with dolutegravir, respectively ( p  < 0.001). Calendar years, HIV-risk factor, higher baseline cholesterol and an InSTI-based previous regimen predicted TD, whereas lamivudine+dolutegravir therapy and previous tenofovir use were protective. VF was the cause of TD in 6/123 cases with darunavir/r, 4/97 with atazanavir/r and 3/21 with dolutegravir. Other main reasons for TD were: toxicity (43.1% with darunavir/r, 39.2% with atazanavir/r, 52.4% with dolutegravir), further simplification (36.6% with darunavir/r, 30.9% with atazanavir/r, 14.3% with dolutegravir). Incidence of VF did not differ among study groups ( p  = 0.747). No factor could predict VF. Lipid profile improved in the dolutegravir group, whereas renal function improved in the bPIs groups. Conclusions In real practice, a switch to lamivudine+dolutegravir showed similar efficacy but longer durability than a switch to lamivudine+bPIs.

Objectives The primary objective is to demonstrate that COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) prevents progression to severe pneumonia in elderly COVID-19 pneumonia patients with chronic comorbidities. Secondary objectives are to demonstrate that CCP decreases the viral load in nasopharyngeal swabs and increases the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titre in recipients. Trial design This is a randomized, open-label, parallel group, phase II/III study with a superiority framework. The trial starts with a screening phase II designed with two-tailed alpha=0.2. In case of positive results, the trial will proceed in a formally comparative phase III (alpha=0.05). Participants Adult patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 who are at risk according to CDC definition are eligible. Inclusion criteria are all the following: age ≥ 65; pneumonia at CT scan; PaO2/FiO2 ≥300 mmHg; presence of one or more comorbidities; signed informed consent. Exclusion criteria are one of the following: age < 65; PaO2/FiO2 < 300 mmHg; pending cardiopulmonary arrest; refusal to blood product transfusions; severe IgA deficiency; any life-threatening comorbidity or any other medical condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, makes the patient unsuitable for inclusion. The trial is being conducted at three reference COVID-19 centres in the middle of Italy. Intervention and comparator Intervention: COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma (CCP) in addition to standard therapy. Patients receive three doses (200 ml/day on 3 consecutive days) of ABO matched CCP. Comparator: Standard therapy Main outcomes A. Primary outcome for Phase II: Proportion of patients without progression in severity of pulmonary disease, defined as worsening of 2 points in the ordinal scale of WHO by day 14. B. Primary outcome for Phase III: Proportion of patients without progression in severity of pulmonary disease, defined as worsening of 2 points in the ordinal scale of WHO by day 14. Secondary outcomes for Phase III: Decreased viral load on nasopharyngeal swab at days 6, 9 and 14; Decreased viremia at days 6 and 9; Increased antibody titer against SARS-CoV2 at days 30 and 60; Proportion of patients with negative of SARS-CoV2 nasopharyngeal swab at day 30; Length of hospital stay; Mortality rate at day 28; Total plasma related adverse event (day 60); Total non-plasma related adverse events (day 60); Severe adverse events (SAE) (day 60). Randomisation Treatment allocation is randomized with a ratio 1:1 in both phase II and phase III. Randomization sequences will be generated at Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS through the RedCap web application. Randomized stratification is performed according to age (under/over 80 years), and sex. Blinding (masking) None, this is an open-label trial. Numbers to be randomised (sample size) Phase II: 114 patients (57 per arm). Phase III: 182 patients (91 per arm) Trial Status The trial recruitment started on May 27, 2020. The anticipated date of recruitment completion is April 30, 2021. The protocol version is 2 (May 10, 2020). Trial registration The trial has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (May 5, 2020). The Identifier number is NCT04374526 Full protocol The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1 ). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.

The health emergency linked to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has highlighted problems in the health management of chronic patients due to their risk of infection, suggesting the need of new methods to monitor patients. People living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) represent a paradigm of chronic patients where an e-health-based remote monitoring could have a significant impact in maintaining an adequate standard of care. The key objective of the study is to provide both an efficient operating model to “follow” the patient, capture the evolution of their disease, and establish proximity and relief through a remote collaborative model. These dimensions are collected through a dedicated mobile application that triggers questionnaires on the basis of decision-making algorithms, tagging patients and sending alerts to staff in order to tailor interventions. All outcomes and alerts are monitored and processed through an innovative e-Clinical platform. The processing of the collected data aims into learning and evaluating predictive models for the possible upcoming alerts on the basis of past data, using machine learning algorithms. The models will be clinically validated as the study collects more data, and, if successful, the resulting multidimensional vector of past attributes will act as a digital composite biomarker capable of predicting HIV-related alerts. Design: All PLWH > 18 sears old and stable disease followed at the outpatient services of a university hospital (n = 1500) will be enrolled in the interventional study. The study is ongoing, and patients are currently being recruited. Preliminary results are yielding monthly data to facilitate learning of predictive models for the alerts of interest. Such models are learnt for one or two months of history of the questionnaire data. In this manuscript, the protocol—including the rationale, detailed technical aspects underlying the study, and some preliminary results—are described. Conclusions: The management of HIV-infected patients in the pandemic era represents a challenge for future patient management beyond the pandemic period. The application of artificial intelligence and machine learning systems as described in this study could enable remote patient management that takes into account the real needs of the patient and the monitoring of the most relevant aspects of PLWH management today.

Primary study outcome was absence of treatment failure (virological failure, VF, or treatment interruption) per protocol at week 48. Patients on 3-drug ART with stable HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL and CCR5-tropic virus were randomized 1:1 to maraviroc with darunavir/ritonavir qd (study arm) or continue current ART (continuation arm). In June 2015, 115 patients were evaluable for the primary outcome (56 study, 59 continuation arm). The study was discontinued due to excess of VF in the study arm (7 cases, 12.5%, vs 0 in the continuation arm, p = 0.005). The proportion free of treatment failure was 73.2% in the study and 59.3% in the continuation arm. Two participants in the study and 10 in the continuation arm discontinued therapy due to adverse events (p = 0.030). At VF, no emergent drug resistance was detected. Co-receptor tropism switched to non-R5 in one patient. Patients with VF reported lower adherence and had lower plasma drug levels. Femoral bone mineral density was significantly improved in the study arm. Switching to maraviroc with darunavir/ritonavir qd in virologically suppressed patients was associated with improved tolerability but was virologically inferior to 3-drug therapy.

Background: European countries have included healthcare workers (HCWs) among priority groups for COVID-19 vaccination. We established a multi-country hospital network to measure the SARS-CoV-2 incidence and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines among HCWs against laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: HCWs from 19 hospitals in 10 countries participated in a dynamic prospective cohort study, providing samples for SARS-CoV-2 testing at enrolment and during weekly/fortnightly follow-up. We measured the incidence during pre-Delta (2 May–6 September 2021), Delta (7 September–14 December 2021), and Omicron (15 December 2021–2 May 2023) waves. Using Cox regression, we measured the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of the first COVID-19 booster dose versus primary course alone during Delta and Omicron waves. Results: We included a total of 3015 HCWs. Participants were mostly female (2306; 79%), with a clinical role (2047; 68%), and had a median age of 44 years. The overall incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 3.01/10,000 person-days during pre-Delta, 4.21/10,000 during Delta, and 23.20/10,000 during Omicron waves. rVE was 59% (95% CI: −25; 86) during Delta and 22% (1; 39) during Omicron waves. rVE was 51% (30; 65) 7–90 days after the first booster dose during the Omicron wave. Conclusions: The incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCWs was higher during the Omicron circulation period. The first COVID-19 vaccine booster provided additional protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to primary course vaccination when recently vaccinated <90 days. This multi-country HCW cohort study addressing infection as the main outcome is crucial for informing public health interventions for HCWs.

Introduction Central nervous system adverse events (AE) have been a cause of discontinuation of dolutegravir-containing therapy, especially in combination with abacavir. The main aim of the study was to evaluate whether the switch to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide ( BIC/FTC/TAF) was associated with a reduction in severity and incidence of neuropsychiatric symptoms compared to continued dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine ( DTG/ABC/3TC). Methods DOBINeuro is a randomized trial enrolling people living with HIV (PLWH) treated with DTG/ABC/3TC for > 6 months and with HIV-RNA < 50 cps/ml for > 12 months. At baseline, PLWH are randomized to continue DTG/ABC/3TC or switch to BIC/FTC/TAF. The original sample size was 50 PLWH per arm, but the enrollment was prematurely stopped due to a delayed recruitment process. Neuropsychiatric symptoms were evaluated by the self-report Symptom Checklist (SCL)-90-R and the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview Plus. Results A total of 41 PLWH were enrolled and underwent randomization: 20 were randomized to continue DTG/ABC/3TC and 21 to switch to BIC/FTC/TAF. At baseline, clinical and laboratory characteristics were homogeneous in the two arms. Switching from DTG/ABC/3TC to BIC/FTC/TAF in virologically suppressed PLWH was associated with an improvement in sleep disorders but not in any other neuropsychiatric symptom. Conclusions Although limited by a low sample size, this study suggests neuropsychiatric tolerability may improve when switching virologically suppressed PLWH from DTG to BIC-based strategies.

Introduction Ageing of HIV‐infected patients led to an increasing rate of osteopenia and osteoporosis. The cause is multifactorial, including virus activity, drug toxicity and host factors. The aim of our analysis is to quantify this issue according to our department experience and to evaluate predictors of low BMD. Materials and Methods HIV‐1‐infected patients, on stable HAART, were consecutively enrolled in this cross‐sectional study and underwent DEXA. We analyzed the prevalence and evaluated predictors of low BMD in our population. Results We collected data from 208 patients, 148 of whom were male, with 49 years median age (IQR 24.1–68.3). About 39% of patients were heterosexuals, 33.7 MSM and 12.5% were IDU, 40.4% were smokers. Caucasians were 93.3%, and 13.9% were co‐infected with HCV virus. Around 6.7% of patients were on their first HAART regimen and all of them started TDF. Their median time of HAART exposure was 1.17 years (IQR 0.8–1.6). Conversely, median time of HAART exposure of multi‐experienced patients was 8.5 years (IQR 3.1–12.0). We stratified DEXA results for patients on first‐line regimen versus multi‐experienced one. We found that 42.9% of patients on first‐line HAART had low BMD of lumbar spine and 7.1% had osteoporosis. Regarding the multi‐experienced group of patients, lumbar spine osteopenia was observed in 36.6% of patients and 15.5% of them had osteoporosis. Median age of patients with low BMD of lumbar spine was 45.6 (IQR 24.1–68.3) for patients on first‐line regimen and 49.8 years for multi‐experienced (IQR 44.2–54.0) regimen. We found similar data for BMD of hip, but no patients in the first group had hip osteoporosis. We also analyzed predictors of low BMD in our population. MSM patients showed a 3.4‐fold higher risk to have osteoporosis of lumbar spine (OR 3.41, CI 1,105–9,269, p=0.03). As expected, we found that non‐Caucasian patients had 13.5‐fold higher risk to have osteoporosis of the hip (OR 13.52, CI 1.5–122.7, p=0.02). Exposure to HAART was also evaluated, but no predictors were found. Conclusions Our data confirm how osteoporosis is highly prevalent and occurs earlier in HIV‐infected patients. Antiretrovirals play a crucial role. In our experience loss of BMD can occur within a year of treatment, when almost half of our patients starting TDF had a low BMD. MSM patients have a higher risk to develop spine osteoporosis and non‐Caucasian patients are more likely to have hip osteoporosis. We remark the importance of BMD assessment for HIV‐infected patients especially during their first months of treatment.

Introduction Raltegravir intensification is associated with an increase in 2‐LTR episomal HIV DNA= circles, indicating a persistent low‐level replication, in some individuals in ART with suppressed HIV RNA. We aimed at monitoring residual plasma HIV RNA and cellular HIV DNA in virologically suppressed patients switching to a raltegravir‐based regimen. Materials and Methods Forty‐six HIV‐infected subjects on PI or NNRTI based‐regimens, with plasma HIV RNA level <40 copies/mL for ≥6 months and CD4 >200 cells/µL for ≥12 months were enrolled. Thirty‐four patients switched to raltegravir‐based regimen (RASTA study group) and 12 continued a PI or NNRTI based‐regimen (control group). Ultrasensitive HIV residual viremia and total PBMC HIV DNA were assessed at baseline (W0), 24 (W24) and 48 (W48) weeks. HIV RNA levels were determined by an ultrasensitive test derived from a commercial real time PCR (limit of detection 5 copies/ml). A real time PCR was used to quantify HIV DNA copy numbers in PBMCs. Results At W0, HIV DNA was detected in all patients while at W48 it was detectable in 82.3% of RASTA group vs 100% of controls (p=0.01). The difference between the average values of HIV DNA log10 copies/10°6 CD4 at W0 (median 3.11, IQR 2.70–3.45) and W48 (median 2.87, IQR 2.24–3.38) was statistically significant for RASTA group (p=0.035). Male gender (mean difference −0.37 log10 copies/10°6 PBMC, p=0.023) and previous PI based‐ART (mean difference +0.39 log10 copies/10°6 PBMC, p=0.036) were predictive of HIV DNA level at W0. After adjusting for previous PI based‐ART, male gender was the only variable independently associated with HIV DNA size at W0 (mean difference −0.326 log10 copies/10°6 PBMC, 95% CI −0.641, −0.011 p=0.043). Ultrasensitive HIV‐1 RNA was detectable at W0 in 50% of RASTA group versus 66.7% of controls and at W48 in 32.4% versus 45.5%, respectively. No differences were found between HIV RNA levels at W0 and W48 within and between the two groups. Conclusions Switching to raltegravir‐based regimens may be associated with a decrease of HIV reservoir, as measured by total PBMC HIV DNA. A larger sample size is required to confirm this finding.

Introduction Low bone mineral density (BMD) and osteoporosis are prevalent in HIV‐infected patients and were associated with HIV infection and tenofovir‐containing ART. Materials and Methods The GUSTA study (GUided Simplification with Tropism Assay) is a two‐arm, prospective, multicenter, 1:1 randomized controlled trial designed to demonstrate the non‐inferiority of therapeutic switch to maraviroc+darunavir/ritonavir (MVC+DRV/r) 300/800/100 mg QD against the continuation of previous triple cART in patients with stable virological suppression. Enrolment criteria include HIV1‐RNA <50 copies/mL for >6 months, R5 tropism and CD4>200 cells/µL for >3 months. Dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry scans of proximal femur and lumbar spine were performed at baseline and week 48. Bone composition was evaluated using L2‐L4 lumbar column and proximal femoral BMD, T‐score and the Z‐score. At the same timepoints, plasma bone metabolism biomarkers were measured. Linear regression was used to compare means of differences between arms. The association between BMD changes and the baseline variables was assessed by linear regression. Results 27 patients were included, 13 from study group and 14 from control group, 74.1% were males, 44.4% heterosexuals, 81.5% Caucasian, median age was 47 years (IQR 41–53), time from HIV diagnosis 13.4 years (9–19), CD4 553/µL (406–739), nadir CD4 201/µL (76–283). At baseline, median ART duration was 10.5 years (5.7–15.3), the majority of patients (70.4%) was on tenofovir, 63% was on a PI‐based regimen and 14,8% on an NNRTI‐based regimen. Mean proximal femur BMD from baseline increased over 48 weeks by 2.06% (SD 2.24) in the study arm and decreased by −2.77% (SD 4.63) in control arm (p=0.003). The change over 48 weeks in proximal femur T‐score was significantly different between the study (+0.11, SD 0.22) and control arm (−1.14, SD 0.27, p=0.016). Also the changes in total alkalin phosphatase (−20 U/L vs −1.5, p=0.003) was significant between the two groups. After adjusting for time from HIV diagnosis and years of ART, study group was the only factor associated to higher mean percentage change from baseline femoral BMD (MVC+DRV/r +4.83, p=0.044). Conclusions The study demonstrated a significant improvement in femoral BMD and T‐score after treatment simplification with MVC+DRV/r.

Introduction According to recent evidence about boosted protease inhibitors (PIs/r)‐simplified regimens, the combination of 3TC and DRV/r 800/100 mg could represent a feasible option for optimizing antiretroviral therapy (ART) in treatment‐experienced HIV+ patients. Patients and Methods We retrospectively evaluated patients switching to 3TC+DRV/r, with at least six months of viral suppression, no resistance mutation to DRV or 3TC and not HBV‐coinfected: incidence of ART discontinuation and of virological failure (VF: 2 consecutive HIV‐RNA determinations>49 cps/mL or a single one≥1000 cps/mL) and the probability of remaining discontinuation‐free during one‐year follow‐up (FU), as well as changes in laboratory parameters at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months were estimated. Results We included 94 patients: 74 males, mostly MSM (39.4%), with 49 years old, 9 years of HIV disease, 8 years of ART (median values). Median nadir CD4 count and zenith viral load (log10) were 194 cells/µL and 4.90, respectively. Ten patients were HCV‐coinfected and 38 had at least a previous VF. Seventy‐four patients were on an NRTIs‐based triple regimen (mainly TDF/FTC or 3TC/ABC) whereas 14 on another PI‐based dual therapy (mainly LPV/r). Incidence of treatment discontinuation was 12.4 per 100 patients‐year follow‐up (PYFU), but only 2 patients experienced a VF (3.5 per 100 PYFU). Mean time free from discontinuation was 5 years (95% CI 4–6), with a cumulative one‐year estimated probability of staying on 3TC+DRV/r of 85.9%. At three months, a trend of increased CD4 cells count (+42 cells/µL, p 0.059) was observed, but not confirmed at later time point; an increase of total cholesterol (TC, +17mg/dL, p 0.008) and LDL (+19 mg/dL, p 0.002), and a decreased level of AST and ALT (−2 UI/L, p 0.045; −5 UI/L, p 0.009, respectively) were also detected. Total bilirubin was reduced (−0.71 mg/dL, p 0.038). At 6 and 12 months, alteration of lipid profile was similar, with also an increased TC/HDL ratio (+0.48, p=0.030, at six months) and HDL/LDL ratio (−0.04, p=0.035, at 12 months). A significant decrease in ALT levels (−6 UI/L, 0.013) and a diminishing trend for AST and total bilirubin, as well as a significant increase in renal function (GFR +4mL/min, p 0.048) were observed at 12 months. Conclusions These observations on 3TC+DRV/r‐based dual therapy simplification in virologically suppressed patients show a good profile of efficacy and safety. An extended FU time is needed in order to establish the real impact of this promising therapeutic choice.