Explore the vast range of titles available.

Predicting individual mental traits and behavioral dispositions from brain imaging data through machine-learning approaches is becoming a rapidly evolving field in neuroscience. Beyond scientific and clinical applications, such approaches also hold the potential to gain substantial influence in fields such as human resource management, education, or criminal law. Although several challenges render real-life applications of such tools difficult, future conflicts of individual, economic, and public interests are preprogrammed, given the prospect of improved personalized predictions across many domains. In this Perspective paper, we thus argue for the need to engage in a discussion on the ethical, legal, and societal implications of the emergent possibilities for brain-based predictions and outline some of the aspects for this discourse.

•Scale-free brain dynamics in sensory regions exhibit a time-dependent spectral exponent in response to naturalistic inputs•This time-dependent spectral exponent positively correlates with time-varying inter-subject correlation in visual and auditory regions•The relative Rest-to-Movie SD change in time-dependent scale-free dynamics modulates the level of time-dependent inter-subject correlation during naturalistic inputs Environmental processes, such as auditory and visual inputs, often follow power-law distributions with a time-dependent and constantly changing spectral exponent, β(t). However, it remains unclear how the brain’s scale-free dynamics continuously respond to naturalistic inputs, such as by potentially alternating instead of static levels of the spectral exponent. Our fMRI study investigates the brain’s dynamic, time-dependent spectral exponent, β(t), during movie-watching, and uses time-varying inter-subject correlation, ISC(t), to assess the extent to which input dynamics are reflected as shared brain activity across subjects in early sensory regions. Notably, we investigate the level of ISC particularly based on the modulation by time-dependent scale-free dynamics or β(t). We obtained three key findings: First, the brain’s β(t) showed a distinct temporal structure in visual and auditory regions during naturalistic inputs compared to the resting-state, investigated in the 7 Tesla Human Connectome Project dataset. Second, β(t) and ISC(t) were positively correlated during naturalistic inputs. Third, grouping subjects based on the Rest-to-Movie standard deviation change of the time-dependent spectral exponent β(t) revealed that the brain’s relative shift from intrinsic to stimulus-driven scale-free dynamics modulates the level of shared brain activity, or ISC(t), and thus the imprinting of inputs on brain activity. This modulation was further supported by the observation that the two groups displayed significantly different β(t)-ISC(t) correlations, where the group with a higher mean of ISC(t) during inputs also exhibited a higher β(t)-ISC(t) correlation in visual and auditory regions. In summary, our fMRI study underscores a positive relationship between time-dependent scale-free dynamics and ISC, where higher spectral exponents correspond to higher degrees of shared brain activity during ongoing audiovisual inputs.

Morally judicious behavior forms the fabric of human sociality. Here, we sought to investigate neural activity associated with different facets of moral thought. Previous research suggests that the cognitive and emotional sources of moral decisions might be closely related to theory of mind, an abstract-cognitive skill, and empathy, a rapid-emotional skill. That is, moral decisions are thought to crucially refer to other persons’ representation of intentions and behavioral outcomes as well as (vicariously experienced) emotional states. We thus hypothesized that moral decisions might be implemented in brain areas engaged in ‘theory of mind’ and empathy. This assumption was tested by conducting a large-scale activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies, which assessed 2,607 peak coordinates from 247 experiments in 1,790 participants. The brain areas that were consistently involved in moral decisions showed more convergence with the ALE analysis targeting theory of mind versus empathy. More specifically, the neurotopographical overlap between morality and empathy disfavors a role of affective sharing during moral decisions. Ultimately, our results provide evidence that the neural network underlying moral decisions is probably domain-global and might be dissociable into cognitive and affective sub-systems.

Although there are well-known limitations of the human cognitive system in performing two tasks simultaneously (dual-tasking) or alternatingly (task-switching), the question for a common vs. distinct neural basis of these multitasking limitations is still open. We performed two Activation Likelihood Estimation meta-analyses of neuroimaging studies on dual-tasking or task-switching and tested for commonalities and differences in the brain regions associated with either domain. We found a common core network related to multitasking comprising bilateral intraparietal sulcus (IPS), left dorsal premotor cortex (dPMC), and right anterior insula. Meta-analytic contrasts revealed eight fronto-parietal clusters more consistently activated in dual-tasking (bilateral frontal operculum, dPMC, and anterior IPS, left inferior frontal sulcus and left inferior frontal gyrus) and, conversely, four clusters (left inferior frontal junction, posterior IPS, and precuneus as well as frontomedial cortex) more consistently activated in task-switching. Together with sub-analyses of preparation effects in task-switching, our results argue against purely passive structural processing limitations in multitasking. Based on these findings and drawing on current theorizing, we present a neuro-cognitive processing model of multitasking.

Major efforts in human neuroimaging strive to understand individual differences and find biomarkers for clinical applications by predicting behavioural phenotypes from brain imaging data. To identify generalisable and replicable brain-behaviour prediction models, sufficient measurement reliability is essential. However, the selection of prediction targets is predominantly guided by scientific interest or data availability rather than psychometric considerations. Here, we demonstrate the impact of low reliability in behavioural phenotypes on out-of-sample prediction performance. Using simulated and empirical data from four large-scale datasets, we find that reliability levels common across many phenotypes can markedly limit the ability to link brain and behaviour. Next, using 5000 participants from the UK Biobank, we show that only highly reliable data can fully benefit from increasing sample sizes from hundreds to thousands of participants. Our findings highlight the importance of measurement reliability for identifying meaningful brain–behaviour associations from individual differences and underscore the need for greater emphasis on psychometrics in future research. Our ability to identify associations between behaviour and brain imaging is important for uncovering markers of cognition and disease. Here, the authors illustrate the importance of the reliability of behavioural measurements to accurately investigate brain-behaviour associations using machine learning.

Different aspects of attention can be assessed through psychological tests to identify stable individual or group differences as well as alterations after interventions. Aiming for a wide applicability of attentional assessments, Psychology Experiment Building Language (PEBL) is an open-source software system for designing and running computerized tasks that tax various attentional functions. Here, we evaluated the reliability and validity of computerized attention tasks as provided with the PEBL package: Continuous Performance Task (CPT), Switcher task, Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT), Mental Rotation task, and Attentional Network Test. For all tasks, we evaluated test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), as well as internal consistency through within-test correlations and split-half ICC. Across tasks, response time scores showed adequate reliability, whereas scores of performance accuracy, variability, and deterioration over time did not. Stability across application sites was observed for the CPT and Switcher task, but practice effects were observed for all tasks except the PVT. We substantiate convergent and discriminant validity for several task scores using between-task correlations and provide further evidence for construct validity via associations of task scores with attentional and motivational assessments. Taken together, our results provide necessary information to help design and interpret studies involving attention assessments.

•Neurofeedback allows brain-based attention training.•Participants learned simultaneous control over large-scale functional networks.•Learned network self-regulation is preserved even without feedback.•Neurofeedback training improves sustained attention temporarily. The brain regions supporting sustained attention (sustained attention network; SAN) and mind-wandering (default-mode network; DMN) have been extensively studied. Nevertheless, this knowledge has not yet been translated into advanced brain-based attention training protocols. Here, we used network-based real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to provide healthy individuals with information about current activity levels in SAN and DMN. Specifically, 15 participants trained to control the difference between SAN and DMN hemodynamic activity and completed behavioral attention tests before and after neurofeedback training. Through training, participants improved controlling the differential SAN-DMN feedback signal, which was accomplished mainly through deactivating DMN. After training, participants were able to apply learned self-regulation of the differential feedback signal even when feedback was no longer available (i.e., during transfer runs). The neurofeedback group improved in sustained attention after training, although this improvement was temporally limited and rarely exceeded mere practice effects that were controlled by a test-retest behavioral control group. The learned self-regulation and the behavioral outcomes suggest that neurofeedback training of differential SAN and DMN activity has the potential to become a non-invasive and non-pharmacological tool to enhance attention and mitigate specific attention deficits.

The posterior medial cortex (PMC) is particularly poorly understood. Its neural activity changes have been related to highly disparate mental processes. We therefore investigated PMC properties with a data-driven exploratory approach. First, we subdivided the PMC by whole-brain coactivation profiles. Second, functional connectivity of the ensuing PMC regions was compared by task-constrained meta-analytic coactivation mapping (MACM) and task-unconstrained resting-state correlations (RSFC). Third, PMC regions were functionally described by forward/reverse functional inference. A precuneal cluster was mostly connected to the intraparietal sulcus, frontal eye fields, and right temporo-parietal junction; associated with attention and motor tasks. A ventral posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) cluster was mostly connected to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and middle left inferior parietal cortex (IPC); associated with facial appraisal and language tasks. A dorsal PCC cluster was mostly connected to the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, anterior/posterior IPC, posterior midcingulate cortex, and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; associated with delay discounting. A cluster in the retrosplenial cortex was mostly connected to the anterior thalamus and hippocampus. Furthermore, all PMC clusters were congruently coupled with the default mode network according to task-unconstrained but not task-constrained connectivity. We thus identified distinct regions in the PMC and characterized their neural networks and functional implications. •Connectivity-based parcellation identified four distinct cortical modules.•The clusters related to processing attention, perspectives, object and space facets.•All clusters were connected to the default-mode network at rest, but not during task.

•VBM experiments differ from fMRI experiments on multiple parameter levels•VBM ALE showcases similar sensitivity and specificity to functional ALE•cFWE is the preferred thresholding approach for VBM ALE•Researchers should aim to include 23 or more experiments in their dataset Activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis has been applied to structural neuroimaging data since long, but up to now, any systematic assessment of the algorithm's behavior, power and sensitivity has been based on simulations using functional neuroimaging databases as their foundation. Here, we aimed to determine whether the guidelines offered by previous evaluations can be generalized to ALE meta-analyses of voxel-based morphometry (VBM) studies. We ran 365000 distinct ALE analyses filled with simulated experiments, randomly sampling parameters from BrainMap's VBM experiment database. We then examined the algorithm's sensitivity, its susceptibility to spurious convergence, and its susceptibility to excessive contributions by individual experiments. In general, the performance of the ALE algorithm was highly comparable between imaging modalities, with the algorithm's sensitivity and specificity reaching similar levels with structural data as previously observed with functional data. Because of the lower number of foci reported and the higher number of participants usually included in structural experiments, individual studies had, on average, a higher impact towards significant clusters. To prevent significant clusters from being driven by single experiments, we recommend that researchers include at least 23 experiments in a VBM ALE dataset, instead of the previously recommended minimum of n = 17. While these recommendations do not constitute hard borders, running ALE analyses on smaller datasets would require special diligence in assessing and reporting the contributions of experiments to individual clusters.

Personality is associated with variation in all kinds of mental faculties, including affective, social, executive, and memory functioning. The intrinsic dynamics of neural networks underlying these mental functions are reflected in their functional connectivity at rest (RSFC). We, therefore, aimed to probe whether connectivity in functional networks allows predicting individual scores of the five-factor personality model and potential gender differences thereof. We assessed nine meta-analytically derived functional networks, representing social, affective, executive, and mnemonic systems. RSFC of all networks was computed in a sample of 210 males and 210 well-matched females and in a replication sample of 155 males and 155 females. Personality scores were predicted using relevance vector machine in both samples. Cross-validation prediction accuracy was defined as the correlation between true and predicted scores. RSFC within networks representing social, affective, mnemonic, and executive systems significantly predicted self-reported levels of Extraversion, Neuroticism, Agreeableness, and Openness. RSFC patterns of most networks, however, predicted personality traits only either in males or in females. Personality traits can be predicted by patterns of RSFC in specific functional brain networks, providing new insights into the neurobiology of personality. However, as most associations were gender-specific, RSFC–personality relations should not be considered independently of gender.