Explore the vast range of titles available.

Introduction Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) affects over one fifth of women worldwide, and endometriosis is one of the most common causes. In the present study, we examined whether sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is effective in the treatment of refractory chronic pelvic pain in women with endometriosis. Material and methods This multicenter prospective pilot study was started in 2017 and includes patients with chronic pelvic pain with no other obvious pathology than endometriosis. Other treatment options have been tried or they are unsuitable. Patients underwent SNM implantation. The main outcome was postoperative pain reduction and secondary outcome was quality of life. The following questionnaires were used to assess the outcomes: Brief pain inventory (BPI), clinical global impression ‐ improvement (CGI‐I), 15D‐measure of health‐related quality of life, and Biberoglu and Behrman (B&B) score. Results A total of 35 patients underwent the SNM procedure and, at the time of analysis, 15 patients had returned one‐year questionnaires. The patients had a history of endometriosis for a median of 5.5 (interquartile range 2–9) years, with no correlation between the severity of symptoms and the duration of the disease (p = 0.158). A total of 31 patients (89%) were implanted with the internal pulse generator. There were statistically significant changes in BPI pain‐related items. Worst experienced daily pain decreased among those who returned 12‐month questionnaires from median 9 to 5 (p = 0.006), average daily pain from 6 to 3.5 (p = 0.004), and least daily pain from 3 to 1 (p = 0.004). Based on the CGI questionnaire (n = 14), at 12 months nine patients (60%) experienced great improvement in their symptoms, three patients (20%) much improvement and two patients (13%) minimal improvement. None of the patients experienced worsening of their symptoms. There was a statistically significant change in overall 15D score at 1 month (p < 0.001), 6 months (p = 0.001) and 12 months (p = 0.018), when the results were compared to baseline values. Median B&B score also improved significantly and decreased from a baseline value of 8 (4–12) to 4.5 (0–6), p = 0.002. Conclusions Based on the preliminary findings of our study, SNM might be a promising treatment of CPP in endometriosis patients. The treatment of chronic pelvic pain related to endometriosis is difficult and the mainstream remain medical therapy and surgery. Based on the preliminary findings of our study, it appears that SNM is a promising treatment option of CPP in endometriosis patients that do not respond to conventional therapies.

Background Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an established therapy in urology and gastroenterological surgery for treatment of overactive bladder symptoms, urge urinary incontinence or fecal incontinence. SNM has also been used with good results in patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP). Our aim was to analyze long-term results of SNM in Finnish patients with endometriosis related CPP. Methods This is a register-based retrospective study including all the endometriosis patients treated with SNM for CPP in Finland between 2004 and 2017. There were four centers where these procedures were performed, two University Hospitals and two Central Hospitals. Long-term results were assessed by phone interview in spring 2021. Results A total of 16 women with endometriosis, with a median age of 39 (25–50) years, underwent SNM treatment for chronic pelvic pain (CPP), with the median follow-up time of 73 (48–85) months. The Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG) was implanted to 14 patients (88%). By the end of the follow-up period, 10 patients (62,5% of all patients and 71% of those who received IPG) had a functional SNM. Pain was assessed by numeral rating scale (NRS) and decreased from a median of 7.4 (3.6–10) to 2.3 (0-6.5). Conclusions SNM could be a good option in the treatment of endometriosis related chronic pelvic pain when standard therapy is not enough.

Excision of all endometriotic lesions is the method of choice in the treatment of severe endometriosis resistant to medical therapy. The infiltrating nature of the disease as well as extensive surgery may, however, cause chronic pain that cannot be relieved by either surgery or hormonal treatment. As a pilot treatment, we tested the effect of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for four endometriosis patients suffering chronic pelvic pain and pelvic organ dysfunction after radical surgical treatment. Three out of four patients reported improvement in their symptoms during the neuromodulation testing period and a permanent pulse generator was installed. After 2.5 years, all three patients report better quality of life and want to continue with SNM.

ObjectiveHuman epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is a promising novel serum biomarker for the detection of early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and for the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant ovarian tumors. The objective of the present study was to determine the value of HE4 for monitoring the response to primary therapy in patients with advanced disease.MethodsSerum HE4 and cancer antigen (CA) 125 levels of 10 patients with advanced EOC and one patient with adenocarcinoma of unknown origin were measured preoperatively and during first-line chemotherapy. Seven patients were treated with primary surgery and six cycles of chemotherapy. Response to treatment was evaluated 4 weeks after the completion of chemotherapy using computed tomography. Four patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) before surgery. To evaluate the early response to chemotherapy, changes in serum biomarker levels were compared with metabolic changes of tumors during NACT as detected by positron emission tomography/computed tomography.ResultsThe profile of HE4 during primary chemotherapy was in line with radiologic and clinical responses. In the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group, HE4 correlated better with the radiologic response than CA 125.ConclusionAssessment of serum HE4 may improve the reliability of response evaluation during chemotherapy for serous epithelial ovarian cancer.