Explore the vast range of titles available.

Opinion statement The search for effective therapies for the highly heterogenous disease acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has remained elusive. While cytotoxic therapies can induce complete remission and even, at times, long-term survival, this approach is associated with significant toxic effects to visceral organs and worsening of immune dysfunction and marrow suppression leading to death. Sophisticated molecular studies have revealed defects within the AML cell that can be exploited by utilizing small molecule agents to target these defects, often dubbed “target therapy.” Several medications have already established new standards of care for many patients with AML, including FDA-approved agents that inhibitor IDH1, IDH2, FLT3, and BCL-2. Emerging small molecules hold additional to add to the armamentarium of AML treatment options including MCL-1 inhibitors, TP53 inhibitors, menin inhibitors, and E-selectin antagonists. Moreover, the increasing options also mean that future combinations of these agents need to be explored, including with cytotoxic drugs and other newer emerging strategies such as immunotherapies for AML. Recent investigations continue to show that overcoming many of the challenges of treating AML finally is on the horizon.

Sargramostim [recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhu GM-CSF)] was approved by US FDA in 1991 to accelerate bone marrow recovery in diverse settings of bone marrow failure and is designated on the list of FDA Essential Medicines, Medical Countermeasures, and Critical Inputs. Other important biological activities including accelerating tissue repair and modulating host immunity to infection and cancer the innate and adaptive immune systems are reported in pre-clinical models but incompletely studied in humans. Assess safety and efficacy of sargramostim in cancer and other diverse experimental and clinical settings. We systematically reviewed PubMed, Cochrane and TRIP databases for clinical data on sargramostim in cancer. In a variety of settings, sargramostim after exposure to bone marrow-suppressing agents accelerated hematologic recovery resulting in fewer infections, less therapy-related toxicity and sometimes improved survival. As an immune modulator, sargramostim also enhanced anti-cancer responses in solid cancers when combined with conventional therapies, for example with immune checkpoint inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. Sargramostim accelerates hematologic recovery in diverse clinical settings and enhances anti-cancer responses with a favorable safety profile. Uses other than in hematologic recovery are less-well studied; more data are needed on immune-enhancing benefits. We envision significantly expanded use of sargramostim in varied immune settings. Sargramostim has the potential to reverse the immune suppression associated with sepsis, trauma, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and COVID-19. Further, sargramostim therapy has been promising in the adjuvant setting with vaccines and for anti-microbial-resistant infections and treating autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis and gastrointestinal, peripheral arterial and neuro-inflammatory diseases. It also may be useful as an adjuvant in anti-cancer immunotherapy.

Haploidentical donors are now increasingly considered for transplantation in the absence of HLA-matched donors or when an urgent transplant is needed. Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) have been recently recognized as an important barrier against successful engraftment of donor cells, which can affect transplant survival. DSA appear more prevalent in this type of transplant due to higher likelihood of alloimmunization of multiparous females against offspring’s HLA antigens, and the degree of mismatch. Here we summarize the evidence for the role of DSA in the development of primary graft failure in haploidentical transplantation and provide consensus recommendations from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplant Group on testing, monitoring, and treatment of patients with DSA receiving haploidentical hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation.

Patients with AML who were between 17 and 60 years of age were randomly assigned to receive induction therapy with the standard dose of daunorubicin or twice the standard dose; the two groups also received a standard dose of cytarabine. Rates of complete remission and overall survival were best in the high-dose group, especially among patients with a favorable or an intermediate cytogenetic risk profile. Patients with AML who were between 17 and 60 years of age were randomly assigned to receive induction therapy with the standard dose of daunorubicin or twice the standard dose. Rates of complete remission and overall survival were best in the high-dose group. The survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is affected by many variables, including therapy that induces complete remission and appropriate consolidation therapy. Currently, anthracycline plus cytarabine is the usual induction therapy for patients with AML. 1 The widely used intravenous combination of daunorubicin (at a dose of 45 mg per square meter of body-surface area), given daily for 3 days, and cytarabine (at a dose of 100 mg per square meter), given daily for 7 days, results in complete remission in 50 to 75% of patients. 1 , 2 Neither the addition of other drugs to daunorubicin and cytarabine 3 nor intensification . . .

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematologic malignancy that carries a poor prognosis and has garnered few treatment advances in the last few decades. Mutation of the internal tandem duplication (ITD) region of fms-like tyrosine kinase (FLT3) is considered high risk for decreased response and overall survival. Midostaurin is a Type III receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor found to inhibit FLT3 and other receptor tyrosine kinases, including platelet-derived growth factor receptors, cyclin-dependent kinase 1, src, c-kit, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor. In preclinical studies, midostaurin exhibited broad-spectrum antitumor activity toward a wide range of tumor xenografts, as well as an FLT3-ITD-driven mouse model of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Midostaurin is orally administered and generally well tolerated as a single agent; hematologic toxicity increases substantially when administered in combination with standard induction chemotherapy. Clinical trials primarily have focused on relapsed/refractory AML and MDS and included single- and combination-agent studies. Administration of midostaurin to relapsed/refractory MDS and AML patients confers a robust anti-blast response sufficient to bridge a minority of patients to transplant. In combination with histone deacetylase inhibitors, responses appear comparable to historic controls, while the addition of midostaurin to standard induction chemotherapy may prolong survival in FLT3-ITD mutant patients. The response of some wild-type (WT)-FLT3 patients to midostaurin therapy is consistent with midostaurin's ability to inhibit WT-FLT3 in vitro, and also may reflect overexpression of WT-FLT3 in those patients and/or off-target effects such as inhibition of kinases other than FLT3. Midostaurin represents a well-tolerated, easily administered oral agent with the potential to bridge mutant and WT-FLT3 AML patients to transplant and possibly deepen response to induction chemotherapy. Ongoing studies are investigating midostaurin's role in pretransplant induction and posttransplant consolidation therapy.

The diagnosis of AL amyloidosis is often challenging due to its systemic nature and heterogeneous clinical presentation. Current serological biomarkers for diagnosis and monitoring are not optimal. We have considered the possibility that mononuclear cell‐type specific molecular expression can be used to develop blood‐based biomarkers to diagnose and monitor patients with AL amyloidosis. Peripheral blood monocytes and CD4+ T cells from patients with documented AL amyloidosis or myeloma without amyloidosis were assessed by enhanced flow cytometric analysis for expression levels of 20 analytes chosen for the possibility that their expression levels may lead to diagnostic assays and biomarkers. We found definitive expression level differences for brain‐derived neurotrophin factor (BDNF), calmodulin, and phospho‐TBK1 in CD4+ T cells and for phospho‐GSK3β in monocytes. Logistic regression and ROC analysis showed that BDNF in CD4+ T cells and heme oxygenase 1 in monocytes significantly distinguished between patients with myeloma versus patients with AL amyloidosis (AUC = 0.75). Additionally, we discovered remarkable differences in intermolecular associations between the samples from the two patient groups, suggesting the involvement of specific pathogenetic pathways. Our results demonstrate that mononuclear cell‐type specific molecular expression may be useful for developing a diagnostic assay and biomarkers for patients with AL amyloidosis.