Explore the vast range of titles available.

SummaryBackgroundThere is no standard second-line treatment after platinum–etoposide chemotherapy for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab, and FOLFIRI alone, in this setting. MethodsWe did a randomised, non-comparative, open-label, phase 2 trial (PRODIGE 41-BEVANEC) at 26 hospitals in France. We included patients aged 18 years or older with locally advanced or metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma or neuroendocrine carcinoma of unknown primary origin, documented progressive disease during or after first-line platinum–etoposide chemotherapy, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1; block size of three), without stratification, to receive FOLFIRI (irinotecan 180 mg/m 2, calcium folinate 400 mg/m 2 or levofolinate 200 mg/m 2, and fluorouracil 400 mg/m 2 bolus then 2400 mg/m 2 over 46 h) plus bevacizumab 5 mg/kg or FOLFIRI alone, intravenously, every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Neither patients nor investigators were masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was overall survival at 6 months after randomisation, evaluated in the modified intention-to-treat population (all enrolled and randomly assigned patients who received at least one cycle of FOLFIRI). This study is now complete and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02820857. FindingsBetween Sept 5, 2017, and Feb 8, 2022, 150 patients were assessed for eligibility and 133 were enrolled and randomly assigned: 65 to the FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab group and 68 to the FOLFIRI group. 126 patients (59 in the FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab group and 67 in the FOLFIRI group) received at least one cycle of FOLFIRI and were included in the modified intention-to-treat population, 83 (66%) of whom were male and 43 (34%) were female, and the median age of the patients was 67 years (IQR 58–73). The primary tumour location was colorectal in 38 (30%) of 126 patients, pancreatic in 34 (27%), gastro-oesophageal in 22 (17%), and unknown in 23 (18%). After a median follow-up of 25·7 months (95% CI 22·0–38·2), 6-month overall survival was 53% (80% CI 43–61) in the FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab group and 60% (51–68) in the FOLFIRI group. Grade 3–4 adverse events that occurred in at least 5% of patients were neutropenia (eight [14%] patients), diarrhoea (six [10%]), and asthenia (five [8%]) in the FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab group, and neutropenia (seven [10%]) in the FOLFIRI group. One treatment-related death (ischaemic stroke) occurred in the FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab group. InterpretationThe addition of bevacizumab did not seem to increase the benefit of FOLFIRI with regard to overall survival. FOLFIRI could be considered as a standard second-line treatment in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma. FundingFrench Ministry of Health and Roche SAS.

Perioperative FLOT (fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel) triplet chemotherapy is the standard of care for localised and resectable gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. We aimed to compare a modified FLOT regimen (also known as TFOX) with FOLFOX as first-line treatment for patients with HER2-negative advanced gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. PRODIGE 51-FFCD-GASTFOX is an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial conducted at 96 medical centres in France. Eligible individuals were aged 18 years or older, had histologically confirmed, HER2-negative adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastro-oesophageal junction that was locally advanced unresectable or metastatic and previously untreated, measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), using the minimisation method, to receive FOLFOX (folinic acid 400 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, and 5-fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m2 then 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 as a continuous 46 h infusion every 2 weeks) or TFOX (docetaxel 50 mg/m2, folinic acid 400 mg/m2, and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 then 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 as a continuous 46 h infusion every 2 weeks). Randomisation was stratified by centre, ECOG performance status, (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, tumour stage, tumour location, and pathological histological subtype. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (assessed in the intention-to-treat population), defined as time from randomisation to the first radiological or clinical progression (or both), or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (defined as time from randomisation to death due to any cause) and objective response rate (defined as the proportion of patients with a best overall complete or partial response). Hazard ratio and 95% CIs were estimated using an unstratified Cox proportional hazards model. When the proportional hazards assumption was violated, the restricted mean survival time was used to estimate the treatment effect size. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03006432, and EudraCT, 2016–002331–16. Between Dec 19, 2016, and Dec 26, 2022, 507 patients were randomly assigned (254 to the TFOX group and 253 to the FOLFOX group [intention-to-treat population]). The median age was 64·2 years (IQR 56·7–70·8), and 399 (79%) participants were male and 108 (21%) were female. At median follow-up of 42·8 months (25·8–49·9), the median progression-free survival was 7·59 months (95% CI 7·06–7·95) in the TFOX group versus 5·98 months (5·65–6·97) in the FOLFOX group. The assumption of proportional hazards was violated (p=0·013); therefore, the 12-month restricted mean progression-free survival was calculated: 7·52 months (7·06–7·97) in the TFOX group versus 6·62 months (6·16–7·09) in the FOLFOX group (p=0·0072). The median overall survival was 15·08 months (13·70–16·72) in the TFOX group versus 12·65 months (10·94–14·00) in the FOLFOX group (proportional hazards assumption was confirmed; HR 0·82 [0·68–0·99]; p=0·048) and the objective response rate was 62·3% (56·0–68·3) versus 53·4% (47·0–59·8; p=0·045). The most common grade 3 and 4 treatment-emergent adverse events were diarrhoea (37 [15%] in the TFOX group vs 18 [7%] in the FOLFOX group), peripheral neuropathy (80 [32%] vs 49 [20%]), neutropenia (67 [27%] vs 44 [18%]), and fatigue (40 [16%] vs 20 [8%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 66 (27%) participants in the TFOX group and 33 (13%) in the FOLFOX group. There were two (<1%) treatment-related deaths in the TFOX group (one due to septic shock and one due to gastrointestinal perforation) and one (<1%) in the FOLFOX group (due to septic shock). The modified FLOT/TFOX regimen significantly improved progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate compared with FOLFOX in previously untreated patients with advanced HER2-negative gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. The modified FLOT/TFOX regimen might represent a new first-line treatment option for patients eligible for this docetaxel triplet chemotherapy. Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive.

Abstract Background In metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, few data are available on the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis and its impact on dose-intensity (DI), or the link between DI and progression-free survival (PFS). This study assessed the impact of G-CSF prophylaxis on the DI received by patients and the relationship between full DI and PFS according to chemotherapy regimens. Patients and Methods Patients from three first-line randomized phase II clinical trials were included in this retrospective cohort. G-CSF prophylaxis groups were identified and balanced according to baseline characteristics using a propensity score. Patients were classified into 2 treatment groups (FOLFIRINOX vs FOLFIRI/nab-paclitaxel (NAB)). DI was a binary variable (full/reduced). Adverse events were defined using NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Results Of the 498 patients, 154 (31%) were in “prophylaxis” group; 179 (36%) were treated by FOLFIRINOX and 319 (64%) by FOLFIRI/NAB. In FOLFIRINOX group, G-CSF prophylaxis was significantly associated with a higher rate of full DI (OR, 5.07; 95% CI, 1.52-16.90; P < .01) while in FOLFIRI/NAB group, it was significantly associated with a lower rate of full DI (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.83; P = .03). Full DI was associated with a non-significant increase in PFS (FOLFIRINOX group: HR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.59-1.16; P = .27; FOLFIRI/NAB group: HR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.63-1.11; P = .22). Conclusion Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor prophylaxis was associated with a higher rate of full DI with FOLFIRINOX. Full DI was associated with a non-significant increase in PFS. These results need to be confirmed prospectively. Few data are available on the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This study assessed the effect of G-CSF prophylaxis on dose intensity and the relationship between full dose intensity and progression-free survival according to chemotherapy regimens.

Background: Predictive biomarkers of response to chemotherapy plus antiangiogenic for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are lacking. The objective of this study was to test the prognostic role of splenomegaly on baseline CT scan. Methods: This study is a sub-study of PRODIGE-9 study, which included 488 mCRC patients treated by 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) and bevacizumab in first line. The association between splenic volume, and PFS and OS was evaluated by univariate and multivariable Cox analyses. The relation between circulating monocytic Myeloid derived suppressor cells (mMDSC) and splenomegaly was also determined. Results: Baseline splenic volume > 180 mL was associated with poor PFS (median PFS = 9.2 versus 11.1 months; log-rank p = 0.0125), but was not statistically associated with OS (median OS = 22.6 versus 28.5 months; log-rank p = 0.1643). The increase in splenic volume at 3 months had no impact on PFS (HR 0.928; log-rank p = 0.56) or on OS (HR 0.843; log-rank p = 0.21). Baseline splenic volume was positively correlated with the level of baseline circulating mMDSC (r = 0.48, p-value = 0.031). Conclusion: Baseline splenomegaly is a prognostic biomarker in patients with mCRC treated with FOLFIRI and bevacizumab, and a surrogate marker of MDSC accumulation.

ObjectiveDiagnostic tests, such as Immunoscore, predict prognosis in patients with colon cancer. However, additional prognostic markers could be detected on pathological slides using artificial intelligence tools.DesignWe have developed a software to detect colon tumour, healthy mucosa, stroma and immune cells on CD3 and CD8 stained slides. The lymphocyte density and surface area were quantified automatically in the tumour core (TC) and invasive margin (IM). Using a LASSO algorithm, DGMate (DiGital tuMor pArameTErs), we detected digital parameters within the tumour cells related to patient outcomes.ResultsWithin the dataset of 1018 patients, we observed that a poorer relapse-free survival (RFS) was associated with high IM stromal area (HR 5.65; 95% CI 2.34 to 13.67; p<0.0001) and high DGMate (HR 2.72; 95% CI 1.92 to 3.85; p<0.001). Higher CD3+ TC, CD3+ IM and CD8+ TC densities were significantly associated with a longer RFS. Analysis of variance showed that CD3+ TC yielded a similar prognostic value to the classical CD3/CD8 Immunoscore (p=0.44). A combination of the IM stromal area, DGMate and CD3, designated ‘DGMuneS’, outperformed Immunoscore when used in estimating patients’ prognosis (C-index=0.601 vs 0.578, p=0.04) and was independently associated with patient outcomes following Cox multivariate analysis. A predictive nomogram based on DGMuneS and clinical variables identified a group of patients with less than 10% relapse risk and another group with a 50% relapse risk.ConclusionThese findings suggest that artificial intelligence can potentially improve patient care by assisting pathologists in better defining stage III colon cancer patients’ prognosis.

ObjectiveThe prognostication of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) patients remains uncertain, mainly based on carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), with limited utility. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has been suggested as a prognostic factor, but its added value has been poorly explored. The objective was to determine whether ctDNA is an independent factor for the prognostication of mPDAC.DesignTranslational study based on two prospective collections of plasma samples of mPDAC patients naïve for chemotherapy. One used as a test series and the other as validation series coming from two randomised trials (Prodige 35 and Prodige 37). CtDNA was assessed by digital droplet PCR targeting two methylated markers (HOXD8 and POU4F1) according to a newly developed and validated method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed according to ctDNA status.ResultsOf 372 plasma samples available, 354 patients were analyzed for survival. In the validation series, 145 of 255 patients were found ctDNA positive (56.8%), Median PFS and OS were 5.3 and 8.2 months in ctDNA-positive and 6.2 and 12.6 months in ctDNA-negative patients, respectively. ctDNA positivity was more often associated with young age, high CA19-9 level and neutrophils lymphocytes ratio. In multivariate analysis including these previous markers, ctDNA was confirmed as an independent prognostic marker for PFS (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.5, CI 95% [1.03–2.18], p = 0.034) and OS (HR 1.62, CI 95% [1.05–2.5], p = 0.029).ConclusionsIn this first ctDNA assessment in a large series of mPDAC derived from clinical trials, ctDNA was detectable in 56.8% of patients and confirmed as an independent prognostic marker.

BackgroundTriplet chemotherapy, with docetaxel-5FU-oxaliplatin (TEFOX), has yielded promising results in patients with advanced and operable gastric adenocarcinoma. This may prove useful in treating signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC), which is known to be chemoresistant and has a poor prognosis. We therefore evaluated TEFOX in patients with untreated advanced SRCC.MethodsPatients with metastatic or locally advanced non-resectable SRCC were treated with TEFOX. Chemotherapy was administered every 14 days, with combined docetaxel (50 mg/m2) and oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) followed by 5FU (2400 mg/m2).ResultsAmong 65 patients enrolled, including 17 with linitis plastica, ORR and DCR were 66.1% and 87.6%, respectively. Median PFS and OS were 9.7 months (95% CI [6.9–11.4]) and 14.3 months (95% CI [11.6–21.6]) respectively. Twenty-six patients (40%) initially considered as unresectable had secondary resection (n = 24) or radiotherapy (n = 2) with curative intent, with median PFS and OS of 12.4 and 26.2 months, respectively.ConclusionsTEFOX appears to be effective as first-line treatment in advanced gastric SRCC and has an acceptable safety profile. It allowed a curative intent approach in 40% of patients. Considering the low chemosensitivity of SRCC reported with other chemotherapy regimens and pending for randomised studies, TEFOX might be an option in advanced gastric SRCC.

Abstract Introduction Predictive markers of LV5FU2 maintenance benefit after first-line induction with FOLFIRINOX in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer are necessary to select patients who will not be harmed by this strategy. Patients and Methods We focused on patients who received 12 cycles of FOLFIRINOX (arm A, N = 88) or 8 cycles of FOLFIRINOX followed by LV5FU2 maintenance in controlled patients (arm B, N = 91) from the PRODIGE-35 trial. Prognostic factors and predictors of efficiency were identified by using Cox regression. Median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and time to deterioration of quality of life (TTD-QoL) were evaluated. Results Poor independent prognostic factors were primary tumor in place, age <65 years and the presence of liver metastases for PFS, a baseline neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥5 and CA19.9 ≥500 UI/L for OS, independent of the treatment arm. Patients with one metastatic site had a longer PFS in arm A, whereas patients with ≥2 metastatic sites had a longer PFS in arm B. We also identified predictors of OS and TTD-QoL in arm B but these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion Except for patients with one metastatic site who benefited more from 12 cycles of FOLFIRINOX, a maintenance strategy with LV5FU2 should be widely offered to mPC patients whose survival and QoL are preserved after 4 months of FOLFIRINOX. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02352337). This retrospective analysis of the PRODIGE-35 trial showed that LV5FU2 maintenance after 8 cycles of FOLFIRINOX is feasible in patients treated first line for metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Background As cancer treatment, biotherapies can be as effective as chemotherapy while reducing the risk of secondary effects, so that they can be taken over longer periods than conventional chemotherapy. Thus, some trials aimed at assessing the benefit of maintaining biotherapies during chemotherapy-free intervals (CFI). For example, the recent PRODIGE9 trial assessed the effect of maintaining bevacizumab during CFI in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. However, its analysis was hindered by a small difference of exposure to the treatment between the randomized groups and by a large proportion of early drop outs, leading to a potentially unbalanced distribution of confounding factors among the trial completers. To address these limitations, we re-analyzed the PRODIGE9 data to assess the effects of different exposure metrics on all-cause mortality of patients with mCRC using methods originally developed for observational studies. Methods To account for the actual patterns of drug use by individual patients and for possible cumulative effects, we used five alternative time-varying exposure metrics: (i) cumulative dose, (ii) quantiles of the cumulative dose, (iii) standardized cumulative dose, (iv) Theoretical Blood Concentration (TBC), and (v) Weighted Cumulative Exposure (WCE). The last two metrics account for the timing of drug use. Treatment effects were estimated using adjusted Hazard Ratio from multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Results After excluding 112 patients who died during the induction period, we analyzed data on 382 patients, among whom 320 (83.8%) died. All time-varying exposures improved substantially the model’s fit to data, relative to using only the time-invariant randomization group. All exposures indicated a protective effect for higher cumulative bevacizumab doses. The best-fitting WCE and TBC models accounted for both the cumulative effects and the different impact of doses taken at different times. Conclusions All time-varying analyses, regardless of the exposure metric used, consistently suggested protective effects of higher cumulative bevacizumab doses. However, the results may partly reflect the presence of a confusion bias. Complementing the main ITT analysis of maintenance trials with an analysis of potential cumulative effects of treatment actually taken can provide new insights, but the results must be interpreted with caution because they do not benefit from the randomization. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00952029 . Registered 8 August 2009.

Introduction Bevacizumab, an angiogenesis inhibitor, is commonly used alongside chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCCR). While inducing necrosis in tumours, bevacizumab may also lead to atrophy in tumour-free organs. Artificial intelligence (AI) models offer user-friendly methods for measuring organ volumes. This study explores the relationship between bevacizumab-induced atrophy using AI-assisted volume measurement in tumour-free organs and treatment efficacy. Methods This multicenter retrospective study includes patients from the PRODIGE 9 and PRODIGE 20 trials. Organ atrophy was assessed by evaluating volume changes from diagnosis to two months after treatment initiation in patients receiving bevacizumab compared to those who did not. Statistical analyses were performed using the Wilcoxon test, with correlations between volumetric changes. Overall and progression-free survival were assessed using log-rank tests and Cox regression models. Results Among the 214 patients included, 192 received bevacizumab. Both liver and spleen volumes were measured using a deep learning-based AI model and manual measurements. AI-generated volume measurements showed a strong correlation with manual measurements (Pearson coefficient > 0.8). Bevacizumab-treated patients exhibited significant atrophy of non-tumoural liver volume ( p  = 0.0378), while no significant changes were observed in tumour or spleen volumes in either group. Survival analyses revealed that patients with a smaller decrease in non-tumoural liver volume had improved overall survival ( p  = 0.016), although this association became non-significant after adjusting for age, sex, and tumour volume at diagnosis ( p  = 0.25). Conclusion Our findings support the feasibility and reliability of AI in organ volume measurement. While bevacizumab exposure was linked to non-tumoural liver atrophy, its impact on survival remains inconclusive after adjustment. These results pave the way for further research into bevacizumab-induced organ atrophy and the potential of AI in personalizing oncology treatments.