Explore the vast range of titles available.

This weekend's issue is that No leader, Daniel Johnson, has asked Prime Minister Jean Chretien to state that he will do something constitutional to ensure that Quebec has \"distinct society\" status. Chretien responded that he knows that Quebec is a \"Distinct Society,\" but the Referendum is about the separation of Quebec, not about the constitution. The Yes side, particularly [Lucien Bouchard], is crowing about this: yet another example of how the feds really are not going to make changes and that Johnson and Chretien should reveal, in detail, how Quebec will be accommodated if the No side wins. He says that this is the final indication of how Quebec's needs do not assume importance (this from the man who refuses to talk specifically about a \"partnership offer\" to \"the Rest of Canada\" [ROC](f.3) after a Yes vote). The Angus Reid poll of those outside of Quebec: national unity is now the Canadians' first concern. But most think that if Quebec does become independent, it should be treated like other nations with no special economic considerations. 80 percent say a no vote will increase their willingness to negotiate a better deal with Quebec, but 77 percent say that an offer made to Quebec should also be made to other provinces. Only 13 percent favor a close economic union with an independent Quebec. Only 20 percent think that citizens of an independent Quebec should keep the Canadian dollar or Canadian passports. Some polling data: SOM finds 93 percent of Quebeckers want the feds to move immediately to solve constitutional problems. Only 36 percent outside Quebec say move now, 40 percent wait until next year. Both Yes and No supporters want Quebec to take an active part in changing federalism. 81 percent of those in Quebec and 60 percent outside say they believe Ottawa must hand over substantial powers to the provinces. Outside of Quebec, 52 percent say they support constitutional recognition of Quebec's distinctiveness. This is up 27 points from April.