Explore the vast range of titles available.

A cohort of patients who underwent stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease was compared with a propensity-matched cohort of patients who underwent coronary-artery bypass grafting. The risk of death and the composite outcome of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or stroke did not differ significantly between the two groups. The risk of target-vessel revascularization was higher in the group that received stents. The risk of death and the composite outcome of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or stroke did not differ significantly between the two groups. The risk of target-vessel revascularization was higher in the group that received stents. Significant narrowing of the left main coronary artery puts a patient at high risk, since it can jeopardize the entire myocardium of the left ventricle, and it has the worst prognosis of any form of coronary artery disease. 1 On the basis of clinical trials that show a survival benefit with bypass surgery as compared with medical treatment, 1 – 4 coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been considered standard therapy for patients with left main coronary artery disease and is recommended by current practice guidelines. 5 , 6 Because of concern about procedural risk and long-term durability, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) usually has been restricted . . .

There are conflicting data regarding the benefit of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)–guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over angiography-guided PCI. Since the last meta-analysis was published, several new studies have been reported. We performed a comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical impact of IVUS-guided PCI with drug-eluting stent compared with conventional angiography-guided PCI. This meta-analysis included 26,503 patients from 3 randomized and 14 observational studies; 12,499 patients underwent IVUS-guided PCI and 14,004 underwent angiography-guided PCI. Main outcome measures were total mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). IVUS-guided PCI was significantly associated with more stents, longer stents, and larger stents. Regarding clinical outcomes, IVUS-guided PCI was associated with a significantly lower risk of TLR (odds ratio [OR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66 to 1.00, p = 0.046). In addition, the risk of death (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.79, p <0.001), MI (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.75, p <0.001), and stent thrombosis (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.75, p <0.001) were also decreased. In conclusion, our meta-analysis demonstrated that IVUS-guided PCI was associated with lower risk of death, MI, TLR, and stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent implantation.

There is limited data comparing effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents in patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). We compared the long-term outcomes of the 2 revascularization strategies in 1,246 patients presented with NSTE-ACS for left main or multivessel coronary artery disease. Data were pooled from the Randomized Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in the Treatment of Patients with Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease (BEST) trial, the Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease (PRECOMBAT) trial, and the Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 study groups. During the median follow-up of 60 months, the rate of the primary outcome was significantly lower with CABG than with PCI (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56 to 0.98; p = 0.036). This difference was mainly attributed to a significant reduction in the rate of myocardial infarction (HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.82, p = 0.006). The superiority of CABG over PCI was consistent across the major subgroups. The individual risks of death from any causes or stroke were not different between the 2 groups. In contrast, the rate of repeat revascularization was significantly lower in the CABG group than in the PCI group (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.75, p <0.001). In this study, among patients with NSTE-ACS for left main or multivessel coronary artery disease, CABG significantly reduces the risk of death from any causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke compared with PCI with drug-eluting stents.

The aim of the present study was to assess the intravascular ultrasound predictors for angiographic edge restenosis after newer generation drug-eluting stent implantation. A total of 820 patients (987 lesions) who underwent newer generation drug-eluting stent placement (236 Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stents, 246 Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents, and 505 everolimus-eluting stents) with 9 months of angiographic surveillance were enrolled. The post-stenting angiographic and intravascular ultrasound images of 1,668 reference segments (681 proximal and 987 distal) were analyzed. Overall, 37% of angiographically normal proximal reference segments and 21% of angiographically normal distal reference segments had plaque burden >50%. In the overall cohort of 1,668 reference segments, 47 (2.8%) had 9-month angiographic edge restenosis (diameter stenosis >50%). Edge restenosis was predicted by a post-stenting reference segment plaque burden >54.5% (sensitivity 81%, specificity 80%) and a reference segment minimum lumen area of 5.7 mm2 (sensitivity 72%, specificity 59%). The edge restenosis rate was 2.1% in the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stents, 2.4% in the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents, and 3.4% in the everolimus-eluting stents lesions (p = 0.311). The predictive cutoff of the reference plaque burden was 56.3% for Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stents, 57.3% for Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents, and 54.2% for everolimus-eluting stents. The criteria for residual plaque burden were similar between proximal and distal reference segments (56.4% vs 51.9%, respectively), but the minimum lumen area criteria were quite different (<7.1 mm2 for proximal vs <4.8 mm2 for distal reference segments). In conclusion, after newer drug-eluting stent implantation, edge restenosis was predicted by post-stenting reference segment plaque burden >55%.

Patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis were assigned to either CABG or PCI with sirolimus-eluting stents. At 1 year, with a wide prespecified noninferiority margin, PCI was found to be noninferior to CABG. Anumber of registry reports, as well as a substudy from a large, randomized trial, have indicated that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may be an acceptable alternative to coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) in some patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. 1 – 11 Recent clinical guidelines have accordingly stated that elective PCI can be considered for patients who have unprotected left main coronary artery disease, although they suggest that the aggregated evidence favors CABG. 12 , 13 Whether the outcomes after PCI are similar to those after CABG remains uncertain, however, owing to the lack of large, randomized clinical trials. Registry results have . . .

Cilostazol has reduced restenosis and repeat intervention after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. However, there is little data regarding impact of cilostazol on cardiac events after DES implantation. Therefore, we assessed the long-term efficacy and safety of cilostazol in patients undergoing successful DES implantation. The patients (n = 3,099) undergoing successful DES implantation were treated with triple (aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol; triple group, n = 1,443) or dual (aspirin and clopidogrel; dual group, n = 1,656) antiplatelet therapy. We compared adverse outcomes (death, myocardial infarction [MI], or stent thrombosis) at 12 months using the inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) for the entire cohort and propensity score matching. After IPTW adjustment, 12-month death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.762, 95% CI 0.401-1.448, P = .4062) was not different between the 2 groups. However, 12-month MI (HR 0.233, 95% CI 0.077-0.703, P = .0097) and stent thrombosis (HR 0.136, 95% CI 0.035-0.521, P = .0036) were significantly lower in triple group with no difference of major bleeding (HR 0.969, 95% CI 0.443-2.119, P = .9372). In the propensity score–matched cohort (965 pairs), 12-month clinical outcomes were similar to those of IPTW adjustment. On extended Cox model, duration of triple antiplatelet therapy was associated with reduction of stent thrombosis (HR 0.056, 95% CI 0.003-0.916, P = .0433) and MI (HR 0.749, 95% CI 0.568-0.988, P = .0408). Triple antiplatelet therapy significantly reduced 12-month risks of stent thrombosis and MI after DES implantation compared with dual antiplatelet therapy without increased risk of bleeding complications. The longer duration of triple therapy after DES implantation was associated with the lower risk of stent thrombosis and MI.

Functional lesion assessment for coronary tandem lesions and its clinical applications have not been thoroughly studied. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the fractional flow reserve (FFR) gradient across an individual stenosis (ΔFFR) during pressure-wire pullback is a surrogate of the relative functional severity of each stenosis in coronary tandem lesions. For in vitro validation, computational flow dynamic modeling of coronary tandem lesion with various degree of stenosis was constructed. For clinical validation, a total of 52 patients (104 lesions) with coronary tandem lesions (2 stenoses along 1 coronary artery) were consecutively enrolled, and tailored stent procedures based on ΔFFR was performed, at first treating the lesion with large ΔFFR and then subsequently reassessing the FFR for the remaining lesion. The coronary stenosis was considered functionally significant and stenting was performed when the FFR of a lesion was ≤0.80. Using in vitro computational flow dynamic modeling, the lesion with the large ΔFFR of the coronary tandem lesion was indicated as the lesion with the greater degree of simulated diameter stenosis. In the clinical cohort, 28 patients (53.8%) had only single-lesion treatment, and stent implantation for 28 lesions (26.9%) was deferred according to the proposed strategy. During the 9-month follow-up period, only 1 repeat revascularization occurred among the deferred lesions. In conclusion, for the treatment of coronary tandem lesions, ΔFFR may be a useful index for prioritizing the treatment sequence and optimizing the stenting procedure. In this way, unnecessary stent implantation can be avoided, with the achievement of favorable functional and clinical outcomes.

Conflicting data on sex-based differences in outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among Western population exist. Little is known about the nature of sex-specific PCI outcomes in an Asian population. We performed a pooled analysis using 23,604 patients from 11 prospective PCI clinical studies performed in Korea. The primary outcome was a major cardiovascular event, defined as composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or stroke. Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and target vessel revascularization. Thirty-day and 2-year rates of major cardiovascular events were more frequent in women than in men, mainly because of a higher incidence of periprocedural myocardial infarction in women (30-day: 9.2% vs 7.1%; 2-year: 11.2% vs 8.9%). After multivariable adjustment, women had significantly higher risks of 30-day (hazard ratio [HR] 1.27, 95% CI 1.19-1.36) and 2-year major cardiovascular events (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.13-1.30). Unadjusted 30-day and 2-year all-cause mortality was similar between women and men (30-day: 0.5% vs 0.4%; 2-year: 2.8% vs 2.8%). However, after multivariable adjustment, women had a lower adjusted risk of 2-year death (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77-0.87). No sex-based difference was observed for target vessel revascularization (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.91-1.25). Overall, sex-specific findings for outcomes were consistent across multiple patient subgroups. Among Korean population undergoing contemporary PCI, women have a significantly higher risk of short- and long-term major cardiovascular events than do men but have better long-term survival.

Clinical outcomes for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease between coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and drug-eluting stents (DESs) remain controversial. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using DESs with CABG in patients with ULMCA disease. Databases were searched for clinical studies that reported outcomes after PCI with DESs and CABG for treatment of ULMCA disease. End points of this meta-analysis were mortality; composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke; and target vessel revascularization at 1-year follow-up. Pooled effects were calculated using fixed-effects model (Mantel–Haenszel method) or random-effects models (Dersimonian–Laird method). Twelve clinical studies (3 randomized trials and 9 observational studies) with 5,079 patients were involved in this study. At 1-year follow-up, there were trends toward lower risk of death (odds ratio [OR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45 to 1.02) and the composite end point of death, MI, or stroke (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.00) in the DES group compared to the CABG group. However, target vessel revascularization was significantly higher in the DES group compared to the CABG group (OR 3.52, 95% CI 2.72 to 4.56). In conclusion, PCI with DESs is associated with favorable outcomes for mortality; composite end point of death, MI, or stroke; and a higher risk of target vessel revascularization compared to CABG in patients with ULMCA disease.

Even in the drug-eluting stent era, restenosis has remained an unresolved issue, particularly in the treatment of complex coronary lesions. In this study, patient-level data from 3 randomized trials (Drug-Eluting Stenting Followed by Cilostazol Treatment Reduces Late Restenosis in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus [DECLARE-DIABETES] and Drug-Eluting Stenting Followed by Cilostazol Treatment Reduces Late Restenosis in Patients With Long Native Coronary Lesions [DECLARE-LONG] I and II) were pooled to estimate the differential antirestenotic efficacy of add-on cilostazol according to the implanted drug-eluting stent in patients at high risk for restenosis. A total of 1,399 patients underwent sirolimus-eluting stent (SES; n = 450), paclitaxel-eluting stent (n = 450), and zotarolimus-eluting stent (n = 499) implantation and received triple-antiplatelet therapy (TAT; aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol, n = 700) and dual-antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel, n = 699). Randomization of antiplatelet regimen was stratified by stent type. In-stent late loss after TAT was significantly lower than that after dual-antiplatelet therapy, regardless of implanted stent type. However, the incidence of in-segment restenosis after TAT was significantly lower with SES (0.5% vs 6.7%, p = 0.014) and zotarolimus-eluting stent (12.2% vs 20.0%, p = 0.028) implantation but not paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation (14.4% vs 20.0%, p = 0.244). A significant interaction was present between stent type and antiplatelet regimen for the risk for in-segment restenosis (p = 0.004). Post hoc analysis using bootstrap resampling methods showed that the relative risk reduction for in-segment restenosis after TAT was most prominent with SES implantation. In conclusion, add-on cilostazol effectively reduced restenosis in patients at high risk for restenosis, particularly in those receiving SES, suggesting the sustainable utility of add-on cilostazol therapy in newer generation drug-eluting stents with comparable efficacy with that of SES.