Explore the vast range of titles available.

Abstract Study Objectives Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown no reduction in adverse cardiovascular (CV) events in patients randomized to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This study examined whether randomized study populations were representative of OSA patients attending a sleep clinic. Methods Sleep clinic patients were 3,965 consecutive adults diagnosed with OSA by in-laboratory polysomnography from 2006 to 2010 at a tertiary hospital sleep clinic. Characteristics of these patients were compared with participants of five recent RCTs examining the effect of CPAP on adverse CV events in OSA. The percentage of patients with severe (apnea-hypopnea index, [AHI] ≥ 30 events/h) or any OSA (AHI ≥ 5 events/h) who met the eligibility criteria of each RCT was determined, and those criteria that excluded the most patients identified. Results Compared to RCT participants, sleep clinic OSA patients were younger, sleepier, more likely to be female and less likely to have established CV disease. The percentage of patients with severe or any OSA who met the RCT eligibility criteria ranged from 1.2% to 20.9% and 0.8% to 21.9%, respectively. The eligibility criteria that excluded most patients were preexisting CV disease, symptoms of excessive sleepiness, nocturnal hypoxemia and co-morbidities. Conclusions A minority of sleep clinic patients diagnosed with OSA meet the eligibility criteria of RCTs of CPAP on adverse CV events in OSA. OSA populations in these RCTs differ considerably from typical sleep clinic OSA patients. This suggests that the findings of such OSA treatment-related RCTs are not generalizable to sleep clinic OSA patients. Randomized Intervention with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in CAD and OSA (RICCADSA) trial, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00519597, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00519597. Usefulness of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Treatment in Patients with a First Ever Stroke and Sleep Apnea Syndrome, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00202501, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00202501. Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) on Hypertension and Cardiovascular Morbidity-Mortality in Patients with Sleep Apnea and no Daytime Sleepiness, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00127348, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00127348. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) (ISAACC), https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01335087, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01335087.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent and underdiagnosed medical condition, which is associated with various cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. The current mainstay of therapy is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP); however, CPAP is known to be poorly accepted and tolerated by patients. In randomized controlled trials evaluating CPAP in cardiovascular outcomes, the average usage was less than 3.5 hours, which is below the 4 hours per night recommended to achieve a clinical benefit. This low adherence may have resulted in poor effectiveness and failure to show cardiovascular risk reduction. The mandibular advancement device (MAD) is an intraoral device designed to advance the mandible during sleep. It functions primarily through alteration of the jaw and/or tongue position, which results in improved upper airway patency and reduced upper airway collapsibility. The MAD is an approved alternative therapy that has been consistently shown to be the preferred option by patients who are affected by OSA. Although the MAD is less efficacious than CPAP in abolishing apnea and hypopnea events in some patients, its greater usage results in comparable improvements in quality‐of‐life and cardiovascular measures, including blood pressure reduction. This review summarizes the impact of OSA on cardiovascular health, the limitations of CPAP, and the potential of OSA treatment using MADs in cardiovascular risk reduction.

ObjectivePatients with advanced coronary artery disease are referred for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and it remains unknown if sleep apnoea is a risk marker. We evaluated the association between sleep apnoea and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in patients undergoing non-emergent CABG.MethodsThis was a prospective cohort study conducted between November 2013 and December 2018. Patients from four public hospitals referred to a tertiary cardiac centre for non-emergent CABG were recruited for an overnight sleep study using a wrist-worn Watch-PAT 200 device prior to CABG.ResultsAmong the 1007 patients who completed the study, sleep apnoea (defined as apnoea-hypopnoea index ≥15 events per hour) was diagnosed in 513 patients (50.9%). Over a mean follow-up period of 2.1 years, 124 patients experienced the four-component MACCE (2-year cumulative incidence estimate, 11.3%). There was a total of 33 cardiac deaths (2.5%), 42 non-fatal myocardial infarctions (3.7%), 50 non-fatal strokes (4.9%) and 36 unplanned revascularisations (3.2%). The crude incidence of MACCE was higher in the sleep apnoea group than the non-sleep apnoea group (2-year estimate, 14.7% vs 7.8%; p=0.002). Sleep apnoea predicted the incidence of MACCE in unadjusted Cox regression analysis (HR 1.69; 95% CI 1.18 to 2.43), and remained statistically significant (adjusted HR 1.57; 95% CI 1.09 to 2.25), after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic kidney disease and excessive daytime sleepiness.ConclusionSleep apnoea is independently associated with increased MACCE in patients undergoing CABG.Trial registration number NCT02701504

IntroductionIn addition to hypertension, the constellation of metabolic abnormalities (diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia and/or obesity) independently increases the incidence and severity of cardiovascular diseases, and this is compounded by the modern lifestyle and ageing society. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome is high and non-hypertensive heart failure is common in Asians. Adverse cardiac remodelling is an important substrate for cardiac dysfunction in the onset and progression of heart failure and its amelioration improves outcomes and prognosis. A better understanding of metabolic-driven cardiac remodelling is warranted due to the rising prevalence and complexity of metabolic syndrome and strong interests in targeted therapy.Methods and analysisResponse of the myocardium to hypertrophic conditions in the adult population is a prospective observational cohort study with an aim to establish the significance of cardiac remodelling by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). The current recruitment target is 2000 participants. Expanding from the initial population with hypertension, the study examines adults with cardiometabolic conditions, including diabetes, dyslipidaemia, obesity and fatty liver disease. Eligible patients are identified at National Heart Centre Singapore, primary care clinics and through public outreach. Physical, clinical, imaging and biochemical data are collected. Cardiac remodelling features pertaining to hypertrophy, fibrosis and functional changes are assessed on CMR. Body adiposity is mapped by MRI across the heart, liver and abdomen. Outcome data are adjudicated and follow-up assessment will be available in a subset of participants. Blood biomarkers will be investigated in relation to imaging findings. Cross-sectional analysis will establish the implication of cardiometabolic disease towards cardiac remodelling, while follow-up and outcome analysis will infer on disease progression and prognosis.Ethics and disseminationThe study was approved by the SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board (2015/2603). Written informed consent is obtained from all participants. Study findings will be reported in peer-reviewed journals and at scientific conferences.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02670031.

Diffuse interstitial fibrosis is associated with adverse outcomes in hypertensive heart disease and may be reversible. Sacubitril/valsartan could offer greater anti-fibrotic effects than valsartan alone. In the REVERSE-LVH phase 2 open-labelled trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT: 03553810; funded by the National Medical Research Council of Singapore), 78 patients with essential hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) were randomized 1:1 to sacubitril/valsartan or valsartan for 52 weeks. Primary endpoint was a change in interstitial volume, assessed using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Despite similar 24-hour systolic blood pressure at 52 weeks (125 ± 11 vs. 126 ± 11 mmHg; P  = 0.762), sacubitril/valsartan resulted in a greater absolute reduction in interstitial volume compared to valsartan (−5.2 ± 5.4 vs. −2.5 ± 3.1 mL; P  = 0.006). Secondary endpoints showed significant differences favoring sacubitril/valsartan in LV mass, left atrial volume, estimated LV filling pressure, and improved cardiac circulating biomarkers (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and high-sensitivity troponin T). Other markers of cardiac volumes, function and mechanics were similar between the two treatment arms. Here we show the potential myocardial benefits of sacubitril/valsartan beyond blood pressure control, though larger studies are needed to confirm their clinical relevance. Here the authors compare the efficacy between sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan in improving diffuse myocardial fibrosis in patients with hypertensive heart disease, assessed as change in interstitial volume with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. The results show potential myocardial benefits of sacubitril/valsartan beyond blood pressure control.

Purpose The NoSAS score was developed to identify subjects at high risk of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). We aimed to validate the NoSAS score in a multiethnic Asian cohort and compare its performance to the STOP-Bang and Berlin questionnaires. Methods A sample of 242 subjects selected from a population-based cohort in Singapore completed home-based sleep testing with an Embletta device (type 3 monitor). All subjects were given the STOP-Bang and Berlin questionnaires for self-administration prior to the sleep study. The NoSAS score was subsequently calculated based on available demographic data and Berlin questionnaire responses. Results The prevalence of severe SDB, defined as an apnea-hypopnea index cutoff of ≥30 events/h, was 10.7%. The number of subjects who were classified as high risk by the NoSAS score and STOP-Bang and Berlin questionnaires were 76 (31.4%), 89 (36.8%), and 79 (32.6%), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of the NoSAS score to predict severe SDB were 69.2, 73.1, 95.2, and 23.7%, respectively. The STOP-Bang and Berlin questionnaires performed similarly to the NoSAS score, with area under the curve (AUC) values of all three questionnaires clustered around 0.682–0.748. Compared to the STOP-Bang (94.8%) and Berlin questionnaires (96.3%), the NoSAS score (95.2%) had equally high negative predictive value in ruling out severe SDB. Conclusions The NoSAS score performed similarly to the STOP-Bang and Berlin questionnaires in a multiethnic Asian cohort. All three questionnaires had high negative predictive values in ruling out severe SDB and may have utility as screening tools.

Patients with cancer are at increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. Guidelines do not address lipid profile targets for these patients. Within the lipid profiles, we hypothesized that patients with cancer develop MI or stroke at lower low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations than patients without cancer and suffer worse outcomes. We linked nationwide longitudinal MI, stroke and cancer registries from years 2007–2017. We identified 42,148 eligible patients with MI (2421 prior cancer; 39,727 no cancer) and 43,888 eligible patients with stroke (3152 prior cancer; 40,738 no cancer). Median LDL-C concentration was lower in the prior cancer group than the no cancer group at incident MI [2.43 versus 3.10 mmol/L, adjusted ratio 0.87 (95% CI 0.85–0.89)] and stroke [2.81 versus 3.22 mmol/L, adjusted ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.91–0.95)]. Similarly, median triglyceride and total cholesterol concentrations were lower in the prior cancer group, with no difference in high density lipoprotein cholesterol. Prior cancer was associated with higher post-MI mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.48, 95% CI 1.37–1.59] and post-stroke mortality (adjusted HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.52–2.52). Despite lower LDL-C concentrations, patients with prior cancer had worse post-MI and stroke mortality than patients without cancer.

The relative and combined effects of sleep apnea with diabetes mellitus (DM) on cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remain unknown. In this secondary analysis of data from the SABOT study, 1007 patients were reclassified into four groups based on their sleep apnea and DM statuses, yielding 295, 218, 278, and 216 patients in the sleep apnea (+) DM (+), sleep apnea (+) DM (−), sleep apnea (−) DM (+), and sleep apnea (−) DM (−) groups, respectively. After a mean follow-up period of 2.1 years, the crude incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event was 18% in the sleep apnea (+) DM (+), 11% in the sleep apnea (+) DM (−), 13% in the sleep apnea (−) DM (+), and 5% in the sleep apnea (−) DM (−) groups. Using sleep apnea (−) DM (−) as the reference group, a Cox regression analysis indicated that sleep apnea (+) and DM (+) independently predicted MACCEs (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.7–6.2; p  = 0.005) and hospitalization for heart failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 12.6; 95% confidence interval, 3.0–52.3; p  < 0.001). Sleep apnea and DM have independent effects on the prognosis of patients undergoing CABG. Clinical trial registration : ClinicalTrials.gov identification no. NCT02701504.

IntroductionAlthough treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) reduces blood pressure (BP), adherence to CPAP is often suboptimal. A mandibular advancement device (MAD) is a guideline-endorsed alternative therapy for OSA. Still, there is limited evidence on the relative efficacy between MAD and CPAP on BP reduction. We evaluate whether treatment of moderate-to-severe OSA using MAD can improve BP and other health-related outcomes compared with CPAP.Methods and analysisThis is a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial conducted. We will recruit 220 Asians with a history of hypertension and high cardiovascular risk for an overnight polysomnography screening. Those with moderate-to-severe OSA (apnoea–hypopnoea index ≥15 events/hour) will be randomised to treatment with either MAD or CPAP in a 1:1 ratio. Stratified by age (60 vs <60 years old), body mass index (25 vs <25 kg/m2) and apnoea–hypopnoea index (30 vs <30 events/hour), an adaptive randomisation scheme with permuted blocks constructed in real-time is implemented to restrict imbalance. The overall study duration is 12 months. The primary endpoint is the 24-hour mean arterial BP difference between baseline and 6-month follow-up. The secondary endpoints include other measures of ambulatory BP monitoring, arrhythmia based on a 4-day electrocardiographic monitoring, biomarker and proteomic analysis, cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived myocardial fibrosis and remodelling and quality-of-life questionnaires. Recruitment began in October 2019 and ended in December 2022. Comparison between MAD and CPAP will be performed using covariance (ANCOVA) analysis of the changes in 24-hour mean arterial BP while adjusting for the baseline 24-hour mean arterial BP. We will compare the 95% CIs around the treatment difference point estimate with the prespecified non-inferiority margin (1.5 mm Hg). If the upper limit of the 95% CI is <1.5 mm Hg and crosses 0, non-inferiority of the MAD relative to CPAP will be established.Ethics and disseminationThe Domain Specific Review Board-C, National Healthcare Group under approved the study protocol (NHG DSRB Ref: 2019/00359, approved on 28 August 2019). Study findings will be disseminated to various local, national, and international audiences through abstract presentations and publication in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNCT04119999.

Objectives: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been found to reduce serum urate in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. To evaluate if this effect applies to both patients with and without diabetes, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of SGLT2 inhibitors on serum urate levels in this population. Methods: Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and SCOPUS) were searched on 25 September 2021 for articles published from 1 January 2000 up to 25 September 2021, for studies that examined the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on serum urate in study subjects. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed, with subgroup analyses on the type of SGLT2 inhibitor agent administered, presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, presence of chronic kidney disease and drug dose. Results: A total of 43 randomized controlled trials, with a combined cohort of 31,921 patients, were included. Both patients with [−31.48 μmol/L; 95% confidence interval (CI): −37.35 to −25.60] and without diabetes (−91.38 μmol/L; 95% CI: −126.53 to −56.24) on SGLT2 inhibitors had significantly lower urate levels when compared with placebo. This treatment effect was similarly observed across different types of SGLT2 inhibitors. However, in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with chronic kidney disease, the reduction in serum urate with SGLT2 inhibitors became insignificant (95% CI: −22.17 to 5.94, p < 0.01). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that SGLT2 inhibitors are beneficial in reducing serum urate in patients with and without diabetes. SGLT2 inhibitors could therefore contribute to the general treatment of hyperuricaemia.