Explore the vast range of titles available.

Introduction Plasma-derived von Willebrand factor containing FVIII concentrates (pdVWF/FVIII-C) are indicated as replacement therapy for patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD). This study assessed safety and efficacy associated with long-term real-world experience of the pdVWF/FVIII-C, Fanhdi®, in patients with VWD. Methods This observational, prospective, post-authorization cohort study was conducted at five centers in Spain. Patients with VWD were treated with the pdVWF/FVIII-C to achieve satisfactory hemostasis for on-demand (bleeding episodes and surgical/invasive procedures) and prophylaxis treatment. Clinical efficacy was evaluated as the response to treatment in both settings. Safety parameters were assessed. Results Fifteen VWD patients received at least one dose of the pdVWF/FVIII-C and were followed for 12 months. Forty-six bleeding episodes were reported for 9 (60.0%) patients, and 6 surgical/invasive procedures for 5 (33.3%) patients. Most frequently reported bleedings were gastrointestinal (3 [33.0%] patients) and gynecological (3 [33.0%] patients). No complications nor bleeding episodes related to surgical/invasive procedures were reported. Overall clinical efficacy of treatment (including on-demand and prophylaxis) achieved 100% excellent and/or good (n = 15 patients), being excellent for 7 (46.7%) patients. There were 27 treatment-emergent adverse events in 8 (53.3%) patients, 11 serious adverse events in 3 (20.0%) patients, but none of them were drug-related. No clinical signs and symptoms of immunogenicity or thromboembolic events were reported. Conclusions This real-world evidence study confirmed the efficacy of the pdVWF/FVIII-C as on-demand and/or prophylaxis treatment in patients with bleeding episodes or surgical procedures in VWD. Fanhdi® was well tolerated without any safety concerns.

Background Navafenterol (AZD8871) is a dual-pharmacology muscarinic antagonist β 2− agonist (MABA) molecule in development for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of single doses of navafenterol were investigated in patients with moderate to severe COPD. Methods This was a randomized, five-way complete cross-over study. Patients received single doses of navafenterol 400 μg, navafenterol 1800 μg and placebo (all double-blind) and indacaterol 150 μg and tiotropium 18 μg (both open-label active comparators). The primary pharmacodynamic endpoint was change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) on day 2. Safety and tolerability were monitored throughout. Results Thirty-eight patients were randomized and 28 (73.7%) completed the study. Navafenterol 400 μg and 1800 μg demonstrated statistically significant improvements vs placebo in change from baseline in trough FEV 1 (least squares mean [95% confidence interval]: 0.111 [0.059, 0.163] L and 0.210 [0.156, 0.264] L, respectively, both P  < .0001). The changes were significantly greater with navafenterol 1800 μg vs the active comparators (least squares mean treatment difference: 0.065–0.069 L, both P  < .05). The frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar for placebo and the active comparators (range 34.4–37.5%), slightly higher for navafenterol 400 μg (52.9%), and lowest for navafenterol 1800 μg (22.6%). Conclusions Both doses of navafenterol demonstrated sustained bronchodilation over 24 h. Navafenterol was well tolerated and no safety concerns were raised. Trial registry ClinicalTrials.gov ; No.: NCT02573155 ; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov . Registered 9th October, 2015.

Background: The long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) aclidinium was approved in Europe in 2012 to relieve symptoms in adult patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A post-authorization safely study was initiated to assess potential cardiovascular risks associated with LAMAs versus long-acting beta2-agonists. Purpose: To estimate incidence rates and adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in new users of aclidinium, aclidinium/fonnoterol, tiotropium, other LAMA, long- acting beta-agonists/inhaled corticosteroids (LABA/ICS), and LAMA/LABA compared with initiators of LABA. Patients and Methods: This population-based cohort study included patients with COPD aged [greater than or equal to] 40 years initiating COPD medications in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Auram database from 2012 to 2019. Poisson regression models were used to estimate the IRR for AMI, stroke, and MACE in users of COPD medications versus LABA, adjusting for clinically relevant covariables. Results: The study included 11,121 new users of aclidinium, 4804 of aclidinium/fonnoterol, 56,198 of tiotropium, 23,856 of other LAMA, 17,450 of LAMA/LABA, 70,289 of LABA/ICS, and 13,716 of LABA. During periods of continuous medication use after initiation (current use), crude incidence rates per 1000 person-years for AMI ranged from 8.7 (aclidinium/fonnoterol) to 12.4 (LAMA/ LABA), for stroke ranged from 4.8 (aclidinium/fonnoterol) to 7.2 (LAMA/LABA), and for MACE ranged from 13.5 (aclidinium/ fonnoterol) to 19.3 (LAMA/LABA). Using LABA as reference, adjusted IRRs [95% confidence intervals] were close to 1 for all study drugs for AMI (lowest for aclidinium/fonnoterol, 0.95 [0.60-1.52], and highest for LAMA/LABA, 1.23 [0.91-1.67]), stroke (lowest for aclidinium/fonnoterol, 0.64 [0.39-1.06], and highest for tiotropium, 1.02 [0.81-1.27] for tiotropium) and for MACE (lowest for aclidinium, 0.93 [0.75-1.16], and highest for LAMA/LABA, 1.24 [0.97-1.59]). Conclusion: Risks of AMI, stroke, and MACE in current users of aclidinium, aclidinium/fonnoterol, tiotropium, other LAMA, LAMA/LABA, or LABA/ICS were similar to the risks among current users of LABA. Keywords: aclidinium, acute myocardial infarction, LAMA, stroke, United Kingdom

Background Navafenterol (AZD8871) is a novel, long-acting, dual-pharmacology (muscarinic receptor antagonist and β 2− adrenoceptor agonist) molecule in development for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. Methods These two phase I, randomised, single-blind, multiple-ascending-dose studies evaluated inhaled navafenterol and placebo (3:1 ratio) in healthy, male, non-Japanese (study A; NCT02814656) and Japanese (study B; NCT03159442) volunteers. In each study, volunteers were dosed in three cohorts, allowing gradual dose escalation from 300 μg to 600 μg to 900 μg. The primary objective was to investigate the safety and tolerability of navafenterol at steady state. Pharmacokinetics were also assessed. Results Twenty-four volunteers completed each study (navafenterol, n  = 6; placebo, n  = 2 in each cohort). There were no deaths, serious adverse events (AEs) or treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) leading to discontinuation of navafenterol. The most frequent TEAEs were vessel puncture-site bruise (placebo, n = 2; navafenterol 900 μg; n  = 3) in study A and diarrhoea (placebo, n  = 1; navafenterol 300 μg, n = 2; navafenterol 900 μg, n = 3) in study B. No dose-response relationship was observed for TEAEs. There was a dose-dependent increase in mean heart rate on day 16 in both studies. The pharmacokinetics of navafenterol were similar between non-Japanese and Japanese volunteers. Conclusions Multiple ascending doses of navafenterol were well-tolerated and the safety and pharmacokinetics of navafenterol were similar in non-Japanese and Japanese volunteers. The findings support navafenterol clinical development. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ; Nos.: NCT02814656 and NCT03159442; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov .

Oral corticosteroid use is limited by side effects, some caused by off‐target actions on the mineralocorticoid receptor that disrupt electrolyte balance. AZD9567 is a selective, nonsteroidal glucocorticoid receptor modulator. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of AZD9567 and prednisolone were assessed in a phase IIa study. Anti‐inflammatory mechanism of action was also evaluated in vitro in monocytes from healthy donors. In this randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group, multicenter study, patients with active rheumatoid arthritis were randomized 1:1 to AZD9567 40 mg or prednisolone 20 mg once daily orally for 14 days. The primary end point was change from baseline in DAS28‐CRP at day 15. Secondary end points included components of DAS28‐CRP, American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70), and safety end points, including serum electrolytes. Overall, 21 patients were randomized to AZD9567 (n = 11) or prednisolone (n = 10), and all completed the study. As anticipated, AZD9567 had a similar efficacy profile to prednisolone, with no clinically meaningful (i.e., >1.0) difference in change from baseline to day 15 in DAS28‐CRP between AZD9567 and prednisolone (least‐squares mean difference: 0.47, 95% confidence interval: −0.49 to 1.43). Similar results were observed for the secondary efficacy end points. In vitro transcriptomic analysis showed that anti‐inflammatory responses were similar for AZD9567, prednisolone, and dexamethasone. Unlike prednisolone, AZD9567 had no effect on the serum sodium:potassium ratio. The safety profile was not different from that of prednisolone. Larger studies of longer duration are required to determine whether AZD9567 40 mg may in the future be an alternative to prednisolone in patients with inflammatory disease.

The long-acting anticholinergic (LAMA) aclidinium was approved in Europe in 2012 to relieve symptoms in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A Post-Authorisation Safety Study (PASS) was initiated to assess potential cardiovascular safety concerns for aclidinium. To estimate the adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) for hospitalisation for heart failure in patients with COPD who were new users of aclidinium, tiotropium, other LAMA, long-acting beta-agonists/inhaled corticosteroids (LABA/ICS), and LAMA/LABA were compared with initiators of LABA. This population-based cohort study included patients with COPD aged ≥40 years initiating COPD medications in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD in the United Kingdom from 2012 to 2017. Medications were identified via general practice prescriptions. The first-ever hospitalisations for heart failure were identified in the Hospital Episode Statistics, and general practitioner records from the CPRD. Poisson regression models were used to estimate the IRR for hospitalisation for heart failure in users of COPD medications versus LABA, adjusting for clinically relevant covariates. The study included 4350 new users of aclidinium, 23,405 of tiotropium, 6977 of other LAMAs, 3122 of LAMA/LABA, 26,093 of LABA/ICS, and 5678 of LABA. Mean age was 69-70 years across medication groups. Aclidinium users had the highest proportion of severe COPD, and LABA users had the lowest (35% vs 19%, respectively). Crude incidence rates per 1000 person-years for the first-ever hospitalisation for heart failure ranged from 6.9 in LABA to 9.5 in aclidinium. Using LABA as reference, adjusted IRRs (95% confidence interval) for first-ever hospitalisation for heart failure were 0.90 (0.53-1.53) for aclidinium, 1.02 (0.69-1.51) for tiotropium, 0.86 (0.50-1.47) for other LAMAs, 1.09 (0.41-2.92) for LAMA/LABA, and 1.01 (0.69, 1.48) for LABA/ICS. The study did not find increased risks of hospitalisations for heart failure in new users of aclidinium, tiotropium, other LAMAs, LAMA/LABA, and LABA/ICS compared with LABA.

[...]once-daily doses of the MABA AZD8871 in patients with COPD delivered significant bronchodilation and clinically meaningful improvement of symptoms. Author Contributions: D.S. is the overall guarantor of this report and takes responsibility for the content, including the data and analysis; L.J., U.W.H., A.J., M.-P.M., V.B., A.L., A.A., C.A., and I.P. contributed to the study design, concept, and/or interpretation; D.S. and R.F. contributed to data acquisition; A.J. and M.-P.M. performed the statistical analyses; and all authors critically revised the manuscript and approved the submitted version. Vogelmeier CF, Criner GJ, Martinez FJ, Anzueto A, Barnes PJ, Bourbeau J, et at Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease 2017 report: GOLD executive summary.

Background and Objectives Aclidinium bromide was approved in the European Union for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in adult patients in 2012 and in a fixed-dose combination with formoterol in 2014. We characterised new users of aclidinium, aclidinium/formoterol and other COPD medications and evaluated off-label prescribing of these medications in three European populations. Methods We described demographic characteristics, comorbidities, comedications, COPD severity and off-label prescribing of new users of aclidinium, aclidinium/formoterol and other COPD medications in patients with COPD aged ≥ 40 years in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD, UK), Danish National Health Databases, and German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database (GePaRD) between 2015 and 2017. Results We included 17,668 new users of aclidinium (CPRD, 4871; Denmark, 2836; GePaRD, 9961) and 14,808 new users of aclidinium/formoterol (CPRD, 2153; Denmark, 2586; GePaRD, 10,069). Study patients were of similar age, except in GePaRD, where users of long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA)/inhaled corticosteroids were younger. Patients had multiple comorbidities and used multiple comedications—most frequently hypertension (50–79%) and short-acting beta2-agonists (26–84%). Aclidinium users in CPRD and long-acting anticholinergics/LABA users in Denmark and GePaRD had the highest frequency of severe/very severe COPD. Off-label prescribing of aclidinium (5.0% [CPRD]–8.9% [Denmark]) and aclidinium/formoterol (2.6% [GePaRD]–3.2% [CPRD]) was low, and the main reason was asthma without a COPD diagnosis. Conclusions Aclidinium and aclidinium/formoterol were mostly prescribed according to label, with preference given to older patients with more severe COPD and to patients with a high prevalence of comorbidities and comedication use.