Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
5 result(s) for "Leichman, Lawrence P"
Sort by:
Trastuzumab with trimodality treatment for oesophageal adenocarcinoma with HER2 overexpression (NRG Oncology/RTOG 1010): a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial
Trastuzumab is a monoclonal antibody against HER2 (also known as ERBB2). The primary objective of the NRG Oncology/RTOG-1010 trial was to establish whether trastuzumab improves disease-free survival when combined with trimodality treatment (paclitaxel plus carboplatin and radiotherapy, followed by surgery) for patients with untreated HER2-overexpressing oesophageal adenocarcinoma. NRG Oncology/RTOG-1010 was an open label, randomised, phase 3 trial for which patients were accrued from 111 NRG-affiliated institutions in the USA. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) with newly diagnosed pathologically confirmed oesophageal adenocarcinoma, American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition T1N1–2 or T2–3N0–2 stage disease, and a Zubrod performance status of 0–2. Patients were stratified by adenopathy (no vs yes [coeliac absent] vs yes [coeliac present ≤2 cm]) and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive weekly intravenous paclitaxel (50 mg/m2 intravenously over 1 h) and carboplatin (area under the curve 2, intravenously over 30–60 min) for 6 weeks with radiotherapy 50·4 Gy in 28 fractions (chemoradiotherapy) followed by surgery, with or without intravenous trastuzumab (4 mg/kg in week one, 2 mg/kg per week for 5 weeks during chemoradiotherapy, 6 mg/kg once presurgery, and 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 13 treatments starting 21–56 days after surgery). The primary endpoint, disease-free survival, was defined as the time from randomisation to death or first of locoregional disease persistence or recurrence, distant metastases, or second primary malignancy. Analyses were done by modified intention to treat. This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01196390; it is now closed and in follow-up. 606 patients were entered for HER2 assessment from Dec 30, 2010 to Nov 10, 2015, and 203 eligible patients who were HER2-positive were enrolled and randomly assigned to chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab (n=102) or chemoradiotherapy alone (n=101). Median duration of follow-up was 2·8 years (IQR 1·4–5·7). Median disease-free survival was 19·6 months (95% CI 13·5–26·2) with chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab compared with 14·2 months (10·5–23·0) for chemoradiotherapy alone (hazard ratio 0·99 [95% CI 0·71–1·39], log-rank p=0·97). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 41 (43%) of 95 patients in the chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab group versus 52 (54%) of 96 in the chemoradiotherapy group and grade 4 events occurred in 20 (21%) versus 21 (22%). The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events for both groups were haematological (53 [56%] of 95 patients in the chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab group vs 55 [57%] of 96 patients in the chemotherapy group) or gastrointestinal disorders (28 [29%] vs 20 [21 %]). 34 (36%) of 95 patients in the chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab group and 27 (28%) of 96 patients in the chemoradiotherapy only group had treatment-related serious adverse events. There were eight treatment-related deaths: five (5%) of 95 patients in the chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab group (bronchopleural fistula, oesophageal anastomotic leak, lung infection, sudden death, and death not otherwise specified), and three (3%) of 96 in the chemoradiotherapy group (two multiorgan failure and one sepsis). The addition of trastuzumab to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for HER2-overexpressing oesophageal cancer was not effective. Trastuzumab did not lead to increased toxicities, suggesting that future studies combining it with or using other agents targeting HER2 in oesophageal cancer are warranted. National Cancer Institute and Genentech.
Delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy among stage III colon cancer patients at a public versus private hospital in New York City
Purpose Prior studies of timeliness of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) initiation in stage III colon cancer have suggested longer time to AC at public compared with private hospitals. Few studies have explored differences in AC completion. We investigated whether timely initiation and completion of AC differed between a public and private hospital, affiliated with the same academic institution in a large, urban setting. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of stage III colon cancer patients who had surgery and AC at the same medical center between 2008 and 2015, either at its affiliated public hospital ( n  = 43) or private hospital ( n  = 79). We defined timely initiation as receiving AC within 60 days postoperatively, and completion as receiving ≥ 75% of planned AC. Univariate and stepwise multivariable logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with AC delivery. Results Median number of days to AC was significantly greater among patients at the public (53, range 31–231) compared with the private hospital (43, range 25–105; p  = 0.002). However, the percentage of patients with timely AC initiation did not differ substantially by hospital (74 vs 81%, p  = 0.40). In multivariable analysis, age (OR 0.95/year, 95% CI 0.91–0.99) and laparoscopic versus open surgery (OR 5.65, 95% CI 1.92–16.62) were significant factors associated with timely AC initiation. Moreover, AC completion did not differ significantly between public (83.7%) and private (89.9%) hospital patients ( p  = 0.32). Conclusions The proportions of patients with timely initiation and completion of AC were similar at a public and private hospital affiliated with a large, urban medical center. Future research should investigate how specific system-level factors help alleviate this expected difference in timely care delivery.
Chemoradiation Therapy versus Chemotherapy Alone for Gastric Cancer after R0 Surgical Resection: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
Objective: Current national guidelines include category 1 recommendations for perioperative chemotherapy or adjuvant chemoradiation with surgical resection for patients with stage IB-IIIB gastric cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized trials in which chemotherapy was prospectively tested against chemoradiation with surgical resection. Methods: We electronically searched PubMed and EMBASE for randomized, controlled clinical trials involving patients with gastric adenocarcinoma, status post-R0 resection. The interventions compared were adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiation, with any chemotherapy regimen. The primary outcomes of interest were disease-free survival and overall survival. The Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model was used to calculate effect sizes. Results: Six trials that included 1,171 patients were evaluated; 599 were randomized to adjuvant chemoradiation and 572 to chemotherapy alone. Chemoradiation was associated with a significant increase in disease-free survival (odds ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval 1.08-2.03) when compared to chemotherapy alone. However, there was no significant difference in overall survival (odds ratio 1.27, 95% confidence interval 0.95-1.71). Five trials found no statistically significant differences in toxicities between the two groups. Conclusion: In patients with gastric cancer status post-R0 resection, adjuvant chemoradiation was associated with higher disease-free survival when compared to chemotherapy alone. It remains appropriate to design trials testing new systemic agents with radiotherapy.
High frequency of simultaneous loss of p16 and p16β gene expression in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus but not in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or stomach
Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) was used to measure gene expressions (relative mRNA levels) of p16 and the alternate transcript p16β in esophageal and gastric tumors. p16 gene expression was undetectable in 13 of 25 esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. In 11 of these tumors, p16β was simultaneously missing whereas two of the p16-deficient tumors still expressed p16β. Among 34 esophageal adenocarcinomas and 11 gastric adenocarcinomas, only one tumor lacked p16 expression and all tumors expressed p16β. p16 sequences were not detectable by PCR in genomic DNA from tumors lacking both p16 and p16β mRNA, suggesting that the simultaneous loss of both gene expressions resulted from homozygous genomic deletion of the p16 gene. However, DNA from tumors that lacked p16 mRNA but expressed p16β did contain the p16 gene, consistent with loss of p16 expression in these tumors by transcriptional suppression. No point mutations in p16 cDNA were detected among 12 that were sequenced, but one p16 cDNA from a squamous cell carcinoma had a 19-base deletion, possibly indicating a splice-site mutation. Among those tumors that expressed p16 mRNA, the gene expression values of both p16 and p16β varied over a wide range. In some cases, p16 expression was detectable but low, suggesting that down-regulation of p16 expression may be used in some cases to achieve the funtional equivalent of gene deletion or transcriptional silencing. These results demonstrate that p16 expression patterns differ based on tumor histology and origin. Homozygous deletion of p16 appears to be common in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas but in adenocarcinomas, both gene deletion and transcriptional silencing of p16 were infrequent.
A phase 1b study of erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in patients with previously untreated advanced pancreatic cancer: an Academic Oncology GI Cancer Consortium study
Purpose Addition of either nab-paclitaxel or erlotinib to gemcitabine to treat advanced pancreatic cancer has demonstrated overall survival benefit. This study was conducted to evaluate the tolerability and safety of combining all three drugs and assess preliminary evidence of efficacy. Methods In this open-label, phase 1b study, patients with previously untreated, advanced pancreatic cancer were treated in 28-day cycles with intravenous gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15, and once daily oral erlotinib. A standard “3 + 3” design was used. Dose level 1 (DL1) for gemcitabine (mg/m 2 )/nab-paclitaxel (mg/m 2 )/erlotinib (mg) was 1000/125/100, respectively, with de-escalation to DL−1 (1000/100/100), DL−2b (1000/75/100), and DL−3 (1000/75/75). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined by occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in ≤1 of six patients within the first cycle. Efficacy was assessed with CT scans performed at two-cycle intervals. Results Nineteen patients were enrolled. DLTs occurred in two patients at DL1, three patients at DL−1, two patients at DL−2b, and one patient at DL−3. The MTD for the combination of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel/erlotinib was DL−3 (1000/75/75). In analyses of efficacy among 14 evaluable patients, partial responses were observed in four of six patients at DL1, one of two patients at DL−2b, and two of six patients at DL−3. Conclusion The addition of erlotinib to gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel is not tolerable at standard single-agent dosing of all drugs. However, significant clinical activity was noted, even at DL−3. Further study of the combination will need to incorporate reduced dosing.