Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
150 result(s) for "Leroux-Roels, Geert"
Sort by:
Differences in antigenic sites and other functional regions between genotype A and G mumps virus surface proteins
The surface proteins of the mumps virus, the fusion protein (F) and haemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN), are key factors in mumps pathogenesis and are important targets for the immune response during mumps virus infection. We compared the predicted amino acid sequences of the F and HN genes from Dutch mumps virus samples from the pre-vaccine era (1957–1982) with mumps virus genotype G strains (from 2004 onwards). Genotype G is the most frequently detected mumps genotype in recent outbreaks in vaccinated communities, especially in Western Europe, the USA and Japan. Amino acid differences between the Jeryl Lynn vaccine strains (genotype A) and genotype G strains were predominantly located in known B-cell epitopes and in N-linked glycosylation sites on the HN protein. There were eight variable amino acid positions specific to genotype A or genotype G sequences in five known B-cell epitopes of the HN protein. These differences may account for the reported antigenic differences between Jeryl Lynn and genotype G strains. We also found amino acid differences in and near sites on the HN protein that have been reported to play a role in mumps virus pathogenesis. These differences may contribute to the occurrence of genotype G outbreaks in vaccinated communities.
A Novel Carbohydrate Fatty-Acid Monosulphate Ester, Squalane-in-Water Adjuvant Is Safe and Enhances Inactivated Influenza Vaccine Immunogenicity in Older Adults
Influenza vaccines are the primary strategy to prevent severe influenza disease; however, their efficacy is often suboptimal, particularly in older adults (OAs). LiteVax Adjuvant (LVA), a novel adjuvant containing carbohydrate fatty-acid monosulphate ester (CMS) as the active ingredient, has demonstrated a favourable safety profile and enhanced immunogenicity when combined with a low-dose seasonal influenza vaccine in adults aged 18 to 50 years in a first-in-human phase 1 study. The present study investigates the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of CMS-based adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine in OAs, with a comparison to responses in younger adults (YAs). In this phase 1b, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial, 36 YAs (18–50 years) and 48 OAs (≥60 years) were randomized (1:1:1) to receive either 0.5 mg or 1 mg LVA combined with VaxigripTetra, or VaxigripTetra alone. Solicited adverse events (AEs) were recorded using an electronic diary for 7 days following vaccination. Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers against four influenza strains were measured at baseline (pre-vaccination) and at 7-, 28-, and 180-days post-vaccination. All 24 YAs and 31 out of 32 OAs receiving CMS-based adjuvanted vaccines reported pain post-vaccination, compared to 8/12 YAs and 4/16 OAs receiving VaxigripTetra. Systemic AEs were more frequently reported among YAs receiving CMS-based adjuvanted vaccines (22/24) compared to those receiving VaxigripTetra (8/12). In OAs, the number of systemic AEs was similar regardless of CMS-based adjuvant administration. Most AEs were mild to moderate and resolved within 3 days. Both CMS-based adjuvanted formulations elicited increased HI titers at Day 7, peaking at Day 28, with a decline thereafter that remained above baseline at Day 180. In YAs, HI titers were comparable between the CMS-based adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted vaccines across all strains and timepoints. In contrast, CMS-based adjuvanted vaccination in OAs induced higher HI titers at Days 28 and 180 for all influenza strains tested. LVA shows an acceptable safety profile in both age cohorts and enhances humoral immune responses in older adults. The 1 mg dose of LVA was more immunogenic, highlighting its potential utility in this target population. Future research will focus on elucidating the mechanisms underlying the immunostimulatory effect of the CMS-based adjuvant.
Antibody avidity, persistence, and response to antigen recall: comparison of vaccine adjuvants
Differences in innate immune ‘imprinting’ between vaccine adjuvants may mediate dissimilar effects on the quantity/quality of persisting adaptive responses. We compared antibody avidity maturation, antibody/memory B cell/CD4 + T cell response durability, and recall responses to non-adjuvanted fractional-dose antigen administered 1-year post-immunization (Day [D]360), between hepatitis B vaccines containing Adjuvant System (AS)01 B , AS01 E , AS03, AS04, or Alum (NCT00805389). Both the antibody and B cell levels ranked similarly (AS01 B/E /AS03 > AS04 > Alum) at peak response, at D360, and following their increases post-antigen recall (D390). Proportions of high-avidity antibodies increased post-dose 2 across all groups and persisted at D360, but avidity maturation appeared to be more strongly promoted by AS vs. Alum. Post-antigen recall, frequencies of subjects with high-avidity antibodies increased only markedly in the AS groups. Among the AS, total antibody responses were lowest for AS04. However, proportions of high-avidity antibodies were similar between groups, suggesting that MPL in AS04 contributes to avidity maturation. Specific combinations of immunoenhancers in the AS, regardless of their individual nature, increase antibody persistence and avidity maturation.
The role of cell-mediated immunity against influenza and its implications for vaccine evaluation
Influenza vaccines remain the most effective tools to prevent flu and its complications. Trivalent or quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccines primarily elicit antibodies towards haemagglutinin and neuraminidase. These vaccines fail to induce high protective efficacy, in particular in older adults and immunocompromised individuals and require annual updates to keep up with evolving influenza strains (antigenic drift). Vaccine efficacy declines when there is a mismatch between its content and circulating strains. Current correlates of protection are merely based on serological parameters determined by haemagglutination inhibition or single radial haemolysis assays. However, there is ample evidence showing that these serological correlates of protection can both over- or underestimate the protective efficacy of influenza vaccines. Next-generation universal influenza vaccines that induce cross-reactive cellular immune responses (CD4 + and/or CD8 + T-cell responses) against conserved epitopes may overcome some of the shortcomings of the current inactivated vaccines by eliciting broader protection that lasts for several influenza seasons and potentially enhances pandemic preparedness. Assessment of cellular immune responses in clinical trials that evaluate the immunogenicity of these new generation vaccines is thus of utmost importance. Moreover, studies are needed to examine whether these cross-reactive cellular immune responses can be considered as new or complementary correlates of protection in the evaluation of traditional and next-generation influenza vaccines. An overview of the assays that can be applied to measure cell-mediated immune responses to influenza with their strengths and weaknesses is provided here.
Publisher Correction: Differences in antigenic sites and other functional regions between genotype A and G mumps virus surface proteins
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.
Infection, vaccination and risk of dementia: a proposed immunological model
With ageing populations, the prevalence of different types of dementias is increasing. The pathology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most common form of dementia, has been linked to the presence of plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in the central nervous system of patients. There are growing indications that risk of developing dementia correlates with several infectious agents, including human herpes viruses, flaviviruses and SARS-CoV-2. This has led to a proposition that AD and other dementias could be considered as having an infectious disease etiology. Whilst the mechanisms behind this remain unclear, intriguing epidemiological data suggest that several vaccinations are correlated with reduced risk for dementia. Intravesicular administration of the tuberculosis vaccine strain Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) has been associated with decreased risk of dementia in bladder cancer patients. This has led to the hypothesis that non-specific effects of vaccinations, mediated through trained innate immunity, provide a mechanistic explanation. Over the last few years, the AS01-adjuvanted recombinant shingles vaccine has also been associated with reduced risk in several studies. Moreover, in a recent study, immunization with the adjuvanted RSV vaccine, also containing AS01, was shown to reduce risk of dementia. Integrating data on BCG and mechanistic hypotheses, recent findings on the AS01 adjuvant, and the role of trained innate immunity, we describe here an immunological model that connects vaccine and adjuvant mode of action with risk of dementia. This immunological model can help shape a research roadmap to further elucidate the mechanisms behind the collective epidemiological data.
Human Immunity and Susceptibility to Influenza A(H3) Viruses of Avian, Equine, and Swine Origin
Influenza A viruses (IAVs) of subtype H3 that infect humans are antigenically divergent from those of birds, horses, and swine. Human immunity against these viruses might be limited, implying potential pandemic risk. To determine human risk, we selected 4 avian, 1 equine, and 3 swine IAVs representing major H3 lineages. We tested serum collected during 2017-2018 from 286 persons in Belgium for hemagglutination inhibiting antibodies and virus neutralizing antibodies against those animal-origin IAVs and tested replication in human airway epithelia. Seroprevalence rates for circulating IAVs from swine in North America were >51%, swine in Europe 7%-37%, and birds and equids ≤12%. Replication was efficient for cluster IV-A IAVs from swine in North America and IAVs from swine in Europe, intermediate for IAVs from horses and poultry, and absent for IAVs from wild birds and a novel human-like swine IAV in North America. Public health risk may be highest for swine H3 IAVs.
A Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial Evaluating Safety and Immunogenicity of a Varicella Zoster Glycoprotein E Subunit Vaccine Candidate in Young and Older Adults
Background. An adjuvanted recombinant varicella zoster virus (VZV) subunit vaccine is being developed for the prevention of herpes zoster and its complications. Methods. In a phase I/II, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study, older adults (50-70 years) received 2 doses 2 months apart of an adjuvanted recombinant glycoprotein E vaccine (HZ/su; n = 45), a live attenuated Oka strain VZV vaccine (OKA; n = 45), or HZ/su and OKA administered concomitantly (n = 45). To evaluate safety prior to administration in older adults, young adults (18–30 years) were vaccinated with 2 doses 2 months apart of HZ/su (n = 10) or OKA (n = 10). Safety and immunogenicity were assessed up to 42 months for older adults immunized with HZ/su and up to 12 months for all others. Results. Few grade 3 events and no severe adverse events were reported. Fatigue, myalgia, headache, and injection site pain were the most common solicited reactions for HZ/su and occurred more frequently than with OICA. CD4⁺ T-cell and humoral immune responses were much higher with HZ/su than with OKA and remained elevated until 42 months. Addition of OKA to HZ/su did not increase immunogenicity. Conclusions. In this study, HZ/su adjuvanted subunit vaccine was well tolerated and more immunogenic than a live attenuated VZV vaccine.
Antigen sparing and cross-reactive immunity with an adjuvanted rH5N1 prototype pandemic influenza vaccine: a randomised controlled trial
Antigen sparing is regarded as crucial for pandemic vaccine development because worldwide influenza vaccine production capacity is limited. Adjuvantation is an important antigen-sparing strategy. We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant H5N1 split-virion vaccine formulated with a proprietary adjuvant system and investigated whether it can induce cross-reactive immunity. Two doses of an inactivated split A/Vietnam/1194/2004 NIBRG-14 (recombinant H5N1 engineered by reverse genetics) vaccine were administered 21 days apart to eight groups of 50 volunteers aged 18–60 years. We studied four antigen doses (3·8 μg, 7·5 μg, 15 μg, and 30 μg haemagglutinin) given with or without adjuvant. Blood samples were collected to analyse humoral immune response. Adverse events were recorded up through study day 51. Safety analyses were of the whole vaccinated cohort and immunogenicity analyses per protocol. This trial is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00309634. All eight vaccine formulations had a good safety profile. No serious adverse events were reported. The adjuvanted vaccines induced more injection-site symptoms and general symptoms than did the non-adjuvanted vaccines, but most were mild to moderate in intensity and transient in nature. The adjuvanted formulations were significantly more immunogenic than the non-adjuvanted formulations at all antigen doses. At the lowest antigenic dose (3·8 μg), immune responses for the adjuvanted vaccine against the recombinant homologous vaccine strain (A/Vietnam/1194/2004 NIBRG-14, clade 1) met or exceeded all US Food and Drug Administration and European Union licensure criteria. Furthermore, 37 of 48 (77%) participants receiving 3·8 μg of the adjuvanted vaccine seroconverted for neutralising antibodies against a strain derived by reverse genetics from a drifted H5N1 isolate (A/Indonesia/5/2005, clade 2). Adjuvantation conferred significant antigen sparing that could increase the production capacity of pandemic influenza vaccine. Moreover, the cross-clade neutralising antibody responses recorded imply that such a vaccine could be deployed for immunisation before a pandemic.