Explore the vast range of titles available.

Introduction: Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is a hematologic malignancy characterized by the clonal expansion of myeloid progenitors. While it primarily affects the bone marrow, extramedullary relapse occurs in 3–5% of cases, and it is linked to poor prognosis. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement presents diagnostic challenges due to nonspecific symptoms. CNS manifestations include leptomeningeal dissemination, nerve infiltration, parenchymal lesions, and myeloid sarcoma, occurring at any disease stage and frequently asymptomatic. Methods: A 62-year-old man with a recent history of AML in remission presented with diplopia and aching paresthesias in the left periorbital region spreading to the left frontal area. The diagnostic workup included neurological and hematological evaluation, lumbar puncture, brain CT, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with contrast, and dermatological evaluation with skin biopsy due to the appearance of nodular skin lesions on the abdomen and thorax. Results: Neurological evaluation showed hypoesthesia in the left mandibular region, consistent with left trigeminal nerve involvement, extending to the periorbital and frontal areas, and impaired adduction of the left eye with divergent strabismus in the primary position due to left oculomotor nerve palsy. Brain MRI showed an equivocal thickening of the left oculomotor nerve without enhancement. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis initially showed elevated protein (47 mg/dL) with negative cytology; a repeat lumbar puncture one week later detected leukemic cells. Skin biopsy revealed cutaneous AML localization. A diagnosis of AML relapse with CNS and cutaneous localization was made. Salvage therapy with FLAG-IDA-VEN (fludarabine, cytarabine, idarubicin, venetoclax) and intrathecal methotrexate, cytarabine, and dexamethasone was started. Subsequent lumbar punctures were negative for leukemic cells. Due to high-risk status and extramedullary disease, the patient underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Post-transplant aplasia was complicated by septic shock; the patient succumbed to an invasive fungal infection. Conclusions: This case illustrates the diagnostic complexity and poor prognosis of extramedullary AML relapse involving the CNS. Early recognition of neurological signs, including cranial nerve dysfunction, is crucial for timely diagnosis and management. Although initial investigations were negative, further analyses—including repeated CSF examinations and skin biopsy—led to the identification of leukemic involvement. Although neuroleukemiosis cannot be confirmed without nerve biopsy, the combination of clinical presentation, neuroimaging, and CSF data strongly supports the diagnosis of extramedullary relapse of AML. Multidisciplinary evaluation remains essential for detecting extramedullary relapse. Despite treatment achieving CSF clearance, the prognosis remains unfavorable, underscoring the need for vigilant clinical suspicion in hematologic patients presenting with neurological symptoms.

The translocation t(8;9)(p22;p24) results in the production of a chimeric PCM1‐JAK2 fusion protein leading to the constitutive activation of the Janus Kinase 2 that renders this disease potentially sensitive to ruxolitinib. Here, we report an interesting case of PCM1‐JAK2 myeloproliferative neoplasm evolving in myeloid sarcoma and B precursor ALL. The identification of a specific molecular marker offered the possibility to monitor the depth of remission after transplant and to start an early preemptive therapy with ruxolitinib as soon as any evidence of disease reappraisal was documented.

Data on the use of azacytidine and decitabine as salvage therapy for acute myeloid leukemia are limited. We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of 100 patients treated with hypomethylating agents (HMA) as salvage therapy in nine Italian institutions. A total of 24% of patients obtained a response to HMA (CR, PR, or CRi), while 26% showed a stable disease (SD); 50% of patients experienced progressive disease. Median OS was 6.5 months. OS in patients with de novo AML was 6.1 months, while OS in patients with secondary AML (sAML) was 12.3 months (p = 0.037). Median OS after HMA in patients with SD as best response to HMA was similar to median OS in patients with response to HMA (10.6 months vs. 13 months). On multivariate analysis, OS difference between patients who obtained a response versus patients who did not was significant (p = 0.0037). OS difference in sAML was significantly better than in de novo AML (p < 0.00001). HMA showed a remarkable efficacy in terms of response rate and OS in a subgroup of patients (sAMLs), historically characterized by a poor outcome. Therefore, 5Azacitidine and decitabine may represent a good clinical option in a selected patient population with relapsed or refractory AML, unsuitable for allo-HSCT.

Considerable progress has been made in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, current therapeutic results are still unsatisfactory in untreated high-risk patients and poorer in those with primary refractory or relapsed disease. In older patients, reluctance by clinicians to treat unfit patients, higher AML cell resistance related to more frequent adverse karyotype and/or precedent myelodysplastic syndrome, and preferential involvement of chemorefractory early hemopoietic precursors in the pathogenesis of the disease further account for poor prognosis, with median survival lower than six months. A general agreement exists concerning the administration of aggressive salvage therapy in young adults followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation; on the contrary, different therapeutic approaches varying in intensity, from conventional salvage chemotherapy based on intermediate–high-dose cytarabine to best supportive care, are currently considered in the relapsed, older AML patient population. Either patients’ characteristics or physicians’ attitudes count toward the process of clinical decision making. In addition, several new drugs with clinical activity described as “promising” in uncontrolled single-arm studies failed to improve long-term outcomes when tested in larger randomized clinical trials. Recently, new agents have been approved and are expected to consistently improve the clinical outcome for selected genomic subgroups, and research is in progress in other molecular settings. While relapsed AML remains a tremendous challenge to both patients and clinicians, knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis of the disease is fast in progress, potentially leading to personalized therapy in most patients.

A real-life study on CPX-351 and the standard arm (‘7 + 3’) of the CPX-351 registrative trial in adults with secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia were compared by an unanchored Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC), in order to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of CPX-351. Results of this study are important to confirm the role of CPX-351 in significantly improving survival and remission rates compared with ‘7 + 3’ with a good safety profile in AML patients with high-risk features, a target group traditionally with a very poor prognosis. Moreover, this pilot analysis underlines the potentiality of the statistical method to compare studies with strong differences.

IDH1/2 mutations are common in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and represent a therapeutic target. The GIMEMA AML1516 observational protocol was designed to study the prevalence of IDH1/2 mutations and associations with clinico-biological parameters in a cohort of Italian AML patients. We analyzed a cohort of 284 AML consecutive patients at diagnosis, 139 females and 145 males, of a median age of 65 years (range: 19–86). Of these, 38 (14%) harbored IDH1 and 51 (18%) IDH2 mutations. IDH1/2 mutations were significantly associated with WHO PS >2 (p < 0.001) and non-complex karyotype (p = 0.021) when compared to IDH1/2-WT. Furthermore, patients with IDH1 mutations were more frequently NPM1-mutated (p = 0.007) and had a higher platelet count (p = 0.036). At relapse, IDH1/2 mutations were detected in 6 (25%) patients. As per the outcome, 60.5% of IDH1/2-mutated patients achieved complete remission; overall survival and event-free survival at 2 years were 44.5% and 36.1%, respectively: these rates were similar to IDH1/2-WT. In IDH1/2-mutated patients, high WBC proved to be an independent prognostic factor for survival. In conclusion, the GIMEMA AML1516 confirms that IDH1/2 mutations are frequently detected at diagnosis and underlines the importance of recognizing IDH1/2-mutated cases up-front to offer the most appropriate therapeutic strategy, given the availability of IDH1/2 inhibitors.

The present observational study aimed to compare the efficacy of azacitidine (AZA) and intensive chemotherapy (IC) in elderly patients with untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML), diagnosed according to WHO criteria. In the two groups, we evaluated complete remission (CR), overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). The AZA group included 89 patients; median age was 73 years (range 61–80) and median white blood cell count (WBCc) 2.5 × 109/L (range 0.27–83), 45% of the patients had BM blasts ≥ 30%, and 44 (49%) had a secondary AML (sAML). Karyotype was evaluable in 69 patients: 51 (74%) had intermediate-risk abnormalities and 18 (26%) an unfavorable risk karyotype. IC group consisted of 110 patients who received an induction course with mitoxantrone, cytarabine, and etoposide, followed by two consolidation cycles including idarubicin, cytarabine, and etoposide. Median age was 67 years (range 61–78) and median WBCc 8.0 × 109/L (range 0.69–258); 44 (40%) had a sAML. Karyotype was evaluable in 88 patients, 71 (81%) had intermediate risk, and 17 (19%) unfavorable risk karyotype. To minimize the effects of treatment selection bias, adjustments were made using the propensity-score matching method, which yielded 74 patient pairs. CR rate was significantly higher in IC vs AZA group (73 vs 25%, respectively) (p < 0.0001), but the 3-year OS rates and median OS were not significantly different (21.6 vs 11% and 15.8 vs 13 months, respectively). Our analysis suggests similar outcomes with AZA compared to IC. Controlled, randomized clinical trials are warranted to confirm this conclusion.