Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Children often experience anxiety and pain during minor surgical procedures, prompting the search for effective pain management strategies beyond traditional pharmaceutical approaches. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of virtual reality (VR) as a pain reduction method in pediatric outpatient surgical interventions compared to the standard use of nitrous oxide. The research questions explore pain reduction levels, patient preferences, enjoyment during VR use, and the time limit of the VR application. Methods The study employs a randomized controlled trial design, utilizing VR technology and nitrous oxide in separate groups in 100 children at the age from 6 to 15 undergoing minor surgical procedures. Outcomes are monitored directly after the intervention and two weeks following the procedure. The primary outcome measure is the pain level, assessed using visual face and visual analog scales. Secondary outcomes are the fun and/or fear experienced during the intervention, the willingness to undergo the same procedure again (if necessary), and whether there is a time limit with the VR application compared to nitrous oxide. The study also considers adverse events and safety measures. Discussion The study aims to address a significant research gap in pediatric pain management strategies, as it is the first randomized controlled trial designed to compare pain levels using VR versus a control group with nitrous oxide analgosedation in children undergoing minor surgical procedures. Preliminary evidence suggests VR may offer a viable alternative to traditional pain management methods, as VR technology could be an effective distraction and pain management tool for pediatric patients undergoing outpatient surgical procedures. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05510141. Registered on August 22, 2022. Virtual Reality Games in Pediatric Surgery—Full Text View—ClinicalTrials.gov. Trial sponsor The principal investigator, Cordula Scherer act as the Sponsor, Clinic for pediatric surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, CH 3010 Bern, Switzerland.

Background The reported survival of implants depends on the definition used for the endpoint, usually revision. When screening through registry reports from different countries, it appears that revision is defined quite differently. Questions/purposes The purposes of this study were to compare the definitions of revision among registry reports and to apply common clinical scenarios to these definitions. Methods We downloaded or requested reports of all available national joint registries. Of the 23 registries we identified, 13 had published reports that were available in English and were beyond the pilot phase. We searched these registries’ reports for the definitions of the endpoint, mostly revision. We then applied the following scenarios to the definition of revision and analyzed if those scenarios were regarded as a revision: (A) wound revision without any addition or removal of implant components (such as hematoma evacuation); (B) exchange of head and/or liner (like for infection); (C) isolated secondary patella resurfacing; and (D) secondary patella resurfacing with a routine liner exchange. Results All registries looked separately at the characteristic of primary implantation without a revision and 11 of 13 registers reported on the characteristics of revisions. Regarding the definition of revision, there were considerable differences across the reports. In 11 of 13 reports, the primary outcome was revision of the implant. In one registry the primary endpoint was “reintervention/revision” while another registry reported separately on “failure” and “reoperations”. In three registries, the definition of the outcome was not provided, however in one report a results list gave an indication for the definition of the outcome. Wound revision without any addition or removal of implant components (scenario A) was considered a revision in three of nine reports that provided a clear definition on this question, whereas two others did not provide enough information to allow this determination. Exchange of the head and/or liner (like for infection; scenario B) was considered a revision in 11 of 11; isolated secondary patella resurfacing (scenario C) in six of eight; and secondary patella resurfacing with routine liner exchange (scenario D) was considered a revision in nine of nine reports. Conclusions Revision, which is the most common main endpoint used by arthroplasty registries, is not universally defined. This implies that some reoperations that are considered a revision in one registry are not considered a revision in another registry. Therefore, comparisons of implant performance using data from different registries have to be performed with caution. We suggest that registries work to harmonize their definitions of revision to help facilitate comparisons of results across the world’s arthroplasty registries.

Background The number of unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs) is growing worldwide. Because lateral UKAs are performed much less frequently than medial UKAs, the limited information leaves unclear whether UKAs have comparable survival and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of the lateral UKA to medial UKAs. Questions/purposes We therefore compared the (1) survivorship and (2) HRQoL after lateral versus medial cemented mobile-bearing UKAs and (3) determined whether there is an association of survival to modifications of surgical technique in one of three phases. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 558 patients who underwent mobile-bearing UKAs from 2002 to 2009. From the records we determined revision of the joint for any reason and revision for aseptic loosening. Patients reported their physical function, pain, and stiffness as measured by the WOMAC, SF-36 physical-component summary (PCS), and Lequesne knee score. Information regarding implant survival was collected for 93% of the patients. We analyzed the patients separately by three phases based on surgical changes associated with each phase (1: initial technique; 2: improved cementing; 3: additional bone resection to ensure backward sliding of the inlay without impingement). The minimum followup was 2.1 years (mean, 6 years; range, 2.1–9.8 years). Results Implant survival was 88% at 9 years. We found similar implant survival rates for medial (90%) and lateral UKAs (83%). In all HRQoL measures, patients receiving a medial UKA had better mean scores compared with patients who had a lateral UKA: WOMAC physical function (23 versus 34, respectively) and pain (21 versus 34) and SF-36 PCS (41 versus 38). There were no survival differences by surgical phase. Conclusions Our observations suggest a medial UKA is associated with superior HRQoL when compared with a lateral UKA, although implant survival is similar. Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Abstract Purpose The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after conservatively versus surgically treated paediatric proximal humeral fractures is poorly understood. We assessed the HRQoL after this injury and asked if HRQoL was associated with age, radiological classification or treatment chosen. Methods We identified 228 patients who were treated for proximal humeral fractures between 2004 and 2017. These patients completed the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick-DASH) (primary outcome), the Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) and questions regarding patient satisfaction. Fractures were classified radiologically following the Paediatric Comprehensive AO Classification. Results We were able to follow-up on 190 children; 147 (mean age 8.7 years (0.8 to 15.7)) sustained a metaphyseal and 43 (mean age 11.6 years (3.7 to 15.8)) sustained a Salter Harris type I or II injury. Most fractures (90%) were simple, 10% were multifragmentary. In total, 137 children (72%) were treated nonoperatively, 51 (27%) were treated by elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN). After a median follow-up of 7.6 years (0.8 to 14.3) there was an overall mean Quick-DASH of 4.3 (SD 9.3) for girls and 1.2 (SD 3.1) for boys. The mean function score of the PedsQL was 94.7 (SD 11.1) for girls and 98.0 (SD 6.0) for boys. The mean psychosocial score of the PedsQL was 92.0 (SD 11.1) for girls and 94.1 (SD 11.6) for boys. Most children (79%) were very satisfied with the cosmetic result and 74% were very satisfied with the treatment overall. Surgery and female sex were associated with lower satisfaction. Conclusion In this cohort of 190 patients, where immobilization for mildly displaced fractures, and closed reduction and ESIN was used for displaced fractures, there was equally excellent mid- and long-term HRQoL when assessed by the Quick-Dash and the PedsQL. Level of Evidence Therapeutic, Level IV

Background Specific anatomic differences are believed to account for gender-specific function and health-related quality of life after TKA. However, there are conflicting data in the literature regarding these gender-specific outcomes, especially as woman appear to have surgery later in the course of the disease compared with men. Questions/purposes We asked whether (1) women had worse knee function and health-related quality of life after TKA compared with men, (2) lower improvements in scores, and (3) slower recovery after surgery. Methods Using a cohort study design, we retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data from three multicenter randomized controlled trials evaluating rehabilitation measures after standard unisex knee arthroplasty in 494 patients (141 men and 353 women). The primary outcome was self-reported physical function as measured by the WOMAC at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes included the pain and stiffness scales of the WOMAC and the physical and mental component summaries of the SF-36. At the time of surgery, the women were on average older (70.8 versus 67.8 years), had lower mean physical function (55 versus 47), higher mean pain scores (54 versus 48), and greater stiffness (54 versus 46) as measured by the WOMAC. Results At the 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month followups, men and women had similar WOMAC scores. Improvements were greater for women compared with men for WOMAC function and pain subscale scores at the 3-month (function, 28 versus 23; pain, 32 versus 25) and 6-month followups (function, 32 versus 27; pain, 36 versus 31). At the 12- and 24-month followups we noted no differences in improvement between men and women. Conclusion Although women had greater functional limitations at the time of surgery than men, they recover faster early after standard TKA although function is similar at 12 and 24 months. Women also had greater improvement of WOMAC scores after standard TKA than men. Level of Evidence Level II, prognostic study. See the guidelines for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Introduction Every joint registry aims to improve patient care by identifying implants that have an inferior performance. For this reason, each registry records the implant name that has been used in the individual patient. In most registries, a paper-based approach has been utilized for this purpose. However, in addition to being time-consuming, this approach does not account for the fact that failure patterns are not necessarily implant specific but can be associated with design features that are used in a number of implants. Therefore, we aimed to develop and evaluate an implant product library that allows both time saving barcode scanning on site in the hospital for the registration of the implant components and a detailed description of implant specifications. Materials and methods A task force consisting of representatives of the German Arthroplasty Registry, industry, and computer specialists agreed on a solution that allows barcode scanning of implant components and that also uses a detailed standardized classification describing arthroplasty components. The manufacturers classified all their components that are sold in Germany according to this classification. The implant database was analyzed regarding the completeness of components by algorithms and real-time data. Results The implant library could be set up successfully. At this point, the implant database includes more than 38,000 items, of which all were classified by the manufacturers according to the predefined scheme. Using patient data from the German Arthroplasty Registry, several errors in the database were detected, all of which were corrected by the respective implant manufacturers. Conclusions The implant library that was developed for the German Arthroplasty Registry allows not only on-site barcode scanning for the registration of the implant components but also its classification tree allows a sophisticated analysis regarding implant characteristics, regardless of brand or manufacturer. The database is maintained by the implant manufacturers, thereby allowing registries to focus their resources on other areas of research. The database might represent a possible global model, which might encourage harmonization between joint replacement registries enabling comparisons between joint replacement registries.