Explore the vast range of titles available.

BackgroundSAGES established a military committee in 2009 and since that time. It may not be readily clear why a traditionally laparoscopic and endoscopic surgical society should have a military committee whose members' primary mission is combat surgery. Military surgeons have a second mission, though, which is to provide care for all its beneficiaries in all the surgical subspecialties. They also have a third mission, which is to train the next generation of military surgeons. The aim of this paper is to discuss the relationship with SAGES that enables the military to succeed in these missions and the benefits it provides to SAGES.MethodsA historical review of the military committee and its activities since its inception in 2009.ResultsThrough SAGES, military surgeons have a cost-effective means of developing professionally and receiving education in surgical areas outside of the battlefield arena, which the DOD does not provide. For 13 years, SAGES has also provided an academic venue for research in these specialties. With the addition of military members, SAGES can access more surgeons and surgical innovation like surgery in space and worldwide telemedicine. The military committee also gives SAGES an opportunity to directly contribute to the care of military service members, retirees, and VA beneficiaries, which benefits the United States as a whole.ConclusionsSAGES and the military have enjoyed a mutually beneficial relationship. The contributions of SAGES have undoubtedly saved and improved US service member and beneficiary lives. It has also improved the education and academic advancements of the military surgeons. SAGES also reaches more surgeons and has another platform for surgical innovation. The relationship should continue and be allowed to grow.

IntroductionBody mass index (BMI) > 50 kg/m2 is associated with relatively increased morbidity and mortality with bariatric surgery (BS). There is reluctance to consider these patients operative candidates without preoperative weight loss. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists have demonstrated effective weight loss in the post-BS setting. This study aims to determine the safety and efficacy of GLP-1 agonists in the pre-habilitation of patients with BMI > 50 kg/m2.MethodsThis is a retrospective review of bariatric surgery patients with BMI > 50 kg/m2 from a single bariatric center. Patients were compared by preoperative GLP-1 therapy status. All patients received medical, surgical, psychiatric, and nutritional evaluation and counseling. Preoperative BMI, change in weight from program intake until surgery, time to surgery, and perioperative complications were evaluated.Results31 patients were included in the analysis. 18 (58%) received a GLP-1 agonist preoperatively. GLP-1 agonist use was associated with a 5.5 ± 3.2-point reduction in BMI compared to 2.9 ± 2.4 amongst controls (p = 0.026). There was no difference in the mean length of time in the bariatric program prior to surgery between groups (p = 0.332). There were no reported complications related to GLP-1 use in the preoperative setting and no difference in perioperative complications between groups (p = 0.245).DiscussionGLP-1 agonist use in patients with a BMI > 50 kg/m2 results in significantly more weight loss prior to bariatric surgery, without increased time to surgery or complication rate. Further study is required to evaluate the long-term impact of preoperative GLP-1 agonist use prior to bariatric surgery. This therapy may improve perioperative and long-term outcomes in the very high-risk BMI population.

BackgroundSpace travel is experiencing a renaissance with expanding commercial and international efforts. Space surgery will have growing relevance as mission frequency and distances increase beyond low Earth orbit.MethodsThis white paper from the SAGES Space Surgery Task Force raises awareness among the SAGES membership regarding the challenges and opportunities surrounding this emerging field that anticipates surgical care in the most extreme, austere environments.ResultsInnovation in technology and preventive medicine principles will enhance the effectiveness of space surgical care when the need arises. The impact of advancements in space and terrestrial medicine to support space exploration indicates the need for a surgeon to oversee medical/surgical invasive treatment to ensure astronaut health and mission success. Advanced technology, including semi- and autonomous robotic systems, may be a preferred way to deliver this care in the foreseeable future. There is currently a need to develop training curricula and flight-compatible supplies and technology for physicians that deliver surgical care to this special patient population. The protocols and technology developed to address the unique challenges of space travel will provide value for care in space as well as in extreme, austere terrestrial environments on Earth.ConclusionSpace surgery will continue to evolve as commercial and government programs explore further into space. The SAGES Space Surgery Task Force is favorably positioned to significantly contribute to addressing some capability gaps in delivering surgical care in space.

The lessons from this book help surgeons prepare for emergency events that require disaster preparedness usually handled by the United States military, including chemical attacks and massive casualty events. Written by experts in the field perspectives that come from various combat zones and disaster sites, this book highlights the pitfalls to avoid, the organization that is essential for success, and the tips to help perform surgery in the most austere conditions . The book will address situations where surgeons may have to operate on wanted criminals, operate wearing chemical protective equipment, operate in a collapsed building, or even remove an unexploded device. The book includes cases from the battlefield that are designed to guide surgeons facing these scenarios in the civilian world. There are also chapters detailing the lessons learned from the Boston Marathon Bombing, airline disasters, and the Oklahoma City bombing. Unlike any other current text, Surgery During Natural Disasters, Combat, Terrorist Attacks, and Crisis Situations is an excellent resource for all surgeons who might be faced with these events.

Objectives Open inguinal hernia repair is felt to be a less expensive operation than a laparoscopic one. Performing open repair on patients with an obese body mass index (BMI) results in longer operative times, longer hospital stay, and complications that will potentially impose higher cost to the facility and patient. This study aims to define the ideal BMI at which a laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair will be advantageous over open inguinal hernia repair. Methods The NSQIP database was analyzed for ( n  = 64,501) complications, mortality, and operating time for open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs during the time period from 2005 to 2012. Bilateral and recurrent hernias were excluded. Chi-square tests and Fisher’s exact tests were used to assess associations between type of surgery and categorical variables including demographics, risk factors, and 30-day outcomes. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to determine whether odds ratios differed by level of BMI. The HCUP database was used for determining difference in cost and length of stay between open and laparoscopic procedures. Results There were 17,919 laparoscopic repairs and 46,582 open repairs in the study period. The overall morbidity (across all BMI categories) is statistically greater in the open repair group when compared to the laparoscopic group ( p  = 0.03). Postoperative complications (including wound disruption, failure to wean from the ventilator, and UTI) were greater in the open repair group across all BMI categories. Deep incisional surgical site infections (SSI) were more common in the overweight open repair group ( p  = 0.026). The return to the operating room across all BMI categories was statistically significant for the open repair group ( n  = 269) compared to the laparoscopic repair group ( n  = 70) with p  = 0.003. There was no difference in the return to operating room between the BMI categories. The odds ratio (OR) was found to be statistically significant when comparing the obese category to both normal and overweight populations for the open procedure. Conclusion Open hernia repairs have more complications than do laparoscopic ones; however, there does not appear to be a difference in treating obese patients with hernias using a laparoscopic approach versus an open one. One may consider using a laparoscopic approach in overweight patients (BMI 25–29.9) as there appears to be fewer deep SSI.

BackgroundThe healthcare system plays a pivotal role in environmental sustainability, and the operating room (OR) significantly contributes to its overall carbon footprint. In response to this critical challenge, leading medical societies, government bodies, regulatory agencies, and industry stakeholders are taking measures to address healthcare sustainability and its impact on climate change. Healthcare now represents almost 20% of the US national economy and 8.5% of US carbon emissions. Internationally, healthcare represents 5% of global carbon emissions. US Healthcare is an outlier in both per capita cost, and per capita greenhouse gas emission, with almost twice per capita emissions compared to every other country in the world.MethodsThe Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) established the Sustainability in Surgical Practice joint task force in 2023. This collaborative effort aims to actively promote education, mitigation, and innovation, steering surgical practices toward a more sustainable future.ResultsSeveral key initiatives have included a survey of members' knowledge and awareness, a scoping review of terminology, metrics, and initiatives, and deep engagement of key stakeholders.DiscussionThis position paper serves as a Call to Action, proposing a series of actions to catalyze and accelerate the surgical sustainability leadership needed to respond effectively to climate change, and to lead the societal transformation towards health that our times demand.

BackgroundSurgical care significantly contributes to healthcare-associated greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). Surgeon attitudes about mitigation of the impact of surgical practice on environmental sustainability remains poorly understood. To better understand surgeon perspectives globally, the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery established a joint Sustainability in Surgical Practice (SSP) Task Force and distributed a survey on sustainability.MethodsOur survey asked about (1) surgeon attitudes toward sustainability, (2) ability to estimate the carbon footprint of surgical procedures and supplies, (3) concerns about the negative impacts of sustainable interventions, (4) willingness to change specific practices, and (5) preferred educational topics and modalities. Questions were primarily written in Likert-scale format. A clustering analysis was performed to determine whether survey respondents could be grouped into distinct subsets to inform future outreach and education efforts.ResultsWe received 1024 responses, predominantly from North America and Europe. The study revealed that while 63% of respondents were motivated to enhance the sustainability of their practice, less than 10% could accurately estimate the carbon footprint of surgical activities. Most were not concerned that sustainability efforts would negatively impact their practice and showed readiness to adopt proposed sustainable practices. Online webinars and modules were the preferred educational methods. A clustering analysis identified a group particularly concerned yet willing to adopt sustainable changes.ConclusionSurgeons believe that operating room waste is a critical issue and are willing to change practice to improve it. However, there exists a gap in understanding the environmental impact of surgical procedures and supplies, and a sizable minority have some degree of concern about potential adverse consequences of implementing sustainable policies. This study uniquely provides an international, multidisciplinary snapshot of surgeons’ attitudes, knowledge, concerns, willingness, and preferred educational modalities related to mitigating the environmental impact of surgical practice.

BackgroundSurgical care in the operating room (OR) contributes one-third of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in healthcare. The European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) initiated a joint Task Force to promote sustainability within minimally invasive gastrointestinal surgery.MethodsA scoping review was conducted by searching MEDLINE via Ovid, Embase via Elsevier, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus on August 25th, 2023 to identify articles reporting on the impact of gastrointestinal surgical care on the environment. The objectives were to establish the terminology, outcome measures, and scope associated with sustainable surgical practice. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics.ResultsWe screened 22,439 articles to identify 85 articles relevant to anesthesia, general surgical practice, and gastrointestinal surgery. There were 58/85 (68.2%) cohort studies and 12/85 (14.1%) Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies. The most commonly measured outcomes were kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents (kg CO2eq), cost of resource consumption in US dollars or euros, surgical waste in kg, water consumption in liters, and energy consumption in kilowatt-hours. Surgical waste production and the use of anesthetic gases were among the largest contributors to the climate impact of surgical practice. Educational initiatives to educate surgical staff on the climate impact of surgery, recycling programs, and strategies to restrict the use of noxious anesthetic gases had the highest impact in reducing the carbon footprint of surgical care. Establishing green teams with multidisciplinary champions is an effective strategy to initiate a sustainability program in gastrointestinal surgery.ConclusionThis review establishes standard terminology and outcome measures used to define the environmental footprint of surgical practices. Impactful initiatives to achieve sustainability in surgical practice will require education and multidisciplinary collaborations among key stakeholders including surgeons, researchers, operating room staff, hospital managers, industry partners, and policymakers.

Burnout and depression in General Surgery residents affect patient care and drive attrition. Few impactful interventions exist, in part because little is known about influential drivers and mechanistic relationships. Residents from 16 general surgery programs completed published well-being scales in January 2021. Social network analysis demonstrated influential relationships between factors, and path analysis revealed drivers of burnout and depression. 300 residents completed the survey (34% response rate). Workplace demand and mindfulness influenced depressive symptoms and emotional exhaustion, mediated by perceived stress. Mindfulness increased personal accomplishment, mediated by psychological well-being (p ​< ​0.05 for all results). All mediated effects were greater than direct effects. This study yielded a quantitative conceptual model of mechanistic relationships affecting well-being in surgical residency, identifying stress and psychological well-being (measuring sense of purpose) as central mediators, and triangulating workplace demand and mindfulness as potentially high-yield interventional targets for reducing burnout and depression in surgical residency. •This national study quantitatively modeled well-being in general surgery residency.•Analysis yielded drivers and mediators of well-being outcomes.•Workplace demand and mindfulness are key influences on burnout and depression.•Stress and psychological well-being mediate these effects.•Workplace demand and mindfulness are high-yield interventional targets.

Simply put, the h-index is defined as \"the number of papers with a citation number > or = h.\"1 The h-index is now considered an important marker for the process of tenure and promotion at academic medical programs as it is an easily computable index that can be used as a yardstick to compare the importance, significance, and broad impact of an individual's cumulative research contributions. Scatter plot analysis and linear regression were used to determine correlation between the number of published articles and the change in the h-index or self-citation. Scatter plot analysis showed there was a low positive correlation between the number of publications and the change in the h-index (R2 = 0.3234) and a moderate positive correlation between the number of publications and the number of self-citations (R2 = 0.5897). Within the entire cohort and the subgroups of chairpersons and full professors, the average h-index change with selfcitation was an increase of 0.44, 0.42, and 0.44, respectively. [...]for the large majority of academic general surgeons, the inclusion of self-citations did not change the h-index by a full integer or significantly impact their academic profile.