Explore the vast range of titles available.

BackgroundLangerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare disease primarily occurring in children, and commonly involves the bone and skin; gastrointestinal tract involvement is notably rare. The incidence and significance of gastrointestinal lesions in adult LCH are unclear; thus, we aimed to investigate adult Japanese cases of LCH and clarify the features of gastrointestinal involvement.MethodsWe gathered clinical information on 43 Japanese cases of adult LCH and analyzed patient backgrounds, affected organs, features of the gastrointestinal lesions, and the clinical courses.ResultsThirteen patients underwent endoscopic examinations: an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy alone in 5, lower gastrointestinal endoscopy alone in 3, and both in 5 patients. A gastric lesion (one case), colonic lesion (one case), and both gastric and rectal lesions (one case) were detected. The three cases of gastrointestinal involvement also exhibited nongastrointestinal multisystem LCH lesions and showed no gastrointestinal symptoms or increased uptake on positron emission tomography. Endoscopy revealed small erosions without specific features; histological examinations were required for diagnosis. These three cases were treated with chemotherapy, comprising vinblastine/prednisolone, methotrexate, and daily 6-mercaptopurine, for 36 weeks; in two cases, the clinical condition remained stable for several years post-treatment. One case showed recurrence 1 year 7 months after treatment, and chemotherapy was re-administered. No case with single-system disease exhibited gastrointestinal involvement.ConclusionsAlthough gastrointestinal LCH lesions are rare, they were more common than expected in our cases of multisystem LCH. However, these lesions were relatively small and did not affect the patients’ clinical courses.

Although the fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin (FIT) is a widely used screening test for colorectal cancer, it is not sensitive enough to detect advanced colorectal adenoma. To address this issue, we performed this study to investigate whether combining the FIT and fecal DNA testing of methylated somatostatin (SST) could improve diagnostic performance for advanced colorectal adenoma. We collected feces from 79 healthy subjects with negative results on colonoscopy, 43 patients with non‐advanced colorectal adenoma, 117 patients with advanced colorectal adenoma, and 126 patients with colorectal cancer. After fecal DNA was incubated with methylation‐sensitive restriction enzymes, SST methylation levels were measured by droplet digital PCR. Using logistic multivariate analysis, we established a prediction formula for detecting colorectal neoplasia and named it the FAMS (FIT, age, methylated SST) index. The diagnostic performance of a single use of FIT for advanced colorectal adenoma showed a sensitivity of 29.1% (34/117) and specificity of 89.3% (109/122). In contrast, the FAMS index showed a sensitivity of 56.4% (66/117) at a similar specificity point of 91.0% (111/122). Furthermore, even at the higher specificity point of 94.3% (115/122), the sensitivity was still higher than that of FIT, reaching 42.7% (50/117). As the FAMS index showed better diagnostic performance for advanced colorectal adenoma than a single use of FIT, the FAMS index could be a promising tool for detecting advanced colorectal adenoma. The FAMS index may be a promising test for the diagnosis of advanced colorectal adenoma.

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) causes transient acute infection, and little is known of viral shedding via the duodenum and into the intestinal environment, including the gut microbiome, from the period of infection until after the recovery of symptoms. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to comprehensively observe the amount of virus excreted into the intestinal tract, the changes in the intestinal microbiome, and the level of inflammation during the healing process. We used blood and stool specimens from patients with human immunodeficiency virus who were infected with HAV during the HAV outbreak in Japan in 2018. Moreover, we observed changes in fecal HAV RNA and quantified the plasma cytokine level and gut microbiome by 16S rRNA analysis from clinical onset to at least 6 months after healing. HAV was detected from clinical onset up to a period of more than 150 days. Immediately after infection, many pro-inflammatory cytokines were elicited, and some cytokines showed different behaviors. The intestinal microbiome changed significantly after infection (dysbiosis), and the dysbiosis continued for a long time after healing. These observations suggest that the immunocompromised state is associated with prolonged viral shedding into the intestinal tract and delayed recovery of the intestinal environment.

Background: A controlled-release (CR) formulation of simvastatin was recently developed in Korea. The formulation is expected to yield a lower C max and similar AUC values compared with the immediate-release (IR) formulation. Objective: The goal of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of the new CR formulation and an IR formulation of simvastatin after single- and multiple-dose administration in healthy Korean subjects. This study was developed as part of a product development project at the request of the Korean regulatory agency. Methods: This was a randomized, open-label, parallelgroup, 2-part study. Eligible subjects were healthy male or female volunteers between the ages of 19 and 55 years and within 20% of their ideal weight. In part I, each subject received a single dose of the CR or IR formulation of simvastatin 40 mg orally (20 mg × 2 tablets) after fasting. In part II, each subject received the same dose of the CR or IR formulation for 8 consecutive days. Blood samples were obtained for 48 hours after the dose in part I and after the first and the last dose in part II. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for both simvastatin (the inactive prodrug) and simvastatin acid (the active moiety). An adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding) or symptom, regardless of whether it had a causal relationship with the study medication. Serious AEs were defined as any events that are considered life threatening, require hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, cause persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or result in congenital abnormality, birth defect, or death. AEs were determined based on patient interviews and physical examinations. Results: Twenty-four healthy subjects (17 men, 7 women; mean [SD] age, 29 [7] years; age range, 22–50 years) were enrolled in part I, and 29 subjects (17 men, 12 women; mean age, 33 [9] years; age range, 19–55 years) were enrolled in part II. For simvastatin acid, C max was significantly smaller (1.68 vs 3.62 ng/mL; P < 0.013) and T max and apparent t ½ significantly longer (10.33 vs 4.04 hours [ P < 0.001] and 11.41 vs 4.16 hours [ P < 0.011]) for the CR formulation compared with the IR formulation, respectively, after the single-dose administration. After the multiple-dose administration, for simvastatin acid, the C max for the CR formulation was significantly smaller (3.40 vs 5.16 ng/mL; P < 0.037), while the values for T max and apparent t ½ were significantly longer (8.40 vs 4.57 hours and 13.09 vs 4.52 hours; both, P < 0.001) compared with the IR formulation. There was no significant difference between the CR and the IR formulations for AUC 0−last and AUC 0−∞) during either the single- or multiple-dose testing. Both CR and IR formulations were well tolerated in all subjects, and no serious AEs or adverse drug reactions were found. No subjects reported any AEs during part I of the study. During part II, 6 subjects (3 from each formulation group) reported headache, 1 reported lumbago before the dose, and 1 subject had a hordeolum while receiving the CR formulation. Conclusions: The C max of the simvastatin CR formulation was found to be significantly smaller while the AUC of the active moiety did not differ significantly from that of the IR formulation in these healthy Korean subjects. The simvastatin CR and IR formulations were well tolerated, with no serious AEs observed. To evaluate the characteristics of the CR formulation, its clinical efficacy must be examined in patient populations.

BackgroundPeople living with HIV (PLWH) face greater risks of developing non-AIDS-defining cancers (NADCs) than the general population; however, the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. The tumor microenvironment plays a significant role in the carcinogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC), an NADC. We studied this carcinogenesis in PLWH by determining inflammatory phenotypes and assessing PD-1/PD-L1 expression in premalignant CRC stages of colon adenomas in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients.MethodsWe obtained polyp specimens from 22 HIV-positive and 61 HIV-negative participants treated with colonoscopy and polyp excision. We analyzed adenomas from 33 HIV-positive and 99 HIV-negative patients by immunohistochemistry using anti-CD4, anti-CD8, anti-FoxP3, and anti-CD163 antibodies. Additionally, we analyzed the expression levels of immune checkpoint proteins. We also evaluated the correlation between cell infiltration and blood cell counts.ResultsHIV-positive participants had fewer infiltrating CD4+ T cells than HIV-negative participants (p = 0.0016). However, no statistical differences were observed in infiltrating CD8+ and FoxP3+ T cells and CD163+ macrophages. Moreover, epithelial cells did not express PD-1 or PD-L1. Notably, CD4+ T cell infiltration correlated with nadir blood CD4+ T cell counts (p <  0.05) but not with current blood CD4+ T cell counts.ConclusionImmune surveillance dysfunction owing to decreased CD4+ T cell infiltration in colon adenomas might be involved in colon carcinogenesis in HIV-positive individuals. Collectively, since the nadir blood CD4+ T cell count is strongly correlated with CD4+ T cell infiltration, it could facilitate efficient follow-up and enable treatment strategies for HIV-positive patients with colon adenomas.

Intestinal Behçet disease (BD), associated with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), is often refractory to treatment. An 80-year-old man with trisomy 8 MDS (refractory anemia) developed intermittent fever. Despite investigations to exclude infectious disease, autoimmune disease, and malignancy as the cause of the fever, the etiology could not be determined. A colonoscopy revealed several shallow round ulcers in the ileocecal region and ascending colon, and the biopsy specimens showed nonspecific inflammation. Thereafter, the patient experienced abdominal pain and diarrhea. Other than an oral aphthous ulcer, the patient did not show symptoms to meet the diagnostic criteria for BD. The patient was diagnosed with intestinal ulcers (intestinal BD-like disease) with MDS and trisomy 8. After treatment failure with 5-aminosalicylic acid, steroid, colchicine, and azacitidine, cerebral infarction occurred. Eating was difficult because of the patient’s impaired consciousness; hence, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) was commenced. The fever and abdominal symptoms improved with bowel rest over approximately 1 month. Small amounts of food were orally administered to the patient following recovery from the after-effects of the cerebral infarction, but diarrhea and fever repeatedly flared up. Therefore, TPN was continued at home. The patient has not experienced any further intestinal BD symptoms for approximately 1 year with bowel rest. Nutritional therapy, including bowel rest, may be an effective treatment option for intestinal BD with MDS, and might be used as an induction therapy of remission or a supportive therapy for other treatments.

We have reported previously that fecal DNA testing of TWIST1 methylation in combination with the fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin (FIT) (combination test) is useful for colorectal neoplasia screening. In this study, using larger sample sizes, we studied the clinical performance of the combination test for the detection of colorectal neoplasia and, especially, advanced colorectal adenoma. We performed a prospective study in which FIT, fecal DNA testing of TWIST1 methylation, and colonoscopy were performed on 372 patients with colorectal neoplasia and 71 subjects without colorectal neoplasia. We assessed the individual clinical performance of each of FIT and fecal DNA testing of TWIST1 methylation and of the combination test for the detection of colorectal neoplasia including advanced adenoma based on morphologic subtypes. The FIT alone had a sensitivity of 7.5% (3/40) for nonadvanced adenoma, 32.3% (41/127) for advanced adenoma, and 93.7% (192/205) for colorectal cancer and a specificity of 87.3% (62/71). The combination test had a sensitivity of 35.0% (14/40) for nonadvanced adenoma, 68.5% (87/127) for advanced adenoma, and 95.6% (196/205) for colorectal cancer and a specificity of 80.3% (57/71). For morphological subtypes of advanced adenoma, the sensitivity of FIT was only 28.2% (20/71) for polypoid type and 16.1% (5/31) for nonpolypoid type, whereas the combination test increased the sensitivities to 64.8% (46/71) and 71.0% (22/31), respectively. The combination of the fecal DNA test with FIT seemed to be useful to detect colorectal neoplasia and, especially, advanced adenoma of the nonpolypoid type.

A sustained-release (SR) formulation of cilostazol was recently developed in Korea and was expected to yield a lower C max and a similar AUC to the immediate-release (IR) formulation. The goal of the present study was to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of a newly developed SR formulation and an IR formulation of cilostazol after single- and multiple-dose administration and to evaluate the influence of food in healthy Korean subjects. This study was developed as part of a product development project at the request of the Korean regulatory agency. This was a randomized, 3-part, sequential, open-label, 2-period crossover study. Each part consisted of different subjects between the ages of 19 and 55 years. In part 1, each subject received a single dose of SR (200 mg × 1 tablet, once daily) and IR (100 mg × 2 tablets, BID) formulations of cilostazol orally 7 days apart in a fasted state. In part 2, each subject received a single dose of the SR (200 mg × 1 tablet, once daily) formulation of cilostazol 7 days apart in a fasted and a fed state. In part 3, each subject received multiple doses of the 2 formulations for 8 consecutive days 21 days apart. Blood samples were taken for 72 hours after the dose. Cilostazol pharmacokinetics were determined for both the parent drug and its metabolites (OPC-13015 and OPC-13213). Adverse events were evaluated through interviews and physical examinations. Among the 92 enrolled subjects (66 men, 26 women; part 1, n = 26; part 2, n = 26; part 3, n = 40), 87 completed the study. In part 1, all the primary pharmacokinetic parameters satisfied the criterion for assumed bioequivalence both in cilostazol and its metabolites, yielding 90% CI ratios of 0.9624 to 1.2323, 0.8873 to 1.1208, and 0.8919 to 1.1283 for C max and 0.8370 to 1.0134, 0.8204 to 0.9807, and 0.8134 to 0.9699 for AUC 0–last of cilostazol, OPC-13015, and OPC-13213, respectively. In part 2, food intake increased C max and AUC significantly ( P < 0.0001), yielding geometric mean ratios of 3.2879, 2.9894, and 3.0592 for C max and 1.7001, 1.7689, and 1.6976 for AUC 0–last of cilostazol, OPC-13015, and OPC-13213. In part 3, only the C ssmax of clilostazol in the reference formulation did not satisfy the criterion for assumed bioequivalence, yielding 90% CI ratios of 1.2693 to 1.4238 and 1.2038 to 1.3441, respectively. When each dose was normalized, the C max for the SR formulation was significantly lower ( P < 0.005 for cilostazol). Headache was the most frequently noted adverse effect (part 1, a total of 14 subjects with the IR formulation and 14 with the SR formulation; part 2, a total of 10 without food and 23 with a high-fat meal; part 3, a total of 10 with the IR formulation and 24 with the SR formulation), followed by nausea (part 1, none; part 2, only 1 without food and 3 with a high-fat meal; part 3, a total of 3 with the IR formulation and 3 with the SR formulation), and then dizziness (parts 1 and 2, none; part 3, a total of 4 with the IR formulation and 5 with the SR formulation). All other AEs, including fever, cough, vomiting, palpitation, diarrhea, and epigastric pain, occurred in <3 subjects. These findings suggest that in this select group of healthy Korean volunteers, the SR formulation of cilostazol was not significantly different in AUC compared with that of the IR formulation, although it did display a significantly lower C max per dose in both the single- and multiple-dose groups. Food significantly increased the bioavailability of the SR formulation. The cilostazol SR and IR formulations were well tolerated in all parts of the study, with no serious adverse events reported. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01455558.