Explore the vast range of titles available.

In a randomized trial involving patients with aortic stenosis, the use of a cerebral protection device during TAVR did not decrease the risk of periprocedural stroke, but there were fewer disabling strokes.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is already an accepted option to treat elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who are inoperable or at high surgical risk. However, short- and long-term mortality after TAVI remains an important issue, raising the need to further improve the technology of TAVI as well as to identify patients who will not benefit from TAVI. A total of 1,391 patients treated with TAVI at 27 hospitals were included in the German Transcatheter Aortic Valve Interventions – Registry. One-year follow-up data were available for 1,318 patients (94.8%), with a mean follow-up period of 12.9 ± 4.5 months. One-year mortality was 19.9%. Survivors and nonsurvivors showed multiple differences in patient characteristics, indications for interventions, preintervention and interventional characteristics, and postintervention events. A higher logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score was associated with higher 1-year mortality (p <0.0001). Cox proportional-hazards analysis revealed the following independent predictors of mortality: among preintervention findings: previous mitral insufficiency ≥II° (p = 0.0005), low-gradient aortic stenosis (p = 0.0008), previous decompensation (p = 0.0061), previous myocardial infarction (p = 0.0138), renal failure (p = 0.0180), previous New York Heart Association class IV (p = 0.0254), and female gender (p = 0.0346); among procedural factors: intraprocedural conversion to surgery (p = 0.0009), peri-intervention stroke (p = 0.0003), and residual aortic insufficiency ≥II° (p = 0.0022); and among postprocedural events: postintervention myocardial infarction (p = 0.0009) and postintervention pulmonary embolism (p = 0.0025). In conclusion, 1-year mortality after TAVI was 19.9% in this series. Patient characteristics and procedural as well as postintervention factors associated with mortality were identified, which may allow better patient selection and better care for these critically ill patients.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the standard of care for many patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis who are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality during surgical aortic valve replacement. However, there is still no general consensus regarding the use of general anesthesia (GA) versus local anesthesia with sedation (non-GA) during the TAVI procedure. Using propensity score–matching analysis, we analyzed the characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent TAVI with either GA (n = 245) or non-GA (n = 245) in the fully monitored, international, CoreValve ADVANCE Study. No statistically significant differences existed between the non-GA and GA groups in all-cause mortality (25.4% vs 23.9%, p = 0.78), cardiovascular mortality (16.4% vs 16.6%, p = 0.92), or stroke (5.2% vs 6.9%, p = 0.57) through 2-year follow-up. Major vascular complications were more common in the non-GA group. Total hospital stay was similar between the 2 groups. Conversion from non-GA to GA occurred in 13 patients (5.3%) because of procedural complications in 9 patients and discomfort or restlessness in 4 patients. Most procedural complications were related to valve positioning or vascular issues. Two of the 13 converted patients died during the procedure. Both GA and non-GA are widely used in real-world TAVI practice, and the decision appears to be guided by only a few patient-related factors and dominated by local and national practice. The outcomes of both anesthesia modes are equally good. When conversion from non-GA did occur, the complication requiring GA affected outcomes.

Mitochondrial dysfunction contributes to impaired myocardial energetics and performance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Elamipretide (Ela) enhances mitochondrial bioenergetics in preclinical models, yet its relevance in HFpEF remains unclear. This study examined the effects of Ela on cardiac mitochondrial function, structure, and cardiovascular performance in a rodent HFpEF model. Female obese ZSF1 rats received vehicle or Ela for 12 weeks, with age-matched lean rats as controls. Cardiac function and hemodynamics were assessed by echocardiography and pressure–volume analysis. Mitochondrial respiration was measured in permeabilized fibers and ultrastructure evaluated by transmission electron microscopy. Molecular and histological analyses included cardiolipin lipidomics and mRNA/protein profiling of hypertrophic, fibrotic, and inflammatory markers. Ela modestly improved complex I and II respiration, whereas mitochondrial ultrastructure, cardiolipin composition, and tafazzin expression were unchanged. Diastolic dysfunction persisted, reflected by unchanged E/é, ventricular stiffness factor β, and titin phosphorylation. Compared to untreated HFpEF, systolic performance showed a mild decline, with small reductions in LV ejection fraction and end-systolic elastance. Accordingly, cardiac remodeling, including hypertrophy, fibrosis, and inflammatory activation, remained unaltered. Vascular stiffness slightly increased, while carotid reactivity and morphology were preserved. In conclusion, despite enhanced mitochondrial respiration following Ela treatment, no functional or structural benefits were observed in experimental HFpEF, suggesting limited therapeutic efficacy once HFpEF is established.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) shows diverse disease patterns, with various combinations of comorbidities and symptoms. A common hallmark is exercise intolerance, caused by alterations in the peripheral skeletal muscle (SKM) including a recently indicated titin hyperphosphorylation. Our aim is to compare a metabolic syndrome- (ZSF-1 rats) and a hypertension-driven (Dahl salt-sensitive (DSS) rats) HFpEF rat-model in relation to SKM function and titin phosphorylation. Obese ZSF-1 and high-salt fed DSS rats (HFpEF) were compared to lean ZSF-1 and low-salt fed rats (con). HFpEF was confirmed by echocardiography and invasive haemodynamic measurements. SKM atrophy, in vitro force measurements, titin- and contractile protein expression were evaluated. Obese ZSF-1 HFpEF rats showed muscle atrophy, reduced muscle force and increased titin phosphorylation compared to controls, which was not detected in hypertensive DSS rats. Fiber type specific troponins, myostatin and four and a half LIM domain 1 were differently regulated between the two models. Altogether, our results show that both animal models of HFpEF exhibit different SKM phenotypes, probably based on the divergent disease etiologies, which may help to define the most suitable animal model for HFpEF to test potential treatment regimens.

This study compared two new-generation drug-eluting coronary stents that release zotarolimus or everolimus. Clinical and angiographic outcomes were similar with the two stents, although there was a somewhat higher rate of stent thrombosis with the zotarolimus stent. In this study comparing two new-generation drug-eluting coronary stents, clinical and angiographic outcomes were similar, although there was a somewhat higher rate of stent thrombosis with the zotarolimus stent. The use of early drug-eluting stents consisting of a metal platform and the controlled release of a therapeutic agent from a durable polymer matrix has partially addressed the problem of restenosis. 1 , 2 Although these first-generation polymers were considered biocompatible, they have been associated with allergic reactions and inflammation, which in combination with incomplete strut endothelialization have led to early and late stent thrombosis. 3 New-generation polymer coatings aim more specifically at mimicking the endothelial lining in order to prevent thrombotic complications. In addition, basic research has shown that some of these polymeric materials could potentially up-regulate genes related to thrombosis, inflammation, . . .

Left ventricular (LV) myocardial mass is important in the evaluation of cardiac remodeling and requires accurate assessment when performed on linear measurements in two-dimensional echocardiography (Echo). We aimed to compare the accuracy of the Devereux formula (DEV) and the Teichholz formula (TEICH) in calculating LV myocardial mass in Echo using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as the reference method. Based on preceding mathematical calculations, we identified primarily LV size rather than wall thickness as the main source of bias between DEV and TEICH in a retrospective derivation cohort (n = 1276). Although LV mass from DEV and TEICH were correlated with CMR, TEICH did not show a proportional bias as did DEV (− 2 g/m 2 vs. + 22 g/m 2 ). This could be validated in an independent prospective cohort (n = 226) with symptomatic non-ischemic heart failure. DEV systematically overestimated LV mass in all tiers of LV remodeling as compared to TEICH. In conclusion, the TEICH method accounts for the changes in LV geometry with increasing LV mass and thus better reflects the different pattern of LV remodeling than the DEV method. This has important clinical implications, as TEICH may be more appropriate for use in clinical practice, rather than DEV, currently recommended.

A novel stent platform eluting biolimus, a sirolimus analogue, from a biodegradable polymer showed promising results in preliminary studies. We compared the safety and efficacy of a biolimus-eluting stent (with biodegradable polymer) with a sirolimus-eluting stent (with durable polymer). We undertook a multicentre, assessor-blind, non-inferiority study in ten European centres. 1707 patients aged 18 years or older with chronic stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes were centrally randomised by a computer-generated allocation sequence to treatment with either biolimus-eluting (n=857) or sirolimus-eluting (n=850) stents. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or clinically-indicated target vessel revascularisation within 9 months. Analysis was by intention to treat. 427 patients were randomly allocated to angiographic follow-up, with in-stent percentage diameter stenosis as principal outcome measure at 9 months. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00389220. We analysed all randomised patients. Biolimus-eluting stents were non-inferior to sirolimus-eluting stents for the primary endpoint at 9 months (79 [9%] patients vs 89 [11%], rate ratio 0·88 [95% CI 0·64–1·19], p for non-inferiority=0·003, p for superiority=0·39). Frequency of cardiac death (14 [1·6%] vs 21 [2·5%], p for superiority=0·22), myocardial infarction (49 [5·7%] vs 39 [4·6%], p=0·30), and clinically-indicated target vessel revascularisation (38 [4·4%] vs 47 [5·5%], p=0·29) were similar for both stent types. 168 (79%) patients in the biolimus-eluting group and 167 (78%) in the sirolimus-eluting group had data for angiographic follow-up available. Biolimus-eluting stents were non-inferior to sirolimus-eluting stents in in-stent percentage diameter stenosis (20·9% vs 23·3%, difference −2·2% [95% CI −6·0 to 1·6], p for non-inferiority=0·001, p for superiority=0·26). Our results suggest that a stent eluting biolimus from a biodegradable polymer represents a safe and effective alternative to a stent eluting sirolimus from a durable polymer in patients with chronic stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes. Biosensors Europe SA, Switzerland.