Explore the vast range of titles available.

Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits both interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 signaling, is an effective treatment option in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Patients with AD are already at increased risk of developing conjunctivitis, and clinical trials and case reports have shown a greater incidence of conjunctivitis in individuals with AD treated with dupilumab. As this is one of the more commonly reported side effects of this biologic agent, it is important that clinicians are aware of this association and advise patients receiving dupilumab to report signs of conjunctivitis. This review summarizes the risk factors, clinical features, and management options for patients with AD presenting with conjunctivitis after receiving dupilumab therapy.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a multifactorial inflammatory disorder. Previous studies have ascertained an association between anemia and HS; however, they were limited by low sample size and lack of demographic information. The objective of this study is to address the concerns of prior research and identify specific subgroups and subtypes of anemia present in HS patients and evaluate how these subgroups impact hospital outcomes. We analyzed HS hospitalizations using the National Inpatient Sample from the years 2016 to 2019. HS was associated with the nutritional anemia, aplastic anemia, and acute posthemorrhagic anemia subgroups. Within these subgroups, HS was specifically associated with iron deficiency anemia, anemia of chronic disease, and other anemia subtypes. HS patients also displayed a lower risk of having aplastic anemia, also described as anemia from bone marrow failure. Our findings build upon previous studies evaluating HS and anemia and provide a clearer understanding of the association as well as how it impacts inpatient outcomes.

•Autoinjector devices have been developed to make self-injection easier.•Autoinjectors increase adherence over long treatment durations for patients.•Lebrikizumab administration via autoinjector was bioequivalent to prefilled syringe. Lebrikizumab is a novel, high-affinity immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody that targets interleukin-13, a central mediator in atopic dermatitis (AD). In previous studies in patients with moderate-to-severe AD, lebrikizumab, administered subcutaneously via a prefilled syringe with a needle safety device (PFS-NSD), demonstrated rapid and durable dose-dependent efficacy. We assessed the pharmacokinetics and safety of lebrikizumab using either a PFS-NSD or an investigational autoinjector. Such devices have been developed to make self-injection easier for patients, thus increasing adherence over long treatment durations. The current study compared the pharmacokinetics and safety of 250 mg lebrikizumab (2 mL of a 125-mg/mL solution) administered subcutaneously at 1 of 3 different injection sites (abdomen, arm, or thigh) in 241 healthy participants using either a PFS-NSD (N = 122) or an investigational autoinjector (N = 119). Statistical analysis demonstrated 2-mL (125 mg/mL) lebrikizumab autoinjector was bioequivalent to 2-mL (125 mg/mL) lebrikizumab PFS-NSD as 90% CIs of the geometric least squares means ratios for lebrikizumab AUC(0-tlast), AUC(0-∞), and Cmax were all completely contained within the prespecified confidence limits of 0.80 and 1.25. Injection-site location did not appear to impact lebrikizumab systemic exposure for either device. Lebrikizumab was well tolerated with no SAEs reported after PFS-NSD or autoinjector administration. Bioequivalence was demonstrated between 250 mg lebrikizumab 2-mL autoinjector and prefilled syringe devices, showing both devices to be suitable options for administering lebrikizumab.

Background Complementary and alternative interventions are becoming increasingly utilized as adjuncts to conventional treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). While the number of studies continues to grow, the vastness of the subject coupled with the relatively poor quality and small size of the studies limit their usefulness to clinicians. Purpose Our aim was to comprehensively review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of complementary and alternative therapies for AD. Methods Searches were performed on PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, and the Global Resource for EczemA Trial (GREAT) databases, focusing on RCTs of alternative or complementary AD therapies, with a sample size of ≥10, through March 2015 and limited to the English language. A total of 70 manuscripts met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Results There is at least some level I evidence to support the use of acupuncture and acupressure, stress-reducing techniques such as hypnosis, massage, and biofeedback, balneotherapy, herbal preparations (with many important caveats), certain botanical oils, oral evening primrose oil, vitamin D supplementation, and topical vitamin B 12 . Many other therapies either have sufficient data to suggest that they are ineffective, or simply do not have enough evidence to formulate a verdict. Conclusions Careful review of the literature reveals several promising therapies in this domain; such findings may help direct further research that is necessary to bolster clinical recommendations for alternative or complementary treatments of AD.

Introduction Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease for which signs and symptoms have a negative impact on a patient’s quality of life (QoL) and mental health. Here, we assess the impact of lebrikizumab on QoL and mental health after 16 weeks of treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Methods Data were analyzed over 16 weeks from two separate phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, monotherapy trials (ADvocate1 and ADvocate2). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the following measures: Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale (VAS), EQ-5D-5L index scores (UK and US), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety, and PROMIS Depression. Results Treatment with lebrikizumab 250 mg every 2 weeks in two studies led to statistically significant improvements (based on nominal p  values) versus placebo in DLQI since week 4 (the first timepoint assessed) for the following measures: change from baseline in DLQI total score (ADvocate1 − 7.8 vs − 2.8; ADvocate2 − 7.3 vs − 3.9), proportion of patients with DLQI ≥ 4-point improvement (ADvocate1 69.5% vs 36.2%; ADvocate2 60.5% vs 42.6%), DLQI total score ≤ 5 (ADvocate1 36.7% vs 8.8%; ADvocate2 29.6% vs 10.8%), and DLQI (0, 1) (ADvocate1 12.3% vs 1.7%; ADvocate2 9.2% vs 1.7%). Improvements in DLQI measures, EQ-5D-5L index scores (UK and US), and EQ-5D-5L VAS were sustained through week 16. Additionally, lebrikizumab improved PROMIS Anxiety and PROMIS Depression scores, and improvements were higher in patients with at least a mild score (≥ 55) versus placebo for PROMIS Anxiety (ADvocate1 − 7.43 vs − 1.51; ADvocate2 − 4.95 vs − 0.82) and PROMIS Depression (ADvocate1 − 7.42 vs − 2.46; ADvocate2 − 4.28 vs − 2.00). Conclusions Treatment with monotherapy 250 mg lebrikizumab for 16 weeks provided clinically meaningful improvements in outcomes related to QoL and mental health for patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Lebrikizumab-treated patients reported improvements in DLQI as early as week 4, the first measure since baseline. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Registration NCT04146363 (ADvocate1) and NCT04178967 (ADvocate2).

Purpose of ReviewBiologics and small molecule inhibitors (SMIs) are a rapidly growing class of highly efficacious therapies in the treatment of chronic immunologic and allergic conditions. With precision targeting of inflammatory signaling molecules, these new agents selectively modulate the immune system to treat a variety of conditions. Dermatologic diseases, including atopic dermatitis and psoriasis, are of particular interest due to the growing number of new biologics and SMIs in recent years. This review serves to summarize and evaluate the recent literature regarding biologics and SMIs.Recent FindingsCurrently approved biologics for AD achieve clear or almost clear skin in less than 40% of patients treated. Several biologics that are still under investigation for AD have shown better efficacy in phase III trials with similar safety profiles. Recently approved SMIs for AD also demonstrate a high degree of efficacy, but safety profiles may limit their use. Psoriasis has several highly efficacious biologics on the market; however, only one SMI is currently available. Additional SMIs for psoriasis have completed phase III trials and demonstrated high efficacy.SummaryThis article evaluates recent literature on biologics and small molecule inhibitors for AD and psoriasis.

Topical corticosteroids, topical steroid-sparing agents, and emollients are all used to treat atopic dermatitis. However, there are no formal guidelines dictating the order and timing in which these topical modalities should be applied. Additionally, the order of application may change drug absorption, efficacy, and distribution. This is especially important for patients with atopic dermatitis. These patients have a dysfunctional skin barrier, which can lead to greater systemic absorption of drugs. Moreover, children already have an increased rate of systemic absorption due to a higher ratio of body surface area to body weight. Thus, the order of application of topical regimens is of the utmost importance in pediatric dermatology. This manuscript presents an updated review of the literature with a focus on guiding clinicians toward the best practices from the available resources.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic pruritic inflammatory skin disease in which management with topical anti-inflammatory agents during exacerbations remains the mainstay of treatment. With no cure in sight, a significant proportion of patients elect to incorporate complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) as an adjunct to conventional treatment. Many clinicians find it difficult to provide recommendations as the field covers an extensive number of very disparate therapies, with limited quality evidence to indicate efficacy. Since publication of the last review on this topic in the Journal that compiled and analyzed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on CAMs in 2015, several new studies have surfaced. This update aims to aggregate and review these new data. A literature search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Global Resource for EczemA Trials (GREAT) databases for RCTs on complementary and alternative therapies in AD from March 2015 through May 2018, resulting in 15 studies being included in this review. The preliminary results for many treatments such as vitamin E, East Indian Sandalwood Oil (EISO), melatonin, l -histidine, and Manuka honey show positive clinical effects, but there is currently not enough evidence to recommend their use in AD therapy. Future investigative efforts should focus on reproducing some of these studies with a larger sample size whose clinical characteristics and demographics are more reflective of the general AD population, and standardizing the process to produce reliable data.