Explore the vast range of titles available.

The combination of anastrozole and fulvestrant — which interfere with estrogen signaling by distinct mechanisms — increases progression-free and overall survival as compared with anastrozole alone or anastrozole followed by fulvestrant in women with HR-positive breast cancer. Endocrine therapy plays a central role in the treatment of hormone-receptor (HR)–positive metastatic breast cancer. 1 Selective aromatase inhibitors, such as anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane, lower the estrogen level and are used as first-line endocrine treatments of HR-positive metastatic disease, owing to their superiority over tamoxifen. 1 Fulvestrant (Faslodex, AstraZeneca) is an analogue of estradiol that down-regulates the estrogen receptor by disrupting estrogen-receptor dimerization and accelerating degradation of the unstable fulvestrant–estrogen-receptor complex. 2 This effect leads to reduced cross-talk between the estrogen receptor and estrogen-independent growth factor signaling, thus delaying resistance to hormone therapy. 2 Clinically, fulvestrant at a dose of 250 mg monthly . . .

In node-positive breast cancer, adjuvant doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel was associated with significantly better disease-free survival than the three drugs together or doxorubicin–docetaxel. Premenopausal women who became amenorrheic as a consequence of treatment had significantly improved overall and disease-free survival, regardless of their treatment or the hormone-receptor status of their tumor. In node-positive breast cancer, adjuvant doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel was associated with significantly better disease-free survival than the three drugs together or doxorubicin–docetaxel. Premenopausal women who became amenorrheic as a consequence of treatment had significantly improved overall and disease-free survival. Chemotherapy regimens that combine anthracyclines and taxanes with other agents such as cyclophosphamide result in improved disease-free and overall survival among women with operable lymph-node–positive breast cancer. 1 , 2 The contribution of cyclophosphamide to these regimens has not been defined. Initial evaluations of taxanes in the adjuvant setting used a sequential approach of administration after completion of the anthracycline-based regimen. Phase 3 trials in advanced breast cancer have shown superiority with a doxorubicin–docetaxel combination as compared with doxorubicin–cyclophosphamide and with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and docetaxel (ACT, also known as the TAC regimen), and as compared with fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide. 3 , 4 These . . .

The addition of fulvestrant to anastrozole in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer led to significantly longer progression-free survival (median, 15 months) and overall survival (median, 50 months) than anastrozole alone (13.5 and 42 months, respectively) when given as first-line endocrine therapy.

The response of bone-dominant (BD) breast cancer to therapy is difficult to assess by conventional imaging. Our preliminary studies have shown that quantitative serial 2-[(18)F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D: -glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) correlates with therapeutic response of BD breast cancer, but the relationship to long-term outcome measures is unknown. Our goal was to evaluate the prognostic power of serial FDG PET in BD breast cancer patients undergoing treatment. We reviewed medical records of 405 consecutive breast cancer patients referred for FDG PET. Of these, 28 demonstrated metastatic BD breast cancer, were undergoing treatment, had at least 2 serial PET scans, and had abnormal FDG uptake on the first scan. Standardized uptake value (SUV) for the most conspicuous bone lesion at the initial scan, absolute change in SUV over an interval of 1-17 months, and percent change in SUV were considered as predictors of time-to-progression (TTP) and time to skeletal-related event (t-SRE). Using proportional hazards regression, smaller percentage decreases in SUV (or increases in SUV) were associated with a shorter TTP (P < 0.006). A patient with no change in SUV was twice as likely to progress compared to a patient with a 42% median decrease in SUV. A higher SUV on the initial FDG PET predicted a shorter t-SRE (hazard ratio = 1.30, P < 0.02). Changes in serial FDG PET may predict TTP in BD metastatic breast cancer patients. However, larger prospective trials are needed to validate changes in FDG PET as a surrogate endpoint for treatment response.

Results from phase II studies in patients with stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer with ipsilateral mediastinal nodal metastases (N2) have shown the feasibility of resection after concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy with promising rates of survival. We therefore did this phase III trial to compare concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy followed by resection with standard concurrent chemotherapy and definitive radiotherapy without resection. Patients with stage T1-3pN2M0 non-small-cell lung cancer were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to concurrent induction chemotherapy (two cycles of cisplatin [50 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8, 29, and 36] and etoposide [50 mg/m 2 on days 1–5 and 29–33]) plus radiotherapy (45 Gy) in multiple academic and community hospitals. If no progression, patients in group 1 underwent resection and those in group 2 continued radiotherapy uninterrupted up to 61 Gy. Two additional cycles of cisplatin and etoposide were given in both groups. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00002550. 202 patients (median age 59 years, range 31–77) were assigned to group 1 and 194 (61 years, 32–78) to group 2. Median OS was 23·6 months (IQR 9·0–not reached) in group 1 versus 22·2 months (9·4–52·7) in group 2 (hazard ratio [HR] 0·87 [0·70–1·10]; p=0·24). Number of patients alive at 5 years was 37 (point estimate 27%) in group 1 and 24 (point estimate 20%) in group 2 (odds ratio 0·63 [0·36–1·10]; p=0·10). With N0 status at thoracotomy, the median OS was 34·4 months (IQR 15·7–not reached; 19 [point estimate 41%] patients alive at 5 years). Progression-free survival (PFS) was better in group 1 than in group 2, median 12·8 months (5·3–42·2) vs 10·5 months (4·8–20·6), HR 0·77 [0·62–0·96]; p=0·017); the number of patients without disease progression at 5 years was 32 (point estimate 22%) versus 13 (point estimate 11%), respectively. Neutropenia and oesophagitis were the main grade 3 or 4 toxicities associated with chemotherapy plus radiotherapy in group 1 (77 [38%] and 20 [10%], respectively) and group 2 (80 [41%] and 44 [23%], respectively). In group 1, 16 (8%) deaths were treatment related versus four (2%) in group 2. In an exploratory analysis, OS was improved for patients who underwent lobectomy, but not pneumonectomy, versus chemotherapy plus radiotherapy. Chemotherapy plus radiotherapy with or without resection (preferably lobectomy) are options for patients with stage IIIA(N2) non-small-cell lung cancer. National Cancer Institute, Canadian Cancer Society, and National Cancer Institute of Canada.

The 21-gene recurrence score assay is prognostic for women with node-negative, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer treated with tamoxifen. A low recurrence score predicts little benefit of chemotherapy. For node-positive breast cancer, we investigated whether the recurrence score was prognostic in women treated with tamoxifen alone and whether it identified those who might not benefit from anthracycline-based chemotherapy, despite higher risks of recurrence. The phase 3 trial SWOG-8814 for postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer showed that chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CAF) before tamoxifen (CAF-T) added survival benefit to treatment with tamoxifen alone. Optional tumour banking yielded specimens for determination of recurrence score by RT-PCR. In this retrospective analysis, we assessed the effect of recurrence score on disease-free survival by treatment group (tamoxifen vs CAF-T) using Cox regression, adjusting for number of positive nodes. There were 367 specimens (40% of the 927 patients in the tamoxifen and CAF-T groups) with sufficient RNA for analysis (tamoxifen, n=148; CAF-T, n=219). The recurrence score was prognostic in the tamoxifen-alone group (p=0·006; hazard ratio [HR] 2·64, 95% CI 1·33–5·27, for a 50-point difference in recurrence score). There was no benefit of CAF in patients with a low recurrence score (score <18; log-rank p=0·97; HR 1·02, 0·54–1·93), but an improvement in disease-free survival for those with a high recurrence score (score ≥31; log-rank p=0·033; HR 0·59, 0·35–1·01), after adjustment for number of positive nodes. The recurrence score by treatment interaction was significant in the first 5 years (p=0·029), with no additional prediction beyond 5 years (p=0·58), although the cumulative benefit remained at 10 years. Results were similar for overall survival and breast-cancer-specific survival. The recurrence score is prognostic for tamoxifen-treated patients with positive nodes and predicts significant benefit of CAF in tumours with a high recurrence score. A low recurrence score identifies women who might not benefit from anthracycline-based chemotherapy, despite positive nodes. National Cancer Institute and Genomic Health.

Postmenopausal women with early breast cancer who have undergone successful initial therapy receive five years of treatment with tamoxifen, an antagonist of the estrogen receptor. This placebo-controlled trial investigated whether the administration of letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor, after five years of tamoxifen therapy is beneficial. The trial was stopped because of a statistically significant reduction in the rate of breast-cancer–related events in the letrozole group as compared with the placebo group. This trial was stopped after an interim analysis. The risk of a recurrence of breast cancer continues for an indefinite period after surgery, radiation, and medical therapy. 1 , 2 Since the growth of breast cancer depends on the action of estrogen, 3 long-term reductions in the risk of recurrence have been achieved by antagonizing the activity of estrogen with the selective estrogen-receptor modulator tamoxifen in women with hormone-receptor–positive tumors. 1 , 2 The postoperative administration of tamoxifen for five years reduces the risk of recurrence by 47 percent and reduces the risk of death by 26 percent. 2 , 4 However, in a trial conducted by the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project . . .

Tamoxifen is standard adjuvant treatment for postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. We assessed the benefit of adding chemotherapy to adjuvant tamoxifen and whether tamoxifen should be given concurrently or after chemotherapy. We undertook a phase 3, parallel, randomised trial (SWOG-8814, INT-0100) in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer to test two major objectives: whether the primary outcome, disease-free survival, was longer with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CAF) given every 4 weeks for six cycles plus 5 years of daily tamoxifen than with tamoxifen alone; and whether disease-free survival was longer with CAF followed by tamoxifen (CAF-T) than with CAF plus concurrent tamoxifen (CAFT). Overall survival and toxicity were predefined, important secondary outcomes for each objective. Patients in this open-label trial were randomly assigned by a computer algorithm in a 2:3:3 ratio (tamoxifen:CAF-T:CAFT) and analysis was by intention to treat of eligible patients. Groups were compared by stratified log-rank tests, followed by Cox regression analyses adjusted for significant prognostic factors. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00929591. Of 1558 randomised women, 1477 (95%) were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. After a maximum of 13 years of follow-up (median 8·94 years), 637 women had a disease-free survival event (tamoxifen, 179 events in 361 patients; CAF-T, 216 events in 566 patients; CAFT, 242 events in 550 patients). For the first objective, therapy with the CAF plus tamoxifen groups combined (CAFT or CAF-T) was superior to tamoxifen alone for the primary endpoint of disease-free survival (adjusted Cox regression hazard ratio [HR] 0·76, 95% CI 0·64–0·91; p=0·002) but only marginally for the secondary endpoint of overall survival (HR 0·83, 0·68–1·01; p=0·057). For the second objective, the adjusted HRs favoured CAF-T over CAFT but did not reach significance for disease-free survival (HR 0·84, 0·70–1·01; p=0·061) or overall survival (HR 0·90, 0·73–1·10; p=0·30). Neutropenia, stomatitis, thromboembolism, congestive heart failure, and leukaemia were more frequent in the combined CAF plus tamoxifen groups than in the tamoxifen-alone group. Chemotherapy with CAF plus tamoxifen given sequentially is more effective adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive, node-positive breast cancer than is tamoxifen alone. However, it might be possible to identify some subgroups that do not benefit from anthracycline-based chemotherapy despite positive nodes. National Cancer Institute (US National Institutes of Health).

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) secondary to metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has increased in incidence with improved systemic disease control. Current treatment options include radiation therapy (to symptomatic sites) and systemic treatment [intrathecal (IT) or intravenous (IV) chemotherapy]. Methotrexate (MTX), thiotepa and cytarabine are the most commonly used IT agents, while high-dose MTX is the most common IV regimen. While IT treatments are generally well tolerated, complications like chemical meningitis, leukoencephalopathy, etc. occur. LMC may cause a breakdown in the blood–brain barrier and thus allow systemic agents to penetrate; however, efficacy is reported only for agents administered at high doses (MTX). We report our institution’s experience in using IV thiotepa as treatment for LMC secondary to MBC. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 13 patients with MBC who developed LMC and treated with IV thiotepa at our institution. It was administered at 40 mg/m 2 every 21 days; median number of thiotepa cycles administered was 5 with the major dose-limiting toxicity being myelosuppression. Four had partial response, 3 had stable disease and 6 had progressive disease. The 6-month survival rate was 69 % and 1-year survival rate was 31 %. Despite retrospective nature of our case series, we found the use of IV thiotepa as sole treatment for LMC in patients with MBC to be well tolerated, easily administered in the ambulatory setting, and with efficacy comparable to the other chemotherapeutic agents commonly used in the treatment of LMC. This regimen warrants further investigation in prospective studies.

Of the approximately 170,000 cases of lung cancer diagnosed each year in the United States, 20 percent are small-cell cancers. 1 Staging systems divide small-cell lung cancer into two categories: limited and extensive. The former is clinically confined to one side of the chest and is treatable by radiotherapy field sizes (portals) tolerated by normal tissues. The main treatment for limited small-cell lung cancer is radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Cisplatin plus etoposide has largely supplanted the older regimens of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine. Advantages of the cisplatin–etoposide regimen over the older regimen include the absence of toxic effects on intrathoracic organs and . . .