Explore the vast range of titles available.

Abstract Heart failure (HF) remains a major cause of mortality, morbidity, and poor quality of life. It is an area of active research. This article is aimed to give an update on recent advances in all aspects of this syndrome. Major changes occurred in drug treatment of HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Sacubitril/valsartan is indicated as a substitute to ACEi/ARBs after PARADIGM-HF (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 0.87 for sacubitril/valsartan vs. enalapril for the primary endpoint and Wei, Lin and Weissfeld HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.71–0.89 for recurrent events). Its initiation was then shown as safe and potentially useful in recent studies in patients hospitalized for acute HF. More recently, dapagliflozin and prevention of adverse-outcomes in DAPA-HF trial showed the beneficial effects of the sodium–glucose transporter type 2 inhibitor dapaglifozin vs. placebo, added to optimal standard therapy [HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.85;0.74; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.85 for the primary endpoint]. Trials with other SGLT 2 inhibitors and in other patients, such as those with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or with recent decompensation, are ongoing. Multiple studies showed the unfavourable prognostic significance of abnormalities in serum potassium levels. Potassium lowering agents may allow initiation and titration of mineralocorticoid antagonists in a larger proportion of patients. Meta-analyses suggest better outcomes with ferric carboxymaltose in patients with iron deficiency. Drugs effective in HFrEF may be useful also in HF with mid-range ejection fraction. Better diagnosis and phenotype characterization seem warranted in HF with preserved ejection fraction. These and other burning aspects of HF research are summarized and reviewed in this article.

In the last years, major progress has occurred in heart failure (HF) management. The 2023 ESC focused update of the 2021 HF guidelines introduced new key recommendations based on the results of the last years of science. First, two drugs, sodium–glucose co‐transporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and finerenone, a novel nonsteroidal, selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), are recommended for the prevention of HF in patients with diabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD). Second, SGLT2 inhibitors are now recommended for the treatment of HF across the entire left ventricular ejection fraction spectrum. The benefits of quadruple therapy in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are well established. Its rapid and early up‐titration along with a close follow‐up with frequent clinical and laboratory re‐assessment after an episode of acute HF (the so‐called ‘high‐intensity care’ strategy) was associated with better outcomes in the STRONG‐HF trial. Patients experiencing an episode of worsening HF might require a fifth drug, vericiguat. In the STEP‐HFpEF‐DM and STEP‐HFpEF trials, semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly administered for 1 year decreased body weight and significantly improved quality of life and the 6 min walk distance in obese patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with or without a history of diabetes. Further data on safety and efficacy, including also hard endpoints, are needed to support the addition of acetazolamide or hydrochlorothiazide to a standard diuretic regimen in patients hospitalized due to acute HF. In the meantime, PUSH‐AHF supported the use of natriuresis‐guided diuretic therapy. Further options and most recent evidence for the treatment of HF, including specific drugs for cardiomyopathies (i.e., mavacamten in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and tafamidis in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis), device therapies, cardiac contractility modulation and percutaneous treatment of valvulopathies, with the recent finding from the TRILUMINATE Pivotal trial, are also reviewed in this article.

Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of mortality, hospitalizations, and reduced quality of life and a major burden for the healthcare system. The number of patients that progress to an advanced stage of HF is growing. Only a limited proportion of these patients can undergo heart transplantation or mechanical circulatory support. The purpose of this review is to summarize medical management of patients with advanced HF. First, evidence‐based oral treatment must be implemented although it is often not tolerated. New therapeutic options may soon become possible for these patients. The second goal is to lessen the symptomatic burden through both decongestion and haemodynamic improvement. Some new treatments acting on cardiac function may fulfil both these needs. Inotropic agents acting through an increase in intracellular calcium have often increased risk of death. However, in the recent Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac Outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure (GALACTIC‐HF) trial, omecamtiv mecarbil was safe and effective in the reduction of the primary outcome of cardiovascular death or HF event compared with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.86–0.99; P = 0.03) and its effects were larger in those patients with more severe left ventricular dysfunction. Patients with severe HF who received omecamtiv mecarbil experienced a significant treatment benefit, whereas patients without severe HF did not (P = 0.005 for interaction). Lastly, clinicians should take care of the end of life with an appropriate multidisciplinary approach. Medical treatment of advanced HF therefore remains a major challenge and a wide open area for further research.

Lots of meta-alysis emphasize that a great number of hospitalized patients with moderate and severe forms of COVID-19 developed acute myocardial damage, defined as an increase of cardiac biomarkers, such N-termil pro–B-type triuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP), creatine kise-myocardial band (CK-MB) and of all type of troponins. The highest mortality rate is related with progressively increasing biomarkers levels and with a history of cardiovascular disease. In fact, the biomarkers dosage should be considered as a prognostic marker in all patients with COVID-19 disease at admission, during hospitalization and in the case of clinical deterioration. The purpose of this review is to evaluate cardiovascular prognostic factors in COVID-19 disease throughout the alysis of cardiac biomarkers to early identify the most serious patients and to optimize their outcomes.

An increasing awareness of the disease, new diagnostic tools and novel therapeutic opportunities have dramatically changed the management of patients with amyloid transthyretin cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). Supportive therapies have shown limited benefits, mostly related to diuretics for the relief from signs and symptoms of congestion in patients presenting heart failure (HF). On the other hand, huge advances in specific (disease-modifying) treatments occurred in the last years. Therapies targeting the amyloidogenic cascade include several pharmacological agents that inhibit hepatic synthesis of TTR, stabilize the tetramer, or disrupt fibrils. Tafamidis, a TTR stabilizer that demonstrated to prolong survival and improve quality of life in the ATTR-ACT trial, is currently the only approved drug for patients with ATTR-CM. The small interfering RNA (siRNA) patisiran and the antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) inotersen have been approved for the treatment of patients with hereditary ATTR polyneuropathy regardless of the presence of cardiac involvement, with patisiran also showing preliminary benefits on the cardiac phenotype. Ongoing phase III clinical trials are investigating another siRNA, vutrisiran, and a novel ASO formulation, eplontersen, in patients with ATTR-CM. CRISPR–Cas9 represents a promising strategy of genome editing to obtain a highly effective blockade of TTR gene expression.

Abstract Cardiac remodelling is a key determinant of worse cardiovascular outcome in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). It affects both the left ventricle (LV) structure and function as well as the left atrium (LA) and the right ventricle (RV). Guideline recommended medical therapy for HF, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptors II blockers/angiotensin receptor blocker-neprilysin inhibitors (ACE-I/ARB/ARNI), beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) and sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), have shown to improve morbidity and mortality in patients with HFrEF. By targeting multiple pathophysiological pathways, foundational HF therapies are supposed to drive their beneficial clinical effects by a direct myocardial effect. Simultaneous initiation of guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) through a synergistic effect promotes a ‘reverse remodelling’, leading to a full or partial recovered structure and function by enhancing systemic neurohumoral regulation and energy metabolism, reducing cardiomyocyte apoptosis, lowering oxidative stress and inflammation and adverse extracellular matrix deposition. The aim of this review is to describe how these classes of drugs can drive reverse remodelling in the LV, LA and RV and improve prognosis in patients with HFrEF.

Adherence to exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is essential for preventing and managing cardiovascular disease (CVD). Participation in CR reduces all-cause mortality by 27% and cardiac deaths by 31% and lowers rehospitalization rates while also improving functional capacity and quality of life. However, many patients do not start, complete, or maintain CR, resulting in reduced functional abilities, a higher risk of recurring events, and poorer long-term outcomes. This narrative review summarizes patterns of adherence to exercise and CR in CVD, with a specific focus on sex- and gender-related differences in referral, participation, and completion. We synthesize evidence on biological, psychological, and social barriers that limit engagement and describe emerging strategies, such as technology-enabled and home-based programs, multidisciplinary care, and family-centered models, to enhance adherence. Finally, we propose a practical, gender-aware framework for CR design and delivery that can be adjusted and evaluated across diverse healthcare settings to guide clinical practice and future research.

Emerging evidences prove that the ongoing pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is strictly linked to coagulopathy even if pneumonia appears as the major clinical manifestation. The exact incidence of thromboembolic events is largely unknown, so that a relative significant number of studies have been performed in order to explore thrombotic risk in COVID-19 patients. Cytokine storm, mediated by pro-inflammatory interleukins, tumor necrosis factor α and elevated acute phase reactants, is primarily responsible for COVID-19-associated hypercoagulopathy. Also comorbidities, promoting endothelial dysfunction, contribute to a higher thromboembolic risk. In this review we aim to investigate epidemiology and clarify the pathophysiological pathways underlying hypercoagulability in COVID-19 patients, providing indications on the prevention of thromboembolic events in COVID-19. Furthermore we aim to reassume the pathophysiological paths involved in COVID-19 infection.

Aims Myocardial injury (MI) in coronavirus disease‐19 (COVID‐19) is quite prevalent at admission and affects prognosis. Little is known about troponin trajectories and their prognostic role. We aimed to describe the early in‐hospital evolution of MI and its prognostic impact. Methods and results We performed an analysis from an Italian multicentre study enrolling COVID‐19 patients, hospitalized from 1 March to 9 April 2020. MI was defined as increased troponin level. The first troponin was tested within 24 h from admission, the second one between 24 and 48 h. Elevated troponin was defined as values above the 99th percentile of normal values. Patients were divided in four groups: normal, normal then elevated, elevated then normal, and elevated. The outcome was in‐hospital death. The study population included 197 patients; 41% had normal troponin at both evaluations, 44% had elevated troponin at both assessments, 8% had normal then elevated troponin, and 7% had elevated then normal troponin. During hospitalization, 49 (25%) patients died. Patients with incident MI, with persistent MI, and with MI only at admission had a higher risk of death compared with those with normal troponin at both evaluations (P < 0.001). At multivariable analysis, patients with normal troponin at admission and MI injury on Day 2 had the highest mortality risk (hazard ratio 3.78, 95% confidence interval 1.10–13.09, P = 0.035). Conclusions In patients admitted for COVID‐19, re‐test MI on Day 2 provides a prognostic value. A non‐negligible proportion of patients with incident MI on Day 2 is identified at high risk of death only by the second measurement.

Aim We investigated the prognostic significance of serum potassium abnormalities at discharge in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF). Methods and results In a retrospective analysis, we included 926 patients hospitalized for AHF, stratified by serum potassium levels at discharge as hypokalaemia (<3.5 mEq/L), normokalaemia (3.5–5.0 mEq/L), and hyperkalaemia (>5.0 mEq/L). The primary endpoint was all‐cause death at 1 year since hospital discharge. At discharge, 40 patients had hypokalaemia (4.3%), 840 normokalaemia (90.7%), and 46 hyperkalaemia (5.0%). Patients with hyperkalaemia at discharge were more frequently men, had more signs of congestion, and lower LVEF while patients with hypokalaemia were more likely to be women with HFpEF. Treatment with ACEi/ARBs and MRAs ≥50% of target dose at discharge was similar across groups. One year all‐cause death occurred in 10% of the patients with hypokalaemia, 13.9% of those with normokalaemia, and 30.4% of those with hyperkalaemia (P = 0.006). After adjustment for covariates, including renal function, background treatment, and baseline potassium level, hyperkalaemia resulted an independent predictor of the primary endpoint (HR 1.96, 95% IC [1.01–3.82]; P = 0.048). Conclusions In patients with AHF, the presence of hyperkalaemia at discharge is an independent predictor of 1 year all‐cause death.