Explore the vast range of titles available.

In a large randomized clinical trial, the median survival among women with recurrent cervical cancer was 17 months when bevacizumab was added to their chemotherapy regimen, as compared with 13 months with chemotherapy alone. Rates of cervical cancer in developed countries have decreased dramatically because of cytologic screening and DNA testing for high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types. Approximately 12,000 cases of cervical cancer are diagnosed in the United States annually, and with continued increases in HPV vaccination, numbers of cases are expected to decrease further. 1 However, for vulnerable populations without access to health care in the United States and throughout the world, cervical cancer remains a considerable problem, with 500,000 new cases and 250,000 deaths annually. 2 Although early-stage and locally advanced cancers may be cured with radical surgery, chemoradiotherapy, or both, patients with metastatic . . .

GOG 240 was a practice-changing randomised phase 3 trial that concluded that chemotherapy plus bevacizumab for advanced cervical cancer significantly improves overall and progression-free survival, and the proportion of patients achieving an overall objective response, compared with chemotherapy alone. In this study, we aimed to analyse patient-reported outcomes in GOG 240. Eligible adult participants (aged ≥18 years) had primary stage IVB or recurrent or persistent carcinoma of the cervix with measurable disease and GOG performance status of 0–1. Participants were randomly assigned by web-based permuted block randomisation (block size 4) in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to the four treatment groups: cisplatin (50 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 or 2 of the treatment cycle) and paclitaxel (135 mg/m2 intravenously over 24 h or 175 mg/m2 intravenously over 3 h on day 1), with or without bevacizumab (15 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 or 2), or paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 over 3 h on day 1) and topotecan (0·75 mg/m2 for 30 min on days 1–3) with or without bevacizumab (15 mg/kg intravenously on day 1). Treatment assignment was concealed at randomisation (everyone was masked to treatment assignment, achieved by the use of a computer encrypted numbering system at the National Cancer Institute) and became open-label when each patient was registered to the trial. Treatment cycles were repeated every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, whichever occurred first. The coprimary endpoints of the trial were overall survival and safety; the primary quality-of-life endpoint was the score on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cervix Trial Outcome Index (FACT-Cx TOI). For our analysis of patient-reported outcomes, participants were assessed before treatment cycles 1, 2, and 5, and at 6 and 9 months after the start of cycle 1, with the FACT-Cx TOI, items from the FACT-GOG-Neurotoxicity subscale, and a worst pain item from the Brief Pain Inventory. All patients who completed baseline quality-of-life assessments and at least one further follow-up assessment were evaluable for quality-of-life outcomes. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00803062. Between April 6, 2009, and Jan 3, 2012, a total of 452 patients were enrolled in the trial, of whom 390 completed baseline quality-of-life assessment and at least one further assessment and were therefore evaluable for quality-of-life outcomes. In these patients, patient-reported outcome completion declined from 426 (94%) of 452 (at baseline) to 193 (63%) of 307 (9 months post-cycle 1), but completion rates did not differ significantly between treatment regimens (p=0·78). The baseline FACT-Cx TOI scores did not differ significantly between patients who received bevacizumab versus those who did not (p=0·27). Compared with patients who received chemotherapy alone, patients who received chemotherapy plus bevacizumab reported FACT-Cx TOI scores that were an average of 1·2 points lower (98·75% CI −4·1 to 1·7; p=0·30). Improvements in overall survival and progression-free survival attributed to the incorporation of bevacizumab into the treatment of advanced cervical cancer were not accompanied by any significant deterioration in health-related quality of life. Patients responding to anti-angiogenesis therapy who maintain an acceptable quality of life could be suitable at progression for treatment with other novel therapies that might confer additional benefit. National Institutes of Health.

Variability in case severity and in the range of symptoms experienced has been apparent from the earliest months of the COVID-19 pandemic. From a clinical perspective, symptom variability might indicate various routes/mechanisms by which infection leads to disease, with different routes requiring potentially different treatment approaches. For public health and control of transmission, symptoms in community cases were the prompt upon which action such as PCR testing and isolation was taken. However, interpreting symptoms presents challenges, for instance, in balancing the sensitivity and specificity of individual symptoms with the need to maximise case finding, whilst managing demand for limited resources such as testing. For both clinical and transmission control reasons, we require an approach that allows for the possibility of distinct symptom phenotypes, rather than assuming variability along a single dimension. Here we address this problem by bringing together four large and diverse datasets deriving from routine testing, a population-representative household survey and participatory smartphone surveillance in the United Kingdom. Through the use of cutting-edge unsupervised classification techniques from statistics and machine learning, we characterise symptom phenotypes among symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive community cases. We first analyse each dataset in isolation and across age bands, before using methods that allow us to compare multiple datasets. While we observe separation due to the total number of symptoms experienced by cases, we also see a separation of symptoms into gastrointestinal, respiratory and other types, and different symptom co-occurrence patterns at the extremes of age. In this way, we are able to demonstrate the deep structure of symptoms of COVID-19 without usual biases due to study design. This is expected to have implications for the identification and management of community SARS-CoV-2 cases and could be further applied to symptom-based management of other diseases and syndromes.

Background:Based primarily on studies concerning early-stage tumours (treated surgically), and locally advanced disease (treated with chemoradiation), the prognosis for women with adenocarcinoma (AC) or adenosquamous (AS) carcinoma has been reported to be poorer than those with squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA) of the cervix. It is unclear whether differences in prognosis also persist in the setting of recurrent or metastatic disease treated using chemotherapy doublets with or without bevacizumab.Methods:Cases were pooled from three Gynaecologic Oncology Group randomised phase III trials of chemotherapy doublets. Pearson's test was used to evaluate response rate (RR) of AC/AS vs SCCA, Kaplan-Meier method to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards model to estimate the impact of histology on PFS and OS.Results:Of 781 evaluable patients, 77% (N=599) had SCCA and 23% (N=182) AC/AS. There were no significant differences in RRs between histologic subgroups. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for death for SCCA vs AC/AS was 1.13 (95% CI 0.93, 1.38 P=0.23). When comparing SC/AS (N=661, 85%) to AC alone (N=120, 15%), the adjusted HR for death was 1.23 (95% CI 0.97, 1.57, P=0.09).Conclusions:AC/AS and SCCA have similar survival in recurrent or metastatic cervical carcinoma when treated with chemotherapy doublets.

ObjectiveThis study aimed to describe pretreatment patient characteristics and baseline quality-of-life scores as they relate to the development of grade 3 or 4 toxicity in patients receiving chemotherapy for advanced/recurrent cervical cancer.MethodsThe study sample was drawn from Gynecologic Oncology Group protocols 179 and 204. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were considered in 4 specified categories as follows: peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, hematological, and gastrointestinal (GI). The data variables explored included age, stage, pretreatment radiation, performance status (PS) at treatment initiation, and baseline Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cervix (FACT-Cx) score. A logistic regression model was developed with various adverse events as binary (0/1) outcomes.ResultsSix hundred seventy-three patient-reported questionnaires were used in the analyses. At baseline, pain was the most severe patient-reported symptom. Baseline line-item patient concerns did demonstrate specific correlations with the development of individual toxicities. In 401 patients who were enrolled on Gynecologic Oncology Group 204 (fatigue not measured on 179), a worse PS predicted the development of grade 3 or 4 fatigue (odds ratio, 2.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.66–4.68). Exposure to previous radiation, treatment regimen, and a worse FACT-Cx score were associated with the reporting of both grade 3 or 4 leukopenia (P < 0.05) and anemia (P < 0.0005). Performance status and treatment regimen (P < 0.05) were associated with the development of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia. Age and treatment regimen (P < 0.05) were associated with the development of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. The FACT-Cx score (P = 0.0016) predicted grade 3 or 4 GI toxicity.ConclusionsThe development of fatigue, hematological, and GI toxicity might be predictable based on factors other than treatment assignment such as age, PS, and patient-reported quality-of-life measurement.

This article reviews the current data on human papillomavirus as the cause of most cervical cancer cases, data on the recently approved human papillomavirus vaccines, and updated information concerning the Bethesda System for interpretation of Papanicolaou test results. Current recommendations for surgical treatment, concurrent chemotherapy, and radiation therapy and recent advances in systemic therapy for advanced or metastatic cervical cancer are reviewed.

During the Silent Era, when most films dealt with dramatic or comedic takes on the \"boy meets girl, boy loses girl\" theme, other motion pictures dared to tackle such topics as rejuvenation, revivication, mesmerism, the supernatural and the grotesque.

A healthy 27-year-old woman presented to an outside institution with unilateral nipple pruritus and a slight brown discolouration. When her symptoms failed to respond to topical therapy, nipple biopsy revealed Paget’s disease of the nipple. The patient sought further evaluation and care at our institution. Further investigation revealed multifocal breast cancer and the patient underwent bilateral mastectomies with sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by adjuvant systemic therapy. She is currently more than 4 years out from surgery and chemotherapy and has had no evidence of breast cancer recurrence.

Chemoradiotherapy with either weekly doses of cisplatin or the combination of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin has become the standard of therapy for patients with locally advanced cervix cancer. Recently reported studies that are directed at improvements in radiation treatment planning, improved tissue oxygenation, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy are likely to lead to improvements in therapy. Nonsurgical preoperative staging with positron emission tomography and sentinel lymph node evaluation could result in effective surgical staging, or even nonsurgical staging, more accurate radiation treatment planning, and improved local and systemic control with a reduction in short-term and long-term morbidity in the treatment of locally advanced cervix cancer. Well-designed, randomized, prospective clinical trials are needed for a more thorough evaluation of these preliminary findings and to set research directions for the next several years.

Background: Edmonston vaccine strains of MV have significant antitumor activity against ovarian cancer xenografts (Peng et al, Cancer Res, 2002). Oncolytic selectivity is due to overexpression of the MV CD46 receptor in ovarian cancer cells. Furthermore, engineering the virus to express the marker peptide CEA (MV-CEA) allows real time monitoring of viral gene expression/ propagation in vivo.Methods: We are conducting a Phase I trial of MV-CEA in patients (pts) with recurrent, taxol and platinum refractory ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma. Eligible pts should have protective anti-MV antibody (ab) titers and normal CEA levels. A standard phase I cohorts of three statistical design is employed. MV-CEA is administered IP via a port-a-cath, q 4 wks for up to 6 cycles.Results: To date, 12 pts have received viral doses from 10 3 to 106 TCID50. No dose-limiting toxicity has been observed. Most common toxicities included grade 1-2 nausea (4 pts); grade 1-2 fatigue (4 pts); grade 1 fever (3 pts); grade 1 abdominal pain (2 pts). One pt had grade 1-3 arthralgias in cycles 4-6. There was no treatment induced immunosuppression as assessed by DTH, CD4, CD8, immunoglobulin and complement levels, no significant increase in the titers of anti-MV abs in serum or ascites in response to treatment, and no development of anti-CEA abs. Viral genomes were detected in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of 2 asymptomatic pts by QRT-PCR. No CEA elevation in the serum was observed in the dose range tested, and there was no viral shedding in urine or mouth gargle specimens. Testing of pt tumor samples for CD46 by IHC demonstrated overexpression of the target receptor in 7/8 pts. Best objective response was stable disease (2-8 mo duration) in 5 pts, while 3 pts had significant decrease in CA125 levels, of 44%, 72%, and 78%, respectively.Conclusions: In this first human application of an engineered oncolytic MV strain, we have observed excellent tolerance after repeat IP administration of the virus. Despite the low doses employed so far, there is early evidence of biologic activity. Dose escalation continues to the target dose of 10 9 TCID50.