Explore the vast range of titles available.

Five patients with acute myelogenous leukemia received hematopoietic stem-cell transplants from a haploidentical donor. They also received T cells from the donor. All five patients had a relapse, and at the time of relapse, genomic HLA typing of leukemic blasts could not detect the recipient's HLA haplotype that differed from the donor's. The loss of the haplotype was due to uniparental disomy. In vitro, the donor's T cells reacted against leukemic blasts obtained at the time of diagnosis, not against blasts obtained at relapse. The results indicate the presence of a mutation that allowed the leukemic cells to escape the immunosurveillance of the donor's T cells. Five patients with acute myelogenous leukemia received hematopoietic stem-cell transplants from a haploidentical donor. They also received T cells from the donor. All five patients had a relapse, and at the time of relapse, genomic HLA typing of leukemic blasts could not detect the recipient's HLA haplotype that differed from the donor's. Transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells from a haploidentical family donor who shares only one HLA haplotype with the recipient is a potentially curative option for patients with high-risk hematologic cancers who lack an HLA-matched donor. 1 – 3 The major limitation of this strategy is the risk of severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which can result from alloreactions mediated by donor T cells against the recipient's unshared HLA haplotype. Since the publication of studies on extensively T-cell–depleted grafts, 1 , 2 a variety of strategies have been developed to prevent or control GVHD after transfer of haploidentical T cells. 4 , 5 The feasibility and efficacy of . . .

Background: Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) represent a major cause of morbidity among allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Isavuconazole (ISA) is a broad-spectrum triazole with favorable safety profile. Objectives and design: Herein, we evaluate the real life coadministration of ISA and sirolimus in allo-HSCT recipients in a single-center retrospective analysis, describing clinical efficacy, safety, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of both drugs. Methods: All consecutive allo-HSCT recipients who received the coadministration of ISA and sirolimus for at least 2 weeks between July 2017 and December 2022 were included in this retrospective analysis. TDM was longitudinally performed during treatment. IFIs were classified according to the revised European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group consensus criteria. Results: A total of 51 recipients were included in the analysis. A total of 17 patients received ISA as continuous antifungal treatment for IFI diagnosed before transplant: one patient experienced a probable invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, and one patient switched from ISA to liposomal amphotericin B for a possible IFI. A total of 34 patients started ISA as antifungal therapy for IFI diagnosed after transplant. Sixteen of 34 were treated for a proven/probable breakthrough IFI during mold-active prophylaxis: 6/16 patients died for IFI after a median of 51 days of ISA. Eighteen of 34 started ISA as empirical therapy for a possible IFI: 15/18 patients were alive with resolution of infection after 6 weeks, 1 died for disease progression, and 2 had empirically changed antifungal therapy due to pneumonia progression. Clinical and radiological response rate was 68% after 90 days from IFI diagnosis. No toxicities related to drug–drug interaction have been registered in patients reaching concomitant therapeutic levels of ISA and sirolimus. Conclusion: The coadministration of ISA and sirolimus was safe and feasible in this cohort, confirming favorable clinical efficacy in patients with multiple-drug coadministration.

Although the outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has dramatically improved in the past decade, it is still compromised by transplant-related mortality (TRM), mainly caused by Graft-vs. -Host Disease (GvHD). We conducted a prospective observational study to ascertain the potential of serum interleukin-6 (IL6) levels, measured before conditioning and 7 days after allo-HSCT, in predicting acute GvHD, TRM and survival after allo-HSCT with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) based GvHD prophylaxis. Between April 2014 and June 2017, we collected samples from 166 consecutive allo-HSCT patients. By ROC analysis, we identified a threshold of 2.5 pg/ml for pre-transplant IL6 and 16.5 pg/ml for post-transplant IL6. Both univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed the ability of high baseline IL6 levels to predict worse OS (HR 4.3; < 0.01) and grade II-IV acute GvHD (HR 1.8; = 0.04), and of high post-transplant IL6 to identify patients with worse OS (HR 3.3; < 0.01) and higher risk of grade II-IV (HR 5; < 0.01) and grade III-IV acute GvHD (HR 10.2; < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, both baseline (HR 6.7; < 0.01) and post-transplant high IL6 levels (HR 3.5; = 0.02) predicted higher TRM. IL6 may contribute to the risk stratification of patients at major risk for aGvHD and TRM, potentially providing a window for additional prophylactic or preemptive strategies to improve the quality of life in the early post-transplant phase and the outcome of allo-HSCT.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in SARS-CoV-2 positive candidates is usually delayed until the clinical resolution of the infection’s symptoms and a negative nasopharyngeal molecular test. However, prolonged SARS-CoV-2 positivity has been frequently observed in haematological malignancies, thus representing a challenge for the timing of transplant procedures. Here, we report on the case of a 34-year-old patient with recent pauci-symptomatic COVID-19 undergoing transplant for high-risk acute B-lymphoblastic leukemia before achieving viral clearance. Shortly before their scheduled allogeneic HSCT from a matched unrelated donor, the patient developed mild Omicron BA.5 infection receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir with fever resolution within 72 hours. Twenty-three days after COVID-19 diagnosis, because of increasing minimal residual disease values in the context of high-risk refractory leukemia and clinical resolution of SARS-2-CoV infection with reduction of viral load at surveillance nasopharyngeal swabs, it was decided not to delay further allo-HSCT. During myelo-ablative conditioning, the nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 viral load increased while the patient remained asymptomatic. Consequently, two days before the transplant, intra-muscular tixagevimab/cilgavimab 300/300 mg and a 3-day course of intravenous remdesivir were administered. During the pre-engraftment phase, veno-occlusive disease (VOD) occurred at day +13, requiring defibrotide treatment to obtain a slow but complete recovery. The post-engraftment phase was characterized by mild COVID-19 at day +23 (cough, rhino-conjunctivitis, fever) that spontaneously resolved, achieving viral clearance at day +28. At day +32, she experienced grade I acute graft-versus host disease (a-GVHD, skin grade II) treated with steroids and photo-apheresis, without further complications during follow-up until day +180. Addressing the issue of allo-HSCT timing in patients recovering from SARS-CoV-2 infection with high-risk malignant diseases is challenging because of 1] the high risk of COVID-19 clinical progression, 2] the impact of transplant delay on leukemia prognosis and 3] the occurrence of endothelial complications such as VOD, a-GVHD, and transplant associated thrombotic micro-angiopathy. Our report describes the favourable outcome of allo-HSCT in a recipient with active SARS-CoV2 infection and high-risk leukemia thanks to timely anti-SARS-CoV-2 preventive therapies and prompt management of transplant-related complications.

Infections and graft-vs-host disease (GvHD) still represent major, not easily predictable complications in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT). Both conditions have been correlated to altered enteric microbiome profiles during the peritransplant period. The main objective of this study was to identify possible early microbiome-based markers useful in pretransplant risk stratification. Stool samples were collected from 96 consecutive patients at the beginning of the pretransplant conditioning regimen (T ) and at 10 (T ) and 30 (T ) days following transplant. When significant in univariate analysis, the identified microbiome markers were used in multivariate regression analyses, together with other significant clinical variables for allo-HSCT-related risk stratification. Four main outcomes were addressed: (1) septic complications, (2) GvHD, (3) relapse of the underlying disease, and (4) mortality. The presence of >5% proinflammatory Enterobacteriaceae at T was the only significant marker for the risk of microbiologically confirmed sepsis. Moreover, ≤10% Lachnospiraceae at T was the only significant factor for increased risk of overall mortality, including death from both infectious and noninfectious causes.Finally, a low bacterial alpha-diversity (Shannon index ≤ 1.3) at T was the only variable significantly correlating with an increased risk of GvHD within 30 days. Microbiome markers can be useful in the very early identification of patients at risk for major transplant-related complications, offering new tools for individualized preemptive or therapeutic strategies to improve allo-HSCT outcomes.

Introduction: Azacitidine (AZA) either single-agent or with donor lymphocytes infusions (DLI) has been used as a salvage treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) relapsing after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). To date, the majority of data come from patients relapsed after HSCT from full-matched donors. Methods: We report a multicenter, collaborative, retrospective analysis of 71 patients with hematologic (n = 40, 56%) and molecular relapse (n = 31, 44%) of myeloid neoplasms after HSCT from alternative donors (mismatched unrelated, n = 39, 55%; haploidentical, n = 29, 41%) consecutively treated at three European centers with AZA ± DLI. Results: Median time from HSCT to relapse was 9 months. Additional DLI were given to 33 patients (46%). After a median of four cycles, overall response rate (ORR) was 49% and complete response (CR) rate was 38%. CR lasted for a median of 17 months (range 5–89 months). Median follow-up in the entire cohort was 11 months (range 1–115 months). Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) at 1 year were 26% and 53%, respectively. Treatment of molecular relapse granted higher CR rate (65% versus 15%; p = 0.0001), 1-year EFS (43% versus 13%; p = 0.006), and 1-year OS (79% versus 34%; p < 0.001) compared to hematologic relapses. Addition of DLI resulted in significantly higher responses and longer 1-year EFS and OS (Mantel–Byar test, p = 0.004 and p = 0.002, respectively). When applied to our cohort, the APSS-R score confirmed its ability to stratify patients into distinct prognostic groups with significantly different response rates (p = 0.0005) and survival (p < 0.0001). Treatment was well tolerated, with the incidence of late acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease of 27% and 18%, respectively. Conclusion: AZA ± DLI proved feasible and effective in AML and MDS relapsing after HSCT from alternative donors. Despite modest efficacy among hematologic relapses, pre-emptive treatment with AZA ± DLI fared better in molecular relapse. Additional DLI contributed to improving efficacy and ensuring longer survival.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivations are strong stimulators of immune-reconstitution (IR) in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. Herein, we analyzed 317 CMV-seropositive consecutive patients (n = 109 letermovir, LTV; n = 208 no-LTV), undergoing HSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and calcineurin inhibitor- (CNI) free graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD) prophylaxis. At day+90, median CD19+/mm3 was higher in LTV-cohort: 5.5 [0;439] versus 2 [0;294], p = 0.008; median CD3+/mm3 counts were lower in LTV-cohort, with no differences in CD4+, CD8+ and NK-cells. At day+180 median CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+/mm3 values were comparable between groups. Higher CD19+/mm3 counts were observed in LTV-cohort: 62 [0; 2983] versus 42 [0; 863]. Significantly higher median NK/mm3 values were seen in LTV-cohort: 225.5 [0;763] versus 163.5 [0;1181], p = 0.0003. The impact of LTV on B-cell IR at 3 months and NK-cell levels at 6 months was retained in multivariate analysis (p < 0.01), whereas the effect on T-cells was not confirmed. Moreover, we confirmed a significant reduction of clinically-relevant CMV, and moderate-to- severe chronic GvHD in LTV-cohort. Overall, in our study the use of LTV was associated with a slight improvement of B-cell and NK-cells reconstitution, with only minor impact on T-cell subsets, giving new insights on polyclonal IR for HSCT recipients in the LTV era.

Ocular graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurs in more than half of patients who develop chronic GVHD after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), causing prolonged morbidity, which affects activities of daily living and quality of life. Here we provide an expert review of ocular GVHD in a collaboration between transplant physicians and ophthalmologists through the Late Effects and Quality of Life Working Committee of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research and the Transplant Complications Working Party of the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Recent updates in ocular GVHD, regarding pathophysiology, preclinical models, risk factors, prevention, screening, diagnosis, response criteria, evaluation measures, and treatment are discussed in this review. Ocular GVHD has at least three biological processes: lacrimal gland dysfunction, meibomian gland dysfunction, and corneoconjunctival inflammation. Preclinical models have found several novel pathogenic mechanisms, including renin angiotensin system and endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling that can be targeted by therapeutic agents. Many studies have identified reliable tests for establishing diagnosis and response assessment of ocular GVHD. Efficacy of systemic and topical treatment for ocular GVHD is summarized. It is important for all health professionals taking care of HCT recipients to have adequate knowledge of ocular GVHD for optimal care.

While opening new frontiers for the cure of malignant and non-malignant diseases, the increasing use of cell therapy poses also several new challenges related to the safety of a living drug. The most effective and consolidated cell therapy approach is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), the only cure for several patients with high-risk hematological malignancies. The potential of allogeneic HSCT is strictly dependent on the donor immune system, particularly on alloreactive T lymphocytes, that promote the beneficial graft-versus-tumor effect (GvT), but may also trigger the detrimental graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD). Gene transfer technologies allow to manipulate donor T-cells to enforce GvT and foster immune reconstitution, while avoiding or controlling GvHD. The suicide gene approach is based on the transfer of a suicide gene into donor lymphocytes, for a safe infusion of a wide T-cell repertoire, that might be selectively controlled in vivo in case of GvHD. The herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-TK) is the suicide gene most extensively tested in humans. Expression of HSV-TK in donor lymphocytes confers lethal sensitivity to the anti-herpes drug, ganciclovir. Progressive improvements in suicide genes, vector technology and transduction protocols have allowed to overcome the toxicity of GvHD while preserving the antitumor efficacy of allogeneic HSCT. Several phase I-II clinical trials in the last 20 years document the safety and the efficacy of HSV-TK approach, able to maintain its clear value over the last decades, in the rapidly progressing horizon of cancer cellular therapy.

The introduction of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is one of the major achievements in the field of haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-HCT). The transplant conditioning intensity (TCI) score is a refined classification of conditioning regimens that assigns weight scores to conditioning regimen components. The aim of our analysis was twofold: to assess the effect on transplant outcomes of combining PTCy with calcineurin inhibitor + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) instead of mTOR inhibitor + MMF for GvHD prophylaxis, and to assess the effect of stratification by conditioning intensity in the setting of haplo-HCT. This study was conducted in adult patients who underwent haplo-HCT at the University Hospital of Udine (UUH) or Ospedale San Raffaele (OSR) between January 2014 and December 2021. Patients received PTCy plus CsA-MMF at UUH and sirolimus-MMF at OSR. Conditioning intensity was defined by the TCI score. All data were collected prospectively. A total of 216 haplo-HCTs were performed, 81 at UUH and 135 at OSR. Notably, none of the patients at UUH received a high TCI score regimen compared to 72 (53.3%) at OSR. Our results show overlapping survival outcomes (OS, NRM, DFS, GRFS, and RI) within the two platforms. We observed a higher incidence of cGvHD within the sirolimus/MMF + PTCy platform, and high TCI was found to be the only risk factor for a higher incidence of grades III-IV aGvHD in univariate analysis. Our results suggest that TCI may reveal the role of chemoradiotherapy in promoting conditions that may contribute to the occurrence of GvHD. The impact of moderate/severe cGvHD on quality of life must challenge our efforts to further optimise prophylactic strategies.