Explore the vast range of titles available.

PurposeIn stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), prescription isodoses and resulting dose homogeneities vary widely across different platforms and clinical entities. Our goal was to investigate the physical limitations of generating dose distributions with an intended level of homogeneity in robotic SRS.MethodsTreatment plans for non-isocentric irradiation of 4 spherical phantom targets (volume 0.27–7.70 ml) and 4 clinical targets (volume 0.50–5.70 ml) were calculated using Sequential (phantom) or VOLOTM (clinical) optimizers (Accuray, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Dose conformity, volume of 12 Gy isodose (V12Gy) as a measure for dose gradient, and treatment time were recorded for different prescribed isodose levels (PILs) and collimator settings. In addition, isocentric irradiation of phantom targets was examined, with dose homogeneity modified by using different collimator sizes.ResultsDose conformity was generally high (nCI ≤ 1.25) and varied little with PIL. For all targets and collimator sets, V12Gy was highest for PIL ≥ 80% and lowest for PIL ≤ 65%. The impact of PIL on V12Gy was highest for isocentric irradiation and lowest for clinical targets (VOLOTM optimization). The variability of V12Gy as a function of collimator selection was significantly higher than that of PIL. V12Gy and treatment time were negatively correlated. Plans utilizing a single collimator with a diameter in the range of 70–80% of the target diameter were fastest, but showed the strongest dependence on PIL.ConclusionInhomogeneous dose distributions with PIL ≤ 70% can be used to minimize dose to normal tissue. PIL ≥ 90% is associated with a marked and significant increase in off-target dose exposure. Careful selection of collimators during planning is even more important.

Background The development of robotic systems has provided an alternative to frame-based stereotactic procedures. The aim of this experimental phantom study was to compare the mechanical accuracy of the Robotic Surgery Assistant (ROSA) and the Leksell stereotactic frame by reducing clinical and procedural factors to a minimum. Methods To precisely compare mechanical accuracy, a stereotactic system was chosen as reference for both methods. A thin layer CT scan with an acrylic phantom fixed to the frame and a localizer enabling the software to recognize the coordinate system was performed. For each of the five phantom targets, two different trajectories were planned, resulting in 10 trajectories. A series of five repetitions was performed, each time based on a new CT scan. Hence, 50 trajectories were analysed for each method. X-rays of the final cannula position were fused with the planning data. The coordinates of the target point and the endpoint of the robot- or frame-guided probe were visually determined using the robotic software. The target point error (TPE) was calculated applying the Euclidian distance. The depth deviation along the trajectory and the lateral deviation were separately calculated. Results Robotics was significantly more accurate, with an arithmetic TPE mean of 0.53 mm (95% CI 0.41 – 0.55 mm) compared to 0.72 mm (95% CI 0.63 – 0.8 mm) in stereotaxy (p < 0.05). In robotics, the mean depth deviation along the trajectory was -0.22 mm (95% CI -0.25 – -0.14 mm). The mean lateral deviation was 0.43 mm (95% CI 0.32 – 0.49 mm). In frame-based stereotaxy, the mean depth deviation amounted to -0.20 mm (95% CI -0.26 – -0.14 mm), the mean lateral deviation to 0.65 mm (95% CI 0.55 – 0.74 mm). Conclusion Both the robotic and frame-based approach proved accurate. The robotic procedure showed significantly higher accuracy. For both methods, procedural factors occurring during surgery might have a more relevant impact on overall accuracy.

Background As irradiated brain volume at 12 Gy (V12) is a predictor for radionecrosis, the purpose of the study was to develop a model for Cyberknife (CK) plans that is able to predict the lowest achievable V12 at a given tumor size and prescription dose (PD), and to suggest a new quality index regarding V12 for optimizing the treatment planning of brain metastases. Method In our model V12 was approximated as a spherical shell around the tumor volume. The radial distance between tumor surface and the 12 Gy isodose line was calculated using an approximation of the mean dose gradient in that area. Assuming a radially symmetrical irradiation from the upper half space, the dose distribution is given by the superposition of single fields. The dose profiles of a single field were derived by the measured off-center ratios (OCR) of the CK system. Using the calculated gradients of the sum dose profiles, minimal-V12 was estimated for different tumor sizes. The model calculation was tested using a phantom dataset and retrospectively applied on clinical cases. Results Our model allows the prediction of a best-case scenario for V12 at a given tumor size and PD which was confirmed by the results of the isocentric phantom plans. The results of the non-isocentric phantom plans showed that an optimization of coverage caused an increase in V12. This was in accordance with the results of the retrospective analysis. V12 s of the clinical cases were on average twice that of the predicted model calculation. A good agreement was achieved for plans with an optimal conformity index (nCI). Re-planning of cases with high V12 showed that lower values could be reached by selecting smaller collimators and by allowing a larger number of total MU and more MU per beam. Conclusions V12 is a main parameter for assessing plan quality in terms of radiotoxicity. The index f12 defined as the ratio of V12 from the actual plan with the evaluated V12 from our model describes the conformity of an optimally possible V12 and thus can be used as a new quality index for optimizing treatment plans.

This paper summarizes outcomes of a single-center study of intracavitary brachytherapy (IBT) with stereotactically applied phosphorus-32 ( 32 P) colloid for treatment of cystic craniopharyngiomas. We assessed its efficacy and safety, on the basis of clinical and radiological outcomes in one of the largest reported patient series. Between 1992 and 2011, 53 patients were treated with IBT, 14 without previous treatment and 39 who had previously been treated for recurrent cysts. Intervention was performed by applying 200 Gy to the internal cyst wall (median volume 6.1 ml). Median clinical and radiological follow-up were 60.2 and 53.0 months, respectively. Actuarial tumor cyst control was 86.0 ± 5.3 % at 12, 24, and 60 months. Actuarial out-of-field control (development of new cysts or progression of solid tumor parts) was 90.9 ± 4.3, 84.0 ± 5.6, and 54.5 ± 8.8 % after 12, 24, and 60 months, respectively. Corresponding actuarial overall progression-free survival was 79.4 ± 6.1, 72.4 ± 6.8, and 45.6 ± 8.7 % at 12, 24, and 60 months, respectively. Visual function improved for 12 patients (23.5 %), remained unchanged for 34 patients (66.7 %), and worsened for five patients (9.8 %), correlating with tumor progression in each case. Endocrinological deterioration occurred for ten patients (19.6 %); for nine patients this was a result of tumor progression or after tumor resection and for one it was attributed to irradiation. Within six months of IBT seven patients (13.7 %) experienced transient neurological deficits and two patients (3.9 %) deteriorated permanently (hemiparesis and third nerve palsy). Stereotactically applied 32 P is highly efficacious for control of cystic components of craniopharyngiomas and is associated with a low risk of permanent morbidity. The procedure does not, however affect the development of new cysts or the progression of solid tumor parts.

Background and purpose Stereotactic radiosurgery with an adapted linear accelerator (linac-SRS) is an established therapy option for brain metastases, benign brain tumors, and arteriovenous malformations. We intended to investigate whether the dosimetric quality of treatment plans achieved with a CyberKnife (CK) is at least equivalent to that for linac-SRS with circular or micromultileaf collimators (microMLC). Patients and methods A random sample of 16 patients with 23 target volumes, previously treated with linac-SRS, was replanned with CK. Planning constraints were identical dose prescription and clinical applicability. In all cases uniform optimization scripts and inverse planning objectives were used. Plans were compared with respect to coverage, minimal dose within target volume, conformity index, and volume of brain tissue irradiated with ≥ 10 Gy. Results Generating the CK plan was unproblematic with simple optimization scripts in all cases. With the CK plans, coverage, minimal target volume dosage, and conformity index were significantly better, while no significant improvement could be shown regarding the 10 Gy volume. Multiobjective comparison for the irradiated target volumes was superior in the CK plan in 20 out of 23 cases and equivalent in 3 out of 23 cases. Multiobjective comparison for the treated patients was superior in the CK plan in all 16 cases. Conclusion The results clearly demonstrate the superiority of the irradiation plan for CK compared to classical linac-SRS with circular collimators and microMLC. In particular, the average minimal target volume dose per patient, increased by 1.9 Gy, and at the same time a 14 % better conformation index seems to be an improvement with clinical relevance.