Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
27
result(s) for
"Lv, Xiu-He"
Sort by:
Prevalence and Characteristics of Covert/Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by
Yang, Li
,
Yang, Jin-Lin
,
Deng, Kai
in
Bias
,
Hepatic Encephalopathy - epidemiology
,
Hepatic Encephalopathy - etiology
2024
INTRODUCTION:Covert/minimal hepatic encephalopathy (C/MHE) is the mildest form of hepatic encephalopathy (HE), but it is closely related to the quality of life and prognosis of patients with cirrhosis. Currently, the epidemiological data of C/MHE have not been well described.METHODS:We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant articles. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of proportions to estimate the pooled prevalence of C/MHE in patients with cirrhosis. We also examined potential risk factors for C/MHE by comparing characteristics of patients with and without C/MHE.RESULTS:Finally, a total of 101 studies were included. The prevalence of C/MHE was 40.9% (95% confidence interval, 38.3%-43.5%) among patients with cirrhosis worldwide. The pooled C/MHE prevalence was 39.9% (95% confidence interval 36.7%-43.1%) based on studies using the psychometric HE score as a diagnostic tool. Meta-regression models showed that geographic region, sample size, mean age, sex ratio, and Child-Pugh classification were influencing factors for the heterogeneity of C/MHE prevalence. The presence of C/MHE was found to be associated with various factors including age, level of education, alcoholic etiology, Child-Pugh classification, MELD score, history of overt HE, presence of other complications, and laboratory tests related to impaired liver function.DISCUSSION:This study reports detailed data on the prevalence of C/MHE as well as clinical features associated with C/MHE, suggesting that C/MHE is one of the most common complications of liver cirrhosis.
Journal Article
Efficacy and safety of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
by
Wang, Chun-Hui
,
Xie, Yan
,
Lv, Xiu-He
in
Abdominal Surgery
,
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - methods
,
Endoscopy
2017
Background
In recent years, submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) has emerged as a novel therapeutic endoscopic technique for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors (SMTs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of STER for upper gastrointestinal SMTs.
Methods
A systematic search of both English and Chinese databases was performed until November 15, 2015. Complete resection and en bloc resection rates were considered the primary outcome measures. Prevalence of complications was considered the secondary outcome measure. A random-effects model was used to generate conservative estimates of the prevalence of the main outcome variables. All data analyses were performed using Meta-Analyst software (version beta 3.13).
Results
A total of 28 studies were included in the final meta-analysis. The pooled complete resection and en bloc resection rates were 97.5 % (95 % CI 96.0–98.5 %) and 94.6 % (95 % CI 91.5–96.7 %), respectively. The common complications associated with STER were air leakage symptoms and perforation. The pooled prevalence of air leakage symptoms was 14.8 % (95 % CI 10.5–20.5 %) for subcutaneous emphysema and pneumomediastinum, 6.1 % (95 % CI 4.0–9.0 %) for pneumothorax and 6.8 % (95 % CI 4.7–9.6 %) for pneumoperitoneum. Additionally, the pooled prevalence of perforation was 5.6 % (95 % CI 3.7–8.2 %). Only a few cases of bleeding were reported in two studies.
Conclusions
STER is a highly feasible and safe treatment option for upper gastrointestinal SMTs.
Journal Article
Duality of the association between COVID-19 and acute pancreatitis
2022
Correspondence to Dr Jin-Lin Yang, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China; yangjinlin@wchscu.cn We read with great interest the study by Pandanaboyana et al.1 The COVID-19 PAN collaborative study was a large international study that provided updated clinical evidence that has deepened our understanding of the relationship between COVID-19 and acute pancreatitis (AP). To explore the relationship between the two diseases, the definition of AP needs to be relatively strict, including a combination of enzymatic changes, imaging changes and typical symptoms, as enzymatic changes alone in patients with COVID-19 appear to be unreliable for the definition of pancreatitis.3 4 Furthermore, this study did not further analyse the reasons for the high mortality rate in patients with both AP and COVID-19. Existing studies have confirmed that concomitant SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with AP leads to further disease deterioration, leading to more severe disease and mortality.1 5 This may be attributed to the exaggerated immune dysfunction, subsequent cytokine storms and endothelial damage that occur under proinflammatory conditions.1 6 However, it remains unclear whether SARS-CoV-2 infection directly leads to pancreatitis.
Journal Article
Proton Pump Inhibitors and COVID-19: Confusing Status Quo
2021
The authors found higher salivary ACE2 mRNA levels of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) users than nonusers and discovered the association between PPI use and increased mortality risk in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). [...]PPIs may also show a promoting effect on COVID-19 progression although inhibiting gastric acid (removes the protective barrier toward ingested microorganisms and results in dysbiosis conditions in the digestive tract), causing serious adverse events (include cardiovascular disease and nephrotoxicity), and modulating the immune response (4). [...]we call for more well-designed studies to address the current confusion about the relationship between PPI and COVID-19. [...]there is clear evidence, individualized medical decision based on a patient's need for PPIs seems to be a reasonable choice rather than blocking the use of PPIs during this pandemic.
Journal Article
Linked color imaging versus white light imaging in the diagnosis of colorectal lesions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
2023
Background:
Miss rate of colorectal neoplasia is associated with lesion histology, size, morphology, or location.
Objectives:
We aim to compare the efficacy of Linked color imaging (LCI) versus white light imaging (WLI) for adenoma detection rate (ADR), the detection of sessile serrated lesions (SSLs), serrated lesions (SLs), advanced adenomas (AAs), diminutive lesions (DLs), and flat lesions (FLs) by using per-patient and per-lesion analysis based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Design:
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Data sources and methods:
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched through May 1st, 2023. We calculated risk ratio for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference for continuous outcomes, and performed sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses.
Results:
Overall, 17 RCTs (10,624 patients) were included. In per-patient analysis, ADR was higher in the LCI group versus the WLI group (p < 0.00001). This effect was consistent for SSL (p = 0.005), SLs (p = 0.01), AAs (p = 0.04), DLs (p < 0.00001), and FLs (p < 0.0001). In per-lesion analysis, LCI showed a significant superiority over WLI with regard to the mean number of adenomas per patient (p < 0.00001). This effect was in accordance with mean SSL (p = 0.001), mean SLs (p < 0.00001), and mean DLs (p < 0.0001) per patient. A subgroup analysis showed that the beneficial effect of the LCI group on the detection of AAs, SSL, and FLs was maintained only for studies when experts and trainees were included but not for experts only.
Conclusions:
Meta-analyses of RCTs data support the use of LCI in clinical practice, especially for trainees.
Journal Article
Proportion and Characteristics of Helicobacter Pylori-Negative Gastric Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
2025
INTRODUCTION:While Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is common in patients with gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, there are still individuals who test negative for it. The proportion and characteristics of these patients remain unclear.METHODS:We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant articles. Using a random-effects model, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the pooled proportion of gastric MALT lymphoma patients with negative H. pylori tests. In addition, we compared characteristics between gastric MALT lymphoma patients with and without H. pylori infection to examine clinical features in H. pylori-negative cases.RESULTS:A total of 50 studies involving 6,033 patients were included. The overall proportion of gastric MALT lymphoma patients with negative H. pylori tests was 20.5% (95% confidence interval: 17.0%-24.6%). This rate exhibited an increasing trend over the years, particularly in non-Asian countries and in studies published after 2013, as well as in cases with sample sizes exceeding 100 patients, in male individuals, and among those with proximal or multiple lesions, nonsuperficial type morphology, submucosal invasion, and advanced clinical staging. Compared with H. pylori-positive patients, those who tested negative were more likely to be male, have proximal lesions, exhibit submucosal invasion, and present with an advanced clinical stage.DISCUSSION:This study provides comprehensive information on the proportion and characteristics of H. pylori-negative gastric MALT lymphoma cases, highlighting the need for future clinical attention to treatment and surveillance in this patient population.
Journal Article
Proton Pump Inhibitors Increase the Risk of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug-Related Small-Bowel Injury: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis
by
Zhang, Xian
,
Yang, Jin-Lin
,
Chen, Ping-Run
in
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - adverse effects
,
Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors
,
Endoscopy
2023
Conflicting results exist on the association between proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-related small-bowel damage. The aim of this study was to determine whether PPIs increased the risk of NSAID-related small-bowel damage by meta-analysis.
A systematic electronic search in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted from the time the database was created until March 31, 2022, for studies reporting associations between PPI use and outcomes, including the endoscopy-verified prevalence of small-bowel injury, mean number of small-bowel injuries per patient, change in hemoglobin level, and risk of small-bowel bleeding in subjects taking NSAIDs. Meta-analytical calculations for odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) were performed with the random-effects model and interpreted with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Fourteen studies comprising 1996 subjects were included. Pooled analysis demonstrated that concomitant use of PPIs significantly increased the prevalence and number of endoscopy-verified small-bowel injuries (prevalence: OR = 3.00; 95% CI: 1.74-5.16; number: MD = 2.30; 95% CI: 0.61-3.99) and decreased hemoglobin levels (MD = -0.50 g/dL; 95% CI: 0.88 to -0.12) in NSAID users but did not change the risk of small-bowel bleeding (OR = 1.24; 95% CI: 0.80-1.92). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that PPIs significantly increased the prevalence of small-bowel injury in subjects taking nonselective NSAIDs (OR = 7.05; 95% CI: 4.70-10.59, 4 studies, I 2 = 0) and COX-2 inhibitors (OR = 4.00; 95% CI: 1.18-13.60, 1 study, no calculated I 2 ) when compared with COX-2 inhibitors alone.
PPIs increased the risk of NSAID-related small-bowel damage, and the clinical significance of higher prevalence of small-bowel injuries should be studied in the future.
Journal Article
Accelerating ESD-induced gastric ulcer healing using a pH-responsive polyurethane/small intestinal submucosa hydrogel delivered by endoscopic catheter
2021
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the standard treatment for early-stage gastric cancer, but the large post-operative ulcers caused by ESD often lead to serious side effects. Post-ESD mucosal repair materials provide a new option for the treatment of post-ESD ulcers. In this study, we developed a polyurethane/small intestinal submucosa (PU/SIS) hydrogel and investigated its efficacy for accelerating ESD-induced ulcer healing in a canine model. PU/SIS hydrogel possessed great biocompatibility and distinctive pH-sensitive swelling properties and protected GES-1 cells from acid attack through forming a dense film in acidic conditions in vitro. Besides, PU/SIS gels present a strong bio-adhesion to gastric tissues under acidic conditions, thus ensuring the retention time of PU/SIS gels in vivo. In a canine model, PU/SIS hydrogel was easily delivered via endoscopy and adhered to the ulcer sites. PU/SIS hydrogel accelerated gastric ulcer healing at an early stage with more epithelium regeneration and slight inflammation. Our findings reveal PU/SIS hydrogel is a promising and attractive candidate for ESD-induced ulcer repair.
Journal Article