Explore the vast range of titles available.

Our aim was to investigate the effects of the sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor empagliflozin on urinary and serum glucose and electrolytes, urinary volume, osmolality, and the renin−angiotensin system in patients with type 2 diabetes. In an open-label study, 22 patients receiving metformin (median age 56 years; range 40–65 years) received empagliflozin 25 mg once daily for 5 days. Food, fluid, and sodium intake were standardized for 3 days before and during treatment. Twenty patients completed treatment. After single and multiple doses of empagliflozin, mean (SE) changes from baseline in 24-hour urinary glucose excretion were 463.3 (57.3) mmol/d and 599.5 (60.0) mmol/d, respectively (83.5 [10.3] g/d and 108.0 [10.8] g/d, respectively) (both P < 0.001), and in fasting serum glucose concentration were −1.8 (0.4) mmol/L and −1.1 (0.3) mmol/L, respectively (both P < 0.001). After a single dose, mean (SE) change from baseline in urine sodium excretion was 45.3 (9.6) mmol/d (P < 0.001), and in urine volume was 341.0 (140.5) g/d (P = 0.025), but there were no changes compared with baseline in either parameter after multiple doses. There were no changes in plasma renin or serum aldosterone with single or multiple doses of empagliflozin. There was a nonsignificant reduction in weight after a single dose of empagliflozin and a mean (SE) change of −1.4 (0.5) kg after multiple doses (P = 0.020). Empagliflozin 25 mg increased urinary glucose excretion and decreased serum glucose and weight with transient natriuresis and increases in urine volume, without significant changes in the renin−angiotensin system. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01276288.

The goal of this study was to investigate the pharmacodynamic effects of co-administration of empagliflozin, a sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, with diuretic agents. In a randomized, open-label cross-over study, 22 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus received empagliflozin 25 mg for 5 days and either hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg for 4 days followed by hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg plus empagliflozin 25 mg for 5 days, or torasemide 5 mg for 4 days followed by torasemide 5 mg plus empagliflozin 25 mg for 5 days; 20 completed treatment. Food, fluid, and sodium intake were standardized for 3 days before and during treatment. At baseline, the median age of the treated patients was 56 years (range, 40–65 years), body mass index was 26.8 kg/m2 (range, 20.1–34.4 kg/m2), fasting plasma glucose was 8.6 mmol/L (range, 6.0–12.9 mmol/L), and glycosylated hemoglobin level was 7.6% (range, 7%–10%). Empagliflozin significantly increased 24-hour urinary glucose excretion and reduced fasting serum glucose levels. These effects were maintained after co-administration with either diuretic. Urinary sodium excretion did not significantly change with empagliflozin or diuretic administration alone, but seemed to increase compared with either diuretic alone when empagliflozin was co-administered with either diuretic. Plasma renin and serum aldosterone levels were unaltered with empagliflozin or torasemide alone, but tended to increase with hydrochlorothiazide alone, and tended to increase when empagliflozin was co-administered with a diuretic compared with either diuretic alone. Urinary volume did not increase with empagliflozin or diuretics alone, but increased when empagliflozin was co-administered with either diuretic. Empagliflozin alone for 5 days increased urinary glucose excretion but did not seem to have a relevant impact on urine volume or electrolytes. When empagliflozin was co-administered with a diuretic agent, urinary glucose excretion remained increased, and the renin-angiotensin system was activated. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01276288.

Letermovir is indicated for prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. Two‐stage population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling of letermovir was conducted to support dose rationale and evaluate the impact of intrinsic/extrinsic factors. Data from healthy phase I study participants over a wide dose range were modeled to evaluate the effects of selected intrinsic factors, including pharmacogenomics; next, phase III HSCT‐recipient data at steady‐state following clinical doses were modeled. The model in HSCT recipients adequately described letermovir PK following both oral or i.v. administration, and was consistent with the healthy participant model at steady‐state clinical doses. Intrinsic factor effects were not clinically meaningful. These staged analyses indicate that letermovir PK in HSCT recipients and healthy participants differ only with respect to bioavailability and absorption rate. The HSCT recipient model was suitable for predicting exposure for exposure–response analysis supporting final dose selection.

Empagliflozin is a potent, oral, selective inhibitor of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 in development for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The goal of these studies was to investigate potential drug–drug interactions between empagliflozin and gemfibrozil (an organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1B1 [OATP1B1]/1B3 and organic anion transporter 3 [OAT3] inhibitor), rifampicin (an OATP1B1/1B3 inhibitor), or probenecid (an OAT3 and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase inhibitor). Two open-label, randomized, crossover studies were undertaken in healthy subjects. In the first study, 18 subjects received the following in 1 of 2 randomized treatment sequences: a single dose of empagliflozin 25 mg alone and gemfibrozil 600 mg BID for 5 days with a single dose of empagliflozin 25 mg on the third day. In the second study, 18 subjects received a single dose of empagliflozin 10 mg, a single dose of empagliflozin 10 mg coadministered with a single dose of rifampicin 600 mg, and probenecid 500 mg BID for 4 days with a single dose of empagliflozin 10 mg on the second day in 1 of 6 randomized treatment sequences. In the gemfibrozil study, 11 subjects were male, mean age was 35.1years and mean body mass index (BMI) was 23.47kg/m2. In the rifampicin/probenecid study, 10 subjects were male, mean age was 32.7years and mean BMI was 23.03kg/m2. Exposure to empagliflozin was increased by coadministration with gemfibrozil (AUC0–∞: geometric mean ratio [GMR], 158.50% [90% CI, 151.77–165.53]; Cmax: GMR, 115.00% [90% CI, 106.15–124.59]), rifampicin (AUC0–∞: GMR, 135.20% [90% CI, 129.58–141.06]; Cmax: GMR, 175.14% [90% CI, 160.14–191.56]), and probenecid (AUC0–∞: GMR, 153.47% [90% CI, 146.41–160.88]; Cmax: GMR, 125.60% [90% CI, 113.67–138.78]). All treatments were well tolerated. Increases in empagliflozin exposure were <2-fold, indicating that the inhibition of the OATP1B1/1B3, OAT3 transporter, and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases did not have a clinically relevant effect on empagliflozin exposure. No dose adjustments of empagliflozin were necessary when it was coadministered with gemfibrozil, rifampicin, or probenecid. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01301742 and NCT01634100.

The development and application of quantitative systems pharmacology models in neuroscience have been modest relative to other fields, such as oncology and immunology, which may reflect the complexity of the brain. Technological and methodological advancements have enhanced the quantitative understanding of brain physiology and pathophysiology and the effects of pharmacological interventions. To maximize the knowledge gained from these novel data types, pharmacometrics modelers may need to expand their toolbox to include additional mathematical and statistical frameworks. A session was held at the 10th annual American Conference on Pharmacometrics (ACoP10) to highlight several recent advancements in quantitative and systems neuroscience. In this mini‐review, we provide a brief overview of technological and methodological advancements in the neuroscience therapeutic area that were discussed during the session and how these can be leveraged with quantitative systems pharmacology modeling to enhance our understanding of neurological diseases. Microphysiological systems using human induced pluripotent stem cells (IPSCs), digital biomarkers, and large‐scale imaging offer more clinically relevant experimental datasets, enhanced granularity, and a plethora of data to potentially improve the preclinical‐to‐clinical translation of therapeutics. Network neuroscience methodologies combined with quantitative systems models of neurodegenerative disease could help bridge the gap between cellular and molecular alterations and clinical end points through the integration of information on neural connectomics. Additional topics, such as the neuroimmune system, microbiome, single‐cell transcriptomic technologies, and digital device biomarkers, are discussed in brief.

Empagliflozin is a potent, selective sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Thiazide or loop diuretics are commonly prescribed in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study investigated potential pharmacokinetic drug−drug interactions between empagliflozin and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) or torasemide (TOR). This was an open-label, crossover study. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomized to receive empagliflozin 25 mg once daily for 5 days and either HCTZ 25 mg once daily for 4 days followed by HCTZ 25 mg once daily plus empagliflozin 25 mg once daily for 5 days or TOR 5 mg once daily for 4 days followed by TOR 5 mg once daily plus empagliflozin once daily for 5 days in 1 of 4 sequences, with at least a 7-day washout period between treatments. Pharmacokinetic parameters of empagliflozin, HCTZ, and TOR were assessed and standard bioequivalence criteria (80%−125%) were applied. Tolerability assessments included the frequency of adverse events and an investigator assessment of global tolerability. Mean (SD) age of the 22 patients treated was 54.0 (8.1) years and body mass index was 27.1 (3.7) kg/m2. Coadministration of empagliflozin with HCTZ or TOR had no effect on exposure to empagliflozin, HCTZ, or TOR. Geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) for empagliflozin AUC over a uniform dosing interval and Cmax at steady state were 107.1% (90% CI, 97.1−118.1) and 102.8% (90% CI, 88.6−119.3), respectively, when coadministered with HCTZ versus administration alone, and 107.8% (90% CI, 100.1−116.1) and 107.5% (90% CI, 97.9−118.0), respectively, when coadministered with TOR versus administration alone. For HCTZ, the geometric mean ratios for AUC over a uniform dosing interval and Cmax at steady state were 96.3% (90% CI, 89.1−104.0) and 101.8% (90% CI, 88.6−116.9), respectively, and for TOR were 101.4% (90% CI, 99.1−103.9) and 104.4% (90% CI, 93.8−116.3), respectively, for combined treatment versus administration alone. The pharmacokinetic profiles of empagliflozin, HCTZ, and TOR were similar after administration alone and in combination. Global tolerability was good for all patients after each treatment, and no severe or serious adverse events were reported. No pharmacokinetic drug−drug interaction was observed between empagliflozin and HCTZ or TOR. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01276288.

The aim was to investigate the effects of coadministration of the sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor empagliflozin with the thiazolidinedione pioglitazone. In study 1, 20 healthy volunteers received 50 mg of empagliflozin alone for 5 days, followed by 50 mg of empagliflozin coadministered with 45 mg of pioglitazone for 7 days and 45 mg of pioglitazone alone for 7 days in 1 of 2 treatment sequences. In study 2, 20 volunteers received 45 mg of pioglitazone alone for 7 days and 10, 25, and 50 mg of empagliflozin for 9 days coadministered with 45 mg of pioglitazone for the first 7 days in 1 of 4 treatment sequences. Pioglitazone exposure (Cmax and AUC) increased when coadministered with empagliflozin versus monotherapy in study 1. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) for pioglitazone Cmax at steady state (Cmax,ss) and for AUC during the dosing interval at steady state (AUCτ,ss) when coadministered with empagliflozin versus administration alone was 187.89% (95% CI, 166.35%–212.23%) and 157.97% (95% CI, 148.02%–168.58%), respectively. Because an increase in pioglitazone exposure was not expected, based on in vitro data, a second study was conducted with the empagliflozin doses tested in Phase III trials. In study 2, pioglitazone exposure decreased marginally when coadministered with empagliflozin. The GMR for pioglitazone Cmax,ss when coadministered with empagliflozin versus administration alone was 87.74% (95% CI, 73.88%–104.21%) with empagliflozin 10 mg, 90.23% (95% CI, 66.84%–121.82%) with empagliflozin 25 mg, and 89.85% (95% CI, 71.03%–113.66%) with empagliflozin 50 mg. The GMR for pioglitazone AUCτ,ss when coadministered with empagliflozin versus administration alone was 90.01% (95% CI, 77.91%–103.99%) with empagliflozin 10 mg, 88.98% (95% CI, 72.69%–108.92%) with empagliflozin 25 mg, and 91.10% (95% CI, 77.40%–107.22%) with empagliflozin 50 mg. The effects of empagliflozin on pioglitazone exposure are not considered to be clinically relevant. Empagliflozin exposure was unaffected by coadministration with pioglitazone. Empagliflozin and pioglitazone were well tolerated when administered alone or in combination. In study 1, adverse events were reported in 1 of 19 participants on empagliflozin 50 mg alone, 4 of 20 on pioglitazone alone, and 5 of 18 on combination treatment. In study 2, adverse events were reported in 8 of 20 participants on pioglitazone alone, 10 of 18 when coadministered with empagliflozin 10 mg, 5 of 17 when coadministered with empagliflozin 25 mg, and 6 of 16 when coadministered with empagliflozin 50 mg. These results indicate that pioglitazone and empagliflozin can be coadministered without dose adjustments. EudraCT identifiers: 2008-006087-11 (study 1) and 2009-018089-36 (study 2).

This study was undertaken to compare the steady-state pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of empagliflozin 5 mg twice daily (BID) and 10 mg once daily (QD) in healthy subjects. In an open-label, 2-way crossover study, subjects (n = 16) received empagliflozin 5 mg BID for 5 days and empagliflozin 10 mg QD for 5 days in a randomized order, with a washout period of ≥6 days between each treatment. The primary objective was the comparison of the overall exposure during a 24-hour period at steady state (AUC0−24,ss) for empagliflozin, based on standard bioequivalence criteria, with BID and QD dose regimens. The study population comprised 7 (43.8%) men and 9 (56.3%) women with a baseline median age of 38.0 years (range, 23−47 years) and a median body mass index of 23.3 kg/m2 (range, 19.8−27.8 kg/m2). Based on standard bioequivalence criteria, there was no difference in the overall exposure of empagliflozin between BID and QD dose regimens (geometric mean ratio of AUC0−24,ss for empagliflozin 5 mg BID compared with empagliflozin 10 mg QD = 99.36%; 90% CI, 94.29−104.71). For empagliflozin 10 mg QD, mean (%CV) AUC during the dosing interval was 1900 nmol · h/L (20.6%), mean (%CV) Cmax,ss was 330 nmol/L (25.3%), and median (range) Tmax,ss was 1.0 hour (0.7−2.0 hours). For empagliflozin 5 mg BID, mean (%CV) AUC during the dosing interval was 1010 nmol · h/L (15.1%) and 867 nmol · h/L (18.6%) after the morning and evening dose, respectively, mean (%CV) Cmax,ss was 193 nmol/L (16.5%) and 120 nmol/L (21.0%), respectively, and median Tmax,ss was 1.0 hour (range, 0.7−2.0 hours) and 2.0 hours (range, 1.0−4.0 hours), respectively. The mean (%CV) cumulative amount of glucose excreted in urine during 24 hours was 52.1 g (32.1%) with empagliflozin 5 mg BID and 43.9 g (30.3%) with empagliflozin 10 mg QD. Adverse events were reported in six subjects (37.5%) receiving empagliflozin 5 mg BID and four (25.0%) receiving empagliflozin 10 mg QD. Headache was the most frequent AE. No severe, serious, or drug-related AEs were reported. There were no clinically relevant differences in pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic properties between BID and QD dose regimens of empagliflozin in healthy subjects. Both dose regimens were well tolerated. EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT) number: 2009-012524-90.

The Critical Path for Parkinson's (CPP) Imaging Biomarker and Modeling and Simulation working groups aimed to achieve qualification opinion by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) Committee for Medical Products for Human Use (CHMP) for the use of baseline dopamine transporter neuroimaging for patient selection in early Parkinson's disease clinical trials. This paper describes the regulatory science strategy to achieve this goal. CPP is an international consortium of three Parkinson's charities and nine pharmaceutical partners, coordinated by the Critical Path Institute.

Empagliflozin is a sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor in clinical development as a treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus. The goal of this study was to investigate potential drug–drug interactions between empagliflozin and verapamil, ramipril, and digoxin in healthy volunteers. The potential drug–drug interactions were evaluated in 3 separate trials. In the first study, 16 subjects were randomized to receive single-dose empagliflozin 25 mg alone or single-dose empagliflozin 25 mg with single-dose verapamil 120 mg. In the second study, 23 subjects were randomized to receive empagliflozin 25 mg once daily (QD) for 5 days, ramipril (2.5 mg on day 1 then 5 mg QD on days 2–5) for 5 days or empagliflozin 25 mg with ramipril (2.5 mg on day 1 then 5 mg QD on days 2–5) for 5 days. In the third study, 20 subjects were randomized to receive single-dose digoxin 0.5 mg alone or empagliflozin 25 mg QD for 8 days with single-dose digoxin 0.5 mg on day 5. Exposure of empagliflozin was not affected by coadministration with verapamil (AUC0–∞: geometric mean ratio [GMR], 102.95%; 90% CI, 98.87–107.20; Cmax: GMR, 92.39%; 90% CI, 85.38–99.97) or ramipril (AUC over a uniform dosing interval τ at steady state [AUCτ,ss]: GMR, 96.55%; 90% CI, 93.05–100.18; Cmax at steady state [Cmax,ss]: GMR, 104.47%; 90% CI 97.65–111.77). Empagliflozin had no clinically relevant effect on exposure of ramipril (AUCτ,ss: GMR, 108.14%; 90% CI 100.51–116.35; Cmax,ss: GMR, 103.61%; 90% CI, 89.73–119.64) or its active metabolite ramiprilat (AUCτ,ss: GMR, 98.67%; 90% CI, 96.00–101.42; Cmax,ss: GMR, 98.29%; 90% CI, 92.67–104.25). Coadministration of empagliflozin had no clinically meaningful effect on digoxin AUC0–∞ (GMR, 106.11%; 90% CI, 96.71–116.41); however, a slight increase in Cmax was observed that was not considered clinically relevant (GMR, 113.94%; 90% CI, 99.33–130.70). All treatments were well tolerated. There were no serious adverse events or adverse events leading to discontinuation in any of the studies. No dose adjustment of empagliflozin is required when coadministered with ramipril or verapamil, and no dose adjustment of digoxin or ramipril is required when coadministered with empagliflozin. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01306175 (digoxin), NCT01276301 (verapamil), and NCT01284621 (ramipril).