Explore the vast range of titles available.

Stress is a well‐established risk factor for psychological burden, yet individual vulnerability varies, suggesting that stress intensity and cognitive-psychological factors might be implicated in this process. This study examined how perceived stress at two different phases (moderate vs. high stress) relates to psychological symptoms and positive mental health through lower levels of psychological flexibility and whether interpretation biases in response to social ambiguity moderate this effect. A total of 228 healthy undergraduate students were assessed once at the beginning of a semester (T0: moderate stress phase) and 12 weeks later during exams (T1: high stress phase). Psychological flexibility mediated the relationship between stress and both psychological symptoms and positive mental health at both time points. Notably, baseline negative interpretation biases moderated this mediation effect for depressive symptoms at T1 (high stress phase), such that lower psychological flexibility was linked to higher depression levels only among individuals with moderate to high levels of negative interpretation bias. In turn, the absence of negative biases buffered against these effects. No such moderation effects were observed under moderate stress (T0) or for positive interpretation biases at either time point. These findings highlight the importance of interventions that combine techniques to foster psychological flexibility and reduce negative interpretation biases, particularly for individuals under high stress or vulnerable to depression.

Addictive behaviors are characterized by information processing biases, including substance-related interpretation biases. In the field of cigarette smoking, such biases have not been investigated yet. The present study thus adopted an open-ended scenario approach to measure smoking-related interpretation biases. Individuals who smoke, those who ceased smoking, and those without a smoking history (total sample N  = 177) were instructed to generate spontaneous continuations for ambiguous, open-ended scenarios that described either a smoking-related or neutral context. Overall, people who smoke generated more smoking-related continuations in response to smoking-relevant situations than non-smoking individuals or people who had stopped smoking, providing evidence for a smoking-related interpretation bias. When differentiating for situation type within smoking-relevant scenarios, smoking individuals produced more smoking-related continuations for positive/social and habit/addictive situations compared to negative/affective ones. Additionally, the tendency to interpret habit/addictive situations in a smoking-related manner was positively associated with cigarette consumption and levels of nicotine dependence. Exploratory analyses indicated that other substance-related continuations were correlated with their respective behavioral counterparts (e.g., the level of self-reported alcohol or caffeine consumption). The present study is the first to demonstrate smoking-related interpretation biases in relation to current cigarette smoking. Future studies should investigate the causal role of such biases in the initiation and/or maintainance of nicotine addiction and the merit of Interpretation-Bias-Modification training to support smoking cessation.

Background Tobacco use is a leading risk factor for premature mortality. Individuals with mental disorders exhibit a smoking prevalence twice that of the general population and engage in higher levels of tobacco consumption, thereby elevating their risk for tobacco-related health complications. Unlike with other substance use disorders, clinical practice in Germany neglects tobacco dependence as a risk factor prior to the initiation of psychotherapy, despite a clear need for intervention: Prolonged cigarette smoking exacerbates mental health symptoms and influences processes central to psychotherapy, such as implicit cognitive processes and emotion regulation. Moreover, short-term nicotine withdrawal associated with tobacco dependence can undermine motivation, reduce positive reinforcement, and cause emotional instability, potentially hindering efforts to improve mental health or the effectiveness of psychotherapeutic interventions. These factors underscore the importance of integrating smoking cessation strategies prior to formal psychotherapy to optimize the therapeutic process and patient outcomes. This study investigates the effects of initiating an intensified smoking cessation program prior to starting psychotherapy. Main measure outcomes of interest are the degree of tobacco dependence, smoking behavior, and mental health outcomes in smokers with mental disorders. By addressing smoking behavior prior to therapy, this trial seeks to establish a more solid foundation for therapeutic work, potentially improving mental health outcomes and promoting a comprehensive approach to mental health care. Methods A single-center randomized controlled trial in an outpatient psychotherapeutic clinic will examine the effects of an intensified smoking cessation intervention versus a waiting control condition. The primary outcome measures include smokers’ nicotine dependence, smoking behavior, and mental health symptoms related to their primary mental disorder, analyzed using variance analysis methods. The smoking intervention consists of a common guideline-based cognitive-behavioral program supplemented by a digital health application. Secondary outcomes include changes in self-reported self-efficacy and implicit cognitive biases. In addition, motivational measures, self-efficacy, implicit approach tendencies, and attitudes toward online interventions will be assessed as secondary measures and examined as potential predictors, moderators, or mediators in exploratory analyses. Attitudes toward online interventions will be measured once at baseline, while all other measures will be assessed before the intervention, post-treatment, and at 6-week and 6-month follow-up sessions. Discussion Addressing smoking behavior before psychotherapy holds potential to significantly enhance mental health outcomes. This study investigates the integration of smoking cessation strategies prior to psychotherapeutic care for cigarette-smoking individuals with mental disorders. By aligning tobacco dependence treatment with approaches used for other substance use disorders, we aim to establish and discuss a comprehensive and guideline-conformant method. This strategy seeks to improve patient outcomes and a cohesive, integrated method for treating smokers with comorbid mental health disorders. Trial registration Prospectively registered on ISCRTN on 01.05.2024, reference number ISRCTN12859609.

Abstract RationaleRecently, experimental paradigms have been developed to strengthen automatic avoidance or inhibitory responses for smoking cues. However, these procedures have not yet been directly compared regarding their effectiveness and mechanisms of action.ObjectiveThis study compared the effects of avoidance vs. inhibitory training as an add-on to a brief smoking cessation intervention. The standard Approach-Avoidance-Task (AAT) was adapted for both training types and control conditions.MethodsOne hundred twenty-four smokers attended behavioral counseling for smoking cessation and were thereafter randomized to one of four training conditions: avoidance-AAT, sham-avoidance-AAT, inhibition-AAT, sham-inhibition-AAT. During a 2-week training period including five training sessions, smokers in the avoidance-AAT trained to implicitly avoid all smoking-related cues, while smokers in the inhibition-AAT trained to implicitly inhibit behavioral response to smoking cues. During sham training, no such contingencies appeared. Self-report and behavioral data were assessed before and after training. Cigarette smoking and nicotine dependence were also assessed at 4- and 12-week follow-ups.ResultsAt posttest, avoidance training was more effective in reducing daily smoking than inhibition training. However, this difference was no longer evident in follow-up assessments. All training conditions improved other smoking- and health-related outcomes. Neither training changed smoking-related approach biases or associations, but approach biases for smoking-unrelated pictures increased and Stroop interference decreased in all conditions. Smoking devaluation was also comparable in all groups.ConclusionsAvoidance training might be slightly more effective in reducing smoking than inhibitory training. Overall, however, all four training types yielded equivalent therapy and training effects. Hence, a clear preference for one type of training remains premature.

Background Tobacco use is globally recognized by the World Health Organization as the foremost risk factor for premature mortality. Individuals with mental disorders exhibit a notably heightened dependence on tobacco, approximately twice as high as that of the general population. The long-term effects of nicotine consumption include an exacerbation of depressive symptoms and a decline in mental health, which can be considered additional risk factors for the vulnerable population of smokers with preexisting mental disorders. Successful smoking cessation is associated with an increase in mental health, comparable or superior to that of pharmacological antidepressant treatments. However, smoking is frequently disregarded within the realm of psychotherapeutic care, unlike in the treatment of other substance use disorders. Smoking may hinder patients’ recovery and responsiveness to psychotherapy, potentially distorting improvements in symptom severity or negative affect. Integrating smoking cessation initiatives into standard psychotherapeutic interventions thus holds significant potential and may be considered essential for long-term mental health. The current study’s objective is to assess the potential of a guideline-based smoking cessation intervention within an outpatient psychotherapeutic setting concerning changes in smoking intensity, nicotine dependence, and mental health outcomes among patients with a mental disorder adjunct to concurrent psychotherapy. This trial aims to bridge the gap between the state of research in light of evidence of the positive effects of successful smoking cessation and the actual practical provision of care in Germany. Methods The effects of an intensified smoking cessation intervention versus a treatment-as-usual (TAU) control intervention on smokers’ smoking intensity, nicotine dependence, and mental health symptoms related to a primary mental disorder will be examined in a single-center randomized controlled trial in an outpatient psychotherapeutic clinic using variance analysis methods. In this case, TAU is referred to as regular psychotherapy sessions without any additional smoking cessation treatment. The smoking intervention consists of a common guideline-based cognitive-behavioral program supplemented by a digital health application. Secondary outcomes include patients’ motivation to quit, self-efficacy, and attitudes toward online interventions. Potential moderators or mediators will be investigated in exploratory analyses. Discussion This study aims to elucidate the potential benefits of integrating smoking cessation interventions into standard psychotherapeutic treatment, akin to approaches used for other substance use disorders. While existing research highlights the positive impact of smoking cessation on mental health, its practical implications within the field of psychotherapy remain unclear. To address this gap, the current study examines the effectiveness of an intensive smoking cessation program alongside ongoing psychotherapy, focusing on both smoking status and mental health outcomes. By doing so, we aim to provide practical insights for psychotherapeutic providers regarding the integration of smoking cessation into comprehensive mental health care. Trial registration Prospectively registered on ISCRTN on 01.05.2024, reference number ISRCTN12859609.

Background Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is a highly prevalent mental disorder associated with enormous stress and suffering. Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is the first-line treatment for SAD, yet its accessibility is often constrained with long waiting times. Digital therapeutic applications, including psychoeducation and self-guided behavioral experiments in virtual reality (VR), could facilitate access and reduce waiting times. The study aims to investigate if ultra-short-time therapy involving self-guided digital therapeutic applications with VR components can reduce the severity of SAD. Methods Forty SAD patients will participate in this randomized controlled trial. Half will get access to a self-guided, digital therapeutic application with exposure-based behavioral experiments in VR, while the other half will receive a control treatment. Both treatments include four therapeutic appointments. Changes in the severity of SAD will be measured after each appointment and on a 6-week follow-up assessment and will be compared between groups, with the change in SAD measured at baseline- and post-assessment as primary outcome. Discussion Self-guided digital therapeutic applications including ultra-short-time therapy combined with VR could help reduce the waiting time for patients and relieve the health system. The results of this study may inform psychotherapists regarding the potential of self-guided digital therapeutic applications including exposure-based behavioral experiments in VR for SAD and will provide important insight for future research on VR therapy. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN18013983 . Registered on 1 February 2022.

Smoking leads to the development of automatic tendencies that promote approach behavior toward smoking-related stimuli which in turn may maintain addictive behavior. The present study examined whether automatic approach tendencies toward smoking-related stimuli can be measured by using an adapted version of the Approach-Avoidance Task (AAT). Given that progression of addictive behavior has been associated with a decreased reactivity of the brain reward system for stimuli signaling natural rewards, we also used the AAT to measure approach behavior toward natural rewarding stimuli in smokers. During the AAT, 92 smokers and 51 non-smokers viewed smoking-related vs. non-smoking-related pictures and pictures of natural rewards (i.e. highly palatable food) vs. neutral pictures. They were instructed to ignore image content and to respond to picture orientation by either pulling or pushing a joystick. Within-group comparisons revealed that smokers showed an automatic approach bias exclusively for smoking-related pictures. Contrary to our expectations, there was no difference in smokers' and non-smokers' approach bias for nicotine-related stimuli, indicating that non-smokers also showed approach tendencies for this picture category. Yet, in contrast to non-smokers, smokers did not show an approach bias for food-related pictures. Moreover, self-reported smoking attitude could not predict approach-avoidance behavior toward nicotine-related pictures in smokers or non-smokers. Our findings indicate that the AAT is suited for measuring smoking-related approach tendencies in smokers. Furthermore, we provide evidence for a diminished approach tendency toward food-related stimuli in smokers, suggesting a decreased sensitivity to natural rewards in the course of nicotine addiction. Our results indicate that in contrast to similar studies conducted in alcohol, cannabis and heroin users, the AAT might only be partially suited for measuring smoking-related approach tendencies in smokers. Nevertheless, our findings are of special importance for current etiological models and smoking cessation programs aimed at modifying nicotine-related approach tendencies in the context of a nicotine addiction.

Individual differences in emotional coping styles are likely to affect information processing on different stages. Repressive coping is assumed to be related to an attentional bias away from threatening information. Possible links to biases in later stages of information processing have not been investigated to date. In the current study, 82 participants completed the visual dot-probe task as a measure of attentional bias and the Approach-Avoidance Task (AAT) as a measure of approach/avoidance bias and classified into coping groups via the Mainz Coping Inventory (MCI). Prevalence of attention bias and approach/avoidance bias were compared between groups. Main results revealed a strong approach tendency toward positive stimuli for repressors and a strong avoidance tendency for sensitizers. No group differences were found for approach bias to negative stimuli or for attention bias. The present findings of strong preferential processing of positive stimuli in repressors may be part of broader information processing alterations, which may also be linked to alterations in emotion processing.

In recent years, internet- and mobile-based interventions (IMIs) have become increasingly relevant in mental health care and have sparked societal debates. Psychotherapists' perspectives are essential for identifying potential opportunities for improvement, facilitating conditions, and barriers to the implementation of these interventions. This study aims to explore psychotherapists' perspectives on opportunities for improvement, facilitating conditions, and barriers to using IMIs. The study used a qualitative research design, utilizing open-ended items in a cross-sectional survey. A total of 350 psychotherapists were asked to provide their written opinions on various aspects of IMIs. Thematic analysis was conducted to analyze the data and identify core themes. The analysis revealed 11 core themes related to the use of IMIs, which were categorized into 4 superordinate categories: \"Applicability,\" \"Treatment Resources,\" \"Technology,\" and \"Perceived Risks and Barriers.\" While many psychotherapists viewed IMIs as a valuable support for conventional psychotherapy, they expressed skepticism about using IMIs as a substitute. Several factors were perceived as hindrances to the applicability of IMIs in clinical practice, including technological issues, subjective concerns about potential data protection risks, a lack of individualization due to the manualized nature of most IMIs, and the high time and financial costs for both psychotherapists and patients. They expressed a desire for easily accessible information on evidence and programs to reduce the time and effort required for training and advocated for this information to be integrated into the conceptualization of new IMIs. The findings of this study emphasize the importance of considering psychotherapists' attitudes in the development, evaluation, and implementation of IMIs. This study revealed that psychotherapists recognized both the opportunities and risks associated with the use of IMIs, with most agreeing that IMIs serve as a tool to support traditional psychotherapy rather than as a substitute for it. Furthermore, it is essential to involve psychotherapists in discussions about IMIs specifically, as well as in the development of new methodologies in psychotherapy more broadly. Overall, this study can advance the use of IMIs in mental health care and contribute to the ongoing societal debate surrounding these interventions.

Background Cognitive behavioral therapy is the first-line treatment for patients with panic disorder (PD) and agoraphobia (AG). Yet, many patients remain untreated due to limited treatment resources. Digital self-guided short-term treatment applications may help to overcome this issue. While some therapeutic applications are already supported by health insurance companies, data on their efficacy is limited. The current study investigates the effect of self-guided digital treatment comprising psychoeducation and virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET). Methods Thirty patients diagnosed with PD, AG, or panic disorder with agoraphobia (PDA) will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group (EG) or the control group (CG). Participants of both groups will undergo baseline diagnostics in the first two sessions. The subsequent treatment for the EG consists of a self-guided 6-week phase of application-based psychoeducation, one therapy session preparing for the VRET, and 4 weeks of application-based self-guided VRET. To control for the potential effects of the therapy session with the therapist, the CG will receive relaxation and stress-reduction training instead. All patients will then undergo a closing session which terminates with the post-assessment (~ 10 weeks after baseline assessment) and a follow-up assessment 6 weeks following the closing session. Symptom severity (primary outcome) will be assessed at baseline, interim, post-treatment, and follow-up. Additionally, remission status (secondary outcome) will be obtained at follow-up. Both measures will be compared between the groups. Discussion The current study aims at providing insights into the efficacy of short-term treatment applications including psychoeducation and self-guided VRET. If successful, this approach might be a feasible and promising way to ease the burden of PD, AG, and PDA on the public health system and contribute to a faster access to treatment. Trial registration ISRCTN ISRCTN10661970 . Prospectively registered on 17 January 2022.