Explore the vast range of titles available.

Understanding the predictability limit of day-to-day weather phenomena such as midlatitude winter storms and summer monsoonal rainstorms is crucial to numerical weather prediction (NWP). This predictability limit is studied using unprecedented high-resolution global models with ensemble experiments of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF; 9-km operational model) and identical-twin experiments of the U.S. Next-Generation Global Prediction System (NGGPS; 3 km). Results suggest that the predictability limit for midlatitude weather may indeed exist and is intrinsic to the underlying dynamical system and instabilities even if the forecast model and the initial conditions are nearly perfect. Currently, a skillful forecast lead time of midlatitude instantaneous weather is around 10 days, which serves as the practical predictability limit. Reducing the current-day initial-condition uncertainty by an order of magnitude extends the deterministic forecast lead times of day-to-day weather by up to 5 days, with much less scope for improving prediction of small-scale phenomena like thunderstorms. Achieving this additional predictability limit can have enormous socioeconomic benefits but requires coordinated efforts by the entire community to design better numerical weather models, to improve observations, and to make better use of observations with advanced data assimilation and computing techniques.

Convectively coupled equatorial waves (CCEWs) are modes of tropical variability that are often seen as potentially beneficial for sub‐seasonal predictions. Quantifying this potential has been proven difficult in operational forecast systems because tropical variability tends to be poorly represented in such models. The European Center for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) is a potential exception because it has been shown to have much improved representation of the tropics. Here, ECMWF reforecasts are used to investigate the predicted evolution of CCEWs and how they might impact sub‐seasonal predictions. It is shown that the ECMWF system is able to generate variability consistent with various modes of CCEWs, but CCEWs tend to be weaker in amplitude and their propagation characteristics often deviate from observations. This study suggests that model advancements aimed at improving the deterministic representation of CCEWs are still needed in order to better understand and utilize tropical sources of sub‐seasonal predictive skill. Plain Language Summary Accurate weather forecasts leverage on proper characterization of the current state of the atmosphere and on predictable atmospheric phenomena that constrain the evolution of that state. Tropical weather forecasting is challenging in both aspects: observations are more sparse than in the extratropics, and the evolution of the atmosphere is constrained by large‐scale forcings such as tropical rainfall. This study focuses on the contribution of equatorial waves to low latitude weather forecast skill because these types of disturbances are known to modulate tropical rainfall, which feed back strongly onto the disturbances themselves. The main finding is that the initial state tends to be fairly well represented in forecast systems; however, within a day or two the amplitude of these waves becomes weaker than in observations, which is a decay time much faster than their typical one‐to‐three week lifetimes. Along with errors in the waves propagation characteristics, this loss of amplitude suggests that equatorial waves do not impact precipitation forecast within the models as much as theory and observations imply they should. Key Points Convectively coupled equatorial waves (CCEWs) are a potential source of global sub‐seasonal precipitation skill Operational forecast model's representation of CCEWs has greatly advanced over the last two decades Deviations from observations often attenuate the role of CCEWs as sources of sub‐seasonal predictive skill

Data-driven modeling based on machine learning (ML) is showing enormous potential for weather forecasting. Rapid progress has been made with impressive results for some applications. The uptake of ML methods could be a game changer for the incremental progress in traditional numerical weather prediction (NWP) known as the “quiet revolution” of weather forecasting. The computational cost of running a forecast with standard NWP systems greatly hinders the improvements that can be made by increasing model resolution and ensemble sizes. An emerging new generation of ML models, developed using high-quality reanalysis datasets like ERA5 for training, allows forecasts that require much lower computational costs and that are highly competitive in terms of accuracy. Here, we compare for the first time ML-generated forecasts with standard NWP-based forecasts in an operational-like context, initialized from the same initial conditions. Focusing on deterministic forecasts, we apply common forecast verification tools to assess to what extent a data-driven forecast produced with one of the recently developed ML models (PanguWeather) matches the quality and attributes of a forecast from one of the leading global NWP systems (the ECMWF IFS). The results are very promising, with comparable accuracy for both global metrics and extreme events, when verified against both the operational IFS analysis and synoptic observations. Overly smooth forecasts, increasing bias with forecast lead time, and poor performance in predicting tropical cyclone intensity are identified as current drawbacks of ML-based forecasts. A new NWP paradigm is emerging relying on inference from ML models and state-of-the-art analysis and reanalysis datasets for forecast initialization and model training.

In this paper we describe SEAS5, ECMWF's fifth generation seasonal forecast system, which became operational in November 2017. Compared to its predecessor, System 4, SEAS5 is a substantially changed forecast system. It includes upgraded versions of the atmosphere and ocean models at higher resolutions, and adds a prognostic sea-ice model. Here, we describe the configuration of SEAS5 and summarise the most noticeable results from a set of diagnostics including biases, variability, teleconnections and forecast skill.An important improvement in SEAS5 is the reduction of the equatorial Pacific cold tongue bias, which is accompanied by a more realistic El Niño amplitude and an improvement in El Niño prediction skill over the central-west Pacific. Improvements in 2 m temperature skill are also clear over the tropical Pacific. Sea-surface temperature (SST) biases in the northern extratropics change due to increased ocean resolution, especially in regions associated with western boundary currents. The increased ocean resolution exposes a new problem in the northwest Atlantic, where SEAS5 fails to capture decadal variability of the North Atlantic subpolar gyre, resulting in a degradation of DJF 2 m temperature prediction skill in this region. The prognostic sea-ice model improves seasonal predictions of sea-ice cover, although some regions and seasons suffer from biases introduced by employing a fully dynamical model rather than the simple, empirical scheme used in System 4. There are also improvements in 2 m temperature skill in the vicinity of the Arctic sea-ice edge. Cold temperature biases in the troposphere improve, but increase at the tropopause. Biases in the extratropical jets are larger than in System 4: extratropical jets are too strong, and displaced northwards in JJA. In summary, development and added complexity since System 4 has ensured that SEAS5 is a state-of-the-art seasonal forecast system which continues to display a particular strength in the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) prediction.

During the past 30 years the skill in ECMWF numerical forecasts has steadily improved. There are three major contributing factors: 1) improvements in the forecast model, 2) improvements in the data assimilation, and 3) the increased number of available observations. In this study the authors are investigating the relative contribution from these three components by using the simple error growth model introduced in a previous study by Lorenz and extended in another study by Dalcher and Kalnay, together with the results from the ECMWF Re-Analysis Interim (ERA-Interim) forecasts where the improvement is only due to an increased number of observations. The authors are also applying the growth model on “lagged” forecast differences in order to investigate the usefulness of the forecast jumpiness as a diagnostic tool for improvements in the forecasts. The main finding is that the main contribution to the reduced forecast error comes from significant initial condition error reductions between 1996 and 2001 together with continuous model improvements. The changes in the available observations contributed to a lesser degree, but the authors note that all the ERA-Interim forecasts are from the satellite era and here the focus is on the midtroposphere in the extratropics. Regarding the jumpiness in the forecasts, this is mainly a function of the error in the initial conditions and is therefore an insufficient tool to investigate improvements in the full forecasting system.

It is often argued that numerical weather prediction models remain deficient in forecasting specific weather features and that such deficiencies contribute significantly to overall forecast errors. To clarify these claims, we quantify how cyclones, fronts, upper tropospheric jets, moisture transport axes (MTAs), and cold‐air outbreaks (CAOs) contribute to short‐term (12‐h) forecast errors and biases in the ERA5 reanalysis dataset from 1979 to 2022. Employing a feature‐based attribution method, we evaluate errors globally, focusing particularly on temperature, moisture, and wind fields, and examine regional and seasonal variations during winter (DJF) and summer (JJA). The presence of weather features is generally associated with increased forecast errors (RMSEs) compared to feature‐free conditions. RMSEs are especially pronounced for moisture fields in conjunction with fronts and MTAs, where errors in total column water vapor can be twice as large. Cyclone‐related errors are more pronounced in the low‐level wind field. During CAOs, on the other hand, errors are reduced. In terms of systematic biases, wind speeds and moisture are underestimated along western boundary currents, together with insufficient moisture transport along MTAs. Wintertime temperature biases over the Northern Hemisphere oceans have stronger associations with fronts and MTAs than those over the Southern Hemisphere oceans. A persistence analysis confirms that for some features and specific variables, forecasts yield less added value relative to non‐feature conditions. Cyclones are the most notable example, where forecasts provide less added value in most cases. In contrast, jets and CAOs are features where forecasts consistently add more added value. The identified feature‐based error diagnostics can aid targeted efforts to improve numerical weather prediction systems. We systematically attribute 12‐h forecast errors to five key synoptic features using ERA5, revealing that their contributions vary significantly across variables, regions, and seasons. During winter, for example, fronts over midlatitude oceans double forecast errors in moisture (left panel), whereas cyclones nearly double the errors in low‐level wind, particularly along the western boundary currents (right panel).

The North Atlantic Waveguide and Downstream Impact Experiment (NAWDEX) explored the impact of diabatic processes on disturbances of the jet stream and their influence on downstream high-impact weather through the deployment of four research aircraft, each with a sophisticated set of remote sensing and in situ instruments, and coordinated with a suite of ground-based measurements. A total of 49 research flights were performed, including, for the first time, coordinated flights of the four aircraft: the German High Altitude and Long Range Research Aircraft (HALO), the Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR) Dassault Falcon 20, the French Service des Avions Français Instrumentés pour la Recherche en Environnement (SAFIRE) Falcon 20, and the British Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements (FAAM) BAe 146. The observation period from 17 September to 22 October 2016 with frequently occurring extratropical and tropical cyclones was ideal for investigating midlatitude weather over the North Atlantic. NAWDEX featured three sequences of upstream triggers of waveguide disturbances, as well as their dynamic interaction with the jet stream, subsequent development, and eventual downstream weather impact on Europe. Examples are presented to highlight the wealth of phenomena that were sampled, the comprehensive coverage, and the multifaceted nature of the measurements. This unique dataset forms the basis for future case studies and detailed evaluations of weather and climate predictions to improve our understanding of diabatic influences on Rossby waves and the downstream impacts of weather systems affecting Europe.

This study discusses and compares three different strategies used to deal with model error in seasonal and decadal forecasts. The strategies discussed are the so-called full initialisation, anomaly initialisation and flux correction. In the full initialisation the coupled model is initialised to a state close to the real-world attractor and after initialisation the model drifts towards its own attractor, giving rise to model bias. The anomaly initialisation aims to initialise the model close to its own attractor, by initialising only the anomalies. The flux correction strategy aims to keep the model trajectory close to the real-world attractor by adding empirical corrections. These three strategies have been implemented in the ECMWF coupled model, and are evaluated at seasonal and decadal time-scales. The practical implications of the different strategies are also discussed. Results show that full initialisation results in a clear model drift towards a colder climate. The anomaly initialisation is able to reduce the drift, by initialising around the model mean state. However, the erroneous model mean state results in degraded seasonal forecast skill. The best results on the seasonal time-scale are obtained using momentum-flux correction, mainly because it avoids the positive feedback responsible for a strong cold bias in the tropical Pacific. It is likely that these results are model dependent: the coupled model used here shows a strong cold bias in the Central Pacific, resulting from a positive coupled feedback between winds and SST. At decadal time-scales it is difficult to determine whether any of the strategies is superior to the others.

There is a longstanding challenge in numerical weather and climate prediction to accurately model tropical wave variability, including convectively coupled equatorial waves (CCEWs) and the Madden–Julian oscillation. For subseasonal prediction, the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) has been shown to be superior to the NOAA Global Forecast System (GFS) in simulating tropical variability, suggesting that the ECMWF model is better at simulating the interaction between cumulus convection and the large-scale tropical circulation. In this study, we experiment with the cumulus convection scheme of the ECMWF IFS in a research version of the GFS to understand which aspects of the IFS cumulus convection scheme outperform those of the GFS convection scheme in the tropics. We show that the IFS cumulus convection scheme produces significantly different tropical moisture and temperature tendency profiles from those simulated by the GFS convection scheme when it is coupled with other physics schemes in the GFS physics package. We show that a consistent treatment of the interaction between parameterized convective plumes in the GFS planetary boundary layer (PBL) and the IFS convection scheme is required for the GFS to replicate the tropical temperature and moisture profiles simulated by the IFS model. The GFS model with the IFS convection scheme, and the consistent treatment between the convection and PBL schemes, produces much more organized convection in the tropics, and generates tropical waves that propagate more coherently than the GFS in its default configuration due to better simulated interaction between low-level convergence and precipitation.

The Year Of Polar Prediction (YOPP) dataset of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) contains initial condition and forecast model output from the operational global, coupled numerical weather prediction system. The dataset has been created to support model forecast evaluation, predictability studies and model error analyses over polar areas, which are strongly affected by climate change with yet unknown feedbacks on global circulation. The dataset complements YOPP observation and modeling research activities that represent a key deliverable of the World Meteorological Organization’s Polar Prediction Program. The dataset covers the period from mid-2017 until the end of the MOSAiC field campaign, expected for autumn 2020. Initial conditions and forecasts up to day-15 are included for the atmosphere and land surface for the entire period, and for ocean and sea-ice model components after June 2019. In addition, tendencies from model dynamics and individual physical processes are included for the first two forecast days. These are essential for characterizing the contribution of individual processes to model state evolution and, hence, for diagnosing sources of model error. Measurement(s) temperature of air • air moisture • temperature of sea surface • water-based rainfall • ozone • pressure • atmospheric wind speed Technology Type(s) satellite imaging of a planet • weather station • computational modeling technique Factor Type(s) spectral space • year of data collection • hourly data collection Sample Characteristic - Environment atmosphere • ocean • sea • ice Sample Characteristic - Location global Machine-accessible metadata file describing the reported data: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13013528