Explore the vast range of titles available.

In women with previous breast cancer who temporarily discontinued adjuvant endocrine therapy to attempt pregnancy, the frequency of breast cancer events was below the prespecified safety threshold and similar to that in controls.

New options are needed for patients with heavily pretreated breast cancer. Etirinotecan pegol is a long-acting topoisomerase-I inhibitor that prolongs exposure to, but reduces the toxicity of, SN38 (the active metabolite of irinotecan). We assessed whether etirinotecan pegol is superior to currently available treatments for patients with previously treated, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. In this open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 3 study (BEACON; BrEAst Cancer Outcomes with NKTR-102), conducted at 135 sites in 11 countries, patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline, a taxane, and capecitabine (and two to five previous regimens for advanced disease) were randomly assigned (1:1) centrally via an interactive response system to etirinotecan pegol (145 mg/m2 as a 90-min intravenous infusion every 3 weeks) or single-drug treatment of physician's choice. Patients with stable brain metastases and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1 were eligible. Randomisation was stratified with a permuted block scheme by region, previous eribulin, and receptor status. After randomisation, patients and investigators were aware of treatment assignments. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01492101. Between Dec 19, 2011, and Aug 20, 2013, 852 patients were randomly assigned; 429 to etirinotecan pegol and 423 to treatment of physician's choice. There was no significant difference in overall survival between groups (median 12·4 months [95% CI 11·0–13·6] for the etirinotecan pegol group vs 10·3 months [9·0–11·3] for the treatment of physician's choice group; hazard ratio 0·87 [95% CI 0·75–1·02]; p=0·084). The safety population includes the 831 patients who received at least one dose of assigned treatment (425 assigned to etirinotecan pegol and 406 to treatment of physician's choice). Serious adverse events were recorded for 128 (30%) patients treated with etirinotecan pegol and 129 (32%) treated with treatment of physician's choice. Fewer patients in the etirinotecan pegol group had grade 3 or worse toxicity than those in the treatment of physician's choice group (204 [48%] vs 256 [63%]; p<0·0001). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were diarrhoea (41 [10%] in the experimental group vs five [1%] in the control group), neutropenia (41 [10%] vs 125 [31%]), and peripheral neuropathy (two [<1%] vs 15 [4%]). Three patients in the etirinotecan pegol group died of treatment-related adverse events (pneumonia, myelodysplastic syndrome, and acute renal failure) and two in the treatment of physician's choice group (neutropenic sepsis and septic shock). This trial did not demonstrate an improvement in overall survival for etirinotecan pegol compared to treatment of physician's choice in patients with heavily pre-treated advanced breast cancer. The toxicity profile noted in the etirinotecan pegol group differed from that in the control group. In view of the frequency of cross-resistance and overlapping toxicities noted with many available drugs and the need for effective drugs in highly refractory disease, etirinotecan pegol may warrant further research in some subgroups of patients. Nektar Therapeutics.

Radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery and mastectomy with node positive disease has been shown to reduce risk of recurrence and mortality in the treatment of breast cancer. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) after conservative surgery offers several advantages over conventional RT including improved acute and late toxicity and quality of life (QoL). We undertook this study to prospectively evaluate acute (≤90 days after last dose of radiotherapy) and long-term (>90 days) cutaneous, esophageal, and fibrosis toxicity and QoL in breast cancer patients treated by adjuvant IMRT after breast surgery. We included patients with complex volumes for which 3D RT does not allow a good coverage of target volumes and sparing organs at risk. We report here an interim analysis with a median follow-up of 13.1 months (range, 6.5–25.9 months). Most of the acute toxicity was cutaneous (95.9%) and oesophageal (59.6%), and mostly grade 1 and 2. Medium-term cutaneous toxicity rate was 25.6%, and mostly grade 1. Medium-term esophageal toxicity was rare (1.8%). In this series acute oesophageal toxicity was found to be associated with dosimetric factors. QoL was well preserved throughout the study, and aesthetic outcomes were good. Based on these data, tomotherapy may be a favorable alternative to other techniques in patients needing a complex irradiation of the breast and lymph node volumes.

Background Early access program (formerly cohort Temporary Authorization for Use) was granted for trastuzumab deruxtecan (T‐DXd) in France based on DESTINY‐Breast01 trial which demonstrated its efficacy and safety in HER2‐positive metastatic/unresectable breast cancer after ≥2 anti‐HER2‐based regimens received at metastatic stage. Methods This multicenter real‐world early access program included HER2‐positive metastatic/unresectable breast patients pretreated with at least two lines of anti‐HER2 regimens who received T‐DXd 5.4 mg/kg intravenously in monotherapy every 3 weeks. Results Four hundred and fifty‐nine patients (median age, 58 years; hormone receptor‐positive, 67%; brain metastases, 28.1%) received T‐DXd. Before inclusion, 81.7% of patients had radiation therapy and 76.5% had undergone surgery. Median number of prior metastatic treatment lines was four (range, 2–22); 99.8% patients had received trastuzumab, 94.8% trastuzumab emtansine and 79.3% pertuzumab. Follow‐up was performed from September 30, 2020 to March 30, 2021; when the early access program stopped, the median duration of T‐DXd treatment was 3.4 (range, 0–7.8) months. In 160 patients with available tumor assessment, objective response rate was 56.7% and 12.1% had progression. In 57 patients with available brain tumor assessment, complete or partial intracranial response was reported for 35.7% patients and 5.4% had progression. A total of 17 (3.7%) patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) was reported with no cases of ILD‐related death. Conclusions In this early access program in patients with heavily pretreated HER2‐positive metastatic/unresectable breast cancer, T‐DXd had antitumor activity with a similar response to that reported in previous clinical studies. T‐DXd was well tolerated and no new safety signals were observed.

Purpose A major question when treating HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is whether early introduction of chemotherapy (CT) increases endocrine resistance. We aimed to describe progression-free survival (PFS) under first endocrine therapy (ET) depending on whether given before or after CT in a large nationwide cohort, in the pre-CDK era. Methods The real-life retrospective ESME database includes all patients with MBC whose first-line treatment was initiated between 2008 and 2014 in one of the 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centres. Our primary objective was to compare PFS from start of first ET in patients with HR+/HER2− MBC who received ET or CT first. Results We identified 6293 patients who received at least one ET line during their first two therapeutic lines for MBC. As first-line therapy, 3832 (60.9%) received ET alone (ET1 1st group), whilst 2461 (39.1%) received CT, including 2024 patients (32.2%) with maintenance ET after CT (ET1 after CT group). Median PFS under first ET was 12.4 months (95% CI 11.9–13.1) in ET 1st group vs. 12.6 months in ET1 after CT group (95% CI 12.1–13.4), HR 0.96 (95% CI 0.90–1.01, P  = 0.1277). Conclusions PFS under first ET appears identical whether prescribed before or after chemotherapy. These data suggest chemotherapy does not promote endocrine resistance.

ImportanceERBB2-low (ie,ERBB2immunohistochemistry score of 1+ or 2+ in the absence ofERBB2gene amplification) breast cancer (BC) is a new entity, with emerging dedicated treatments. Little is known about its prognosis and response to conventional therapy compared withERBB2-zero breast tumors (ie, those with an immunohistochemistry score of 0).ObjectiveTo compare the outcomes for patients withERBB2-low metastatic BC (MBC) with those of patients withERBB2-zero MBC.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study was conducted from the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics MBC platform and included patients with MBC treated between 2008 and 2016 in 18 French comprehensive cancer centers. The data analysis was conducted from July 16, 2020, to April 1, 2022.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcome was progression-free survival under first-line treatments (PFS1).ResultsThe median (range) age was 60.0 (22.0-103.0) years. Among 15 054 patients with MBC, 4671 (31%) hadERBB2-low MBC and 10 383 (69%) hadERBB2-zero MBC. The proportion ofERBB2-low cancers was higher among patients with hormone receptor–positive MBC than those with hormone receptor–negative disease (4083 patients [33.0%] vs 588 patients [21.0%]). With a median follow-up of 49.5 months (95% CI, 48.6-50.4 months), the median OS of theERBB2-low group was 38.0 months (95% CI, 36.4-40.5 months) compared with 33.9 months (95% CI, 32.9-34.9 months) for theERBB2-zero group (P < .001). After adjustment for age, visceral metastases, number of metastatic sites, de novo disease, period of care, and hormone receptor status, patients withERBB2-low MBC had slightly better OS compared with patients withERBB2-zero MBC (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91-0.99;P = .02). In contrast, PFS1 did not differ byERBB2status (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.95-1.02;P = .45). No significant differences in OS and PFS1 were observed in multivariate analyses by hormone receptor status and types of frontline treatment.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this large cohort study, patients withERBB2-low MBC had a slightly better OS than those with completelyERBB2-zero tumors, but identical PFS1, which could help guide treatment selection.

These analyses explore the impact of homologous recombination repair gene mutations, including BRCA1/2 mutations and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), on the efficacy of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor talazoparib in the open-label, two-cohort, Phase 2 ABRAZO trial in germline BRCA1/2-mutation carriers. In the evaluable intent-to-treat population (N = 60), 58 (97%) patients harbor ≥1 BRCA1/2 mutation(s) in tumor sequencing, with 95% (53/56) concordance between germline and tumor mutations, and 85% (40/47) of evaluable patients have BRCA locus loss of heterozygosity indicating HRD. The most prevalent non-BRCA tumor mutations are TP53 in patients with BRCA1 mutations and PIK3CA in patients with BRCA2 mutations. BRCA1- or BRCA2-mutated tumors show comparable clinical benefit within cohorts. While low patient numbers preclude correlations between HRD and efficacy, germline BRCA1/2 mutation detection from tumor-only sequencing shows high sensitivity and non-BRCA genetic/genomic events do not appear to influence talazoparib sensitivity in the ABRAZO trial.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02034916.

Purpose While .sup.18F-FDG PET/CT (FDG-PET/CT) is consensual for clinical stage [greater than or equal to] IIB breast cancers (BC), its benefit for stage I or IIA HER2+ or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients lacks sufficient evidence. We reported a single-institution, retrospective study evaluating FDG-PET/CT impact on patient management and staging for stage I or IIA HER2+ or Triple-Negative BC. Methods Patients who underwent FDG-PET/CT staging before any treatment between January 2015 and December 2020 at Oscar Lambret Center were included. Exclusions: patients with symptoms or conventional imaging suggestive of metastatic dissemination, or with prior malignancies. Initial stage was determined from mammography, breast ultrasound, breast MRI, and clinical examination. Staging and therapeutic impact based on FDG-PET/CT findings collected, including intra- (modification of dose/site/strategy in a type of management previously indicated) and inter-modality (modification of planned treatment strategy) changes. Results The cohort included 287 female patients with clinical stage I or IIA, HER2+, or TNBC. Therapeutic impact observed for 18% of patients (n = 52), with 2% (n = 7) undergoing inter-modality change with omission of planned surgery. The impact on patient management was higher for stage IIA patients (20%, 47/237) than for stage I patients (10%, 5/50). Among stage IIA disease, changes in management were more important for T2N0 patients (22%, 44/205) than for T1N1 patients (9%, 3/32). While not statistically significant, trends suggest usefulness of FDG-PET/CT for T2N0 patients. Conclusion Considering substantial therapeutic implications, our study suggests the usefulness of FDG-PET/CT for patients with stage IIA, HER2-positive, or Triple-Negative BC with tumor size > 2 cm (T2N0).

Purpose While 18 F-FDG PET/CT (FDG-PET/CT) is consensual for clinical stage ≥ IIB breast cancers (BC), its benefit for stage I or IIA HER2+ or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients lacks sufficient evidence. We reported a single-institution, retrospective study evaluating FDG-PET/CT impact on patient management and staging for stage I or IIA HER2+ or Triple-Negative BC. Methods Patients who underwent FDG-PET/CT staging before any treatment between January 2015 and December 2020 at Oscar Lambret Center were included. Exclusions: patients with symptoms or conventional imaging suggestive of metastatic dissemination, or with prior malignancies. Initial stage was determined from mammography, breast ultrasound, breast MRI, and clinical examination. Staging and therapeutic impact based on FDG-PET/CT findings collected, including intra- (modification of dose/site/strategy in a type of management previously indicated) and inter-modality (modification of planned treatment strategy) changes. Results The cohort included 287 female patients with clinical stage I or IIA, HER2+ , or TNBC. Therapeutic impact observed for 18% of patients ( n  = 52), with 2% ( n  = 7) undergoing inter-modality change with omission of planned surgery. The impact on patient management was higher for stage IIA patients (20%, 47/237) than for stage I patients (10%, 5/50). Among stage IIA disease, changes in management were more important for T2N0 patients (22%, 44/205) than for T1N1 patients (9%, 3/32). While not statistically significant, trends suggest usefulness of FDG-PET/CT for T2N0 patients. Conclusion Considering substantial therapeutic implications, our study suggests the usefulness of FDG-PET/CT for patients with stage IIA, HER2-positive, or Triple-Negative BC with tumor size > 2 cm (T2N0).

Background Immunotherapy with pembrolizumab combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy allows an improvement of pathological complete response rate in triple-negative breast cancer patients. The objective of the study is to evaluate the correlation between breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and pathological response after NAC and immunotherapy. It also aims to compare the performances of an abbreviated protocol using ultrafast MRI (UF-MRI) sequences with that of full-protocol MRI (fpMRI). Methods We conducted a single-center study including both retrospectively and prospectively triple-negative breast cancer patients, receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and pembrolizumab between May 2022 and June 2023. Breast MRI, including UF-MRI sequences, was performed to evaluate tumor response. These results were compared to those of postoperative pathological response. Results Among the 36 patients included, 23 obtained pathological complete response. Herein, fpMRI protocol detected 18 complete tumor reduction, reflecting a sensitivity of 0.78 and a specificity of 0.69. The UF-MRI sequences alone showed 19 complete regressions of tumor with a sensitivity of 0.83 and with identical specificity. The agreement between the two MRI protocols was 0.96. Conclusion The addition of immunotherapy to NAC does not prevent accurate MRI findings and tumor response prediction. Furthermore, the analysis of UF-MRI sequences as a stand-alone technique seems to be as efficient as the analysis of fpMRI, suggesting that abbreviated breast MRI could be incorporated into routine clinical practice.