Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
135 result(s) for "Maldonado, Fabien"
Sort by:
HLA-DR cancer cells expression correlates with T cell infiltration and is enriched in lung adenocarcinoma with indolent behavior
Lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) is a heterogeneous group of tumors associated with different survival rates, even when detected at an early stage. Here, we aim to investigate whether CyTOF identifies cellular and molecular predictors of tumor behavior. We developed and validated a CyTOF panel of 34 antibodies in four ADC cell lines and PBMC. We tested our panel in a set of 10 ADCs, classified into long- (LPS) (n = 4) and short-predicted survival (SPS) (n = 6) based on radiomics features. We identified cellular subpopulations of epithelial cancer cells (ECC) and their microenvironment and validated our results by multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) applied to a tissue microarray (TMA) of LPS and SPS ADCs. The antibody panel captured the phenotypical differences in ADC cell lines and PBMC. LPS ADCs had a higher proportion of immune cells. ECC clusters (ECCc) were identified and uncovered two ADC groups. ECCc with high HLA-DR expression were correlated with CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, with LPS samples being enriched for those clusters. We confirmed a positive correlation between HLA-DR expression on ECC and T cell number by mIF staining on TMA slides. Spatial analysis demonstrated shorter distances from T cells to the nearest ECC in LPS. Our results demonstrate a distinctive cellular profile of ECC and their microenvironment in ADC. We showed that HLA-DR expression in ECC is correlated with T cell infiltration, and that a set of ADCs with high abundance of HLA-DR+ ECCc and T cells is enriched in LPS samples. This suggests new insights into the role of antigen presenting tumor cells in tumorigenesis.
Transbronchial Cryobiopsies for the Diagnosis of Diffuse Parenchymal Lung Diseases: Expert Statement from the Cryobiopsy Working Group on Safety and Utility and a Call for Standardization of the Procedure
Transbronchial cryobiopsies (TBCB) have recently been introduced as a promising and safer alternative to surgical lung biopsy in the diagnostic approach to diffuse parenchymal lung diseases (DPLD). Despite a substantial and expanding body of literature, the technique has not yet been standardized and its place in the diagnostic algorithm of DPLD remains to be defined. In part, this reflects concerns over the diagnostic yield and safety of the procedure, together with the rapid spread of the technique without competency and safety standards; furthermore, there is a substantial procedural variability among centers and interventional pulmonologists. We report this expert statement proposed during the third international conference on “Transbronchial Cryobiopsy in Diffuse Parenchymal Lung Disease” (Ravenna, October 27–28, 2016), which formulates evidence- and expert-based suggestions on the indications, contraindications, patient selection, and procedural aspects of the procedure. The following 5 domains were reviewed: (1) what is the role of TBCB in the diagnostic evaluation of DPLD: patient selection; (2) pathological considerations; (3) contraindications and safety considerations; (4) how should TBCB be performed and in what procedural environment; and (5) who should perform TBCB. Finally, the existence of white paper recommendations may also reassure local hospital credentialing committees tasked with endorsing an adoption of the technique.
Assessing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) transmission to healthcare personnel: The global ACT-HCP case-control study
To characterize associations between exposures within and outside the medical workplace with healthcare personnel (HCP) SARS-CoV-2 infection, including the effect of various forms of respiratory protection. Case-control study. We collected data from international participants via an online survey. In total, 1,130 HCP (244 cases with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, and 886 controls healthy throughout the pandemic) from 67 countries not meeting prespecified exclusion (ie, healthy but not working, missing workplace exposure data, COVID symptoms without lab confirmation) were included in this study. Respondents were queried regarding workplace exposures, respiratory protection, and extra-occupational activities. Odds ratios for HCP infection were calculated using multivariable logistic regression and sensitivity analyses controlling for confounders and known biases. HCP infection was associated with non-aerosol-generating contact with COVID-19 patients (adjusted OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.04-1.9; P = .03) and extra-occupational exposures including gatherings of ≥10 people, patronizing restaurants or bars, and public transportation (adjusted OR range, 3.1-16.2). Respirator use during aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) was associated with lower odds of HCP infection (adjusted OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.8, P = .005), as was exposure to intensive care and dedicated COVID units, negative pressure rooms, and personal protective equipment (PPE) observers (adjusted OR range, 0.4-0.7). COVID-19 transmission to HCP was associated with medical exposures currently considered lower-risk and multiple extra-occupational exposures, and exposures associated with proper use of appropriate PPE were protective. Closer scrutiny of infection control measures surrounding healthcare activities and medical settings considered lower risk, and continued awareness of the risks of public congregation, may reduce the incidence of HCP infection.
Assessment of interobserver concordance in radiomic tools for lung nodule classification, with a focus on BRODERS and SILA
While CT lung cancer screening reduces lung cancer-specific mortality, there are remaining challenges. Radiomic tools promiss to address these challenges, however, they are subject to interobserver variability if semi-automated segmentation techniques are used. Herein we report interobserver variability for two validated radiomic tools, BRODERS (Benign versus aggRessive nODule Evaluation using Radiomic Stratification) and CANARY (Computer-Aided Nodule Assessment and Risk Yield). We retrospectively analyzed the CT images of 95 malignant lung nodules of the adenocarcinoma spectrum using BRODERS and CANARY. Cases were identified at Mayo Clinic (n = 45) and Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Nashville/Veteran Administration Tennessee Valley Health Care System (n = 50). Three observers with different training levels (medical student, internal medicine resident and thoracic radiology fellow) each performed lung nodule segmentation. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of 0.77, 0.98 and 0.97 for the average nodule volume, BRODERS cancer probability and Score Indicative of Lesion Aggression (SILA) which summarizes the distribution of the CANARY exemplars indicated good to excellent reliability, respectively. The dice similarity coefficient was 0.79 and 0.81 for the data sets from the two institutions. BRODERS and CANARY are robust radiomics tools with excellent interobserver variability. These tools are simple and reliable regardless the observer/operator’s level of training.
Cost-effectiveness analysis of artificial intelligence-assisted risk stratification of indeterminate pulmonary nodules
Artificial intelligence-based radiomic approaches have been shown to accurately evaluate indeterminate pulmonary nodules. With the expansion of lung cancer screening and utilization of computed tomography imaging, indeterminate pulmonary nodules requiring diagnostic evaluation are increasingly common. Accurate non-invasive characterization may reduce time to cancer diagnosis and decrease invasive procedures for benign disease, but the cost-effectiveness of AI-based methods has not been quantified. We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of AI-assisted clinician evaluation compared to clinician evaluation alone for the cancer risk stratification of patients with indeterminate pulmonary nodules. We constructed a decision model assuming guideline-based care from a payer perspective with a lifetime horizon. The base case is a 1.1 cm incidentally discovered IPN in a 60-year-old operative candidate in a clinical population with a 65% malignancy prevalence. Cost per life-year gained (LYG) was the primary outcome. We conducted deterministic sensitivity analyses on all parameters and performed a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Given clinical variability of malignancy prevalence, we assessed the malignancy prevalence threshold at which utilization of AI would be cost-effective. AI-supported clinician risk stratification resulted in an increase of 0.03 life years compared to clinician alone. With a 65% malignancy prevalence, AI was cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $4,485/LYG. When the malignancy prevalence was < 5%, the ICER for AI support exceeded a standard willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/LYG. In clinical settings with a pre-test probability of malignancy exceeding 5%, AI-supported IPN risk stratification is cost-effective compared to clinician assessment alone.
Chest drain REgular FLushing in ComplIcated parapneumonic EFfusions and empyemas: Study protocol for the RELIEF randomized controlled trial
Pleural infections are common and drainage of the pleural space, in addition to antimicrobial therapy, is often required for adequate treatment. Guidelines suggest flushing small bore chest drains with 20-30 mL of saline every six hours, however, no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have assessed if this practice improves outcomes for pleural space infections. As a result, flushing practice is varied, inconsistent, and confounds the interpretation of studied therapeutic modalities in pleural space infection trials. The impact of regular chest drain flushing compared to as-needed flushing on length of time to chest tube removal is unclear. Chest Drain REgular FLushing in ComplIcated Parapneumonic EFfusions and Empyemas (RELIEF) is a multi-center, open label randomized controlled trial conducted in the United States. Patients with a pleural space infection requiring chest drain placement for inpatient management will be screened for eligibility. Patients will be randomized within 24 hours of chest drain placement to a regular flushing protocol versus as-needed flushing for drain blockage. The primary outcome is time from randomization until time to chest drain removal (hours). Secondary outcomes are length of hospitalization, degree of radiographic improvement by chest X-ray, ultrasound or CT scan from time of drain placement to time of removal, need for additional procedures for the management of pleural space infection, and complications. An ordinal, multi-state transition model will be used to precisely characterize the role of flushing in longitudinal clinical outcomes in the two arms. RELIEF is a multi-center, open label randomized controlled trial that compares a regular saline flushing protocol with as-needed saline flushing of small-bore chest drains (8-20Fr) for the management of pleural space infection. This will be the first randomized controlled trial evaluating flushing protocol with patient-centered outcomes in pleural space infections. The trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06427538) on 05-10-2024.
Potential for trans-pulmonary tumor markers in the early diagnosis of lung cancer: a case report
Background Measurement of tumor markers from peripheral venous blood is an emerging tool to assist in the early diagnosis of lung cancer. Samples from the pulmonary artery and pulmonary artery wedge position (trans-pulmonary samples) are accessible via right-heart catheterization and, by virtue of their proximity to lung tumors, may increase diagnostic yield. Case presentation We report a case of a 64 year-old woman from whom trans-pulmonary samples were obtained and who was diagnosed 16 months later with recurrent metastatic small cell lung cancer. Carcinoembryonic antigen, cytokeratin fragment 21 − 1 (CYFRA), and human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) levels demonstrated increasing concentrations across the pulmonary circulation. These gradients exceeded the assays’ coefficient of variation by several-fold. For CYFRA and HE4, pulmonary artery wedge concentrations exceeded peripheral venous levels by more than 10% and peripheral arterial levels were up to 8% higher than peripheral venous levels. Conclusions Evaluating the feasibility and utility of trans-pulmonary tumor markers for lung cancer diagnosis in a larger cohort should be considered. The addition of a peripheral arterial sample to standard peripheral venous samples may be a more practical alternative.
Novel high-resolution computed tomography-based radiomic classifier for screen-identified pulmonary nodules in the National Lung Screening Trial
Optimization of the clinical management of screen-detected lung nodules is needed to avoid unnecessary diagnostic interventions. Herein we demonstrate the potential value of a novel radiomics-based approach for the classification of screen-detected indeterminate nodules. Independent quantitative variables assessing various radiologic nodule features such as sphericity, flatness, elongation, spiculation, lobulation and curvature were developed from the NLST dataset using 726 indeterminate nodules (all ≥ 7 mm, benign, n = 318 and malignant, n = 408). Multivariate analysis was performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method for variable selection and regularization in order to enhance the prediction accuracy and interpretability of the multivariate model. The bootstrapping method was then applied for the internal validation and the optimism-corrected AUC was reported for the final model. Eight of the originally considered 57 quantitative radiologic features were selected by LASSO multivariate modeling. These 8 features include variables capturing Location: vertical location (Offset carina centroid z), Size: volume estimate (Minimum enclosing brick), Shape: flatness, Density: texture analysis (Score Indicative of Lesion/Lung Aggression/Abnormality (SILA) texture), and surface characteristics: surface complexity (Maximum shape index and Average shape index), and estimates of surface curvature (Average positive mean curvature and Minimum mean curvature), all with P<0.01. The optimism-corrected AUC for these 8 features is 0.939. Our novel radiomic LDCT-based approach for indeterminate screen-detected nodule characterization appears extremely promising however independent external validation is needed.
Robotic versus electromagnetic bronchoscopy for pulmonary leslon assessment using integrated intraprocedural imaging: Study protocol for the reliant 2 trial
Robotic assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) and electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy (ENB) are two approaches to biopsy peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). A recently completed cluster randomized controlled trial, RELIANT (NCT05705544), showed no difference in diagnostic yield between these two modalities. The ENB platform used in RELIANT included integrated digital tomosynthesis, allowing for real-time assessment of PPL location for more precise targeting at the time of biopsy. RAB has since been integrated with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to accomplish the same intraprocedural correction. It is unclear if the diagnostic yield of RAB with integrated CBCT (RAB-CBCT) is superior to ENB with integrated digital tomosynthesis (ENB-DT). Robotic versus Electromagnetic Bronchoscopy for Pulmonary LesIon AssessmeNT using integrated intraprocedural imaging (RELIANT 2) is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, open label, superiority, cluster randomized trial. At each participating institution, procedural rooms are randomly assigned to either RAB-CBCT or ENB-DT, with each procedure room-day considered a cluster. All adult patients undergoing navigational bronchoscopy for evaluation of PPL(s) are eligible. Allocation is concealed from schedulers, proceduralists, and patients until the morning of procedure when each room is randomized to a platform. The primary endpoint is the diagnostic yield, defined as the proportion of cases yielding a specific benign or malignant diagnosis per current ATS/ACCP definition. Secondary and safety endpoints include procedure duration and procedural complications. Enrollment began on November 11, 2024 and is expected to enroll approximately 440 patients in 220 clusters. RELIANT 2 is an ongoing cluster randomized trial comparing the diagnostic yield of RAB-CBCT to that of ENB-DT in patients undergoing bronchoscopy to biopsy PPLs. This trial will help address some of the limitations of the recently published RELIANT trial. Trial registration The trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06654271) on October 21, 2024, prior to patient enrollment.