Explore the vast range of titles available.

Surgical tasks are performed in a sequence of steps, and technical skill evaluation includes assessing task flow efficiency. Our objective was to describe differences in task flow for expert and novice surgeons for a basic surgical task. We used a hierarchical semantic vocabulary to decompose and annotate maneuvers and gestures for 135 instances of a surgeon's knot performed by 18 surgeons. We compared counts of maneuvers and gestures, and analyzed task flow by skill level. Experts used fewer gestures to perform the task (26.29; 95% CI = 25.21 to 27.38 for experts vs. 31.30; 95% CI = 29.05 to 33.55 for novices) and made fewer errors in gestures than novices (1.00; 95% CI = 0.61 to 1.39 vs. 2.84; 95% CI = 2.3 to 3.37). Transitions among maneuvers, and among gestures within each maneuver for expert trials were more predictable than novice trials. Activity segments and state flow transitions within a basic surgical task differ by surgical skill level, and can be used to provide targeted feedback to surgical trainees.

Interventional healthcare will evolve from an artisanal craft based on the individual experiences, preferences and traditions of physicians into a discipline that relies on objective decision-making on the basis of large-scale data from heterogeneous sources.

Introduction and hypothesis The objective was to study the effect of immediate pre-operative warm-up using virtual reality simulation on intraoperative robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RALH) performance by gynecology trainees (residents and fellows). Methods We randomized the first, non-emergent RALH of the day that involved trainees warming up or not warming up. For cases assigned to warm-up, trainees performed a set of exercises on the da Vinci Skills Simulator immediately before the procedure. The supervising attending surgeon, who was not informed whether or not the trainee was assigned to warm-up, assessed the trainee’s performance using the Objective Structured Assessment for Technical Skill (OSATS) and the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) immediately after each surgery. Results We randomized 66 cases and analyzed 58 cases (30 warm-up, 28 no warm-up), which involved 21 trainees. Attending surgeons rated trainees similarly irrespective of warm-up randomization with mean (SD) OSATS composite scores of 22.6 (4.3; warm-up) vs 21.8 (3.4; no warm-up) and mean GEARS composite scores of 19.2 (3.8; warm-up) vs 18.8 (3.1; no warm-up). The difference in composite scores between warm-up and no warm-up was 0.34 (95% CI: −1.44, 2.13), and 0.34 (95% CI: −1.22, 1.90) for OSATS and GEARS respectively. Also, we did not observe any significant differences in each of the component/subscale scores within OSATS and GEARS between cases assigned to warm-up and no warm-up. Conclusion Performing a brief virtual reality-based warm-up before RALH did not significantly improve the intraoperative performance of the trainees.

Suturing skill scores have demonstrated strong predictive capabilities for patient functional recovery. The suturing can be broken down into several substep components, including needle repositioning , needle entry angle , etc. Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have been explored to automate suturing skill scoring. Traditional approaches to skill assessment typically focus on evaluating individual sub-skills required for particular substeps in isolation. However, surgical procedures require the integration and coordination of multiple sub-skills to achieve successful outcomes. Significant associations among the technical sub-skill have been established by existing studies. In this paper, we propose a framework for joint skill assessment that takes into account the interconnected nature of sub-skills required in surgery. The prior known relationships among sub-skills are firstly identified. Our proposed AI system is then empowered by the prior known relationships to perform the suturing skill scoring for each sub-skill domain simultaneously. Our approach can effectively improve skill assessment performance through the prior known relationships among sub-skills. Through the proposed approach to joint skill assessment, we aspire to enhance the evaluation of surgical proficiency and ultimately improve patient outcomes in surgery.

Crowdsourcing is a useful way to rapidly collect information on COVID-19 symptoms. However, there are potential biases and data quality issues given the population that chooses to participate in crowdsourcing activities and the common strategies used to screen participants based on their previous experience. The study aimed to (1) build a pipeline to enable data quality and population representation checks in a pilot setting prior to deploying a final survey to a crowdsourcing platform, (2) assess COVID-19 symptomology among survey respondents who report a previous positive COVID-19 result, and (3) assess associations of symptomology groups and underlying chronic conditions with adverse outcomes due to COVID-19. We developed a web-based survey and hosted it on the Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) crowdsourcing platform. We conducted a pilot study from August 5, 2020, to August 14, 2020, to refine the filtering criteria according to our needs before finalizing the pipeline. The final survey was posted from late August to December 31, 2020. Hierarchical cluster analyses were performed to identify COVID-19 symptomology groups, and logistic regression analyses were performed for hospitalization and mechanical ventilation outcomes. Finally, we performed a validation of study outcomes by comparing our findings to those reported in previous systematic reviews. The crowdsourcing pipeline facilitated piloting our survey study and revising the filtering criteria to target specific MTurk experience levels and to include a second attention check. We collected data from 1254 COVID-19-positive survey participants and identified the following 6 symptomology groups: abdominal and bladder pain (Group 1); flu-like symptoms (loss of smell/taste/appetite; Group 2); hoarseness and sputum production (Group 3); joint aches and stomach cramps (Group 4); eye or skin dryness and vomiting (Group 5); and no symptoms (Group 6). The risk factors for adverse COVID-19 outcomes differed for different symptomology groups. The only risk factor that remained significant across 4 symptomology groups was influenza vaccine in the previous year (Group 1: odds ratio [OR] 6.22, 95% CI 2.32-17.92; Group 2: OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.74-3.18; Group 3: OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.32-10.98; Group 4: OR 4.44, 95% CI 1.53-14.49). Our findings regarding the symptoms of abdominal pain, cough, fever, fatigue, shortness of breath, and vomiting as risk factors for COVID-19 adverse outcomes were concordant with the findings of other researchers. Some high-risk symptoms found in our study, including bladder pain, dry eyes or skin, and loss of appetite, were reported less frequently by other researchers and were not considered previously in relation to COVID-19 adverse outcomes. We demonstrated that a crowdsourced approach was effective for collecting data to assess symptomology associated with COVID-19. Such a strategy may facilitate efficient assessments in a dynamic intersection between emerging infectious diseases, and societal and environmental changes.

BackgroundThe growing interest in analysis of surgical video through machine learning has led to increased research efforts; however, common methods of annotating video data are lacking. There is a need to establish recommendations on the annotation of surgical video data to enable assessment of algorithms and multi-institutional collaboration.MethodsFour working groups were formed from a pool of participants that included clinicians, engineers, and data scientists. The working groups were focused on four themes: (1) temporal models, (2) actions and tasks, (3) tissue characteristics and general anatomy, and (4) software and data structure. A modified Delphi process was utilized to create a consensus survey based on suggested recommendations from each of the working groups.ResultsAfter three Delphi rounds, consensus was reached on recommendations for annotation within each of these domains. A hierarchy for annotation of temporal events in surgery was established.ConclusionsWhile additional work remains to achieve accepted standards for video annotation in surgery, the consensus recommendations on a general framework for annotation presented here lay the foundation for standardization. This type of framework is critical to enabling diverse datasets, performance benchmarks, and collaboration.

New robot-assisted surgery platforms being developed will be required to have proficiency-based simulation training available. Scoring methodologies and performance feedback for trainees are currently not consistent across all robotic simulator platforms. Also, there are virtually no prior publications on how VR simulation passing benchmarks have been established. This paper compares methods evaluated to determine the proficiency-based scoring thresholds (a.k.a. benchmarks) for the new Medtronic Hugo™ RAS robotic simulator. Nine experienced robotic surgeons from multiple disciplines performed the 49 skills exercises 5 times each. The data were analyzed in 3 different ways: (1) include all data collected, (2) exclude first sessions, (3) exclude outliers. Eliminating the first session discounts becoming familiar with the exercise. Discounting outliers allows removal of potentially erroneous data that may be due to technical issues, unexpected distractions, etc. Outliers were identified using a common statistical technique involving the interquartile range of the data. Using each method above, mean and standard deviations were calculated, and the benchmark was set at a value of 1 standard deviation above the mean. In comparison to including all the data, when outliers are excluded, fewer data points are removed than just excluding first sessions, and the metric benchmarks are made more difficult by an average of 11%. When first sessions are excluded, the metric benchmarks are made easier by an average of about 2%. In comparison with benchmarks calculated using all data points, excluding outliers resulted in the biggest change making the benchmarks more challenging. We determined that this method provided the best representation of the data. These benchmarks should be validated with future clinical training studies.

Surgical educators have recommended individualized coaching for acquisition, retention and improvement of expertise in technical skills. Such one-on-one coaching is limited to institutions that can afford surgical coaches and is certainly not feasible at national and global scales. We hypothesize that automated methods that model intraoperative video, surgeon's hand and instrument motion, and sensor data can provide effective and efficient individualized coaching. With the advent of instrumented operating rooms and training laboratories, access to such large scale intra-operative data has become feasible. Previous methods for automated skill assessment present an overall evaluation at the task/global level to the surgeons without any directed feedback and error analysis. Demonstration, if at all, is present in the form of fixed instructional videos, while deliberate practice is completely absent from automated training platforms. We believe that an effective coach should: demonstrate expert behavior (how do I do it correctly), evaluate trainee performance (how did I do) at task and segment-level, critique errors and deficits (where and why was I wrong), recommend deliberate practice (what do I do to improve), and monitor skill progress (when do I become proficient).In this thesis, we present new methods and solutions towards these coaching interventions in different training settings viz. virtual reality simulation, bench-top simulation and the operating room. First, we outline a summarizations-based approach for surgical phase modeling using various sources of intra-operative procedural data such as – system events (sensors) as well as crowdsourced surgical activity context. We validate a crowdsourced approach to obtain context summarizations of intra-operative surgical activity. Second, we develop a new scoring method to evaluate task segments using rankings derived from pairwise comparisons of performances obtained via crowdsourcing. We show that reliable and valid crowdsourced pairwise comparisons can be obtained across multiple training task settings. Additionally, we present preliminary results comparing inter-rater agreement in relative ratings and absolute ratings for crowdsourced assessments of an endoscopic sinus surgery training task data set. Third, we implement a real-time feedback and teaching framework using virtual reality simulation to present teaching cues and deficit metrics that are targeted at critical learning elements of a task. We compare the effectiveness of this real-time coach to independent self-driven learning on a needle passing task in a pilot randomized controlled trial. Finally, we present an integration of the above components of task progress detection, segment-level evaluation and real-time feedback towards the first end-to-end automated virtual coach for surgical training.

With introduction of new technologies in the operating room like the da Vinci Surgical System, training surgeons to use them effectively and efficiently is crucial in the delivery of better patient care. Coaching by an expert surgeon is effective in teaching relevant technical skills, but current methods to deliver effective coaching are limited and not scalable. We present a virtual reality simulation-based framework for automated virtual coaching in surgical education. We implement our framework within the da Vinci Skills Simulator. We provide three coaching modes ranging from a hands-on teacher (continuous guidance) to a handsoff guide (assistance upon request). We present six teaching cues targeted at critical learning elements of a needle passing task, which are shown to the user based on the coaching mode. These cues are graphical overlays which guide the user, inform them about sub-par performance, and show relevant video demonstrations. We evaluated our framework in a pilot randomized controlled trial with 16 subjects in each arm. In a post-study questionnaire, participants reported high comprehension of feedback, and perceived improvement in performance. After three practice repetitions of the task, the control arm (independent learning) showed better motion efficiency whereas the experimental arm (received real-time coaching) had better performance of learning elements (as per the ACS Resident Skills Curriculum). We observed statistically higher improvement in the experimental group based on one of the metrics (related to needle grasp orientation). In conclusion, we developed an automated coach that provides real-time cues for surgical training and demonstrated its feasibility.

This paper introduces Surgical Data Science as an emerging scientific discipline. Key perspectives are based on discussions during an intensive two-day international interactive workshop that brought together leading researchers working in the related field of computer and robot assisted interventions. Our consensus opinion is that increasing access to large amounts of complex data, at scale, throughout the patient care process, complemented by advances in data science and machine learning techniques, has set the stage for a new generation of analytics that will support decision-making and quality improvement in interventional medicine. In this article, we provide a consensus definition for Surgical Data Science, identify associated challenges and opportunities and provide a roadmap for advancing the field.