Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
113 result(s) for "Manchanda, Ranjit"
Sort by:
The DNA methylome of cervical cells can predict the presence of ovarian cancer
The vast majority of epithelial ovarian cancer arises from tissues that are embryologically derived from the Müllerian Duct. Here, we demonstrate that a DNA methylation signature in easy-to-access Müllerian Duct-derived cervical cells from women with and without ovarian cancer (i.e. referred to as the Women’s risk IDentification for Ovarian Cancer index or WID-OC-index) is capable of identifying women with an ovarian cancer in the absence of tumour DNA with an AUC of 0.76 and women with an endometrial cancer with an AUC of 0.81. This and the observation that the cervical cell WID-OC-index mimics the epigenetic program of those cells at risk of becoming cancerous in BRCA1/2 germline mutation carriers (i.e. mammary epithelium, fallopian tube fimbriae, prostate) further suggest that the epigenetic misprogramming of cervical cells is an indicator for cancer predisposition. This concept has the potential to advance the field of risk-stratified cancer screening and prevention. Most ovarian cancers originate from cells originally derived from Müllerian Duct cells. Here, the authors show that the methylation profile of Müllerian Duct cells isolated from cervical samples can predict whether a woman has cervical cancer.
Immunotherapy that improves response to chemotherapy in high-grade serous ovarian cancer
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) of tumour-infiltrating immune cells in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) omental biopsies reveals potential targets that could enhance response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Analysis of 64,097 cells identifies NACT-induced overexpression of stabilin-1 (clever-1) on macrophages and FOXP3 in Tregs that is confirmed at the protein level. STAB1 inhibition in vitro induces anti-tumour macrophages. FOXP3 anti-sense oligonucleotide (FOXP3-ASO), repolarises Tregs to an effector T cell phenotype. ScRNAseq on 69,781 cells from an HGSOC syngeneic mouse model recapitulates the patients’ data. Combining chemotherapy with anti-stabilin1 antibody and/or Foxp3-ASO significantly increases survival of mice with established peritoneal disease in two HGSOC syngeneic models and progression-free survival in a third model. Long-term survivors (300 days + ) are resistant to tumour rechallenge. Anti-stabilin1 antibody enriches the tumours with CXCL9+ macrophages and Foxp3-ASO increases TBET cell infiltration. Our results suggest that targeting these molecules in immune cells may improve chemotherapy response in patients. Chemotherapy causes changes to immune infiltration and activation in high grade serous ovarian cancer patients. Here, the authors use single cell RNA-seq to identify key markers differentially expressed on macrophages and Treg cell types following treatment which may affect treatment response.
3D pentaculture model unveils malignant cell-driven macrophage polarization in high-grade serous ovarian cancer
High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is characterized by a complex, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) that contributes to poor clinical outcomes and resistance to therapy. To replicate the human TME in vitro, we develop a 3D pentaculture model incorporating five human cell types: malignant HGSOC cells and primary fibroblasts, mesothelial cells, adipocytes, monocytes. Monocytes differentiate into macrophages without exogenous cytokines in the pentacultures. Bulk RNA sequencing and deconvolution with single-cell RNA data from patient biopsies reveal that macrophage clusters within the pentacultures replicate those found in human HGSOC metastases, and proportions of individual clusters vary according to the malignant cell line. The pentacultures enable detailed analysis of malignant cell–macrophage interactions and highlight the influence of malignant cell genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic heterogeneity on the TME. Furthermore, targeting of “do-not-eat-me” signals with anti-CD47 and anti-CD24 monoclonal antibodies demonstrate differential effects on macrophage activity and cancer cell viability, again depending on the individual malignant cell line. Real-time microscopic monitoring of the pentacultures confirms dynamic modulation of macrophage behavior. We conclude that this pentaculture model offers a platform to study malignant cell control of TME elements and in particular their interactions with myeloid cells. High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is characterised by a complex tumour microenvironment contributing to poor clinical outcomes and resistance to therapy. Here, the authors develop a 3D pentaculture in vitro model of HGSOC incorporating five human cell types, revealing how malignant cells drive macrophage polarisation and influence the tumour microenvironment.
Breast Cancer Risk and Breast-Cancer-Specific Mortality following Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy in BRCA Carriers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is the gold standard method of ovarian cancer risk reduction, but the data are conflicting regarding the impact on breast cancer (BC) outcomes. This study aimed to quantify BC risk/mortality in BRCA1/BRCA2 carriers after RRSO. Methods: We conducted a systematic review (CRD42018077613) of BRCA1/BRCA2 carriers undergoing RRSO, with the outcomes including primary BC (PBC), contralateral BC (CBC) and BC-specific mortality (BCSM) using a fixed-effects meta-analysis, with subgroup analyses stratified by mutation and menopause status. Results: RRSO was not associated with a significant reduction in the PBC risk (RR = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.59–1.21) or CBC risk (RR = 0.95, 95%CI: 0.65–1.39) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers combined but was associated with reduced BC-specific mortality in BC-affected BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers combined (RR = 0.26, 95%CI: 0.18–0.39). Subgroup analyses showed that RRSO was not associated with a reduction in the PBC risk (RR = 0.89, 95%CI: 0.68–1.17) or CBC risk (RR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.59–1.24) in BRCA1 carriers nor a reduction in the CBC risk in BRCA2 carriers (RR = 0.35, 95%CI: 0.07–1.74) but was associated with a reduction in the PBC risk in BRCA2 carriers (RR = 0.63, 95%CI: 0.41–0.97) and BCSM in BC-affected BRCA1 carriers (RR = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.30–0.70). The mean NNT = 20.6 RRSOs to prevent one PBC death in BRCA2 carriers, while 5.6 and 14.2 RRSOs may prevent one BC death in BC-affected BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers combined and BRCA1 carriers, respectively. Conclusions: RRSO was not associated with PBC or CBC risk reduction in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers combined but was associated with improved BC survival in BC-affected BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers combined and BRCA1 carriers and a reduced PBC risk in BRCA2 carriers.
P-POSSUM Falls Short: Predicting Morbidity in Ovarian Cancer (OC) Cytoreductive Surgery
Objective: The P-POSSUM scale is widely used in predicting perioperative morbidity and mortality. Evidence on the performance of P-POSSUM in predicting outcomes after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for ovarian cancer (OC) is limited. In this study, we assess how well P-POSSUM predicts morbidity in OC CRS and explore whether incorporating additional clinical variables can enhance its predictive accuracy. We retrospectively collected data on consecutive patients undergoing OC CRS within a tertiary gynaecologic oncology network. The collected information included demographic characteristics, P-POSSUM morbidity and mortality scores, Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) scores, preoperative serum albumin levels, and observed 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality, classified using the Clavien–Dindo (CD) scale. The predictive performance of P-POSSUM was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to calculate sensitivity and specificity. A stepwise regression analysis was then applied to identify additional variables that could improve model performance, incorporating preoperative covariates. The final model incorporated parameters chosen through bootstrap investigation of the model variability (stepAIC). Predicted versus observed morbidity was calibrated and performance compared between P-POSSUM and the final model. Results: Of 161 sequential OC patients, 95 (59%) underwent primary, 45 (28%) interval, and 21 (13%) delayed CRS. The mean age was 66.4 (95%CI: 60–75) and duration of surgery was 223 mins (95%CI: 142–279). Sixty-five (40.3%) patients had ≥1 postoperative complication. Two deaths were reported. Among the observed complications, 4 patients (6.1%) experienced CD4, 10 patients (15.3%) CD3, 38 patients (58.5%) CD2, and 11 patients (16.9%) CD1 events. The mean P-POSSUM-predicted morbidity and mortality were 59.5% (95%CI: 56.7–62.3%) and 5.86% (95%CI: 5.02–6.70%), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) for P-POSSUM in predicting morbidity and mortality was 0.539 (p = 0.401) and 0.569 (p = 0.137), respectively. Given the small number of deaths, no robust conclusions regarding mortality are possible. EFS and BMI emerged as significant predictors of observed morbidity using a stepwise-model selection process. The AIC of this final model was 211.44. Our final model of PPOSSUM + EFS + BMI had AUC = 0.6551 (Delong’s Z = 1.8845, p-value = 0.05949). Conclusions: The P-POSSUM scale shows poor performance for predicting morbidity in OC CRS. New validated and accurate model(s) are necessary for predicting surgical morbidity. Our proposed model incorporates additional variables to improve P-POSSUM’s performance. This requires further development and validation.
Special Issue “Gynaecological Cancers Risk: Breast Cancer, Ovarian Cancer and Endometrial Cancer”
Over the last decade there have been significant advances and developments in our understanding of factors affecting women’s cancer risk, our ability to identify individuals at increased risk and risk stratify populations, as well as implement and evaluate strategies for screening and prevention [...]
Long-Term Secondary Care Costs of Endometrial Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study Nested within the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS)
There is limited evidence on the costs of Endometrial Cancer (EC) by stage of disease. We estimated the long-term secondary care costs of EC according to stage at diagnosis in an English population-based cohort. Women participating in UKCTOCS and diagnosed with EC following enrolment (2001-2005) and prior to 31st Dec 2009 were identified to have EC through multiple sources. Survival was calculated through data linkage to death registry. Costs estimates were derived from hospital records accessed from Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) with additional patient level covariates derived from case notes and patient questionnaires. Missing and censored data was imputed using Multiple Imputation. Regression analysis of cost and survival was undertaken. 491 of 641 women with EC were included. Five year total costs were strongly dependent on stage, ranging from £9,475 (diagnosis at stage IA/IB) to £26,080 (diagnosis at stage III). Stage, grade and BMI were the strongest predictors of costs. The majority of costs for stage I/II EC were incurred in the first six months after diagnosis while for stage III / IV considerable costs accrued after the first six months. In addition to survival advantages, there are significant cost savings if patients with EC are detected earlier.
Prognosis Following Surgery for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer and Diagnostic Criteria Predictive of Cytoreduction Success: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
For women achieving clinical remission after the completion of initial treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer, 80% with advanced-stage disease will develop recurrence. However, the standard treatment of women with recurrent platinum-sensitive diseases remains poorly defined. Secondary (SCS), tertiary (TCS) or quaternary (QCS) cytoreduction surgery for recurrence has been suggested to be associated with increased overall survival (OS). We searched five databases for studies reporting death rate, OS, cytoreduction rates, post-operative morbidity/mortality and diagnostic models predicting complete cytoreduction in a platinum-sensitive disease recurrence setting. Death rates calculated from raw data were pooled based on a random-effects model. Meta-regression/linear regression was performed to explore the role of complete or optimal cytoreduction as a moderator. Pooled death rates were 45%, 51%, 66% for SCS, TCS and QCS, respectively. Median OS for optimal cytoreduction ranged from 16–91, 24–99 and 39–135 months for SCS, TCS and QCS, respectively. Every 10% increase in complete cytoreduction rates at SCS corresponds to a 7% increase in median OS. Complete cytoreduction rates ranged from 9–100%, 35–90% and 33–100% for SCS, TCS and QCS, respectively. Major post-operative thirty-day morbidity was reported to range from 0–47%, 13–33% and 15–29% for SCS, TCS and QCS, respectively. Thirty-day post-operative mortality was 0–6%, 0–3% and 0–2% for SCS, TCS and QCS, respectively. There were two externally validated diagnostic models predicting complete cytoreduction at SCS, but none for TCS and QCS. In conclusion, our data confirm that maximal effort higher order cytoreductive surgery resulting in complete cytoreduction can improve survival.
Population Based Testing for Primary Prevention: A Systematic Review
The current clinical model for genetic testing is based on clinical-criteria/family-history (FH) and a pre-defined mutation probability threshold. It requires people to develop cancer before identifying unaffected individuals in the family to target prevention. This process is inefficient, resource intensive and misses >50% of individuals or mutation carriers at risk. Population genetic-testing can overcome these limitations. It is technically feasible to test populations on a large scale; genetic-testing costs are falling and acceptability and awareness are rising. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Pubmed, CINAHL and PsychINFO databases were searched using free-text and MeSH terms; retrieved reference lists of publications were screened; additionally, web-based platforms, Google, and clinical-trial registries were searched. Quality of studies was evaluated using appropriate check-lists. A number of studies have evaluated population-based BRCA-testing in the Jewish population. This has been found to be acceptable, feasible, clinically-effective, safe, associated with high satisfaction rates and extremely cost-effective. Data support change in guidelines for population-based BRCA-testing in the Jewish population. Population panel testing for BRCA1/BRCA2/RAD51C/RAD51D/BRIP1/PALB2 gene mutations is the most cost-effective genetic-testing strategy in general-population women and can prevent thousands more breast and ovarian cancers than current clinical-criteria based approaches. A few ongoing studies are evaluating population-based genetic-testing for multiple cancer susceptibility genes in the general population but more implementation studies are needed. A future population-testing programme could also target other chronic diseases.
Impact of a decision aid about stratified ovarian cancer risk-management on women’s knowledge and intentions: a randomised online experimental survey study
Background Risk stratification using genetic and other types of personal information could improve current best available approaches to ovarian cancer risk reduction, improving identification of women at increased risk of ovarian cancer and reducing unnecessary interventions for women at lower risk. Amounts of information given to women may influence key informed decision-related outcomes, e.g. knowledge. The primary aim of this study was to compare informed decision-related outcomes between women given one of two versions (gist vs. extended) of a decision aid about stratified ovarian cancer risk-management. Methods This was an experimental survey study comparing the effects of brief (gist) information with lengthier, more detailed (extended) information on cognitions relevant to informed decision-making about participating in risk-stratified ovarian cancer screening. Women with no personal history of ovarian cancer were recruited through an online survey company and randomised to view the gist ( n  = 512) or extended ( n  = 519) version of a website-based decision aid and completed an online survey. Primary outcomes were knowledge and intentions. Secondary outcomes included attitudes (values) and decisional conflict. Results There were no significant differences between the gist and extended conditions in knowledge about ovarian cancer (time*group interaction: F = 0.20, p  = 0.66) or intention to participate in ovarian cancer screening based on genetic risk assessment (t(1029) = 0.43, p  = 0.67). There were also no between-groups differences in secondary outcomes. In the sample overall ( n  = 1031), knowledge about ovarian cancer increased from before to after exposure to the decision aid (from 5.71 to 6.77 out of a possible 10: t  = 19.04, p  < 0.001), and 74% of participants said that they would participate in ovarian cancer screening based on genetic risk assessment. Conclusions No differences in knowledge or intentions were found between women who viewed the gist version and women who viewed the extended version of a decision aid about risk-stratified ovarian cancer screening. Knowledge increased for women in both decision aid groups. Further research is needed to determine the ideal volume and type of content for decision aids about stratified ovarian cancer risk-management. Trial registrations This study was registered with the ISRCTN registry; registration number: ISRCTN48627877 .