Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background: The presence of biofilms and low antimicrobial concentrations in bone tissue make prosthetic joint infections (PJI) difficult to treat. Ceftobiprole (CTO) has a potential role in MRSA PJI. This study evaluated the efficacy of ceftobiprole and daptomycin (DAP) alone and in combination against MRSA biofilms at expected bone tissue concentrations. We assessed whether CTO-DAP outperformed DAP combined with a non-anti-MRSA beta-lactam (cefazolin [CZO]). Methods: A dynamic in vitro PK/PD biofilm model (CDC biofilm reactor) was used to simulate concentrations expected in cortical bone at a standard dosing of DAP (10 mg/kg/24 h), CTO (500 mg/8 h), and CZO (2 g/8 h), and assess performance against a 48-h MRSA biofilm from two clinical isolates that cause PJI (MRSA-1811 and MRSA-1733). Time–kill curves using the log change method (Δlog10 CFU/cm2) assessed antimicrobial efficacy over 56 h. Resistance emergence was monitored. Results: Although both monotherapies were active, neither reached bactericidal levels nor was one superior to the other (Δlog10 CFU/cm2 CTO vs. DAP: −1.44 ± 0.25 vs. −1.50 ± 0.01 [p = 0.686] and −1.55 ± 0.74 vs. −0.56 ± 0.36 [p = 0.108] for MRSA-1811 and MRSA-1733, respectively). Only in the MRSA-1811 isolate did the CTO-DAP combination improve the activity of each monotherapy, without achieving a synergistic effect (Δlog10 CFU/cm2: CTO-DAP −2.087 ± 0.048 vs. CTO −1.436 ± 0.249 [p = 0.013] and vs. DAP −1.503 ± 0.011 [p = 0.006]). No combination therapy (CTO-DAP vs. DAP-CZO) outperformed the other in either strain. No resistant bacterial subpopulations appeared with any antibiotic regimen. Conclusions: At clinically relevant concentrations, ceftobiprole and daptomycin showed similar activity against MRSA biofilms. The CTO-DAP combination showed comparable efficacy to DAP-CZO.

Prosthetic joint infections are considered difficult to treat they needing aggressive surgery and long antimicrobial treatments. However, the exact duration of these therapies has been established empirically. In the last years, several studies have explored the possibility of reducing the length of treatment in this setting, with conflicting results. In this narrative review, we critically appraise the published evidence, considering the different surgical approaches (implant retention [DAIR] and one-step and two-step exchange procedures) separately. In patients managed with DAIR, usually treated for at least 12 weeks, a large, randomized trial failed to show that 6 weeks were non-inferior. However, another randomized clinical trial supports the use of 8 weeks, as long as the surgical conditions are favorable and antibiotics with good antibiofilm activity can be administered. In patients managed with a two-step exchange procedure, usually treated during 6 weeks, a randomized clinical trial showed the efficacy of a 4-week course of antimicrobials. Also, the use of local antibiotics may allow the use of even shorter treatments. Finally, in the case of one-step exchange procedures, there is a trend towards reducing the length of therapy, and the largest randomized clinical trial supports the use of 6 weeks of therapy.

Background: Prosthetic ankle infection is an infrequent and rarely explored prosthetic joint infection (PJI). In early infection, the debridement of implants inserted using the transfibular approach has certain peculiarities that pose a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge, the impact of which on infection prognosis is still unknown. Methods: This study prospectively collected all cases of transfibular prosthetic ankle infection at a tertiary hospital between 2014 and 2022, describing their demographic, clinical, microbiological, and management characteristics, along with the outcome over a long follow-up. This cohort was compared with a cohort of infected fibular plates without prostheses implanted in the same period of time. Results: Seven cases of ankle PJI were analysed, all of them implanted using a transfibular approach. They were all early prosthetic infections. The median age was 63 years (range 54–74) with a predominance of women (71.4%), three patients with diabetes (42.9%), and one patient with rheumatoid arthritis (14.3%). The aetiology was predominantly staphylococcal (4 [57.1%] methicillin-susceptible S. aureus and 1 [14.3%] S. epidermidis). All cases were managed with irrigation and debridement limited to the fibular plate, four of which failed (57%). By comparison, eleven cases of infected fibular plates without prostheses implanted were analysed. There were no differences in clinical, microbiological, or therapeutic management characteristics between the groups. Failure among infected fibular plates occurred in only two cases (18%). Conclusions: Debridement of infected transfibular ankle prostheses suggests a worse evolution than would be expected for other joint infections. This could be explained by the nature of the debridement, limited to the fibular component. Further detailed studies of the surgical possibilities in prosthetic ankle infections are necessary to improve the prognosis of these infections, given their impact on joint function.

The emergence of ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) resistance among Guiana extended-spectrum β-lactamase (GES)-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates has rarely been described. Herein, we analyze the phenotypic and genomic characterization of CZA resistance in different GES-producing P. aeruginosa isolates that emerged in our institution. A subset of nine CZA-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates was analyzed and compared with thirteen CZA-susceptible isolates by whole-genome sequencing (WGS). All CZA-resistant isolates belonged to the ST235 clone and O11 serotype. A variety of GES enzymes were detected: GES-20 (55.6%, 5/9), GES-5 (22.2%, 2/9), GES-1 (11.1%, 1/9), and GES-7 (11.1%, 1/9). WGS revealed the presence of two mutations within the blaGES-20 gene comprising two single-nucleotide substitutions, which caused aspartic acid/serine and leucine/premature stop codon amino acid changes at positions 165 (D165S) and 237 (L237X), respectively. No major differences in the mutational resistome (AmpC, OprD porin, and MexAB-OprM efflux pump-encoding genes) were found among CZA-resistant and CZA-susceptible isolates. None of the mutations that have been previously demonstrated to cause CZA resistance were observed. Different mutations within the blaGES-20 gene were documented in CZA-resistant GES-producing P. aeruginosa isolates belonging to the ST235 clone in our institution. Although further analysis should be performed, according to our results, other resistance mechanisms might be involved in CZA resistance.

Background: Antibiotic tolerance in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms poses a major clinical challenge in prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). This study aimed to characterize the antibiotic tolerance of clinical S. aureus isolates recovered from cases of PJI under different stress conditions, including biofilm formation and antibiotic exposure. The correlation between tolerance level, the presence of specific tolerance-related genes, and clinical outcome was also evaluated. Methods: Twelve clinical S. aureus isolates were analyzed. To assess tolerance, the TDtest was used on exponentially growing bacteria, 48 h biofilms, and biofilms treated with levofloxacin and/or rifampin. Whole-genome sequencing was performed to identify tolerance-associated genes. Results: All isolates were phenotypically susceptible to rifampin and levofloxacin. Although all strains exhibited basal tolerance levels, biofilm formation led to heightened antibiotic tolerance, particularly those treated with rifampin as compared to levofloxacin: 29.5 vs. 17 (p = 0.01). Rifampin tolerance in biofilm-embedded bacteria was significantly higher in isolates from patients with treatment failure (p < 0.0001). Levofloxacin tolerance showed no significant association with clinical outcomes. There was no correlation between reduction in biofilm bacterial burden after treatment and tolerance levels. Genomic analysis identified associations between higher levofloxacin tolerance and the presence of sspA and leuS in biofilm isolates, and between rifampin tolerance and prs and pgm. Conclusions: In this study, clinical S. aureus strains isolated from prosthetic joint infections exhibited considerable inter-strain variability in antibiotic tolerance, particularly under biofilm conditions. Elevated rifampin tolerance in biofilm-embedded bacteria was associated with poor clinical outcomes, underscoring the need for tolerance assessment beyond standard susceptibility testing.

The aim of our study was to elucidate if SARS-CoV-2 viral load on admission, measured by real-time reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) cycle threshold (Ct) value on nasopharyngeal samples, was a marker of disease severity. All hospitalized adult patients with a diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection by rRT-PCR performed on a nasopharingeal sample from March 1 to March 18 in our institution were included. The study population was divided according to the Ct value obtained upon admission in patients with high viral load (Ct < 25), intermediate viral load (Ct: 25–30) and low viral load (Ct > 30). Demographic, clinical and laboratory variables of the different groups were analyzed to assess the influence of viral load on the development of respiratory failure during admission. Overall, 455 sequential patients were included. The median Ct value was 28 (IQR: 24–32). One hundred and thirty patients (28.6%) had a high viral load, 175 (38.5%) an intermediate viral load and 150 (33%) a low viral load. Advanced age, male sex, presence of cardiovascular disease and laboratory markers such as lactate dehydrogenase, lymphocyte count and C-reactive protein, as well as a high viral load on admission, were predictive of respiratory failure. A Ct value < 25 was associated with a higher risk of respiratory failure during admission (OR: 2.99, 95%IC: 1.57–5.69). SARS-CoV-2 viral load, measured through the Ct value on admission, is a valuable tool to predict the development of respiratory failure in COVID-19 inpatients.

Objective Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) present coagulation abnormalities and thromboembolic events that resemble antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). This work has aimed to study the prevalence of APS‐related antigens, antibodies, and immune complexes in patients with COVID‐19 and their association with clinical events. Methods A prospective study was conducted on 474 adults with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection hospitalized in two Spanish university hospitals. Patients were evaluated for classic and extra‐criteria antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs), immunoglobulin G (IgG)/immunoglobulin M (IgM) anticardiolipin, IgG/IgM/immunoglobulin A (IgA) anti‐β2‐glicoprotein‐I (aβ2GPI), IgG/IgM antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT), the immune complex of IgA aβ2GPI (IgA‐aβ2GPI), bounded to β2‐glicoprotein‐1 (β2GPI) and β2GPI levels soon after COVID‐19 diagnosis and were followed‐up until medical discharge or death. Results Prevalence of aPLs in patients with COVID‐19 was as follows: classic aPLs, 5.8%; aPS/PT, 4.6%; IgA‐aβ2GPI, 15%; and any aPL, 21%. When patients were compared with individuals of a control group of a similar age, the only significant difference found was the higher prevalence of IgA‐aβ2GPI (odds ratio: 2.31; 95% confidence interval: 1.16‐4.09). No significant differences were observed in survival, thrombosis, or ventilatory failure in aPL‐positive versus aPL‐negative patients. β2GPI median levels were much lower in patients with COVID‐19 (15.9 mg/l) than in blood donors (168.8 mg/l; P < 0.001). Only 3.5% of patients with COVID‐19 had normal levels of β2GPI (>85 mg/l). Low levels of β2GPI were significantly associated with ventilatory failure (P = 0.026). Conclusion β2GPI levels were much lower in patients with COVID‐19 than in healthy people. Low β2GPI‐levels were associated with ventilatory failure. No differences were observed in the COVID‐19 evolution between aPL‐positive and aPL‐negative patients. Functional β2GPI deficiency could trigger a clinical process similar to that seen in APS but in the absence of aPLs.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has implacably stricken on the wellness of many countries and their health-care systems. The aim of the present study is to analyze the clinical characteristics of the initial wave of patients with COVID-19 attended in our center, and to identify the key variables predicting the development of respiratory failure. Prospective design study with concurrent data retrieval from automated medical records of all hospitalized adult patients who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) rRT-PCR assay performed on respiratory samples from March 2nd to 18th, 2020. Patients were followed up to May 1st, 2020 or death. Respiratory failure was defined as a PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤ 200 mm Hg or the need for mechanical ventilation (either non-invasive positive pressure ventilation or invasive mechanical ventilation). We included 521 patients of whom 416 (81%) had abnormal Chest X-ray on admission. Median age was 64.6 ± 18.2 years. One hundred eighty-one (34.7%) developed respiratory failure after a median time from onset of symptoms of 9 days (IQR 6–11). In-hospital mortality was 23.8% (124/521). The modeling process concluded into a logistic regression multivariable analysis and a predictive score at admission. Age, peripheral pulse oximetry, lymphocyte count, lactate dehydrogenase and C-reactive protein were the selected variables. The model has a good discriminative capacity with an area under the ROC curve of 0.85 (0.82–0.88). The application of a simple and reliable score at admission seems to be a useful tool to predict respiratory failure in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Background: SARS-CoV-2 was the causing agent of the COVID-19 pandemic, which resulted in millions of deaths worldwide and massive economic losses. Although there are already several vaccines licensed, as novel variants develop, understanding the immune response induced by vaccination and natural infection is key for the development of future vaccines. Methods: In this study, we have used flow cytometry and next-generation sequencing to assess the longitudinal CD8+ T-cell response against natural infection and vaccination in convalescent and vaccinated individuals, from early activation to immune memory establishment. Moreover, we have characterized the T-cell receptor clonality and diversity at different stages post-infection and post-vaccination. Results: We have found no significant differences in CD8+ T-cell activation during the first three weeks post-infection compared to the first three weeks after first vaccination. Conversely, natural infection resulted in sustained high levels of T-cell activation at four weeks post-infection, a point in which we observed a decline in T-cell activation post-vaccination despite boosting with a second vaccination shot. Moreover, additional vaccination did not result in enhanced T-cell activation. Of note, we have observed variations in the memory subset structure at every stage of disease and vaccination. Overall, both infection and immunization induced a highly diverse T-cell receptor repertoire, which was observed both between study groups and between patients inside a given group. Conclusions: These data contribute to expand our knowledge about the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination and call for additional strategies to enhance T-cell responses by booster immunization.

BACKGROUNDPassive immunotherapy with convalescent plasma (CP) is a potential treatment for COVID-19. Evidence from controlled clinical trials is inconclusive.METHODSWe conducted a randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial at 27 hospitals in Spain. Patients had to be admitted for COVID-19 pneumonia within 7 days from symptom onset and not on mechanical ventilation or high-flow oxygen devices. Patients were randomized 1:1 to treatment with CP in addition to standard of care (SOC) or to the control arm receiving only SOC. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in categories 5 (noninvasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen), 6 (invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO]), or 7 (death) at 14 days. Primary analysis was performed in the intention-to-treat population.RESULTSBetween April 4, 2020, and February 5, 2021, 350 patients were randomly assigned to either CP (n = 179) or SOC (n = 171). At 14 days, proportion of patients in categories 5, 6, or 7 was 11.7% in the CP group versus 16.4% in the control group (P = 0.205). The difference was greater at 28 days, with 8.4% of patients in categories 5-7 in the CP group versus 17.0% in the control group (P = 0.021). The difference in overall survival did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.19-1.14, log-rank P = 0.087).CONCLUSIONCP showed a significant benefit in preventing progression to noninvasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen, invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO, or death at 28 days. The effect on the predefined primary endpoint at 14 days and the effect on overall survival were not statistically significant.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicaltrials.gov, NCT04345523.FUNDINGGovernment of Spain, Instituto de Salud Carlos III.