Explore the vast range of titles available.

Sodium and, in a lesser way, potassium atomic components of surface-bounded exospheres are among the brightest elements that can be observed from the Earth in our Solar System. Both species have been intensively observed around Mercury, the Moon and the Galilean Moons. During the last decade, new observations have been obtained thanks to space missions carrying remote and in situ instrumentation that provide a completely original view of these species in the exospheres of Mercury and the Moon. They challenged our understanding and modelling of these exospheres and opened new directions of research by suggesting the need to better take into account the relationship between the surface-exosphere and the magnetosphere. In this paper, we first review the large set of observations of Mercury and the Moon Sodium and Potassium exospheres. In the second part, we list what it tells us on the sources and sinks of these exospheres focusing in particular on the role of their magnetospheres of these objects and then discuss, in a third section, how these observations help us to understand and identify the key drivers of these exospheres.

Increasing laser power is necessary to reduce shot noise and enhance the high frequency sensitivity of gravitational wave detectors. However, when the mirrors have very high quality factors and the circulating laser power in the optical cavity reaches several hundred kilowatts, parametric instabilities may arise. The proposed mitigation method employs low quality factor oscillators bonded to the lateral surfaces of the mirrors, resonating at critical frequencies, to lower the quality factor of the mirror critical modes and thus reduce the likelihood of instability. An experimental setup based on a suspended fused silica sample, operated in vacuum and at room temperature, has been used to characterise the mechanical losses of damper components and to estimate the quality factor reduction of the test masses’ critical modes. These results support the development of damping systems for the fifth observation run of the Advanced Virgo interferometer.

The long and the short of it The tidy classification system that divided γ-ray bursts (GRBs) into long-duration busts (lasting more than two seconds) and short may have had its day. The final nail in its coffin may be GRB 060614. Discovered on 14 June 2006 by the Burst Alert Telescope on-board the Swift satellite, this burst was long, at 102 seconds, but as reported in a clutch of papers in this issue, it has a number of properties, including the absence of an accompanying supernova, that were previously considered diagnostic of a 'short' GRB. The hunt is now on for a classification system to take account of the diversity now apparent in GRBs. In the accompanying News & Views, Bing Zhang suggests that the answer may be to adopt a Type I/Type II classification similar to that used for supernovae. Deep optical observations of GRB 060614 show no emerging supernova with absolute magnitude brighter than M V = − 13.7. Any supernova associated with GRB 060614 was therefore at least 100 times fainter, at optical wavelengths, than the other supernovae associated with GRBs. Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are short, intense flashes of soft γ-rays coming from the distant Universe. Long-duration GRBs (those lasting more than ∼2 s) are believed to originate from the deaths of massive stars 1 , mainly on the basis of a handful of solid associations between GRBs and supernovae 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 . GRB 060614, one of the closest GRBs discovered, consisted of a 5-s hard spike followed by softer, brighter emission that lasted for ∼100 s (refs 8 , 9 ). Here we report deep optical observations of GRB 060614 showing no emerging supernova with absolute visual magnitude brighter than M V  = -13.7. Any supernova associated with GRB 060614 was therefore at least 100 times fainter, at optical wavelengths, than the other supernovae associated with GRBs 10 . This demonstrates that some long-lasting GRBs can either be associated with a very faint supernova or produced by different phenomena.

X-Rated Supernova A link between long γ-ray bursts (GRBs) and supernovae has been established, but whether there is a similar relationship between the weaker and softer X-ray flashes and supernovae is unclear. GRB/XRF 060218, spotted by the Swift satellite on 18 February this year, may supply that missing link. In the first of four papers on this novel burster, Campana et al . report the sighting of the X-ray signature of a shock break-out, possible evidence of a supernova in progress. Pian et al . report the optical discovery of a type Ic supernova 2006aj associated with GRB/XRF 060218. Soderberg et al . report radio and X-ray observations that show that XRF 060218 is 100 times less energetic than, but of a type that is ten times more common than cosmological GRBs. Mazzali et al . modelled the spectra and light curve of SN 2006aj to show that it had a much smaller explosion energy and ejected much less mass than other GRB-supernovae, suggesting that it was produced by a star with a mass was only about 20 times that of the Sun, leaving behind a neutron star, rather than a black hole. Observations of the close gamma-ray burst GRB 060218 and its connection to supernova SN 2006aj reveal the break-out of a shock wave driven by a mildly relativistic shell into the dense wind surrounding the GRB progenitor. These observation catch a supernova in the act of exploding. Although the link between long γ-ray bursts (GRBs) and supernovae has been established 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , hitherto there have been no observations of the beginning of a supernova explosion and its intimate link to a GRB. In particular, we do not know how the jet that defines a γ-ray burst emerges from the star's surface, nor how a GRB progenitor explodes. Here we report observations of the relatively nearby GRB 060218 (ref. 5 ) and its connection to supernova SN 2006aj (ref. 6 ). In addition to the classical non-thermal emission, GRB 060218 shows a thermal component in its X-ray spectrum, which cools and shifts into the optical/ultraviolet band as time passes. We interpret these features as arising from the break-out of a shock wave driven by a mildly relativistic shell into the dense wind surrounding the progenitor 7 . We have caught a supernova in the act of exploding, directly observing the shock break-out, which indicates that the GRB progenitor was a Wolf–Rayet star.

The goal of the Archimedes experiment is to investigate the role of the interaction between the vacuum fluctuations and gravitational field. This will be possible thanks to a high sensitivity and cryogenic balance installed in the SarGrav laboratory in the Sos Enattos mine (Sardinia), the Italian candidate site for the third generation gravitational wave observatory Einstein Telescope. Archimedes will measure the small weight variations induced in two high temperature superconductors that have the property of “trapping” or “expelling” vacuum energy when their temperatures are greater or lower than their critical temperatures. Only the radiative heat exchange mechanism must be used to remove or add thermal energy to the sample as it must be isolated from any external interaction that could add energy other than the vacuum one. The status of the experiment will be illustrated together with the most recent results.

Swift response The Swift satellite, launched in November last year, is designed to study γ-ray bursts (GRBs) as soon as they happen. GRBs are the most powerful explosions known in the Universe, and Swift's ability to study the early phases of the X-ray afterglow was expected to yield exciting results. Swift has now bagged its first two long GRBs: in both, the X-ray afterglow emission declined rapidly in the first few hundred seconds, then flattened out. The steep decline was unexpected, and neither it nor the spectral properties of the afterglow can be explained by current models. ‘Long’ γ-ray bursts (GRBs) are commonly accepted to originate in the explosion of particularly massive stars, which give rise to highly relativistic jets. Inhomogeneities in the expanding flow result in internal shock waves that are believed to produce the γ-rays we see 1 , 2 . As the jet travels further outward into the surrounding circumstellar medium, ‘external’ shocks create the afterglow emission seen in the X-ray, optical and radio bands 1 , 2 . Here we report observations of the early phases of the X-ray emission of five GRBs. Their X-ray light curves are characterised by a surprisingly rapid fall-off for the first few hundred seconds, followed by a less rapid decline lasting several hours. This steep decline, together with detailed spectral properties of two particular bursts, shows that violent shock interactions take place in the early jet outflows.

Third-generation gravitational wave observatories will extend the lower frequency limit of the observation band toward 2 Hz, where new sources of gravitational waves, in particular intermediate-mass black holes (IMBH), will be detected. In this frequency region, seismic noise will play an important role, mainly through the so-called Newtonian noise, i.e., the gravity-mediated coupling between ground motion and test mass displacements. The signal lifetime of such sources in the detector is of the order of tens of seconds. In order to determine whether a candidate site to host the Einstein Telescope observatory is particularly suitable to observe such sources, it is necessary to estimate the probability distributions that, in the characteristic time scale of the signal, the sensitivity of the detector is not perturbed by Newtonian noise. In this paper, a first analysis is presented, focused on the Sos Enattos site (Sardinia, Italy), a candidate to host the Einstein Telescope. Starting from a long data set of seismic noise, this distribution is evaluated considering both the presently designed triangular ET configuration and also the classical ”L” configuration.

The emergence of Artificial Intelligence's Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) as a method for analysis of spatial and temporal data gives us a new avenue for research of the processes inherent to planetary exospheres and their interaction with the planetary environment. Hereby, it will be presented a particular study on how in-situ observations of the elemental composition of Mercury's exosphere may serve as an indication of the surface regolith mineral composition below, through predictions given by pre-trained DNNs. In this case the main driver, considered to generate the exosphere, is the micrometeoroid impact vaporization (MIV), which is seen as the dominant process in the night-side hemisphere of the planet. The training datasets will be constructed from randomly generated virtual surfaces, which will aim to generalize the training of the AI models to various types and compositions of the regolith. Different Neural Network models, which include fully-connected networks and Convolutional Neural Networks, will be compared both in giving supervised classification through multivariate regression predictions, and in reconstructing the regolith mineralogy maps. Furthermore, ways to expand the Deep Neural Networks to pattern recognition and knowledge discovery will be explored beyond the surface-exosphere interaction, as well as the possibilities for transfer learning and online learning with the acquisition of real planetary data. The development of such data analysis algorithms will be shown especially in view of the upcoming arrival of the ESA/JAXA's BepiColombo mission to Mercury, the innermost planet, in 2025, with its variety of instruments able to capture the dynamics of the tenuous Hermean environment. Ultimately, would be targeted the implementation of such AI algorithms within the Ground Segment pipeline software architecture of the experiment BepiColombo/MPO/SERENA, composed by four ion and neutral particle detectors.

A correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01561-2

The Swift X-ray Telescope (XRT) has discovered that flares are quite common in early X-ray afterglows of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), being observed in roughly 50% of afterglows with prompt follow-up observations. The flares range in fluence from a few per cent to approximately 100% of the fluence of the prompt emission (the GRB). Repetitive flares are seen, with more than four successive flares detected by the XRT in some afterglows. The rise and fall times of the flares are typically considerably smaller than the time since the burst. These characteristics suggest that the flares are related to the prompt emission mechanism, but at lower photon energies. We conclude that the most likely cause of these flares is late-time activity of the GRB central engine.