Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Series TitleSeries Title
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersContent TypeItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectPublisherSourceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
12
result(s) for
"Marogy, Amal"
Sort by:
The Foundations of Arabic Linguistics II
2015
This second volume on The Foundations of Arabic Linguistics contains contributions from the second conference on Arabic linguistics, hosted by the University of Cambridge in 2012.All contributions deal with the grammatical theories formulated by the first grammarian to write a complete survey of the Arabic language, Sibawayhi (died at the end of the 8th century C.E.). They treat such topics as the use of hadith in grammar, the treatment of Persian loanwords, the expression of modality, conditional clauses, verbal valency, and the syntax of numerals. Contributors are: Georgine Ayoub, Michael G. Carter, Hanadi Dayyeh, Jean N. Druel, Manuela E.B. Giolfo, Almog Kasher, Giuliano Lancioni, Amal Marogy, Arik Sadan, Beata Sheyhatovitch, Cristina Solimando, and Kees Versteegh.
The Foundations of Arabic Linguistics
by
Marogy, Amal Elesha
in
Arabic language-Grammar-History
,
Sībawayh, ʻAmr ibn ʻUthmān,-active 8th century
2012
This volume offers in-depth introductions into major aspects of the Foundations of Arabic Linguistics, early Syriac and medieval Hebrew linguistic traditions. It presents Sībawayhi in the context of his grammatical legacy and reviews his work in the light of modern theories.
Inversion, Definiteness, and Case Assignment in Arabic Nominal Structure: the Classical Theory
2004
The aim of this paper is to briefly show that the pre-positioning of the prepositional (or ẓarf-type) phrase in locative sentences does not affect the function of subject/topic assumed by the noun following it, and that the principle of inversion in Arabic can be accounted for within the traditional Arabic as well as modern linguistic theory. I argue that Kouloughli (2002) the rule of definiteness for subjects is ignored, which will prove to be indispensable when dealing with this kind of phrase. Moreover, the notion of topic or mubtada' is dissociated from the notion of initial position ' ibtidā'. I show that traditional Arabic linguistics still provides us with adequate answers to clause structure and behaviour in the values assigned to the nominal phrases composed of ẓurūf/ prepositional phrases + indefinite noun. The approach adopted in this paper is different from Kouloughli's, as it aims at letting the data speak for themselves, without imposing on them theories from contemporary linguistics.
Journal Article