Explore the vast range of titles available.

Children with learning disorders (LD) perform below average in tests of academic abilities and intelligence. These children also have a significantly abnormal resting-state electroencephalogram (EEG) compared to children with typical development (TD), i.e. , an excess of slow brain oscillations such as delta and theta that may be markers of inefficient cognitive processing. We aimed to explore the relationship between the performance in an intelligence test and the resting-state EEG power spectrum of children with LD. Ninety-one children with LD and 45 control children with TD were evaluated with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children 4th Edition (WISC-IV) test of intelligence and a 19-channel EEG during an eyes-closed resting-state condition. The EEG dimensionality was reduced with a principal component analysis that yielded several components representing EEG bands with functional meaning. The first seven EEG components and the intelligence values were analyzed with multiple linear regression and a between-group discriminant analysis. The EEG power spectrum was significantly related to children’s intelligence, predicting 13.1% of the IQ variance. Generalized delta and theta power were inversely related to IQ, whereas frontoparietal gamma activity was directly related. The intelligence test and the resting state EEG had a combined 82.4% success rate to discriminate between children with TD and those with LDs.

Children with learning disorders (LD children) often have heterogeneous cognitive impairments that affect their ability to learn and use basic academic skills. A proposed cause for this variability has been working memory (WM) capacity. Altered patterns of event-related potentials (ERPs) in these children have also been found in the N400 component associated with semantic priming. However, regarding the semantic priming effect in LD children, no distinction has been made for children with varying WM abilities. This study aims to explore the relationship of WM with the brain’s electrophysiological response that underlies semantic priming in LD children that performed a lexical decision task. A total of 40 children (8-10 years old) participated: 28 children with LD and 12 age-matched controls. The ERPs were recorded for each group and analyzed with permutation-based t-tests. The N400 effect was observed only in the control group, and both groups showed a late positive complex (LPC). Permutation-based regression analyses were performed for the results from the LD group using the WISC-IV indices (e.g., Verbal Comprehension and WM) as independent predictors of the ERPs. The Verbal Comprehension Index, but not the WM index, was a significant predictor of the N400 and LPC effects in LD children.

Electroencephalograms (EEGs) of children with reading disorders (RDs) are characterized by a higher theta and a lower alpha than those of typically developing children. Neurofeedback (NFB) may be helpful for treating learning disorders by reinforcing a reduction in the theta/alpha ratio. Several studies have suggested that NFB may lead to EEG power normalization and cognitive improvements. To further explore brain changes in isolated areas, the aim of this study was to explore the effects of an NFB protocol on functional connectivity (coherence) among children with RDs. Twenty children with an RD and an abnormally high theta/alpha ratio underwent 30 NFB sessions, and five children with the same characteristics received a sham NFB treatment. On average, the children in the NFB group showed an increase in reading accuracy and comprehension scores; their coherence diminished in the delta, theta, and beta bands and increased in the alpha band, primarily the theta intrahemispheric coherences of the left hemisphere, which is closely associated with reading. In contrast, children who received the sham NFB treatment did not show reading changes and had few changes in their coherence patterns. These preliminary results suggest that NFB can positively impact reading-related functions in the brain networks of children with RDs.