Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Recent clinical studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of specific, multidisciplinary, bio-psychosocial, rehabilitation programmes for chronic neck pain. However, prognostic factors for the improvement of pain and disability are mostly unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore prognostic factors associated with improvements in chronic neck pain following participation in a three-week, multidisciplinary, bio-psychosocial, rehabilitation programme. Methods In this observational, prospective cohort study, a total of 112 patients were assessed at the beginning, end, and 6 months following the completion of a multidisciplinary, bio-psychosocial, rehabilitation programme. Inclusion for participation in the rehabilitation programme depended upon an interdisciplinary pain assessment. The primary outcome was neck pain and disability, which was measured using the Northern American Spine Society questionnaire for pain+disability and was quantified with effect sizes (ES). Multivariable linear regression analyses were used to explore potential prognostic factors associated with improvements in pain and disability scores at discharge and at the 6-month follow-up period. Results The mean age of the patients was 59.7 years (standard deviation = 10.8), and 70.5% were female. Patients showed improvement in pain+disability at discharge (ES = 0.56; p  < 0.001), which was sustained at the 6-month follow-up (ES = 0.56; p  < 0.001). Prognostic factors associated with improvement in pain+disability scores at discharge included poor pain+disability baseline scores (partial, adjusted correlation r = 0.414, p  < 0.001), older age (r = 0.223, p  = 0.024), a good baseline cervical active range-of-motion (ROM) (r = 0.210, p  < 0.033), and improvements in the Short-form 36 mental health scale (r = 0.197; p  = 0.047) and cervical ROMs (r = 0.195, p  = 0.048) from baseline values. Prognostic factors associated with improvements in pain+disability at the 6-month follow-up were similar and included poor pain+disability baseline scores (partial, adjusted correlation r = 0.364, p  < 0.001), improvements in the Short-form 36 mental health scale (r = 0.232; p  = 0.002), cervical ROMs (r = 0.247, p  = 0.011), and better cervical ROM baseline scores. However, older age was not a factor (r = 0.134, p  = 0.172). Conclusions Future prognostic models for treatment outcomes in chronic neck pain patients should consider cervical ROM and mental health status. Knowledge of prognostic factors may help in the adoption of individualized treatment for patients who are less likely to respond to multidisciplinary rehabilitation.

Background Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation (MBR) in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) is superior to less intensive treatments for at least one year, but the long-term course of the disease is largely unknown. The primary aim of this study was to describe the long-term course of an MBR in relation to pain, disability, and quality of life from the beginning of an MBR to between 4 to 15 years after participation. The secondary aim was to explore the long-term course of an MBR in relation to physiological outcomes of functioning. Methods This was a observational study conducted at a university hospital. The cohort consisted of participants of a 3-week, CLBP-specific MBR program between August 2001 and January 2013. The North American Spine Society questionnaire (NASS) pain and disability scale was the primary patient -reported outcome measure (PROM). The NASS neurogenic symptoms scale and the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) health survey were secondary PROMs. Patients were assessed before entry to the MBR (T0), at entry (T1), at discharge (T2) and 4 to 15 years after discharge (T3). Effects were quantified by effect size (ES). Score differences were tested for significance using parametric or non-parametric tests and linear mixed models. Results Of 299 consecutive patients from the MBR program, 229 could be contacted. Of these, 84 declined participation, five did not meet the inclusion criteria, and 26 had incomplete data. Thus, 114 patients were included. The mean follow-up time was 9.2 years. At T3, patients exhibited beneficial effects for NASS pain and disability with a moderate ES (ES = 0.63; p  < 0.001). The NASS neurogenic symptoms scale was stable. The SF-36 scales showed an improvement in the bodily pain domain (ES = 1.02; p  < 0.001), but no significant changes for physical functioning, physical role, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, or mental health. The physical health component summary was improved (ES = 0.40, p  = 0.002), and the mental health summary was unchanged. The linear mixed model analysis confirmed improvements in pain and disability between T1 and T3 ( p  = 0.010). Conclusions The results of this study suggest that there is a long-term benefit of MBR participation in patients with CLBP.

Background Cancer cachexia is a prevalent symptom of head and neck neoplasms. The reduction in skeletal muscle mass is one of the main characteristics which can lead to poor physical functioning. The purposes of this pilot randomized controlled trial were to determine the feasibility of progressive resistance training in cachectic head and neck cancer patients during radiotherapy and to explore possible risks and benefits. Methods Twenty cachectic participants with head and neck cancer receiving radiation were randomized to obtain either a machine supported progressive resistance training ( n  = 10) or usual care (n = 10). The training took place 3 times weekly for 30 min. Intervention included 3 exercises for major muscle groups with 8–12 repetition maximum for 3 sets each. Bioelectrical impedance analysis, hand-held dynamometry, Six-Minute Walk Test and standardized questionnaires for fatigue and quality of life were used for evaluating outcomes at baseline before radiotherapy (t1), after 7 weeks of radiotherapy (t2) and 8 weeks after the end of radiotherapy (t3). Results All participants ( n  = 20) completed the trial. No serious adverse events occurred. At the initial assessment the cachectic patients had already lost 7.1 ± 5.2% of their body weight. General fatigue (score 10.7 ± 3.3) and reduced quality of life (score 71.3 ± 20.6) were prevalent in cachectic head and neck cancer patients even before radiotherapy. An average improvement of weight loading for leg press (+ 19.0%), chest press (+ 29.8%) and latissimus pull-down (+ 22.8%) was possible in the intervention group. Participants had at least 13 training sessions. The outcome measures showed nonsignificant changes at t2 and t3, but a trend for a better course of general fatigue and quality of life at t2 in the intervention group. Conclusions Despite advanced tumor stage and burdensome treatment the intervention adherence is excellent. Progressive resistance training in cachectic head and neck cancer patients during radiotherapy seems to be safe and feasible and may have beneficial effects of general fatigue and quality of life. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03524755 . Registered 15 May 2018 - Retrospectively registered.

Background While total hip and knee replacement (THR/TKR) surgery are effective measures to restore functioning and reduce pain in patients with severe osteoarthritis (OA), long-term treatment effects vary among patients. Following behavioral economic theory, these differences may be partially attributed to the impact of personality traits on individual strategies to approach post-surgical challenges. This study explored the associations between self-efficacy, willingness to take risk regarding health (H-WTTR), and future orientation, and the 3-month course of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and OA-specific health status. Methods As part of the prospective and observational MobilE-TRA 2 cohort study, 147 patients aged 60 years and older were assessed by self-administered questionnaires before and three months after THR/TKR at a single German hospital. As indicators for the surgical outcome, HRQoL was assessed by the EuroQol Five-Dimensional Five-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), including the visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), and functioning was assessed by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) using the global score, function score, and pain score. All WOMAC scores were transformed into scales with 0 = worst health and 100 = best health. Self-efficacy was measured using the General Self-Efficacy Short Scale. H-WTTR and future orientation were assessed by single-item questions on 11-point Likert scales. The associations between these personality traits and the 3-month change in the outcome scores were analyzed using linear regression models for THR and TKR respectively. Results In THR patients a one-point-increase in self-efficacy was associated with improvements in EQ-5D-5L (β=0.0704; p =0.0099), WOMAC global (β=6.6337; p =0.0139), WOMAC function (β=8.2557; p =0.0046), and WOMAC pain (β=5.9994; p =0.0232). For TKR, only the association of self-efficacy with the EQ-VAS change-score was significant (β=5.8252; p =0.0482). Self-efficacy demonstrated weak positive, but not significant associations with all WOMAC scores and a negative association close to zero with the EQ-Index. H-WTTR and future orientation showed no significant associations to changes of the outcome scores. Conclusions Self-efficacy appears to be a prognostic factor for better THR/TKR outcomes after three months. If these findings can be confirmed in further research, strategies to improve self-efficacy should be considered in prehabilitation programs. Trial registration Not applicable.

Identification and quantitative segmentation of individual blood vessels in mice visualized with preclinical imaging techniques is a tedious, manual or semiautomated task that can require weeks of reviewing hundreds of levels of individual data sets. Preclinical imaging, such as micro-magnetic resonance imaging (μMRI) can produce tomographic datasets of murine vasculature across length scales and organs, which is of outmost importance to study tumor progression, angiogenesis, or vascular risk factors for diseases such as Alzheimer’s. Training a neural network capable of accurate segmentation results requires a sufficiently large amount of labelled data, which takes a long time to compile. Recently, several reasonably automated approaches have emerged in the preclinical context but still require significant manual input and are less accurate than the deep learning approach presented in this paper—quantified by the Dice score. In this work, the implementation of a shallow, three-dimensional U-Net architecture for the segmentation of vessels in murine brains is presented, which is (1) open-source, (2) can be achieved with a small dataset (in this work only 8 μMRI imaging stacks of mouse brains were available), and (3) requires only a small subset of labelled training data. The presented model is evaluated together with two post-processing methodologies using a cross-validation, which results in an average Dice score of 61.34% in its best setup. The results show, that the methodology is able to detect blood vessels faster and more reliably compared to state-of-the-art vesselness filters with an average Dice score of 43.88% for the used dataset.

Background In 2019, Germany had the highest rate of hip replacement surgery and the fourth highest rate of knee replacement surgery among more than 30 OECD countries. The age-standardised rates were estimated at 174 hip joint and 137 knee joint replacements per 100,000 population. Against this background, the contrast between financial incentives for surgery and missing incentives for non-surgical treatment options is repeatedly discussed. Quality indicators (QIs) can serve to measure and transparently present the quality of evidence-based care. Comparing results in the form of audit and feedback has been shown to improve e.g. guideline-compliant ambulatory care. Existing QIs targeting the care of gon- and coxarthrosis mainly focus on discharge management after joint replacement surgery and/or require additional data collection. Therefore, as part of the MobilE-ARTH project, a set of QIs for ambulatory care prior to joint replacement surgery calculable based on routine data is being developed. The present study’s aim is to evaluate the impact of this QI set in terms of providing feedback on the quality of care. Methods The MobilE-ARTH project comprises (Phase 1) developing a QI set following the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, (Phase 2) implementing the QIs in established physician networks of a German statutory health insurance (SHI) within a prospective, non-blinded, cluster-randomised pilot study, and (Phase 3) evaluating the QI set’s effectiveness. The physicians in the intervention networks will (a) receive feedback reports providing information about the routine data-based QIs of their gon- and/or coxarthrosis patients and aggregated results for their network, and (b) be invited to two voluntary, facilitated network meetings. In these network meetings, the physicians can use the information provided on the feedback reports to discuss multiprofessional care pathways for patients with gon- and/or coxarthrosis. Selected indicators of the QI set will serve as primary and secondary outcome measures. Routine data will be analysed within multi-level models using an intention-to-treat approach. Discussion Feedback reports help maintaining clinical standards and closing the gap between evidence and medical practice, thus enabling an overall improvement in health care. Providing physicians with QI-based information on quality of care promotes identifying strengths and weaknesses in medical treatments. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register, number DRKS00027516 , Registered 25 th January 2022 – Prospectively registered.

Background German social legislation gives patients the right to obtain a second opinion before elective surgery and defines quality criteria for reimbursement by statutory health insurances. However, the effects of second opinions before elective surgery are largely unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a second opinion programme in patients recommended for knee arthroplasty. Methods The largest statutory health insurance funds in Bavaria offered patients who had been recommended to have knee arthroplasty the opportunity to partake in a second opinion programme which consisted of an in person presentation to an experienced knee surgeon. In this cohort study, consecutive patients from this second opinion programme who signed informed consent were included from 07/10/2016 to 14/02/2020. Data were collected before and after the second opinion visit. Results A total of 141 (66%) of 215 patients who presented for a second opinion participated in the evaluation study. The second opinion physician recommended knee arthroplasty to 40% of the patients, later knee arthroplasty if the conditions worsened to 40%, and no knee arthroplasty to 20%. After receiving the second opinion 28 of 56 (41%) undecided patients preferred knee arthroplasty, 14 no knee arthroplasty, 14 remained undecided. Four of 46 patients with a preference for “arthroplasty” changed their decision to “no arthroplasty”, five of 35 patients from “no arthroplasty” to “arthroplasty”. The patients were more confident in their decision according to the decision confidence scale (before: 5.4 ± 3.0; after: 7.8 ± 2.5; p  < 0.001). They rated their satisfaction with the second opinion programme with a mean grade of 1.35 (± 0.60) (best:1; worst:6). Logistic regression analyses showed that the recommendation of the second opinion physician for joint arthroplasty was associated with the guideline criteria radiological severity of osteoarthritis ( p  = 0.001) and knee-joint-specific quality of life ( p  = 0.041). Conclusion The second opinion of an experienced knee surgeon frequently deviates from the initial recommendation for knee arthroplasty. The association of guideline criteria to the second recommendation suggests a high quality of the second opinion. From the patient perspective, the second opinion reduces uncertainties in their treatment decision.

Early rehabilitation in acute hospitals aims to prevent immobilization-related complications and improve the functional capacity of patients with severe or critical illness. Early rehabilitation can be a useful concept to improve functioning in COVID-19 patients. However, literature concerning early in-hospital rehabilitation in COVID-19 patients is scarce. To analyze the utilization of in-hospital interdisciplinary early rehabilitation (IER) in COVID-19 patients and characterize the sample of IER patients. Prospective cohort study. Hospitalized COVID-19 patient cases. This study used data from the National Pandemic Cohort Network (NAPKON) in Germany. IER utilization rates were retrieved. Demographic and clinical data from hospitalized COVID-19 patients who had received IER during the course of their treatment were evaluated. Out of the 2,644 patients in the Cross-Sectoral Platform (German abbreviation: SUEP) cohort, 0.79% [95% CI: 0.51% to 1.22%] received IER during their stay in an acute care hospital. Among the subgroup of patients who had previously been treated in intensive care, 2.13% [95% CI: 1.16% to 3.63%] received IER. The most common comorbidities were cardiovascular diseases (66.7%) and neurological/psychiatric diseases (36.1%). The small sample size limited further analyses. The low rate of early rehabilitation in acute hospitals for COVID-19 patients indicates an unmet need, particularly in severe cases. Structural changes in the health system are needed to close this gap. The WHO and the German Medical Council have recently acknowledged the necessity of early in-hospital rehabilitation and have issued a call for its implementation in acute hospitals.

ObjectiveEvidence of geographical variation in total hip replacement (THR) and deviations from treatment guidelines persists. In this exploratory study, we aim to gain an in-depth understanding of patients’ healthcare trajectories by identifying and visualising medication use patterns in coxarthrosis patients before surgery. We examine their association with patient characteristics and THR, and compare them with recommendations on mild analgesics, opioid prescription and exhaustion of conservative therapy.MethodsIn this exploratory study, we apply State Sequence Analysis (SSA) on German health insurance data (2012–2015). We analyse a cohort of coxarthrosis patients, half of whom underwent THR after a 1 year observation period and half of whom did not undergo surgery until at least 1 year after the observation period. Hierarchical states are defined based on prescriptions. We construct sequences, calculate sequence similarity using optimal matching and identify medication use patterns via clustering. Patterns are visualised, descriptive statistics are presented and logistic regression is employed to investigate the association of medication patterns with subsequent THR.ResultsSeven distinct medication use patterns are identified, correlating strongly with patient characteristics and subsequent THR. Two patterns leading to THR demonstrate exhaustion of pharmacological therapy. Opioid use is concentrated in two small patterns with low odds for THR. The most frequent pattern lacks significant pharmacological therapy.ConclusionsThis SSA uncovers heterogeneity in medication use patterns before surgery in coxarthrosis patients. Cautious opioid handling and adherence to a stepped prescription approach are observed, but many patients display low medication therapy usage and lack evidence of exhausting conservative options before surgery.

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to determine the impact of obtaining a second opinion consultation on time to knee arthroplasty (KA). We further examined the frequency of KA and the determinants of KA following the second opinion.DesignProspective cohort study.SettingThe second opinion programme was implemented at the Ludwig Maximilian University Hospital in Munich.ParticipantsParticipants comprised patients with knee osteoarthritis who were insured with one of the largest statutory health insurance Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse Bayern (mean age 64.3±9.6 years). Patients participated in a second-opinion programme and completed questionnaires on site before and after personal presentation for the second opinion consultation. Follow-up questionnaires were delivered by post at 3 and 12 months after the second opinion consultation. Of the 142 patients included in the study, 47 (33.1%) underwent KA within 12 months after obtaining the second opinion.Primary outcome measuresPrimary outcome measure was time until patients received KA. Cox proportional hazard modelling was used to calculate the associations between the selected predictors and time that elapsed between receipt of the second opinion to KA.ResultsMean time until KA was 17 weeks. Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant differences in time to KA according to the recommendation given at second opinion consultation, knee-related quality of life and Kellgren-Lawrence grade. In multivariate Cox proportional hazard modelling, second opinion recommendation (HR 5.33, 95% CI 1.16, 24.41) and knee-related quality of life (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01, 1.06) were significant predictors of time from second opinion to KA.ConclusionsObtaining a second opinion had significant impact on time to knee replacement. Those who were recommended immediate surgery also underwent surgery more quickly after the second opinion. The effect of knee-related quality of life supports the importance of patient-reported outcome measures in the decision for or against KA.